An all-new version of the ILX code is being developed. You can test and comment at sandbox.ilxor.com.

"Use other words please."

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
"Scribes": Tom, for goodness' sake! (He drinks, you know...)

― mark s, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

'problematic', 'de rieguer (?)', 'mainstream', 'pretentious', 'glitchcore', 'Your round,Geordie !'

― Geordie Racer, Saturday, 14 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

'oeuvres' - why ?

― Mr. Apologetic, Saturday, 14 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"Oeuvre": ulp, guilty! — tho not at ILM, I don't think, and (I hope) always in the service of gags like (the old ones are the best) the "oeuvre of Jive Bunny"... But you're right, Geordie. Out it goes.

― mark s, Saturday, 14 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"Blimey!"

Where did I use 'scribes'? I dread to think.

Glitch is better than squirm at least. I'm too fond of 'glacial' by half.

― Tom, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

'Glacial' is a very nice word, use it at every possible opportunity ("During sunday's match A.'s defense looked truely glacial." ;) IDM has to go though. I'm trying to cut the use of 'overrated'. Really.

― Omar, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Speaking of "glacial", "ethereal" is another word that gets kicked around far too often when talking about 4ad and kranky label bands. I don't think there has been ever been a Cocteau Twins related piece of journalism that has ever refrained from using this word.

Not that I'm about to read them all to find out, but you get the idea...

― Nicole, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Words I used to use a LOT which now make me squirm (I mean, er, no, squirm IS what I mean): provocative; radical; subversive

Revolutionary: I believe I was always already aware that this was a technical word, deployed by advertising agencies, to let you know that yr favourite supermarket product now came in packaging no longer cuboid, but TETRAHEDRAL! Yay.

Stunning: No it isn't. It's mildly amusing/surprising/diverting.

Ethereal: As noted over on Indie-a-Genre, this is now a corporate genre-name, acc. Tower records (i.e. like Reggae).

― mark s, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

satire should never be referred to as either "biting" or "cutting."

i was thinking of this before the thread was posted, but now i've gone and forgotten all of them and, even worse, i've probably even used those examples in recent writing.

― fred solinger, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

pre-packaged: cuz I'm bored with necessary kneejerk defence of anyone this lands on (some of them probably ARE divs)

pretentious: salvageable, actually, provided we can make the old big world use it as unalloyed praise

― mark s, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

On the thoughts page a while back I used "ruefully" twice in a sentence. It doesn't get much more embarrassing than that ...

― Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

'Alternative' - this word is similar to the red cross painted on plague houses. From 15-year-old spazmo Green Day fans who say they like 'Alternative' music, to 'The 11 o'clock Show - The News Alternative', you just know its going to be cack of the highest order.

― DG, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

'BONY'

― Dixon , HARRY, Friday, 20 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I was recently forced to rebuke an associate of mine for using the word "stylee" in all seriousness. I had thought this practice had passed into history, seen? Safe.

― Tim, Friday, 20 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Sorted.

― mark s, Friday, 20 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"Surreal": just subbed an article in which the 'writer' used it THREE times in the FIRST THREE PARAS, basically to mean "ever so slightly odd" — I mean, I'm not a major fan of Aragon/Breton et al, cuz they had a careerist-hack dimension also etc etc, and I kind of like how this levels their pretensions, but but but [splutters off into his own zone again...]

― mark s, Tuesday, 24 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

When I was subbing for a litawawy magazine we had a list of formulations which sent us scrambling for the red pen... top of the list (TOM!) was "luminous prose" - what, you can read it in the dark??

― stevie, Tuesday, 24 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Actually in this case the fanzine was punctuated with hand-stuck glow stars of the sort that were so popular among mid-90s kindercore types, so nyah ;)

But yeah, sorry.

― Tom, Tuesday, 24 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

One I've always hated....schtick. Not sure where it started, although I associate its arrival with late 70's NME.

― David, Tuesday, 24 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I'm not a major fan of Aragon/Breton et al, cuz they had a careerist-hack dimension also etc etc

Sorry? since when did converting to glum stalinism just as your first work becomes a cause celebre (Aragon) or just attacking everyone who ever helped or admired you in print, and refusing lucrative commissions from all the major french newspapers (Breton) constitute a hack dimension? perhaps you're getting mixed up with Salvador Dali?

― Patterson, Tuesday, 24 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Schtick I like because it conveys the predictability of the people it's applied to (major rock'n'pop stars, generally) quite nicely. I use it affectionately fairly often.

― Tom, Tuesday, 24 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

OK, "hack" not EXACTLY the best choice of words — the hacks are those present-day teachers-pet art crits and/or historians who sidle up to them so oozily-defensively.

But •assiduous• curators of their own gallery-of-the-future post-revolution reps: which I just seriously wanna get up between sometimes, and bugger about with. I tht of including Dali, but it wd have taken the heat off the others.

― mark s, Tuesday, 24 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I see your point, Mark. I also see your point about how "surreal" is horribly over-used. But isn't the interesting thing about the "curators of their own gallery-of-the-future post-revolution reps" that they failed to fulfill their aims so miserably? Aside from under-read and fantastic, inspiring little books (Anthology of Black Humour, Paris Peasant) they were really only the creators of l'advertisement fou which, returning to the thread, is a coinage i sincerely hope never to see again.

― Patterson, Tuesday, 24 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"'Nuff said". Ew.

― Tim, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

yes, I'll go along with "'nuff said". It really is one of the worst, isn't it?

x0x0

― norman fay, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"et al"... "natch"...

― stevie, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Anal.

I'm not sure what annoys me more: that it has become an ugly shorthand for 'anally retentive', or that it's only used in such a limited 'slag off' way, compared with the original Freudian sense. I'm not an expert on Freud, but I seem to recall an anally retentive character being about much more than alphabetising your CD collection and making lists.

― Nick, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Po-faced. Is this a teletubbies reference or what?

― Sterling Clover, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I quite like "et al".

― Robin Carmody, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"Sampledelic" / "Sampladelic" (sorry Pete)

"myth" as in "the rock myth" - was about to use it in the Depeche/League thread and suddenly thought HOLD ON.

― Tom, Friday, 27 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"cheese" - it's such a boring metaphor and it doesn't even work.

― Tom, Tuesday, 1 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Correct again Tom, but maybe that's because I don't like erm...real cheese, so I don't like music getting associated with smell. I came across spiel again recently. As irritating as schtick.

― Omar, Tuesday, 1 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"Rockist", especially when used to describe sounds, rather than a mindset.

― Patrick, Tuesday, 1 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"mindset"

too easy and vague by half

― Charlotte, Tuesday, 1 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Hmmm, all right Charlotte. How about "ideas", then ?

― Patrick, Tuesday, 1 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"......... on acid" - too broad, lazy

― K-reg, Wednesday, 2 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"Dinosaur" has been driving me crazy for years: can't believe I forgot it before. Dinosaur meaning what? Lumbering, badly designed, fit for doom and extinction, and deserving of it? So why does absolutely everyone LOVE dinosaurs: dinosaurs are TOTALLY cool, if you're a kid OR if you're a scientist, from Barney to Ankylosaurus (which is like a souped-up tortoise with spikes round its neck like punk rock and a great club of bone at the end of its tail for wacking raptors with).

(Kid vs scientist: who'd want to be anything else anyway?)

Dinosaurs rooled! For 70 million years!! Badly designed? To get rid of them, the cosmos had to hurl a rock the size of Birmingham — at Mexico!!!

Also (somewhat related, tho not somewhat rock-related): "FAT CATS"

I'm sorry, excuse me, just HOW is this headline shortcut going to help stir up class rage against capitalism?

Cats are great, fat cats are bigger, thus better QED.

Might as well call 'em Honey Bunnies or Wonky Donkeys...

― mark s, Wednesday, 2 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

On this 'tip' ("tip"!):

"Chameleon" (Tanya made this point once but she nicked it off me or Pete) - David Bowie a rock chameleon i.e. ever-changing, unpredictable BUT chameleons blend into the background, so it's more like Soup Dragons-y bandwagon jumping AND the only colours they can do are various shades of dull green yellow and brown so 'unpredictable' is a bit off too.

― Tom, Wednesday, 2 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"Macca" is totally unacceptable, even served dripping with sarcasm.

― mark s, Wednesday, 2 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Spawned: NO.

(And this word is doubly evil if used in the same sentence as "punk rock")

― mark s, Wednesday, 2 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"can you say ... ?" - as in "can you say 'manipulation of the media' ?" (just used on another thread)

Like, yeah, I can even *say* it with a nice French Canadian accent. Where did that stupid expression come from ?

― Patrick, Thursday, 3 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

i think that particular bastard expression comes from mr.rogers, who would ask children if they could say the word he trying to teach them. it's now becomes lazy gen x shorthand for explaining a concept and i hate it.

― ethan, Thursday, 3 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"wilfully perverse" - tautology, frequently used to describe electronica

― K-reg, Thursday, 3 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Jacko. Risible. Seminal. Words ending with 'core'.

Post Schmaltz should be used more often.

― Steven James, Thursday, 3 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Post-Schmaltz-Core Revivalists?

― Sterling Clover, Thursday, 3 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

six months pass...
"That says it all": no it doesn't you lazy fuckwit retard. Do some work for a change and PERSUADE us.

― mark s, Sunday, 25 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Thank fuck nobody uses "(x) is worth the price of admission" any more.

― dave q, Sunday, 25 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Spot on Dave, that one's always irritated the fuck out of me as well.

― Robin Carmody, Sunday, 25 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

High school journalism, featuring "Beg, borrow, or steal" "Run, don't walk" "I want my eight bucks back" and "classic" or worse, "perrenial classic" for a group's first album or something. In fact, perrenial classic for anything!

― 1 1 2 3 5, Sunday, 25 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Does anyone remember a Chinese cooking expert (=chef) from early 80s? His apron said "wok, don't fry" . Yes, I know...

― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 25 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes — that’s the primary source of my revulsion. It’s not a mystery! Aggressive male sexuality intruding into my otherwise placid day is jarring.

― Piggy Lepton (La Lechera), Saturday, 6 December 2025 15:28 (ten months ago)

Yeah it’s hilarious to me that the term for this is “semantic bleaching”. I suppose the entire concept of bleaching is going through the reverse process for me whereby it calls to mind much more unsettling mental images than it would have ten years ago.

― Tim F, Saturday, 6 December 2025 15:37 (ten months ago)

I kind of do and don’t agree with you, LL? I was thinking about how full circle internet has come on certain things, like if you search “rape” or “raped” on ilx, some of the more relevant examples near the top are stuff like


Posted: 26 January 2007 at 21:31:19
this song raped me once

And that was so common on so much of the internet back then! Whereas now the tiktok influenced censorship of today, people will not type out the word rape even when it’s about literal, actual rape. I watched a video a couple of weeks ago about some manosphere prick, I forget which one, and they described some event as “he 🍇ed her and it was a known secret for a long time.” Like, grape emoji popping up in otherwise serious discussions of a difficult subject makes me feel like I’m going insane. It almost feels mocking, though the motivation is the video creator not wanting to get demonetised by the algorithms. So that leaves me uneasy, too. I don’t want capitalism and censorship to be the reason casual references died, I’d want it to be people actually being more educated and aware. Sadly…

Wrt “circle jerks”, which I do not use, I never thought of this as aggressive so much as pathetic. The term aiui is meant to be castigating overly self-referential pretentiousness, no? The imagery I have always got is a load of middle aged bearded men huffing and puffing over, oh, some topic that doesn’t interest me, and that’s always struck me as pathetic and even comedic but not so aggressive.

― colonic interrogation (gyac), Saturday, 6 December 2025 15:52 (ten months ago)

I vaguely remember some conservatives or media critics in the early '90s considering _The Simpsons_ vulgar and crude because of Bart using "sucks", "blows" and other now mild-sounding language.

Show itself (naturally) has a great bit on this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfgqkMoeXBo

― colonic interrogation (gyac), Saturday, 6 December 2025 15:56 (ten months ago)

It's a very personal thing for me -- I don't choose to have this reaction, it's wired into me via decades of intrusive thoughts. In earlier times, I would have never even brought it up because of fears it would yield retaliation, a relentless assault of imagery that would leave me feeling even worse.

Re: circle jerk, yes agreed it is pathetic but the image of men/boys "huffing and puffing" disgusts me and therefore the result is the same. An intrusion of unwanted imagery into a situation that was previously neutral.

Again, I freely admit that this is something I have to deal with in my own mind and not anyone else's problem; I'm glad that bringing it up hasn't yielded a torrent of revolting images like it would have some years ago.

― Piggy Lepton (La Lechera), Saturday, 6 December 2025 16:02 (ten months ago)

Yeah I hear that and especially on intrusive thoughts though haven’t experienced it with this.

― colonic interrogation (gyac), Saturday, 6 December 2025 16:05 (ten months ago)

I'm fascinated by the thought of Tracer sitting in all his work meetings crafting double entendres.

― Alba, Saturday, 6 December 2025 16:48 (ten months ago)

Whoa I just remembered that I *did* try to say something about this once and was rewarded with a “fuck off” iirc. It was in a thread for the band Liturgy. On zing outdoors so I’m not looking it up rn.
No wonder this felt dangerous to me lol/sob yet again.

― Piggy Lepton (La Lechera), Saturday, 6 December 2025 17:13 (ten months ago)

i found it Liturgy

― Piggy Lepton (La Lechera), Saturday, 6 December 2025 18:07 (ten months ago)

i claimed "it's 2015, can we not?" and got swiftly told off
i am not sharing this to relitigate that situation, but to note that this is not a new thing for me. i should have remembered this.

― Piggy Lepton (La Lechera), Saturday, 6 December 2025 18:08 (ten months ago)

that was an out-of-line response on their part imo.

― austinato (Austin), Saturday, 6 December 2025 19:14 (ten months ago)

^^^

― Kim Kimberly, Saturday, 6 December 2025 19:20 (ten months ago)

"I don't know who needs to hear this but..."

― bookmarkflaglink (Darin), Tuesday, 9 December 2025 00:41 (ten months ago)

Louder for the people in the back

― calmer chameleon (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 9 December 2025 01:31 (ten months ago)

"the higher-ups"

― map, Tuesday, 9 December 2025 01:32 (ten months ago)

“learnings”

― donna rouge, Tuesday, 9 December 2025 01:48 (ten months ago)

😬

― map, Tuesday, 9 December 2025 01:52 (ten months ago)

"...on my bingo card"

― Cow_Art, Tuesday, 9 December 2025 02:13 (ten months ago)

"ask" as a noun

― bored by endless ecstasy (anagram), Tuesday, 9 December 2025 02:23 (ten months ago)

"core memory"

istg if the pop-psychology of my lifetime manifested into a physical thing, it truly would be huge pile of literal bull shit, with a bunch of very ignorantly blissed out cows standing by at the ready.

― austinato (Austin), Wednesday, 10 December 2025 18:09 (ten months ago)

three months pass...

needle drop

^this. I feel like its use must be *de rigueur* at any uni cinema club

― Galactic Poetaster (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 24 March 2026 23:03 (six months ago)

one month passes...

"final boss"

stop, please

― omar little, Monday, 18 May 2026 21:58 (five months ago)

See also final form, one-shot, side quest, level up, etc

― Jordan s/t (Jordan), Tuesday, 19 May 2026 00:15 (five months ago)

Young people (tm) seem to use video game slang all the time. NPC, bot, etc.

― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 19 May 2026 00:46 (five months ago)

they've gamified my anxiety disorder

― brimstead, Tuesday, 19 May 2026 01:28 (five months ago)

A student wrote that he had leveled up his writing skills in my class and I found it helpful tbh — to see it how they see it helps me encourage other students to try in the pursuit of leveling up.

― Piggy Lepton (La Lechera), Tuesday, 19 May 2026 02:14 (five months ago)

leveled-up is useful. i don't mind these words if they're useful

― rameau in the main room (dog latin), Tuesday, 19 May 2026 08:30 (five months ago)

'level up' makes zero sense to me as a phrase. to my brain it just means 'fix something that's wonky' and i have to make a conscious effort to interpret it any other way

― Ash Ra Pimples (NickB), Tuesday, 19 May 2026 09:45 (five months ago)

NPC is dehumanising language and has a strong fashy flavour, really hate to see non-fashy people using it.

― sonic catterdales (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Tuesday, 19 May 2026 09:58 (five months ago)

It’s a very 2026 phenomenon that the type of cunts who 10 years ago were calling libcucks NPCs now spend all their time talking to a literal NPC that they think is god/their gf/therapist/financial advisor

― unclear apocalypse (wins), Tuesday, 19 May 2026 10:11 (five months ago)

NPC is horrible, yes. Reflective of a solipsistic mindset, but also a reaction formation against the idea that one might not actually be as important as one wishes to be.

― rameau in the main room (dog latin), Tuesday, 19 May 2026 10:23 (five months ago)

i get that npc comes from toxic message board culture and furthermore from video games which have nothing of value to offer to anyone, but 'people who just follow along' is a real phenomenon that deserves some kind of shorthand that isn't too derisive i guess. 'default people', 'mainstreamers', something like that. 'sheeple' if you will.

― shaking babies (map), Tuesday, 19 May 2026 23:06 (five months ago)

I will have to ask my daughter about the decision between NPC and bot.

― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 May 2026 00:08 (four months ago)

That went terribly, now I'm even more confused.

― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 May 2026 00:30 (four months ago)

coronate/coronated evidently continues to give me sub-editor's histamine prickle lol: you can just say crown/crowned and lose literally nothing meaningwise (and gain style-wise imo)

for the fussy of mind "coronation" in the sense of the official ceremony of the crowning of a king (or by extension i guess the official ceremony of the inauguration of a president ect ect) is fine, bcz a latinate term for some all-channels fancy performative* event completely with parchment scrolls and big stamped seals is perhaps helpfully distinctive

"coronation vs contest" is iffy by these pernickety standards but does have a certain rhetorical-alliterative energy so i'll allow it (not that "crowning vs content" doesnt)

*note correct usage austin fans!!

― mark s, Thursday, 21 May 2026 13:06 (four months ago)

one month passes...

new bad trend: artist bios/info profiles that have a single sentence of no more than like 6 one syllable words. or worse, just a single "🥴" emoji or some other anti-information.

USE _ANY_ WORDS PLEASE READING IS (FUN)DAMENTAL

― austinato (Austin), Friday, 17 July 2026 13:25 (three months ago)

yeah, whenever I see emoji-heavy bios on like, instagram or whatever, they display so small that I strain my eyes trying to make out what each one is. I swear my complaint isn't just because I'm pushing 50. I can navigate emojis just fine in a text message chain.

― peace, man, Friday, 17 July 2026 13:48 (three months ago)

Any form of "douche" used negatively makes me cringe. Not only is it an extremely unpleasant visual, but it is also most often associated with feminine hygiene, therefore it feels pretty rooted in misogyny.

― beard papa, Friday, 17 July 2026 15:35 (three months ago)

The douche itself is rooted in misogyny — they’re unnecessary as the apparatus cleans itself.

― Piggy Lepton (La Lechera), Friday, 17 July 2026 15:40 (three months ago)

one month passes...

"absolute cinema"

― austinato (Austin), Sunday, 13 September 2026 03:29 (one month ago)

“‘absolute’ + xxxxx” is a terrible trend that’s as dated as “‘extreme’ + xxxxx.”

IIRC, “Absolute Watchmen” was the first time I saw it mass deployed as a brand name* and it felt like the New Jersey moment of a IP decline/death spiral in progress

― Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 13 September 2026 04:10 (one month ago)

*ignoring the vodka brand for now

― Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 13 September 2026 06:04 (one month ago)

one month passes...

stop calling new bands krautrock or krautrock inspired or w/e.. nobody sounds like faust, nobody's ever sounded like can except maybe the happy mondays,

it's always just motorik neu! stuff but nobody ever cops the non-motorik neu! stuff

if it has amon duul blood it gets called psych rock or space rock, anyway

end rant

― brimstead, Sunday, 18 October 2026 00:42 (yesterday)

this is true. it kinda feels like krautrock was a rite of passage for "serious" rock fans across a few decades, and so the word means more than just a sonic resemblance, it's like a listeners' club code word or something. which is kind of annoying. and yeah i don't hear much that actually sounds like the krautrock bands apart from the rhythm sections of neu! and can.

― old helen (map), Sunday, 18 October 2026 03:45 (yesterday)

"egregious" used to mean "bad" gets my hackles up

― massaman gai (front tea for two), Sunday, 18 October 2026 04:54 (yesterday)

*when used to mean "Bad"

― massaman gai (front tea for two), Sunday, 18 October 2026 04:54 (yesterday)

Haha I remember reading this thread as a young man with ambitions towards music criticism and being like "fuck I can't use ANY words??".

In the spirit of this revival though I get really grouchy about the use of City Pop for countries other than Japan. With some I am admittedly not cultured enough to know whether there was an actual influence - I've seen mixes of Indonesian City Pop and Korean City Pop and sure Tatsuro Yamashita may have inspired some of those artists - but once you get to Lebanese City Pop and Brazilian City Pop, surely what's actually the case is just these artists were listening to the same black American artists the City Pop ppl were listening to?

― a ZX spectrum is haunting Europe (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 18 October 2026 10:46 (yesterday)

I assume it's part of the tendency to see the past as if it was just like the present. Obviously you and I, and all the other people on Ilxor, were aware of city pop from the mid-1970s onwards - I remember being bored of listening to tape cassettes of city pop circa 1980, when I was only four years old* - but the vast, vast, huge, enormous, overwhelmingly huge and enormous, vast, all-encompassing etc probably didn't become aware of its existence until 2019.

Which raises the question of how music made in the 1980s on the other side of the world, by people who probably hadn't heart of city pop, could have been influenced by it. To be fair, most of the Reddit posts that Google throws up talk about "city pop-like music", but that's just a minor detail.

* I remember that my Japanese-British mother, who didn't exist, used to buy me tapes from a shop in Tokyo, Japan, where I didn't live.

― Ashley Pomeroy, Sunday, 18 October 2026 15:46 (yesterday)

IIRC, “Absolute Watchmen” was the first time I saw it mass deployed as a brand name*

Dunbier invented the format for Absolute Authority, a one-off where the sobriquet had an interaction with the title to gestalt a unique descriptor. Other editors did not bother to read the entire two-word phrase.

― uploading this content requires perseveration (sic), Monday, 19 October 2026 04:22 (six hours ago)

I mean, there are people out there - respectable music people, not just snobby gatekeepers - who claim that unless the music came from a particular time and place and scene, you can't call it "UK garage" and anything outside of that scene is something else (the term "UKG" was used, but surely that's just short for UK Garage?). Not sure I agree. Scenes are important, but I don't see why a Swedish band playing music directly influenced by 1950s guitar music can't call themselves "rock and roll"

― snark of mall Ds (dog latin), Monday, 19 October 2026 10:31 (thirty-two minutes ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.