― David Gunnip, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave q, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jeff W, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
By the way Jeff, the NME one is not history rewritten/ re-documented they are all original articles/ Interviews/ reviews.
― DJ Martian, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
everyone moans abt savage's book but no one's *remotely* done the work to improve on it (except me heh): the nme coasting on their rep of NEARLY 30 YEARS AGO can fuck off obv (it was bad enuff working there in 1986 LET ME TELL YOU *waves zimmer frame in feebly threatening way* *attempts to gob but ends up dribbling* etc etc)
they think the clash are punk = oh what's the point
― mark s, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
well those guys were not even necessarily right then (haha farren was DRIVEN OUT OF THE COUNTRY by the wrath of "hip young gunslingers" burchill-parsons => sinking the titanic meant getting rid of HIM)
the bit i like best in the bangs piece is where the girl pogoing turns out to be a teacher
― toby, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dr. C, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
(Ignore me, btw - my 1977 experience of punk = whatever the Daily Express said.)
Yes, I'd like to see a similar Sounds compilation of stuff. What were the main differences between the papers during the period in question?
― ancient mariner s, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)