Other examples? Lou Reed circa New York struck me the same way. Dylan more than once.
― Martin Skidmore, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― J Blount, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
i think what it comes down to is that labels and fans alike need a way to cope with these overlong careers, to make each moment special or otherwise admit to the futility of it all; after a couple dozen albums of widely varying quality, the highest compliment one can pay is "return to form". and it seems the longer these careers go, it gets harder to agree on which is which. my days on the SY and EC newsgroups in particular are peppered with memories of threads wherein every new product was alternately praised the best since _____ or reviled as the last fucking straw in a long line of disappointments. and of course, it's both. so far WIWC sounds roughly on par with Brutal Youth simply because it annoys me for the same reasons, and excites me for the same reasons.
― al, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andy, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave q, Saturday, 4 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
earthling was great
actually cliche aside, "return to form" is an amazingly stupid and destructive way of talking abt how anyone's work works anyway (eg what was exciting abt [xx] is that you didn't know what they were going to do next but you kind of knew you'd love it => now here's their new thing and HOORAH it's quite like something they did a long time ago WTF!)
agitate to get sports-talk out of music!
― mark s, Saturday, 4 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 27 May 2006 20:52 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Saturday, 27 May 2006 20:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 27 May 2006 20:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 27 May 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)
― kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Saturday, 27 May 2006 22:46 (nineteen years ago)