Dusted Magazine -- C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

I still miss Stylus very much. Since it closed its doors, I've looked for a good second daily review site (besides Pitchfork) to consult about new releases. (n.1) Popmatters is good, and I do read it, but somehow it doesn't do it for me. Into that breach has stepped Dusted Magazine. I think it's great: The writing is straightforward and clear, the reviews are compact and well thought-out, they review a wide variety of releases but don't overstuff themselves with reviews of every greatest-hits disc or new album released.

I haven't seen almost any mention of Dusted on ILM. So I'm curious. Does anyone read it? If so, what do you think of it?
_____________________________
(n.1) I have another reliable recommendation source, the fantastic blog 17 Dots, but I'm talking now about the online magazine format only.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 18 February 2008 21:42 (eighteen years ago)

I'm not into most of the records they review (ie the free improv and punk rock stuff), but I still read it pretty much daily. Especially after they added audio in the reviews.

Jordan, Monday, 18 February 2008 21:49 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, the audio is a nice touch. They review a lot of reissue stuff -- e.g., Dust-to-Digital's catalogue -- which I love.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 18 February 2008 21:52 (eighteen years ago)

Hi, Daniel.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 18 February 2008 22:36 (eighteen years ago)

Uh . . . hi.

That you're magazine? If so, it's v. good.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 18 February 2008 22:37 (eighteen years ago)

No, I run a different one, but I think you might like us (paperthinwalls.com)

/end plug

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 18 February 2008 22:40 (eighteen years ago)

That all being said, I like Dusted's guest lists a lot.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 18 February 2008 22:41 (eighteen years ago)

LOL. Yeah, I like PTW a lot. Last year, you did a fantastic track-for-track discussion of the After Dark comp from the Italians Do It Better label. One of the best pieces I read all last year.

(xp)

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 18 February 2008 22:42 (eighteen years ago)

i like paperthinwalls! : )

M@tt He1ges0n, Monday, 18 February 2008 22:42 (eighteen years ago)

Oh sweet, the Dusted xword puzzles are still online. I thought they were gone.

I like the lists also.

Jordan, Monday, 18 February 2008 22:42 (eighteen years ago)

I read this online music magazine.

W4LTER, Monday, 18 February 2008 22:44 (eighteen years ago)

yeah this one is good-- combine this w/ popmatters and you kinda get the indie and pop cross section you had w/ stylus

J0rdan S., Monday, 18 February 2008 22:46 (eighteen years ago)

BTW, WGW, the PTW feature I was thinking of is called "Listening Party," and I just signed up for the RSS feed. As I said, it's a great feature.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 18 February 2008 22:49 (eighteen years ago)

I never really read Stylus. Worst online mag is easily cokemachineglow.

W4LTER, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:11 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

oh wow... thanks D. Esq!

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:12 (eighteen years ago)

yeah cokemachineglow is insufferable-- but i get the feeling only 15 ppl read it and/or are supposed to understand any of it

J0rdan S., Monday, 18 February 2008 23:14 (eighteen years ago)

don't read dusted every day anymore but they do some good stuff ... the "Destined" articles at the end of every year have put me up on a lotta good bands ... and Mosurock's singles column ...

dmr, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:14 (eighteen years ago)

^Yes the singles column.

W4LTER, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:15 (eighteen years ago)

I'm on board with Dusted.

I gave cokemachineglow a chance for a few weeks, but never again.
THE BOOKMARK HAS BEEN DELETED.

Z S, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:21 (eighteen years ago)

one year passes...

I don't always agree with their conclusions, but Dusted's reviews have been especially good lately: well-written, straightforward and interesting.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 23 September 2009 21:54 (sixteen years ago)

Just sayin'.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 23 September 2009 21:54 (sixteen years ago)

i like dusted, mostly for their features though

Ømår Littel (Jordan), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 21:56 (sixteen years ago)

I'm impressed they're still around... also that the bottom of every page on their website still says "©2002-2005 Dusted Magazine. All Rights Reserved"

Jeff LeVine, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 21:59 (sixteen years ago)

haha

Yeah, they're usually real good.

CharlieS, Thursday, 24 September 2009 00:05 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

I'm impressed they're still around... also that the bottom of every page on their website still says "©2002-2005 Dusted Magazine. All Rights Reserved"

Also funny that the Magic Markers circa 2004 or so are still the people you see when you open up the homepage. Part of the reason I like it: they are not trying so hard to maximize page views, just quietly providing rock-solid reviews and occasionally great features etc. (occasional in that they aren't frequent, not in that they are duds).

How many Dusted writers have paying writing gigs elsewhere? It seems like it is largely a site for the love of it, so to speak (being lazy, of coures I could google writers etc., but as so many writers turn up here perhaps there is an insider answer to this?)

grandavis, Thursday, 7 October 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

I am a Dusted stalwart.

Trip Maker, Thursday, 7 October 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

dusted is great. informative, tasteful, no BS.

tylerw, Thursday, 7 October 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

also, unlike so many other music magazines, it doesn't send my browser spiraling towards flash-ad doom.

tylerw, Thursday, 7 October 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

"online music magazines," that is

tylerw, Thursday, 7 October 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

Perhaps this is why it pops up so infrequently in other threads/heated discussions:

... tasteful, no BS.

Not much to throw into the gristmill when you are being generally honest and tasteful, though Mosurock, Earles, and a few others certainly don't pull any punches when they get worked up about something.

grandavis, Thursday, 7 October 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, i mainly just meant that they don't have a "news" section like pfork and other sites -- with important stuff like TRACKLISTING REVEALED and so forth.

tylerw, Thursday, 7 October 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

Marginally popular band adds tourdates to the tourdates we posted yesterday.

grandavis, Thursday, 7 October 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

dusted is great . . . except for andrew beckerman. he comes off like the indie snob little brother of scharpling and wurster's "rock, rot, or rule" dude

kamerad, Thursday, 7 October 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

they have an interesting approach to end-of-year lists, too (just individual writers' year-end reviews and best albums/songs, but without rank-ordering their selections (unless they want to, iirc))

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 7 October 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)

that's really neat, actually

markers, Thursday, 7 October 2010 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

I don't usually rank my year-end list, I think it's pointless. I may choose a top ten and a next ten and so forth, but don't see a big point is nit-picking any further than that.

I'm gonna mention ilxor in everyone of my posts until I get dn'd (ilxor), Thursday, 7 October 2010 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

Markers, have you checked that site out? Lots of interesting stuff going on in their archives etc., and their approach may be refreshing to you, as they stay out of a lot of online nonsense and stick mostly to the task at hand, though of course none of us can do that all of the time in this day and age.

grandavis, Thursday, 7 October 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

I too enjoy their approach to year-end lists. But I think it makes sense strictly because the writers at Dusted seem to have such different genre/sub-genre focuses. There are a fair number of jazz reviews, for example, and trying to rank apples and oranges is too confusing.

Pitchfork is trying to be the expert on indie rock and hip hop; so a year-end ranking makes more sense. Same with, say, Resident Advisor's list.

Indexed, Thursday, 7 October 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

Great site. I've been looking in sort of irregularly for a few years now. I also really appreciate Dusted's calm. PF is just too busy for me to begin to look at (and for my very old laptop to handle!).

Duke, Thursday, 7 October 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

the absence of numeric ratings on dusted reviews really calls attention to how distracting they can be on pitchfork reviews, since both sites' reviews are otherwise kind of similar in style. somehow i find it's easier to be interested in what a dusted review can tell me about the record since there's no other way of finding out from the review.

j., Monday, 11 October 2010 06:01 (fifteen years ago)

They have a great jazz writer in Derek Taylor. There's no-one else currently writing about Peter Brötzmann and free improv with such enthusiasm and clarity.

margana (anagram), Monday, 11 October 2010 08:32 (fifteen years ago)

one year passes...

What's up with it?

Trip Maker, Monday, 1 October 2012 15:03 (thirteen years ago)

I don't know, was about to ask the same thing. One of my usual morning review stops.

HAPPY BDAY TOOTS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 1 October 2012 15:03 (thirteen years ago)

https://twitter.com/spotieotis/status/252744341829853185

DJ Mooncup (NickB), Monday, 1 October 2012 15:07 (thirteen years ago)

server crash innit

DJ Mooncup (NickB), Monday, 1 October 2012 15:07 (thirteen years ago)

Busted

buzza, Monday, 1 October 2012 15:09 (thirteen years ago)

Just glad that it is only a server issue. Was excited to see Pelt surface on Friday in the "Listed" feature, and to see that they are going to have a new album coming out. My favorite music site by far.

grandavis, Monday, 1 October 2012 15:13 (thirteen years ago)

Loved that Listed! Pelt were in my town maybe four years ago and it was so great. I bought the "A Stone For Angus Maclise" lp. Awesome meditation music.

Trip Maker, Monday, 1 October 2012 15:17 (thirteen years ago)

Got excited by news of that Pelt article so I rushed over to the Dusted site to read it and ah...

DJ Mooncup (NickB), Monday, 1 October 2012 15:20 (thirteen years ago)

What's up with it?

DJ Mooncup (NickB), Monday, 1 October 2012 15:20 (thirteen years ago)

lol

Trip Maker, Monday, 1 October 2012 15:22 (thirteen years ago)

Pelt guys are super-nice. If you get a chance to see Mike Gangloff play solo (or with Black Twig Pickers guys in any format) do so, it is great. I live in Virginia, where there is a lot of nonsense passing as old-timey and bluegrass music, but Mike plays a variety of it that is so good! He plays fiddle and banjo tunes in alternate tunings that somehow make the old songs and originals he writes sound so much fuller and more dynamic (helps that he has broad interests beyond old-time and bluegrass music of course). He also goes around rural Virginia and W. Virginia learning them from families/musicians who learned them from others, i.e., tries to go right to the source of the songs. Tells lots of great stories to go along with them too.

grandavis, Monday, 1 October 2012 15:45 (thirteen years ago)

It's back online btw

grandavis, Monday, 1 October 2012 18:03 (thirteen years ago)

it's back! that pelt thing is pretty great.

tylerw, Monday, 1 October 2012 18:04 (thirteen years ago)

seven months pass...

what's up with these guys?

j., Tuesday, 14 May 2013 06:17 (twelve years ago)

yeah, after being one of the more reliably updated sites, they seem to be kinda drifting this year.

tylerw, Tuesday, 14 May 2013 14:17 (twelve years ago)

This bums me out, and has me a little worried that it is just going to go away. Would be incredibly sad for me. Seems like they had developed a new schedule somewhat, which was maybe more like 6 reviews a week, but not sure there is any pattern at all any more.

grandavis, Tuesday, 14 May 2013 14:42 (twelve years ago)

yeah would be a bummer...crazy that i've been checking them out pretty much daily for close to a decade now!

tylerw, Tuesday, 14 May 2013 15:23 (twelve years ago)

love dusted, would hate to see them go

controversial vegan pregnancy (contenderizer), Tuesday, 14 May 2013 15:41 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, me too (in re a decade or so of excellent reviews/features). I would love to hear the "behind the scenes" story of how that site works, because the writing is almost universally good to great (though a real head scratcher has appeared a few times) but surely no one is getting paid (zero adds etc.) The labor of love aspect must run high there, but still, to have kept up the pace they have with (seemingly) no financial reward and such a high quality is truly something to marvel at. It is just so atypical of the internet generally that I can't believe it is real sometimes.

grandavis, Tuesday, 14 May 2013 15:52 (twelve years ago)

one month passes...

so any news? the updates seem to be getting further and further apart. going to be sad if this is falling apart after such a good run.

i kant believe it's not buffon (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 14 June 2013 14:48 (twelve years ago)

There was a week or two there where there were regular reviews again. Then nothing ....

grandavis, Friday, 14 June 2013 15:28 (twelve years ago)

Was just wondering this myself. It's been a good source of reviews for some time now, hope this is just a vacation.

henry s, Friday, 14 June 2013 17:18 (twelve years ago)

Good riddance. I'll miss the Listed feature though.

Jimmywine Dyspeptic, Friday, 14 June 2013 17:39 (twelve years ago)

?

high inerja (seandalai), Friday, 14 June 2013 17:42 (twelve years ago)

Any reason?

grandavis, Friday, 14 June 2013 17:42 (twelve years ago)

Dusted is ace, hope it pulls through.

high inerja (seandalai), Friday, 14 June 2013 17:48 (twelve years ago)

that site is like a ghost town now. bummer. it was one of the best

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 26 June 2013 18:53 (twelve years ago)

Is anyone from that site an ILMer? I think Mosurock was at some point but is long gone, just would love to hear something one way or the other. Big bummer for sure to me though. Can't understand any sentiments of "good riddance" being lobbed their way unless you were on the receiving end of a "Still Single" beat down or got turned down as a reviewer or something.

grandavis, Wednesday, 26 June 2013 18:59 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, I'd really like to hear. I mean, I'm assuming it's pretty much done at this point, but it'd be nice to hear an inside story.

i kant believe it's not buffon (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 26 June 2013 19:03 (twelve years ago)

Sad news if this is the end. They always covered a wide / diverse range of music pretty well IMO.

millmeister, Wednesday, 26 June 2013 21:17 (twelve years ago)

So they updated their chart today, but still no new reviews or anything else. Seems like someone is still investing some energy in it.

i kant believe it's not buffon (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 27 June 2013 13:46 (twelve years ago)

https://twitter.com/FloatingHatchet/status/349863165254832128

dschinghis kraan (NickB), Thursday, 27 June 2013 13:57 (twelve years ago)

Good news!

10zing blogay (seandalai), Thursday, 27 June 2013 13:57 (twelve years ago)

Hah, I know how that "real life" thing goes. Great news on both fronts!

grandavis, Thursday, 27 June 2013 14:23 (twelve years ago)

huzzah!

tylerw, Thursday, 27 June 2013 14:33 (twelve years ago)

Dusted is taking an extended break. We will return in late July.

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 10 July 2013 16:38 (twelve years ago)

three weeks pass...

they're back!

reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 5 August 2013 17:09 (twelve years ago)

Yes!

grandavis, Monday, 5 August 2013 17:25 (twelve years ago)

one month passes...

2 weeks since last new reviews

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 19 September 2013 16:34 (twelve years ago)

cmon guyz we miss u

j., Thursday, 19 September 2013 16:35 (twelve years ago)

two weeks pass...

what happened to these guys? updates gone sporadic in the past few months and the site won't load for me today. come back, dusted!

wmlynch, Friday, 4 October 2013 17:12 (twelve years ago)

Weird, was just coming here to post that the site is completely down.

Immediate Follower (NA), Friday, 4 October 2013 17:14 (twelve years ago)

yeah I found that earlier, Had found they had a review of the Afflicted Man lp that's just been officially reissued so wanted to read it. Either that or the bootleg complete recordings from 2007 & I couldn't get it to load.

Stevolende, Friday, 4 October 2013 18:13 (twelve years ago)

one month passes...

http://dustedmagazine.tumblr.com/

j., Monday, 2 December 2013 03:42 (twelve years ago)

rip dusted, i guess.

Daniel, Esq 2, Monday, 2 December 2013 04:02 (twelve years ago)

one month passes...

Explanation from Otis himself, which seems to be good news generally:

http://dustedmagazine.tumblr.com/post/72098885772/what-happened-to-dusted#

grandavis, Friday, 3 January 2014 18:06 (twelve years ago)

backward compatibility is a bitch

j., Friday, 3 January 2014 18:09 (twelve years ago)

Yep

grandavis, Friday, 3 January 2014 18:14 (twelve years ago)

ha i've always liked that dusted looked pretty much exactly the same for a decade.

tylerw, Friday, 3 January 2014 18:15 (twelve years ago)

five months pass...

http://dustedmagazine.tumblr.com/post/87812734554/the-dusted-in-exile-first-and-maybe-last-mid-year

hard to say things have been smooth sailing over there but i like the sound of this

We are more of a collective than we used to be, so these discussions can go on for some time and often take unexpected turns. An idea surfaced: What if we each nominate one or two records as favorites and then have someone else on staff review them? Sort of like a Secret Santa exchange, except not secret and not very Santa-ish (i.e. no presents). Surprisingly, the concept gained traction, and we all kicked in ideas. A week or so later, I printed all of the recommended albums out in large type, cut them into strips and randomly drew names from a bowl to assign them to writers. There were a few rules. No one could review his or her own suggestion. No one could be assigned a record he or she had already reviewed for Dusted in Exile. You were not allowed to refuse a record because it was outside your comfort zone, which was, after all, sort of the point. We loaded up promos into a Dropbox and started exchanging records.

We ran into the usual problems. Some people didn’t like their assignments. A few, it turned out, didn’t really understand the concept and weren’t as on board as we thought they were. But mostly, it was a pretty interesting experience. It spared us from writing at least once about our favorite records. (I almost always hate my No. 1 a little by year end, just because I’ve had to write about it so many times.) It got us out of our ruts. It fostered more communication between writers, who are, god knows, often pretty isolated from each other. And maybe most importantly, it turned us on to new music, which is, after all, why most of us got into music writing in the first place. It certainly wasn’t the money.

j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 19:31 (eleven years ago)

oh just go away already

Jimmywine Dyspeptic, Thursday, 5 June 2014 01:22 (eleven years ago)

two years pass...

http://dustedmagazine.tumblr.com/post/156939917240/want-to-write-for-dusted

j., Thursday, 9 February 2017 04:03 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.