― kiwi, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
There's a world of difference between trying to get new people in and being rude. I couldn't care less whether somebody who discovers ILM contributes or not. On the other hand I personally try not to tell people to fuck off.
― Tom, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mark, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
what is the "simpson thread"?
― mark s, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
(if everyone in the entire world posted to ILM i would never get the archiving done)
― Sarah, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― gareth, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Gareth said "hi, hullo" in a perfectly way.
If you arrive at a party full of ppl you don't know and say — as you come in — "You're all insufferable cunts!" or similar — hi Nick :) — then some ppl will possibly take it bad. I don't think Simpson did that, but some ppl read him as if he did.
The kidding around was ILM in-jokily doing what we do, true. If he didn't like it and went away that's sorta sad, but there's nothing particularly *intellectually* elitist about it — just that ppl who know each other quite well can be unintentionally forbidding to strangers.
― original bgm, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Goodnight its late nearly 4.00am, thanks gents
alan i have lots of records but i evah listen to any of them
Haha, excellent.
― Martin Skidmore, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dyson, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― jess, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nick Southall, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Yes there is a self-maintaining 'elite' of posters, but really it works more like a pub conversation - if you want to muscle in you can.
And speaking of pub conversation the whole cerebral/emotional 'thing' pisses me off - this is a written board that I mostly post to during work hours, therefore yes of course I am more 'cerebral' here, catch me offline and I will not be talking like this, I will be singing songs and doing stupid thumbs-up signs and ranting about pop songs. Which is more 'real'? Neither. But rabid enthusiasm is really really hard to do well in print - maybe 3 or 4 ppl on the board can pull it off and one of those is routinely hated.
I think you're underestimating how much of the regulars' back-and- forthing is masking actual debate (probably I'm overestimating it too). As for me, yes of course I think the 'kids' need their say but I can only write from what I know, and what I know is life as a 29- year-old with a thousand CDs and a low attention span. No apologies, but hopefully I'm not trying to push that perspective on other people either.
Very true indeed. Though there's lots of stuff out there I currently go 'bleh' about, some folks are getting their first charge out of loud guitars and good noise same way I did in the early eighties. Chuck Eddy's preface to Stairway to Hell captures this cycle perfectly, unsurprisingly.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Grammar/Spelling Police, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― bc, Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― gilgamesh, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― laurie, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)