Music Hoarding: fear of an incomplete collection?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
What is the deal with this latent/eerie desire of mine to retain/possess and especially NOT GET RID OF music. Who shares it? What are your thoughts?

Stuart, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I ask because my mp3 collection is getting too diverse and spotty to burn files to cd in an organized and useful way (meaning once they're burned I'll never hear them again because I'll never know what's on each disc of random tracks)... but I'm practically incapable of deleting any of them, even though I probably won't want to hear most of them at any given time anyway.

Of course this won't bother me (at least for a few months) once I can afford a new hard drive because i'll be able to resume downloading faster than i can listen, probably. If you could access any song/recording ever created at any time from anywhere, wouldn't you stop bothering with mp3s? I'm not sure I would. It would matter whether or not I owned/controlled this hypothetical mammoth database, I think. Bizarre. I am a hopeless music packrat/theif/BRINGER OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVOLUTION.

Stuart, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm the same way, although not with MP3's. I possess over two-thousand compact discs, taking up a vast amoung of space in my apartment. There are some I simply don't listen to, but hold onto for various reasons -- significance, completism, sentimental reasons, whatever -- but I need to weed them out. Yet, more often than not, I find myself cotinuing to buy discs rampantly. It's like an addiction.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, an addiction. Yes yes. NEED NEW FIX.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

re: not getting rid of, i just hate the idea of getting less than what i paid for. re: acquiring, what drove it for me was the belief that there is a vast amount of music out there that i would LOVE but that i havent found yet

Ron, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

my experience of continually buying new lps and then new cds over the last 20 years is:

new music to "find new experience" -- initially maybe teengage concept -- keep one step ahead of peers in "the latest" or "the more obscure" alternative music department -- i did not accept teenage pursuit of music as inherently fashion chasing -- belief that each bit of music is permanent and necessary addition that must nevertheless be owned to be experienced properly

teenage and later the belief continued that this was addition to collection as library (as knowledge) -- it still had to be owned to be experienced properly

continued mistaken belief that alternative meant "exclusive or" rather than as additive or inclusively complimentary (another potentially ambiguous word)

the xor thing meant that music collection was assumed to be xor alternative to trad. consumer commodity music and so had to be owned to be enjoyed since no one else had what i had, plus obscurity grail or shared secret society of aesthetes or intellectual/critical and moral highground assumptions (note: use of "inclusive or" here represents more hopefully sensible current thinking)

simple processing of music once owned meant the realisation that i did not need to own particular music came after i was sick of particular music, begging question that i was often actually buying a slice of time with that music that i would get bored with eventually

yet hung onto music because (a)useful for a radio show or (b)might like it eventually even if sick of it from general dislike/distaste of it or (c)might understand it eventually despite initial feeling of not understanding it or maybe feeling of not comprehension (hoping nifty extra clever stuff / hidden links might be revealed after more exposure, though when i make time for this i'm not sure)

above (a)->(c) are current excuses to keep on with seeking out "new music"

craving for "new buzz" from music is the real thing, basically an addiction based on past thrills when maybe younger and less musically experienced -- am kidding myself -- the more my musical knowledge expands the more quickly bored i become with "new music" -- current craving then manifest as pursuing "difficult", maybe even "inscrutable" music in ever-decreasing odds position of craving "musical buzz"

so i'm addicted to the "musical buzz", a sensation inherited from listening to pop music (but now this "adult" "rationalisation"), the mix of wonderment at newness and fresh musical understanding, a certain ideal mix of intrigue and familiarity that hits at a different time for each different piece of music, and a sensation for which i've continually modified listening/buying practises (or "tastes"), to continually justify the commodity/satisfaction (self satisfaction) inherent in the addiction

and i suppose impassioned participation/interest in ILM is another ancillary excuse to prop up this endless self-satisfying addiction

George Gosset, Thursday, 2 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

My head hurts now after reading George's exhaustively thoughtful ruminations on this subject.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Being a completist seems to be largely a man's game. Never met a girl who wants everything (by a particular artist). Strange. I wonder why that is. Maybe in the way we're brought up?

nathalie, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I used to buy music all the time. I had a collection that (including tapes, records, & cd's), hovered around the 2,500 range. Then I decided to sell a few online. Then I decided to sell more. I didn't stop until I sold almost every cd I owned and I'm currently getting rid of records, too -- the tapes I grouped up and sold as random lots; whatever didn't sell was thrown away. If you make the decision to clean out, it becomes almost as compulsive as buying them in the first place.

Over the course of a year, I'm now down to about 125 cd's and I still have about 500 records left (but they'll be gone soon). Do I really miss anything? Not really. I just mp3'ed anything I thought I'd want later, and I still don't listen to most of it.

This may not be the case for everybody, but just cleaning house on all my music made my life feel much more simple and I'm so glad I did it.

paul, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Same as Nathalie. I have little artist loyalty, even with the few artists that I've admitted into Dr. C's hall of fame (it's a helluva job to get in) I don't think I own anyone's complete ouvre. Not even New Order or Kraftwerk or The Kinks or... you get the picture. I love Neu more than anything, but I don't have Neu 2. It would be a no brainer for me to get Neu 2 and I'd love it, but there's no risk somehow, and always something else more worthy of investigation. I suppose I could get it and move on to Cluster or La Dusseldorf but....

I think the closest I get to completion is Joy Div, where all that I haven't got is the Live at The Electric Circus track. In fact I actively avoid completing artists, there's something a bit cack about owning everything. Then of course, the crackpot completeists only go and change the definition of *everything* anyway by including live albums and bootlegs. Also I hardly ever get CD singles, so I don't get all the extra mixes an' ting. They're all cack anyway.

What I love is RECORDS. Or just individual tracks - maybe that's why I buy so many compilations these days - it sort of uncouples you from having to slot a record into the shelves next to *other stuff* by the same artist. Somehow this act itself feels wrong - which is why my indexing system is based on a series of bonkers rules and logic steps to avoid it.

Dr. C, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm a shocking hoarder, and a compulsive completist. It's very difficult to get out of a habit once I've started it.

I'd find myself always buying CD1/CD2 of every freaking single off the album and ending up with piles upon piles of CD singles I will never and would never listen to...

Recently my disposable income shrunk considerably and I had to force myself to reduce music consumption. Now, I only buy singles that don't appear on the album or only if by a band I really love. Even that's not great..

One day I just know I'm going to snap and sell the lot.. and some other crazy completist collector out there is going to wet his or her pants with delight......

electric sound of jim, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Man, I'm gonna end up sounding like Nathalie and Dr. C, but I'm a complete non-completist. My attention span is like a gnat's and as soon as I get entranced by a genre (black metal for example) or an artist (Current 93 as another) I'll get something *else* (an old Missy Elliot album for $cheap$) or some cool looking old tyme-y folk record (sigh, Bukka White is a god) and I'll forget about black metal and industrial noise and be into Missy and old tyme-y folk for a couple of weeks until I see an Organized Konfusion album that I was looking for used for like ages and a collection of Japanese Garage Rock from the 60's and then. . . . Anyway, you get the picture.

Except for bands who didn't or don't release much or have handy collections of their stuff (Birthday Party, Antipop Consortium, Swans, My Bloody Valentine) and the rare band whose albums and singles are just cheap and easy to find (Techno Animal, Barbara Manning) I don't have anything close to complete collections of anybody and I can't imagine wanting to have all the works of any individual artists more than I want to hear some *new* and amazing sounding thing. That just the kind of hyperactive consumerist music slut I am.

Alex in SF, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's always gd to keep something in reserve - I'm saving 'Meditations' by Coltrane for when I'm all grown up.

Andrew L, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Should mention that actually sounding like either Nathalie or Dr. C is a great thing! They are two of my favorite posters! :)

Alex in SF, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

If I still had every record or CD that I ever bought, I wouldn't have room for anything else in the house. But I keep the collection pretty trim considering how much time and money I've spent on it--if I don't absolutely love something in some way, even if it's just for one song, it doesn't stick around for long. So while I do sometimes feel that my musical acquisitiveness has an obsessive, maybe even unhealthy edge to it, I could probably justify just about every recording I currently own to a mental-health professional if I had to. And although I used to do radio and kept my collection accordingly, I long ago got over the idea that John Peel was going to get sick and call on me to sub or something. Also, I guess I just don't worry so much about missing whatever is the hottest or latest or weirdest anymore. Not to get all patriarchal, but you get older and you have other things to occupy your mind, at least part of the time.

Thankfully, my wife is most forgiving of my hobby, especially since I think she realizes I could find far worse ways of spending my time and our money. Like Internet porn. Or crack.

Lee G, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I certainly have hoarding tendencies, but I also tend to go back through the collection and do the ol' purgearoo fairly regularly on things that I can't recall having listened to since I bought them. Thus I keep this from being pathology. Very few artists deserve the "keep until I die" mentality.

Sean Carruthers, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Being a completist seems to be largely a man's game

I've heard the argument that men have hardwired hunter-gatherer impulses that feed the collecting frenzy. It's probably more of a dick-size anxiety thing, we're always trying to have the biggest something. Perversely, both of these anxieties stem from keep-the- species-reproducing instincts but male collection-mania often results in involuntary celibacy.

fritz, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe collecting little pieces of wax and alphabetizing them on shelves is some kind of sinister urge-displacement strategy on the part of our poor reptile brains to keep our fuck-kill-burn-loot knuckle-dragging viking tendencies sublimated so we can ride crowded buses from tiny apartments to office cubicles without reaching over and biting someones ear off Tyson-style. Bringing home that rare mint condition Eater seven-inch, we're just like those city cats who drop the corpses of baby birds on their master's door-mat.

fritz, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i think one thread that connects people who fervently hoard music is the acute awareness of one's own mortality. it's almost like we think that if we own enough music we will somehow be able to cheat death. or are we simply preparing ourselves for the inevitable -- using music to build a shrine to our own accomplishments on the material plane?

fields of salmon, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I like fritz's theory: acquiring a record collection is a civilized replacement for "collecting treasure" by the old fashion method: staging a Crusade, killing some Jannissaries, and picking trinkets off their corpses.
Only to find that burglars have absconded with the hoard you keep back at your Keep.

Lord Custos 2.0 beta, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not a completist in the "I must have evrything by X" sense (as it happens, I think I have everything Stereolab have ever released except for 1 song, but I'm not bothered if I ever get hold of that song or not). Remixes and what have you have made such quests pretty much redundant these days anyway.

However, I do have occasional ph34rs that I will not eventually acquire everything out there that is "great" (let alone grebt). Especially since I don't know what I'm missing that qualifies.

Jeff W, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Whenever I like a CD by a band that's new to me, my first instinct is to check into anything else they have released. I'll also look for other releases on the label, similar artists, etc. Often, this desire for more/similar/related stuff will supercede my appreciation of the initial disc, so that I accumulate these stacks of half-listened-to CDs, which is kind of sick. Although I never set out thinking I must possess ev-er-y-thing, I can wind up there, one coveting at a time.

As for getting rid of it, the paradox is that I'm reluctant to part with crates of stuff I never listen to, because it might be something I liked but set aside and forgot. And I know as soon as I sell it off, I'll re-discover it and want it back.

Curt, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

So mp3s really change the game... Still get to access the gatherer instinct but with improving hard drive storage technologies the collection gets smaller as it gets larger. Boo. But I don't mind, so long as winamp can gimme that playing time total. Woo. I don't really do the collect everything by X thing either, it's more I hear about a couple bands, check them out, like them some, look for or hear about related bands, repeat and all of a sudden I have 5-30 tracks by a dozen or more scandinavian neo-garage bands that I don't really need, and I repeat this behavior for music both new and old and everything in between. I feel like I've already achieved a 99th percentile cutting-edge awareness factor so that's not really an issue anymore, now it's just filling in the gaps to make me and my computer the living breathing bit-shifting cyborg computer encyclopedia from hell... The other day I found myself flipping through mid-70s print ads at adflip.com because you just know there are hundreds of bands over the years that never made it into the floyd-sabbath-zep-stones classic rock radio rotation, but nobody needs this much Ramatam, right?

Stuart, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Should mention that actually sounding like either Nathalie or Dr. C is a great thing! They are two of my favorite posters! :)
Dude, stop listening to Mortiis, your brain obviously needs to be rewired. heh! For a long period I would rush out and get every record that was mentioned by my fave musicians or that was labeled classick. I wanted to be a completist but, fek it, I will never be able to hear it all. Which is probably a good thing cuz 99 percent is majorly dud anyway.

nathalie, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

My girlfriend thinks that I am an obsessive, but by the standards of this board, I am a rank beginner. My CD collection is in the 400-500 range. I'm not a completist. I don't have *everything* by any band, not even my faves, and I don't own any singles. I also am quite content in selling back CD's, once I'm convinced that they don't do anything for me anymore. In fact I'd rather sell something back that I no longer like (even for a pittance) than have it lurking on my shelf as a kind of blot on my aesthetic sensibility. To me, a collection is defined as much by what it *doesn't* include as by what it does.

o. nate, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Listening to Mortiis at 4am in an empty office lit by flicking neon lights is HOW I KEEP MY MIND SHARP thank you very much. ;)

Alex in SF, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

II've heard the argument that men have hardwired hunter-gatherer impulses that feed the collecting frenzy

But proto-record collector obsessive would be a rubbish hunter-gatherer. He'd spend all his time looking for limited edition sabre-toothed antelopes and shit and meanwhile the kids would be starving and the wife would be getting cross and end up having an affair with Barry in the next door cave who was happy just going to Our Price ie. hunting the common deer.

N., Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Being a completist seems to be largely a man's game. Never met a girl who wants everything (by a particular artist). Strange. I wonder why that is. Maybe in the way we're brought up?

I've got female friends who are way worse then I am with their urges to collect everything Backstreet Boys and N-Sync have ever done so I don't buy the arguement myself.

mr noodles, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Mr Noodles, there are such things as exceptions. Not to sound condescending but I doubt your friends will continue buying the records by *NSync for a long period. Heck, in about two years time Backstreet Boys will have vanished from the charts. Most music fans are already male anyway. (Just check these boards, how many women do we have here??? Not ENOUGH.) And I have rarely seen a girl rush to the store to buy everything by a particular artist. Actually I don't even have ANY female friends *obsessed* with music.

nathalie, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I love N's "limited edition sabre-toothed antelope" line.

I have a female friend with every Velvets recording, 27 (last I heard) bootlegs and I would think every book on them. That's far more completist than I ever get. I have almost everything by the Fall, but that's because I love almost everything they've done.

I am, nonetheless, a major hoarder. I know that I hardly listen to loads of my ~5000 albums, and I should perform a serious purge, but it'd be difficult - I'd feel obliged to listen to everything one last time to check that it should go, and this could take forever. I haven't sold off stuff for many years. I can hardly deny charges of anal retentiveness - I'm the man with all his music in a clever database!

Martin Skidmore, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Martin - I have a friend with 400 live Fall tapes.

Dr. C, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I just spent a half hour packing my CDs. Bloody hell I have far too many.

Tom, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll take 'em! I'll take Jim's as well.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Are you bringing a skip rather than a suitcase?

electric sound of jim, Sunday, 5 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Tom I spent WAY long doing it last time, pls send your tips.

Josh, Sunday, 5 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Women are too idealistic to collect records; the concrete object is disgusting compared to the disembodied sound. women are basically outmoded, they have failed to keep up. Women will obssessively collect a single sound, that is, they'll play the same song over and over again; men will avoid the responsibility and joy of true love by endless deferral over more and more records. But men who make music are more like women in their habits." - Nancy Sinatra.

slueti, Sunday, 5 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Off the topic here slightly, but since Josh and Tom seem to have issues with packing CDs, I'll offer the following: MODULAR LIFE. I suppose that could be misconstrued as some ugly Ikea catalogue sentiment, so I'll quickly amend that with: PINE CRATES. I found a place in town that does pine crates in a number of different configurations, and one of them is almost exactly the right size for two CDs stacked, with enough room for a sheet of thick cardboard to stand them off from each other and give you enough room to insert a finger to remove them from the crate. They also have a size of crate that's perfect for vinyl.

I'm actually going to be moving at the end of the month, and this format is perfect for a move: you simply kick the crate back onto open-end-up config, and then haul out to the car/truck, whatever, CDs or vinyl and all. Milk crates had roughly the same properties earlier, but they warped somewhat when stacked open-end-front with several others on top of them, but with the advantage of proper handholds when you finally disassembled the wall and got them ready for moving, as well as a handy bottom lip that allowed them to lock together somewhat when stacked up. I only really got rid of them because they were warping somewhat and because the pine crates looked much, much nicer. (Even better, if you arrange things properly, you can set up the crates as your stereo stand, even.)

I realize that a lot of people prefer a slightly more anarchic record/cd collection (stacks here and there) but I've moved enough over the last decade to find this configuration preferable in so many ways.

Sean Carruthers, Sunday, 5 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I have those 400-plus racks around. In fact, I have about...8. Plus 4 250s. Still not enough. HOARD, HOARD...

Are you bringing a skip rather than a suitcase?

This is where international shipping, though potentially expensive, pays off. Partially this is so I can circumvent the customs limit upon my return.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 5 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

One day, Ned's house will burn down and he will be sad.

N., Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ugh, don't say it. That actually is one of my greatest fears.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

seven years pass...

Old thread, but an interesting read. It's funny how a lot of people reveal that they have large collections like it's an embarrassing secret, or at least worthy of self-deprecating jokes. Compare that to people with large libraries of books. They usually prominently display them in their homes as a source of pride. It's a mark of being well-rounded, educated, cultured, intellectual, etc. Move up to art collections and it adds even more layers of clues about one's attitudes towards class and wealth.

I love to read, but I generally only keep reference books (usually music related), and sell everything else once I've read it. I'm much less likely to re-read books, so there's not point in them taking up valuable space that could go to music!

Building a music collection has been such a rewarding experience, I really don't understand why almost everyone doesn't do it. I started slow from age 9-12, buying an occasional album with my meager allowance, and each new genre of music completely re-shaping my outlook of how much is out there. 13-17 was of course about obsessing over certain album and artists, and feeling them deeply, as teenagers do. It's also when I developed that hunger for more, a desire to hear everything I possibly can, but frustrated by my limitations of budget and access. I had to made do with taping shows from a college station, swapping records and tapes with friends, listening at the record store. And read about stuff in magazines and record guides that I might not hear until years later. 18-21 was a complete gluttonous era of hyper-absorption, having access to the music library of the college radio station, a school full of people who owned way more music than my high school friends, and a bigger city with literally dozens of great record stores (cheap used cassettes were my thing through my first year, then CDs). As I started the full time work grind, it was a delicate balancing act of trying not to spend too much on music, but enough to feed my addiction, and be lucky enough to be able to listen to music at nearly every job I've had in the past 20 years.

New albums don't hit me as profoundly as they did as a teenager. But having access to over 10,000 albums with a single remote at home and also backed up at work, makes up for that. By making new playlists or listening on random by year or genre, I'm constantly rediscovering stuff. It's like of a like a party every time I'm home, with music flowing through every room (no coctails every night, but there's at least one woman pretending to enjoy it).

Fastnbulbous, Monday, 26 October 2009 19:16 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.