Geir says "Running To Stand Still" is the best thing U2 ever did. I say "Bad" is the same song, but better. Esp. the live version. Whose cuisine reigns supreme?
― rogermexico., Friday, 11 January 2008 23:32 (eighteen years ago)
"Bad" by whom? (Obv. not Michael Jackson)
― Geir Hongro, Friday, 11 January 2008 23:33 (eighteen years ago)
Same because they are both about heroin?
― Mark Rich@rdson, Friday, 11 January 2008 23:43 (eighteen years ago)
it hurts me to say, but i think geir is wrong here
― mookieproof, Saturday, 12 January 2008 00:03 (eighteen years ago)
LOL you cannot be serious
http://youtube.com/watch?v=aPyhYczii8I
― rogermexico., Saturday, 12 January 2008 00:42 (eighteen years ago)
Bad is great
― Herman G. Neuname, Saturday, 12 January 2008 00:46 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, and also because both use a midtempo I-IV-I-IV pattern for the verses, building to a big V chorus (Running) or bridge (Bad). Though to be fair Running To Stand Still does have a harmonica part iirc...
― rogermexico., Saturday, 12 January 2008 00:50 (eighteen years ago)
Both suck, but "Running To Stand Still" is more tolerable.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 12 January 2008 01:04 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.hauntingmids.com/forum/Smileys/default/morrissey-crying.gif
― rogermexico., Saturday, 12 January 2008 01:16 (eighteen years ago)
bad, not even close.
(i like both tunes, even though i'm not a big fan of either album)
― tipsy mothra, Saturday, 12 January 2008 01:23 (eighteen years ago)