1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000
Any good?
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 23:35 (seventeen years ago)
60 - meh 70 - excellent 80 - also excellent 90 - good 00 - middling
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 23:39 (seventeen years ago)
i only remember '90 and '00, and '90 is sort of a nostalgia blur. 2000 sucked but it was 1776 next to 2001.
― omar little, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 23:40 (seventeen years ago)
I first started paying conscious attention to music in 1990 but only the Cocteau Twins "Heaven Or Las Vegas" comes into mind as a good album from that year and i discovered it much later.
Knebworth 1990 - what sort of deal was that about?
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 23:41 (seventeen years ago)
80: bad
90: bad
2000: dont' remember for some reason. probably bad
― akm, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 23:59 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.plong.com/MusicCatalog%5CL%5CLFO%20-%20Frequencies%5CLFO%20-%20Frequencies.jpg
― blueski, Thursday, 10 April 2008 00:05 (seventeen years ago)
sorry that was '91, but i just want to troll nextgrozart
― blueski, Thursday, 10 April 2008 00:07 (seventeen years ago)
60 - Can't tell 70 - Dud 80 - Classic 90 - Classic 00 - Classic
― daavid, Thursday, 10 April 2008 01:34 (seventeen years ago)
I was about to say that I don't mind "Frequency" but then I realised I meant the Altern-8 track. LFO's self-titled track was one of the first tunes I remember liking.
― the next grozart, Thursday, 10 April 2008 07:40 (seventeen years ago)
Most of them are not. 1980 certainly contained a lot of great music, 1970 also had its moments in early prog. But generally, no.
In the 60s, everything before 1963 was rather weak. 1970 had some OK prog, but otherwise nothing like what would follow just a few years later. 1980 was actually a great year even though 1981-83 would be even greater. 1990 was really bad and 2000 was the weakest year of the oughties so far.
― Geir Hongro, Thursday, 10 April 2008 08:26 (seventeen years ago)
70 - Dud
-- daavid,
'kin ell
http://rateyourmusic.com/charts/top/album/1970
― Frogman Henry, Thursday, 10 April 2008 08:28 (seventeen years ago)
just look at #42 eg
― Frogman Henry, Thursday, 10 April 2008 08:33 (seventeen years ago)
'70 may not have been dud, but was it as good as '69, '68 or '67? Likewise with '80. Not dud, but surely '79, '78 and '77 were better.
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 10 April 2008 09:39 (seventeen years ago)
1960 - wasn't here 1970 - wet and gloomy 1980 - bit listless 1990 - not bad 2000 - depressing
That's that, then.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 10 April 2008 10:06 (seventeen years ago)
Likewise with '80. Not dud, but surely '79, '78 and '77 were better.
Looking at my Top 60 of 1980 at RYM, most of the best albums from 1980 were pointing forward towards 1981-82 rather than a continuation of 78-79. Some really good early synthpop albums there.
― Geir Hongro, Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:23 (seventeen years ago)
2000 was awesome for me, one of my best years ever. 1990, god knows.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:25 (seventeen years ago)
Oh we're talking music, aren't we? I thought this was on ILE. 2000 was rubbish, then.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:26 (seventeen years ago)
Musically:
1960 - bleurgh 1970 - can't find my way home 1980 - everything must change 1990 - purple flashing 2000 - hmm
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:29 (seventeen years ago)
the whole trying to find patterns in year numbers thing is lame
― blueski, Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:37 (seventeen years ago)
What is certain is that, from a popular music history kind of view, no year ending in 0 can be said to mark the beginnig of the following decade to much extent. The trends that were typical of the various decades usually either started at the end of the decade before, or mostly in years ending with 1, 2 or 3.
― Geir Hongro, Thursday, 10 April 2008 12:47 (seventeen years ago)
Q.E.D.
― Frogman Henry, Thursday, 10 April 2008 12:52 (seventeen years ago)
― David R., Thursday, 10 April 2008 13:32 (seventeen years ago)
Because everyone knows it happens in 7s!
1957 - don't knock ze rock! 1967 - far out! 1977 - oi oi! 1987 - weeeeeeowwweeeeee 1997 - solid third album by spiritualized 2007 - bzyang sans groink
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 10 April 2008 13:37 (seventeen years ago)
Only years that are prime numbers are good.
Except for 1970, which was the greatest year EVAH
― Myonga Vön Bontee, Thursday, 10 April 2008 14:04 (seventeen years ago)
Deep Purple weren't all that.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 10 April 2008 14:07 (seventeen years ago)
Never like Dana much either
― Tom D., Thursday, 10 April 2008 14:10 (seventeen years ago)
otoh Freda Payne
― blueski, Thursday, 10 April 2008 14:20 (seventeen years ago)
The Pipkins were moderately underrated.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 10 April 2008 14:44 (seventeen years ago)
'70 was awesome, based on looking at that list. Holy shit
― Bill Magill, Thursday, 10 April 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
-- Myonga Vön Bontee, Thursday, 10 April 2008 14:04 (5 hours ago) Link
I'd say it's the opposite (almost):
Years that are prime numbers: C/D
― daavid, Thursday, 10 April 2008 20:10 (seventeen years ago)
Ah, maybe so - but then it's interesting to see if there are correlations isn't it? Years ending in 7 tend to get lionised, but maybe the reason for that is that people start thinking "Fucking hell, we're three quarters of the way through the decade and we need something that's going to blow peoples' minds away".
Whereas years ending in 0 tend to be a bit unsure of themselves - maybe people are a bit frightened of not knowing what's to come and also wary of doing something that sounds like it's fromt he previous decade, and so bold, brash statements don't tend to see the light of day in those years on the whole.
― the next grozart, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:15 (seventeen years ago)
unsurprisingly i don't agree with any of that. people don't make more effort just because of what point of a decade they're in.
― blueski, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:54 (seventeen years ago)
it sounds more like a correlation among how music journalists might think rather than actual musicians.
Well everything's relative of course.
― the next grozart, Saturday, 12 April 2008 04:00 (seventeen years ago)
1960 - Breakthrough for Soul on pop charts as post-payola settles:
Sam Cooke's Chain Gang and Wonderful World Drifters' Magic Moment and Save the Last Dance Joe Jones' You Talk Too Much Miracles' Shop Around Billy Bland's Let the Little Girl Dance Miracles' Shop Around Ray Charles' Georgia On My Mind Shirelles' Will You Love Me Tomorrow
― PappaWheelie V, Saturday, 12 April 2008 04:42 (seventeen years ago)