for when you're scrolling down your last.fm chart and think "when the fuck did i have the time to listen to x amount of songs by x"
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 16 July 2008 08:36 (seventeen years ago)
Menomena 88
Beach House 136
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 16 July 2008 08:37 (seventeen years ago)
Lucky Soul 63
Jack Blanchard & Misty Morgan 87
― electricsound, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 08:38 (seventeen years ago)
Scouting for Girls 306
― Raw Patrick, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 10:20 (seventeen years ago)
Chill out folks. They're updating their software and for the last week or two things have been double- or triple-counted. Apparently they'll be smoothed out to correct numbers when the current beta site goes live.
― mitya, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 10:26 (seventeen years ago)
Air France 183
― poortheatre, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 11:21 (seventeen years ago)
k-os 170
Tiny Tim 41
Meck 32
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 11:28 (seventeen years ago)
jordan what is your last.fm?
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 11:39 (seventeen years ago)
-- J0rdan S., Wednesday, 16 July 2008 09:37 (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link
Hah, remember when last.fm tried to make these dudes succesful?
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 11:54 (seventeen years ago)
trans am: 534 plays.
don't get me wrong. i love trans am. i'm just constantly surprised by how *much* i love trans am.
next is new order (380), which doesn't surprise me at all.
other surprises: yo la tengo (28). i don't ever remember listening to yo la tengo.
soft cell (23). is that all? i listen to soft cell all the time. don't i?
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 12:04 (seventeen years ago)
Counting the number of tracks you listen to isn't a very accurate way of measuring how much you listen to something.
― Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 12:07 (seventeen years ago)
last fm beta is crap http://beta.last.fm/user/trailofgybe
― Herman G. Neuname, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 12:12 (seventeen years ago)
Counting the number of tracks you listen to isn't a very accurate way of measuring how much you listen to something
if you're as anal about last.fm as me, it is.
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 12:14 (seventeen years ago)
How come? 15 minutes of Naked City counts for a day's worth of William Basinski on a straight track count.
― Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 12:20 (seventeen years ago)
hmmmm. qualitative scrobbling. weighted tracks. you're on to something :)
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 12:22 (seventeen years ago)
(but really: i'm sure i've listened to a lot more soft cell albums -- of several tracks each -- than that 23 would suggest.)
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 12:23 (seventeen years ago)
No Age - 450ish
I think this is accounted for by acquiring Weirdo Rippers just after I signed up, and then obv Nouns coming out. I do love 'em but it's a little strange.
Mine's www.last.fm/cmjones83 btw. I can't get on at work to check the exact stats.
― Chris in Belfast, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:01 (seventeen years ago)
i support a system that tracks listening time instead of song counts. stockhausen is still in my top artists lists because of two listens to a 90+ track CD
― Dominique, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)
yeah every time i put glenn gould on he rockets up my top artists list cuz there are so many partitas and they're so short.
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:46 (seventeen years ago)
Last.fm Normaliser to the rescue! Just put in your username, and it will rank your last.fm user chart according to average song length.
― Neil S, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:51 (seventeen years ago)
oh, that's good. trans am and new order still #1 and #2 but jesu ROCKET up there to #3 and the pixies plummet 14 places to ... </alan freeman>
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:53 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, goodbye Minutemen for my artist chart!
― Neil S, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
herman, yours is v interesting :)
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:56 (seventeen years ago)
wow!
original top 10 artists 1 Claude Debussy 2 Glenn Gould 3 Harry Nilsson 4 Randy Newman 5 The Beach Boys 6 Steve Reich 7 Eva Quartet 8 Emmylou Harris 9 Pom Pom 10 Fleetwood Mac
normalized top 10: 1. Steve Reich 2. Claude Debussy 3. Glenn Gould 4. Ricardo Villalobos 5. Ludwig van Beethoven 6. John Coltrane 7. Harry Nilsson 8. Maurice Ravel 9. Meshuggah 10. Randy Newman
― Dominique, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:57 (seventeen years ago)
villalobos becomes my no 1!
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:59 (seventeen years ago)
fizheuer zieheuer will do that
― mitya, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 16:06 (seventeen years ago)
A lot of these chartings usually benefit bands that have songs short enough to count for last.fm but can log in 3 or 4 times more songs than even 3-minute-and-20-second pop artists.
Brainiac and Mountain Goats, for example, happen to highly benefit from this (on my playlists) because avg. song length is around 2-minutes-and-something.
― Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
Steve Reich's a big beneficiary for me too, up 29 places to 15th. Probably not fair, since my Music for 18 Musicians is split into individual tracks for each movement.
Poor Maher Shalal Hash Baz, down 31 places.
― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
-- lex pretend, Wednesday, July 16, 2008 6:39 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Link
http://www.last.fm/user/sargnt88/
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 16 July 2008 16:34 (seventeen years ago)
Panda Bear 97
^lol weed
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 16 July 2008 16:36 (seventeen years ago)
You share some artists in common, including Belle and Sebastian, Los Campesinos!, Clipse, The Hold Steady, and Ghostface.
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 16:39 (seventeen years ago)
The sound on my laptop is all messed up so I never use my last.fm :(
― RabiesAngentleman, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 16:40 (seventeen years ago)
sounds about right
i think last.fm beta is kinda cool-- my big issue with it mostly is that it cuts off artists @ 15 so you kind of get confined to displaying someone you might've listened to a lot 3 years ago (lol fiery furnaces for me). i do think it's cool that they added tabs for 3 month/6 month/12 month becasue thats usually a better indication of what someone is listening to. putting shoutbox all the way at the bottom sux though and it reeks of them copying facebook.
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 16 July 2008 16:43 (seventeen years ago)
Of Monteal 43
Slowdive 29
Blur 20
Art Brut 17 <--WAHT??? Wehn?
― DavidM, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 16:48 (seventeen years ago)
my big issue with it mostly is that it cuts off artists @ 15 so you kind of get confined to displaying someone you might've listened to a lot 3 years ago
What do you mean by this? Only minors can be valid artists on last.fm?
― Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:38 (seventeen years ago)
No Artist Left Behind, Oh Wait U Old LOL
― Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:39 (seventeen years ago)
hahaha no (doing my best not to post chris_hansen.jpg)
i mean that on the front page of beta, it only lists your top 15 overall artists instead of 50
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:39 (seventeen years ago)
I listen to a lot of shitty music
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:41 (seventeen years ago)
Ah ok. Point made. Yeah, just because I did that one Rolling Stones marathon last year on the pod, it's forever my "top artist". Lame.
― Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:41 (seventeen years ago)
Jordan, are we talking at least one unique play per artist/band for that Top 15? Or are multiple plays coming into account too? (Should be a combo of both.)
― Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:42 (seventeen years ago)
mackro you are confusing me
im talking about on the front of one's last.fm profile in non-beta is a list of top 50 overall artists and the beta version only lists top 15 with a link to see the full list
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:44 (seventeen years ago)
Voxtrot 109
???
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 23:01 (seventeen years ago)
no surprises on mine - getting 94 plays out of Rachel Stevens maybe - but she won't break 100 for another 6-12 months unless she miraculously gets a great new single together
― blueski, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 23:08 (seventeen years ago)
Grimly i saw mine before. Posted the normaliser link on the audiosrobbler ;)thread
― Herman G. Neuname, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 23:11 (seventeen years ago)
dont forget your http://omi.musickum.com/index.php5?
― Herman G. Neuname, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 23:13 (seventeen years ago)
Johnny Dilks & His Visitacion Valley Boys - 19
― omar little, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 23:29 (seventeen years ago)
for ages i had a BRMC song on there because i liked it but now i feel sort of weird about it
― omar little, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 23:34 (seventeen years ago)
regular 1 DJ Quik 2 Bun B 3 Freeway 4 Gorilla Zoe 5 UGK 5 The-Dream 7 Beanie Sigel 8 Big L 9 Gregory Isaacs 10 Womack&Womack
normalized 1. DJ Quik 2. Bun B 3. Freeway 4. Beanie Sigel + 3 5. Theo Parrish + 20 6. Big L + 2 7. Quiet Village + 6 8. Gregory Isaacs + 1 9. Trae + 3 10. Larry Heard + 20
This is for the year, for some reason it cant normalize 'all time' the first wtf i notice is Quiet Village
― deej, Thursday, 17 July 2008 01:08 (seventeen years ago)
Top Artists in the last 3 months (see more) Voice of the Seven Woods 51
i remember listening to the new ep once? maybe twice? ok
― jergins, Thursday, 17 July 2008 02:22 (seventeen years ago)
ya mine didn't normalize overall either so this is 12 month
regular 1. lil wayne 2. no age 3. vampire weekend 4. los campesinos! 5. jay-z 6. spoon 7. the-dream 8. hot chip 9. ghostface 10. jens lekman
normalized 1. lil wayne 2. hot chip 3. studio (+19) 4. jay-z 5. vampire weekend 6. kanye west 7. los campesinos 8. spoon 9. jens lekman 10. ghostface
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 17 July 2008 02:27 (seventeen years ago)
another cool think about last.fm beta: the rolling 7 days chart that updates automatically instead of every sunday/monday
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 17 July 2008 02:31 (seventeen years ago)
i can only assume the reason herman hasn't already posted a response going WTF BRING ME BACK MY WEEKLY CHARTS NOW is because he exploded with rage when he read that.
i have to say, though: i prefer the new design. sorry, dude.
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 17 July 2008 10:56 (seventeen years ago)
1. Stars of the Lid 1 173 1,378 - 2. Bonnie 'Prince' Billy 2 155 579 - 3. Olivier Messiaen 10 55 417 + 7 4. Nurse With Wound 22 35 393 + 18 5. Van der Graaf Generator 15 50 375 + 10 6. Steely Dan 3 76 345 - 3 7. Roxy Music 4 71 316 - 3 8. Boards of Canada 10 55 272 + 2 9. Aphex Twin 13 54 261 + 4 10. Swans
This wrings truer somehow
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 17 July 2008 10:59 (seventeen years ago)
morton feldman goes up nineteen spots when I use the normalizer - ha! why doesn't last.fm have this kind of ranking already? it makes way more sense.
― original bgm, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:52 (seventeen years ago)
I guess the beta went live as the new regular version? wow it is slow.
― Euler, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:57 (seventeen years ago)
it's also managed to inexplicably change half my artist and song counts. and it's uglier.
― lex pretend, Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
shit is like breaking my internet
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
i wish that media player would fuck right off
― Herman G. Neuname, Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:12 (seventeen years ago)
Safari can’t open the page “http://www.last.fm/home” because the server unexpectedly dropped the connection, which sometimes occurs when the server is busy. You might be able to open the page later.
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:12 (seventeen years ago)
it may be modeled on facebook, but on a facebook page that is loaded with vampires and what kind of bread are you, and so on. I'm unimpressed.
― Euler, Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
looool what kind of bread are you
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
the shit my friends have on the pages is incredible(ly dumb)
― Euler, Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:16 (seventeen years ago)
can someone send me a "what kind of bread are you" invite?
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:19 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.last.fm/forum/21717/_/154709
# Charts do not reflect track length.Russ says: What I'm saying is that it's impractical to do at this time. It'll take a lot of effort for very little gain. But we are considering it, and I'd like to do it at some point, but there are more important things to do.
Russ says: What I'm saying is that it's impractical to do at this time. It'll take a lot of effort for very little gain. But we are considering it, and I'd like to do it at some point, but there are more important things to do.
― Herman G. Neuname, Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:20 (seventeen years ago)
this redesign doesn't seem so bad. it's not like the site wasn't ugly/slow before!
that sucks about track length. seems like a way better way to measure things to me, anyway.
― original bgm, Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:29 (seventeen years ago)
I can never believe how boring my taste seems on last.fm... I think it reflects my girlfriend's taste and my buddy who checks his email on my computer's taste more than my own, but oh well it's just some big brother shit anyway.
http://www.last.fm/user/waltwhitman
Reglar 1 Nina Simone 557 2 Merle Haggard 458 3 The Flying Burrito Brothers 442 4 T. Rex 439 5 The Sir Douglas Quintet 432 6 Al Green 423 7 Drakkar Sauna 365 8 Sun City Girls 362 9 Emmylou Harris 320 10 Royal Trux 312
Normlized
1 Nina Simone 2 Al Green + 4 3 The Flying Burrito Brothers 4 The Sir Douglas Quintet + 1 5 Parliament + 12 6 Merle Haggard - 4 7 Drakkar Sauna 8 T. Rex - 4 9 Royal Trux+ 1 10 Alice Coltrane + 29
― people explosion, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:12 (seventeen years ago)
I think it reflects my girlfriend's taste
I know what you mean. Iron & Wine is in my top 10.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:25 (seventeen years ago)
Actually, has Last.fm made it any easier to scrobble what you listen to on your iPod? When the site first debuted, you had to sync your iPod to your computer before you listened to anything on your iTunes or else your iPod plays wouldn't register, and so I basically said eff that, because I didn't want to be that anal about it. But so now Last.fm really only shows the stuff I listen to at home, which I'd wager is no more than 20-30% of my total music-listening.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:29 (seventeen years ago)
Artist count: 1 Fleetwood Mac 303 2 Further 224 3 My Bloody Valentine 216 4 Chromatics 213 5 Sucosi 204 6 The Velvet Underground 192 7 Boredoms 175 8 John Fahey 166 9 Glass Candy 152 10 LCD Soundsystem 151 11 Deerhoof 146 12 Daft Punk 144 13 Richard Thompson 140 13 Cibelle 140
Normalized: 1. Boredoms 2. Fleetwood Mac 3. LCD Soundsystem 4. Further 5. The Velvet Underground 6. Daft Punk 7. My Bloody Valentine 8. John Fahey 9. Glass Candy 10. Cibelle 11. Richard Thompson 12. Guitar 13. Brian Eno 14. Broker/Dealer
― Steve Shasta, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:32 (seventeen years ago)
jaymc, yes, scrobbling ipods works better than it ever has, though it's not perfect. DL the new client and it'll prompt you
― jergins, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:35 (seventeen years ago)
1 The Rolling Stones 418 2 Brainiac 333 3 Unwound 321 4 Radiohead 267 5 Super Furry Animals 225 6 Pinback 168 7 Chicago 166 8 Polvo 131 9 Neon Neon 122 10 椎名林檎 (Ringo Shiina) 116
― Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 17 July 2008 23:42 (seventeen years ago)
Actually, has Last.fm made it any easier to scrobble what you listen to on your iPod?
i still use iScrobbler on the mac because when i signed up for last.fm there was no support whatsoever for manually managed iPods in the official client. that might have changed, but i doubt i'll go back. seriously: if you've got a mac, iScrobbler rules -- the iPhone workaround is a little clunky at the moment (you have to fool it into thinking there's another iPod attached or it won't scrobble yr iPhone plays) but i'm confident that'll be fixed before too long.
― grimly fiendish, Friday, 18 July 2008 07:55 (seventeen years ago)
i've used iScrobbler for years now. occasionally there's a hiccup, but no more so than with anything else.
can't comment on iPhone 'cause i live in Russia one of the only two countries in the fucking world where Apple won't sell the phone legally!!!!!!!
sorry. i'm calm again.
― mitya, Friday, 18 July 2008 09:29 (seventeen years ago)
I have a PC and use iSproggler because it syns my iPod plays without a hitch. You do have to sync before listening to anything on iTunes though, whereas the last.fm client (thoughh extremely erratic) doesn't have this problem. Until the client scrobbles 100% of the time though, I'm sticking with iSproggler.
― Chris in Belfast, Friday, 18 July 2008 10:20 (seventeen years ago)