― doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Judd Nelson, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
(unless of course you're considering all major label - and most indie label - artists businessmen.)
― jess, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
i mean, it's strange, i'm writing for all of these magazines now and i'm not really caring about the music i.n.d.u.s.t.r.y. but people are reacting very oddly to me.
for me, all i want to do is write about the music that i love.
london is odd. london is people on cellphones desperate to impress others on cellphones. it's sad.
― stevie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
there are some small bitter fucked up folks in that industry. i steer clear. i'm tired of people attacking me or my friends. like i said, i'm just learning a new skill. i'm writing my book and working on some other projects. i've got an outsiders view of it and it's ego led and fucked up. i got called a fake a and r guy from this one fucktwit just cause i was talking about bands. you can't love music, it seems.
Start a blog.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nick Southall, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I do. I like being perfectly flawed that way.
fuck, this montgolfiers album is beautiful.
― paul, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
it's just the way that it happens.
do you feel like an addict wondering around the streets in seven sisters?
if you do - your a writer. you would be fucking around with those words until they are beautiful. and then showing them off.
if you don't. that's cool.
see?
i'm in love with my book. my articles are little whores, though. i send them out to get fucked and i just try to learn as much as i can from them.
you have to be as honest as you possibly can.
you have to deal with yourself as honestly as you possibly can.
you have to have a relationship whereas people know that is just what and who you are about.
you have to understand that you will fail.
you have to understand you will be successful.
my wife is amazing. very cool that way.
least that is what i think will happen.
Just because one is a writer? I don't see it that way.
could be the self-help like posts
could be thinking that poptones is a good label
could be that he posts too many threads about stuff i dont know
WHY?WHY??WHY???
― Chupa-Cabras, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Well you wouldn't, would you Ned? It's about time you realized that your good nature and surfeit of pals are the only things standing between you and literary genius. That and your unfortunate ability to string a sentence together in english.
― The Actual Mr. Jones, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I haven't quite adjusted to using the winky face yet.
― A Nairn, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
One day there will be no professional music journalists, no more writing ego fuelling swill dismissing other peoples hard work and there will be much more and much better music in the world.
Hey kids if you ever find yourself wanting to be a music journalist - kill yourself. Or at least do something useful like marketing instead.
― Alexander Blair, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
but being bully you would not really get that, would you? bullies operate on the weak - they push and fuck people around and other people are afraid to go against them. it's all a sense of false security.
and your posts are nothing like the unprovoked attacks that i've come across myself already. i used to get upset by people like you, then, i realised, in england, there are thousands of you, and you are hardly unique or thought provoking. you are a migraine, sir.
ps. im not a music industry writer. i'm a novelist trying to learn how to write in a magazine style. i'm repeating myself because you don't seem to get it.
― doomie, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
the funnniest thing about threads like this is the extent to which contributors will paint everyone and all about them as horrifically childish stereotypes. shades of grey, people. shades of grey.
this is not a diss of doomie, btw.
― stevie, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
and you shouldn't see the stasis of your magazine writing career in terms of some invisible evil deity frustrating your dreams, because you'll never get anywhere with that attitude (it probably better suits a novelist). i don't know, before i started getting paid to write, i always felt like i should be doing it for a living, but i never felt the magazine industry owed me a career, and knew that a large amount of luck would be involved in my getting anywhere. its dangerous to invest everything of yourself in such an elusive (and often ultimately unsatisfying) goal.
and if you perceive the discursive and sarcastic responses here in terms of unprovoked attacks on your person, then you probably shouldn't get involved in magazine journalism, because its almost a career prerequisite to be able to withstand the sarcasm, jibes and snipes of all you work with. you need to develop a thicker skin and a more realistic (dare i say sympathetic) perception of events, otherwise you're just going to end up frustrated and bitter.
but your advice is spot on.
magazine writing? it can go away tomorrow and i shan't be bothered.
on an unrelated note, anyone noticed how smoothly the yeah yeah yeahs ep and the liliput compilation play into one another?
And, hey, the industry. Here's an analogy. My dad works on a production line, putting the roofs (or rooves, depending) on John Deere cabs. Now, he gets paid the same if he does one cab a day or fifty cabs a day. However, because he was brought up to believe in the value of hard work, he works as well as he can. Some other guy there does as little as possible, because he knows he's getting paid just the same. Now, that's not the evil evil industry's fault, is it now?
― Judd Nelson, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
and whatever judd nelson, am i'm supposed to really take you seriously?
It's trying to get ideas across in a limited amount of space.
It's difficult and curiously enough the hardest writing is when you don't like the band. I never end up hating stuff that I see. Just the bands where you don't feel anything.
and Ronan, music journalism can be good fun.
But following my dance epiphany I can't think of anything I'd rather do.
― DG, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
until i reminded him that he was 25. 5 years too late.
the music journalism is fun. but i somehow got unwittingly involved with the music industry. and they ripped me apart on another internet board. i'm over it but it was shocking how bitter and mean people can get....but steer clear of that ronan, and it's really good fun. that's what i do, usually.
the book is more important to me and the screenplay for the short film....it's characters, character writing, music writing presents an unique set of problems, how to describe a sound, without referencing bands, in a short space of words.
i liked the ed harcourt ep. not the album much....
In Hot Press, the Irish answer to NME you substitute "remarkable". For a band who have been around as long as REM, it's REMARKABLE that their music still remains remarkably IMPORTANT.
THIS WILL BE YOUR FAVOURITE NEW BAND.
And overuse of remarkable suggests a bunch of scientists in white coats watching bands play in the cruelty of the fucking jungle or something, bloody ridiculous.
ah. but the majority of the times you are a monkey on the typewriter. but it is a cool buzz when it's ONE OF YOUR FAVOURITE NEW BANDS, with a REMARKABLE and LIFE-AFFIRMING album, taking you on a JAZZ ODYESSEY.
crack cocaine knives bare knuckled punch in the face whore oh no OH NO (mark s.'s phrase) zoloft
it usually gets edited out.
― Andreas Kline, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
haha in ten years from now, THE TIMES frontpage headline will be "BLAIR RETIREz = ROxOr wtf!!¡¡¿¿??"
― mark s, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Please explain how this happens. Music history is full of albums and genres that sold in the millions even as the critics uniformly ranted against these works.
― j.lu, Unrepenting Critic, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I wouldn't worry... these are the words of a man who has been buying NME and other publications for at least twenty year and has publically expressed his admiration for certain music critics in the past anyway.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― paul b, Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:56 (twenty-three years ago)