Performing Rights Society

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

This is utter nonsense.

A car repair firm has been taken to court accused of infringing musical copyright because its employees listen to radios at work.

The action against the Kwik-Fit Group has been brought by the Performing Rights Society which collects royalties for songwriters and performers.

At a procedural hearing at the Court of Session in Edinburgh a judge refused to dismiss the £200,000 damages claim.

Kwik-Fit wanted the case brought against it thrown out.

Lord Emslie ruled that the action can go ahead with evidence being heard.

The PRS claimed that Kwik-Fit mechanics routinely use personal radios while working at service centres across the UK and that music, protected by copyright, could be heard by colleagues and customers.

It is maintained that amounts to the "playing" or "performance" of the music in public and renders the firm guilty of infringing copyright.

The Edinburgh-based firm, founded by Sir Tom Farmer, is contesting the action and said it has a 10 year policy banning the use of personal radios in the workplace.

Playing music

The PRS lodged details of countrywide inspection data over the audible playing of music at Kwik-Fit on more than 250 occasions in and after 2005.

It claimed that its pleadings in the action were more than enough to allow a hearing of evidence in the case at which they would expect to establish everything allegedly found and recorded at inspection visits.

Lord Emslie said: "The key point to note, it was said, was that the findings on each occasion were the same with music audibly 'blaring' from employee's radios in such circumstances that the defenders' [Kwik-Fit] local and central management could not have failed to be aware of what was going on."

The judge said: "The allegations are of a widespread and consistent picture emerging over many years whereby routine copyright infringement in the workplace was, or inferentially must have been, known to and 'authorised' or 'permitted' by local and central management."

He said that if that was established after evidence it was "at least possible" that liability for copyright infringement would be brought home against Kwik-Fit.

But Lord Emslie said he should not be taken as accepting that the PRS would necessarily succeed in their claims.

Herman G. Neuname, Friday, 5 October 2007 15:02 (seventeen years ago)

But Lord Emslie said he should not be taken as accepting that the PRS would necessarily succeed in their claims.

.. is the main point here.

Mark G, Friday, 5 October 2007 15:08 (seventeen years ago)

It's nonsense they are even doing it though. Pash to thread btw

Herman G. Neuname, Friday, 5 October 2007 15:16 (seventeen years ago)

They phone us about once a year, as I'm open to the public (IE a shop) I'm supposed to have a license to play music. I get round this by only listening to my own music.

Pashmina, Friday, 5 October 2007 16:51 (seventeen years ago)

In most cases it's not an infringement when the typical small shop has the radio on under US copyright law. No such exception in the UK?

dad a, Friday, 5 October 2007 17:35 (seventeen years ago)

No. If I am to play music in the shop, then I have to cough up some money, they told me.

Pashmina, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:12 (seventeen years ago)

And yes, it's bullshit. Last year I was really struggling to meet my bills, and some fucking bunch of dicks want me to pay (the) money (I haven't got) to madonna and seal and who the fuck ever? Bullshit, I just turned the radio off and never turned it on again.

Pashmina, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:13 (seventeen years ago)

It's a scandal. Why did they target you of all places though? Just random bad luck?

Herman G. Neuname, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:15 (seventeen years ago)

they didn't target me, they just routinely go through business directories and call everyone who might be playing recorded music in public. IIRC it was like 180 quid a year they wanted? I could buy a bike with that and sell it and make money.

Pashmina, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:16 (seventeen years ago)

one year passes...

This is the most appropriate thread I could find for this:

The Senate Committee on the Judiciary will hold a hearing entitled "The Performance Rights Act and Parity among Music Delivery Platforms" on Tuesday, August 4, 2009 at 2:30 p.m. in Room 226 of the Senate Dirksen Office Building.

You can watch it live right now here:

http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=4011

Kevin John Bozelka, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 20:59 (sixteen years ago)

there was this joyfest as well

New ASCAP crackdown on cover bands??? This could potentially suck

鬼の手 (Edward III), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 21:14 (sixteen years ago)

eight months pass...

SoundExchange Announces $51.7 million in Q1 payments to artists, labels

Indie labels claim largest share to date of funds earned from digital music

Washington, DC - SoundExchange, the non-profit performance rights organization appointed by Congress to pay digital royalties to recording artists and sound recording copyright holders, announced today that it has begun sending out checks in its largest-ever quarterly distribution. A total of $51.7 million in royalties from digital transmissions, including Internet radio, satellite radio, and cable TV music channels, are on their way to recording artists and copyright holders. The unprecedented amount represents a 135% increase over first quarter payments last year, and surpasses the previous record distribution by nearly $10 million.

"This was the result of a lot of hard work by our staff, and also represents a new commitment by our registrants to help increase these amounts," said SoundExchange's Executive Director John Simson. "In addition to our usual distribution amounts, this total includes millions of dollars which were freed up by our commitment to cleaning up the bad data which is often reported to us by services."

Simson has spoken publicly about the challenge posed by poor reporting by the digital services which use sound recordings. During this quarter, however, SoundExchange staff have worked with registrants to resolve thousands of entries reported as "label unknown" or attributed incorrectly, by encouraging owners and artists to claim the tracks individually. SoundExchange staff also put in many man-hours of research to correct data so that funds could be distributed properly.

The independent label community received its largest-ever portion of digital revenues this quarter. Many individual recipients received their largest checks to date.

"In this time of shrinking revenues from so many other sources, our SoundExchange income was large enough to have paid the production costs of a new album and more," said Bruce Iglauer, owner/operator of Alligator Records, "Absolutely every label and every recording artist should be a member. It's simply all positives and no negatives."

Simson also credited his organization's outreach to artists who had not previously received royalties with a portion of the growth. When artists and copyright holders register with SoundExchange, they receive lump sums of the royalties they have accrued since 1996. A flood of new registrations, fueled by SoundExchange's ramped-up awareness efforts in mid-2009, meant lots of those checks were issued in Q1.

"We're extremely proud of what we do here," Simson said of the quarter's achievements, "It's a challenge and a privilege to be a part of the process that sees the creators of music fairly paid for their invaluable work."

###

About SoundExchange: SoundExchange is the non-profit performance rights organization that collects statutory royalties from satellite radio, internet radio, cable TV music channels and other services that stream sound recordings. The Copyright Royalty Board, created by Congress, has entrusted SoundExchange as the only entity in the United States to collect and distribute these digital performance royalties for featured recording artists and master rights owners. SoundExchange currently represents over 5,500 record labels, over 45,000 featured artists, and has paid out more than $412 million in royalties since its creation in 2003. www.SoundExchange.com

Kevin John Bozelka, Friday, 9 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.