NIN
― oscar, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 22:21 (seventeen years ago)
Tori Amos
― oscar, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 22:29 (seventeen years ago)
Madonna--Live Nation Eagles--Wal-Mart exclusive. Made a deal which I believe was a flat 30 million, pressed 3 million CDs and Wal-Mart got 'em, one-way. Guess the Saul Williams thing is still digital-only 'til July 8. CD then.
― ellaguru, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 22:33 (seventeen years ago)
oh! i didn't know the Saul Williams was going to CD at all, that's nice
― stephen, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 22:44 (seventeen years ago)
jamiroquai
― oscar, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 23:21 (seventeen years ago)
jay-z
― The Reverend, Thursday, 12 June 2008 04:39 (seventeen years ago)
Juliana Hatfield. Long before Radiohead.
― SeekAltRoute, Thursday, 12 June 2008 04:59 (seventeen years ago)
Marillion, also long before Radiohead.
― Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 12 June 2008 11:53 (seventeen years ago)
Einsturzende Neubauten, for the past 6 years.
― aldo, Thursday, 12 June 2008 11:58 (seventeen years ago)
simply red did this ages ago didn't they (and wasn't there some stories that the band were even in the process of re-recording all the classic albums so that they could release their own versions ?)
― mark e, Thursday, 12 June 2008 12:31 (seventeen years ago)
my life story to thread...
― CharlieNo4, Thursday, 12 June 2008 12:33 (seventeen years ago)
The Futureheads
― Mark G, Thursday, 12 June 2008 12:35 (seventeen years ago)
^^^^^^^
― stephen, Thursday, 12 June 2008 18:58 (seventeen years ago)
Journey, Bryan Adams, potentially AC/DC -- Wal-Mart exclusively. Have gone where the money is, where white-trash US shops for cheap physical goods. Good strategic move, has worked for all who chose it.
I'm only surprised more modern country artists haven't adopted the Wal-Mart only strategy.
― Gorge, Thursday, 12 June 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
Mint Condition is indie, although i guess they have some deal with Wal-Mart too.
― Jordan, Thursday, 12 June 2008 19:45 (seventeen years ago)
Journey actually charted this week. They're kicking themselves over not doing the Wal-Mart thing sooner since their last album apparently only sold about 150 copies.
― Gorge, Thursday, 12 June 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
This would seem to make the Wal-Mart strategy direct anti-matter to the Radiohead ploy.
― Gorge, Thursday, 12 June 2008 19:52 (seventeen years ago)
Michelle Shocked did it a while ago, too.
― Hideous Lump, Friday, 13 June 2008 03:01 (seventeen years ago)
Not at all - both involve leaving long-time major labels for different marketing strategies. The Einsturzende and Hatfield models are not the same as the Radiohead model either, Reznor has done three different variations on it now - lots of people are trying lots of different things, and the Wal-Mart one is one of them that happens to be working for people.
Early entry: Les "Fru1tbat" Carter (of the By Then Stoppable Sex Machine) started selling EPs as shareware back in 1998: he'd put up mp3s of the songs for free downloading, if you liked 'em (or felt generally charitable) you could send him a couple of quid, and when he'd collected enough to press 500, he got a run printed and posted them out. He modified the system later on to raise pressing costs for albums, where the first x number to pre-order the CD got a bonus CD-R of otherwise not-to-be-released songs and versions.
― energy flash gordon, Friday, 13 June 2008 03:30 (seventeen years ago)
hush energy flash you're ruining that handy very scientific "wal mart ppl are dumb hicks!" theory
― J0hn D., Friday, 13 June 2008 03:36 (seventeen years ago)
anyone waiting for juliana hatfield's music to get supremely bold and adventurous must have been sorely disappointed. i like her and all, but she was never working with limitless creative potential.
― Charlie Howard, Friday, 13 June 2008 04:14 (seventeen years ago)
Hanson, iirc
― Hurting 2, Friday, 13 June 2008 04:19 (seventeen years ago)
The Beatles
― Hurting 2, Friday, 13 June 2008 04:20 (seventeen years ago)
^^ yeah, free Christmas 45s every year to their "subscriber base"!
another old-school direct-marketing wrinkle: Sub Pop Singles Club and similar
― energy flash gordon, Friday, 13 June 2008 04:42 (seventeen years ago)
Paul McCartney, well, actually.
But expect nobody to follow Radiohead's exact example. I believe there were no more than 10 per cent or something out of the downloaders who chose to pay anything for their album at all. This was rectified a bit when a lot of those people went out and bought it on its first day in the shops, making it go #1 in spite of having been freely available for months.
― Geir Hongro, Friday, 13 June 2008 09:32 (seventeen years ago)
Well, even leaving the purchase of the XL records version, they still earned more than they would have, more due to Radiohead's fans being the sort of people to atually pay for the stuff they get.
If it had been Babyshambles fans, they'd have earned exactly nowt.
Because RHead fans have more money, obv.
― Mark G, Friday, 13 June 2008 09:45 (seventeen years ago)