Article Response -- Tom on "Ms. Jackson" and more...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
And the other new article today, found here.

As can be guessed from an article by Tom, "Ms. Jackson" itself is a launching point for many other thoughts on pop and its truths. You sure you want to write a book, Tom? Just collect all your shorter pieces together and do a _Blissed Out_ for a newer generation and scene, I tell you.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Apologies for hurried stylistic infelicities and overuse of the word "perfect" which when put near the word "pop" brings horrid thoughts of the Apples In Stereo to mind.

Also the biographies and lives of pop stars are hugely important to our love of pop but not to our love of pop songs. For example - discussion on this forum of Hear'Say almost none of which has mentioned the single or album (not a bad thing before anyone jumps in).

Tom, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Just one query: isn't Ms Jackson about apologising to your ex about making her (and your) daughter cry, rather than about apologising to your ex's mother?

alex thomson, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

It shifts around but mostly not. The first verse seems to be to the ex saying get your mother off my back. Then it goes into "me and your daughter got a special thang going on". And there's the implication that the kid's male anyway - "Thoughts of me, thoughts of she, thoughts of he asking what happened to the feeling that her and me had".

Tom, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

What is 'Ms Jackson'?

the pinefox, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Turn on the radio or watch MTV and look for the rapping cats. Band in question -- OutKast.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Alex, I think you'll find that the intro - this is off the top of my head, can't be bothered to dig the record out of the pile - goes "this is gpes out to baby mommas' mommas". Please correct me if I'm wrong....

Mark Morris, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Anyway I don't actually think you need to know "Ms Jackson" (except to get the last line reference) to understand the point the article's making about pop.

Except maybe there wasn't one. Sigh.

Tom, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Not at all, Tom. Thought that the piece was peachy fine, indeed (considered your compliment fishing a success). But seeing as not many - any - pop songs are addressed to your ex's mom, it seems a shame for people to think that Ms Jackson (and the Ms in the title also gives it away) is just another song about a guy talking to his girl....

Mark Morris, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Ha, well, it wasnt totally compliment fishing. I was just getting a bit annoyed with the excitement-letdown dynamic of seeing a new entry in the article response thread and then finding it was more Outkast exegesis. Article dissing would have done me fine. Any publicity etc. Cheers.

Tom, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

If you were dating someone AND their mother and/or daughter, then "making SOMEONE cry" is pretty much unavoidable — possibly you, if the husband involved arrived at your door with a horsewhip. (Stankonia being a concept LP based round the Diaries of the late Alan Clarke MP, no?)

mark s, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Not GLENDA Jackson MP surely?

Tom, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

"With rock there's all that biography in the way, but because pop stars are manufactured in the sense that they're replacable, you don't get much sense they're singing about themselves."

and this theme continues throughout the rest of the article, peaking with the condemnation of latter-day madonna because the songs are now patently about her.

so i guess i should add this little bit of bio-GRAPH-ical info: "ms. jackson" IS about andre, namely his breakup with erykah badu, and the song was intended for badu's mama, ms. wright. andre and badu have a child together so all of that about the baby is his assurance to ms. wright that he's going to be there when he needs to be, no matter what his relationship with her daughter. being british, you probably never heard about that over there, whereas it was fairly hyped on these shores. (badu's version of the relationship, "green eyes," is on her latest record, and it's a discursive, inscrutable thing, striving for "art" but never coming close to approaching "ms. jackson.")

not that that information detracts too much from your piece, it just found it amusing. it's a good piece, too, with a good closing line, but it strikes me as a little bare, unfinished, like it could use some more fleshing-out and elaboration. but perhaps that's what the book's for?

fred solinger, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I did know about the genesis of Ms Jackson. The piece actually was meant to be about this strain of pop in general rather than that song, but hey, live by the intentional fallacy, die by the intentional fallacy. I think the greatness of Ms J is that you neednt know any of this stuff - he's made his personal general, just like (presumably) Madonna did around the whole Sean Penn thing. In this sense it's clever that the songs addressed to the mother - a fair few people know who Erikah Badu is but who knows who Erikah Badu's mum is? :)

Yeah this stuff does need fleshing out, I agree.

Tom, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

great essay

sundar subramanian, Friday, 13 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

>>> Turn on the radio or watch MTV

Thank you. We did once have MTV in my country, in the 1980s I think, but I haven't seen it for ages; not sure it's still going. I do turn on the radio a great deal, but I'm usually immediately confronted by some hip-hop garbage, so I have to turn it straight off again.

the pinefox, Sunday, 15 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Is the enthusiasm for Destiny's Child, Britney Spears, et al. (sorry if fans don't perceive them as lump-able) among the core FT audience a form of post-'indie'-ism?

Pop stars might afford some relief. They're emotionally distant, or if they get close, it's in a way that emphasizes shared experience - everyone is basically the same, we can all understand this and get through it together, etc. (I think Tom is saying something like this in the article.) With indie pop stars, and to a lesser extent, with rock stars, the songs are often about being on the fringe, being isolated, not being able to relate to others, or more commonly, the other way around. After a while, it might get uncomfortable.

I thought the point about pop icons was extremely interesting and would like to read more on the topic.

Is it possible to maintain distance while writing and singing about personal things? Nick Drake springs to mind.

I've heard the song, and I like it. I think I do because it seems personal, unlike most other chart pop. On the other hand, it's not isolating, like a lot of indie pop is.

Now with Madonna, it just might be that, personally, she has nothing interesting to say.

youn, Sunday, 15 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Pinefox:

"I do turn on the radio a great deal, but I'm usually confronted by some hip-hop garbage"

Actually it is the domination of hip-hop and R&B which now makes daytime Radio 1 fairly listenable to me, certainly compared to five years ago when there seemed to be an Oasis track played every hour.

Robin Carmody, Sunday, 15 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

RC

Fair enough. It is the domination of hip-hop and something that I would not call R&B which now makes daytime Radio 1 largely unlistenable to me.

the pinefox, Monday, 16 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Youn's point I think is extremely interesting because while 'indie pop' and 'indie rock' assume or aspire to an outsider/fringe perspective, I still think the reception of those musics is often all about community, creating community, a 'scene' etc.

I think the stereotypical topics covered in indie music, though - infatuation and alienation, let's say - are as near-universal as the themes pop covers.

Tom, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Thinking: is there a co-relation between the "indie" scene and identity politics as it is exists in its most immature form at universities? "Community" created by excluding the undesirables. The excluders justify their actions by constantly complaining of being excluded, although in truth if they lost this sense of outsiderness their entire purpose would collapse.

To summarise: indiedentity politics.

Tim, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Damn, Tom. That is an excellent piece. I particularly love how you ended it. I wouldn't worry too much about it feeling unfinished since it isn't a book-length essay and it's very easy to put something through constant rounds of editing. Besides, if there's something else you want to add, you can always throw that in there and publish the piece in a different medium...

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I liked the piece very much but, unlike others, was rather disappointed by the ending. I may well be misreading, but it felt to me like Tom saying "sometimes I give up pretending and admit that longevity is the real criterion of big-A Art after all".

Forever ever? Who cares? Shouldn't we be arguing for a redefinition of the criteria of big-A art?

Tim, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Well of course we should. But what I was trying to say is that sometimes I want to say, and look, this stuff works on your terms (longevity, meaning, etc.) *too*, Art People!

Tom, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I thought that was what you meant, and I just don't think you (I, we) should pander to those people, Tom.

Tim, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Yeah, but it's like - these people are wrong on a micro and macro level. They're wrong because the terms of the argument are wrong, which is pretty much what the site's always said. And they're also wrong even on their terms, so it's not really pandering to them, it's more like a "we can beat you with one hand behind our back" stance. So I don't think it's pandering neccessarily.

I can see how it might be dangerous though, in that it's a way that the - ahem - rockists could say well we like this and this and this pop and the rest is worthless and throwaway just like we always said.

Tom, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

seven years pass...

wtf @ me never ever hearing this song on the radio? Am I the only one? At the time this seemed like an instant radio classic, now I never hear it ever? Please tell me I can blame this on Spin South-West and it is not a broader radio affliction.

Plaxico (I know, right?), Thursday, 19 March 2009 00:29 (fifteen years ago) link

ten years pass...

Want to feel old? Ms. Jackson’s grandkid is old enough to vote.

Mr. Snrub, Tuesday, 17 September 2019 11:35 (five years ago) link

also read 2001 ilx

a wagon to the curious (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 17 September 2019 11:38 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.