why is the new montgolfier brothers album so beautiful?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
and can anyone point me to the direction of more gnac stuff.

doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You are not talking about 17 stars, are you? That's about two years old. But that is beautiful, very beautiful even.

alex in mainhattan, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

nah. i was passed the follow up to seventeen stars. it's beautiful. it can make me cry. the songs about relationship breakdown, it's not supernova, it's mike leigh like observations on people. it is genius. wait until it is released.

doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it's called the world is flat.

song titles are:

1. 255 Newbury

2. The understudy

3. Selfish

4. The World is Flat (chorus (the world is flat and I still love you)

5. The second takes forever

6. Swings and roundabouts

7. Dream in Organza

8. I couldnt sleep either

9. Think once more

10. Inches away.

It's strange, the voice is huskier, rougher than the first, the instrumentals are more forceful and cinematic. The stories are more Mike Leigh - touching, heartbreaking, simple loves, simple times.

It's more Momus/Pulp/Gnac. But definitely Montgolfiers.

doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

best lyric is "i'll find a job and settle down, turn to drink and slowly drown, in secrecy"....from The understudy.

It's an english version of American Beauty written by Mike Leigh. It strangely enough has that same feel like Thomas Newman's score to that movie. The lyrical preoccuptions are about settling down and what happens - the boredom, the pain boredom of love dissolving, the sadness of that, beautiful.

doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll miss the midnight rows, and the morning rows and the world feeling safe holding you, the conversations fueled by gin and the angry mood it gets you in and the world doesnt feel as safe holding you....

that's track 3 selfish and then goes off into this coda which sort of sounds like the love theme between donald sutherland/julie christie movie, don't look now.

doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"we will bore all of our friends with blow by blow descriptions of our slow demise....and the world won't feel safe holding you...."

some more lyrics from of selfish. it's a briliant track, alex.

doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

doomie, could you send me a tape or cd-r? i can tape/cdcopy you anything from here. and some more. send me an email.

alex in mainhattan, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

tell me doomie what did you take tonight to be in such amazing posting form?

alex in mainhattan, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

just had a bit of a shock this morning by reading some nasty comments about "friends" who really seem to hate me for doing what i do which is writing.

i have no hidden agenda. apparently that is settling in the music industry.

doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i dunno if i can tape it for you. let me think about it. cool?

but the world is flat is beautiful some lyrics:

i';ve got my point of view, the world is flat, and i still have a chance with you, god is good and life is fair and heaven is waitng and i'll meet you there......

it's so sad, alex, the narrartive is a relationship from the beginning....

"i'll be the apple of your parents eyes....."

"there is no relationship as strong as ours, we will share in half of our problems, talk our worries through, there will be no secrets i hold back from you and we can only get stronger"

and then it carries through with a heartbreakign narrative that love sometimes just fails.

doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it's that alex, unsettling people in attack and i've spent last weekend interviewing an author and hanging out with him and my wife in venice. havent written my book since then. waiting for my muse to return. it will .... it's happening tonight.

doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"you got suspicions and you say that you have got proof, that my committment is flawed and i can't speak the truth, that i am lost and that i am scared, the lawyer is waiting and so i will meet you there, they will call our number and we won't put up a fight...."

"you know i will love you until the day i die, i've got my reasons and please don't ask me why".....

it's so beautiful. it's like watching perfect love die.

doomie, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's more Momus/Pulp/Gnac. But definitely Montgolfiers.

Why, I'll sue their limey asses until they catch fire and the hot air fills their balloons and they rise high, high, high into the stratosphere and collide with satellites and plummet back to earth and meet me in a pub and have a jolly good conversation with the Jarv joining in and then I decide they're great and rip them off for my next album and then they sue me and then...

Momus, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

hahahah!

doomie, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

pwah? when is it actually released? finally, something i can look forward to.

marianna, Monday, 13 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What i want to know is, when the fuck are Poptones going to get off their arse and sign the fantastic Southall Riot!!!!!

electric sound of jim, Monday, 13 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Blimey Southall Riot!

I quite liked the first Montgolfier Brothers album.

Tom, Monday, 13 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Southall Riot are too good for Poptones.

RickyT, Monday, 13 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

new montgolfiers coming out in august!

doomie, Saturday, 25 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

two months pass...
Montgolfier in at Virgin on Import today in NYC!!!!!! ah, it's been a long wait, but well, well worth it...

Matthew Serban, Tuesday, 6 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i was going to buy this, but i downloaded 2.55 newbury and the understudy and another track, and was left underwhelmed, i'm still undecided and i'm going to download another couple before deciding, but, on the evidence, of the 2 tracks i've heard its not as lovely as seventeen stars. theres more of a 'band' feel, and a bigger production, there was feel of the sketches being filled in a bit more, and i like the sketched, open feeling of the first. as i was listening i was thinking, yes, this is a band, people playing instruments. with the first, i kind of forgot there were people playing instruments and doing things, and i was thinking about Todmorden Garden Centre...

they are probably quite good songs, but when high standards are set, it can be difficult to maintain, and comparisons to earlier work are inevitable.

gareth, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

where is my tape mr gareth

mark s, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i have gone one better, mr sinkah! there is a cdr! but it is still in yorkshire, will get it when i go back next.

nalini gave me the sinclair piece last night, thanks mark - i shall read this over the w/e

gareth, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Liked the review of Sage Francis in this weeks NME, doomie.

david h, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

gareth - it's more of an album album - you can't really get the feel until the album is played in it's entirety - like a movie. sorry. it's a beautiful album. and sorry you have not got it yet cause you are missing out.

thanks, re: compliment on the sage francis review. that was a difficult review to write. i had to learn the whole anti-con collective thing/hip hop/etc. before i tackled it. sage emailed me and said THANK YOU!

i saw gareth at the show!

ummm...what else?

i have to work now. i dig my beachwood sparks review more in this issue just cause it's on the same page as the pattern.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

two weeks pass...
I don't buy albums very often. But, the Montgolfier Brothers latest is a must. The songs are a little more fully formed than the first album. There's still a lot of open space in the sound though. Some of it is quite beautiful. This is the kind of sound that a group such as teh English 60's band Tintern Abbey might be making in the 21st Century. Sheer delight!
I'm going to see them live in Manchester October 31st.

John Kertland, Tuesday, 3 September 2002 11:37 (twenty-three years ago)

chickfactor - the production on seventeen stars is really fabulous. what’s your secret?

mark tranmer - don’t go in a studio
roger quigley - would we agree with that?
mark: that the production’s fabulous? no.
roger: i don’t think we would. it’s unusual.

cf: i’m a lousy rock critic, what do i know?

roger: you should pitch that question to richard, vespertine man. he was the main man in the studio wasn’t he?
mark: yeah. we were in the background having arm wrestles but he was at the front.
roger: the four words he said aloud were "turn up the vocals" that was it really.

cf: typical record label guy.

roger: mark always describes it as karaoke basically. he was off in his flat in southampton. recorded and finished the album, stereo mix, sent it to me, i went down two floors down in the high-rise i love in, to dave’s, and recorded vocals right over the top. there was very little to actually to play with dynamically. whereas on this one (their unreleased second lp) because we’ve had an advance and everything, we’ve got identical set-ups. we’ve got a lot more we can play around with, it will end up sounding, hopefully, better. it was sound more produced.

cf: poptones making all their artists having a uniform sleeve takes some personality away from the bands. i prefer the vespertine cover. then again, it makes things easier for the label. did they consult you on that?

roger: they gave us a version, and they said "how about that?" and we said "that’s fine". and they gave us another one and we said we prefer the other one. i know what you mean, obviously it’s easier for them. it makes things cheaper, we’re both big fans of the bloke who actually does it, mike alway.

cf: i think it implies something about your music that it isn’t.

roger: i quite liked it cause it reminded me of jacques tati films.

cf: do you have a record coming out in the u.s.?

mark: at the moment we’ve got darla distributing it on the west coast and parasol distributing it on the east coast. and they’re just taking large quantities of the record, dealing with it like that, we haven’t actually licensed it. when we were talking to alan mcgee to start with, he was saying someone might want to license it but no one’s actually asked us.

cf: that’s shocking!

mark: darla offered us a deal to something. they’ve shown an interest in gnac (mark’s solo project) records as well. that’s the only one really. i know lots of other labels like merge. i can’t really think of what they are.

cf: how many records does gnac have?

mark: three albums.

cf: roger, do you have other projects?

roger: yeah, but not of late. the quigley album was released on the acetone french label. it’s shockingly produced. pitch that against mark’s recordings of the same time. mark’s the master of the midi and the recording side of things, mine was slapdash. get it down, send it off. recently i play drums for another band. they were called speedway, but then we found out that cosmic rough riders’ best friends have a band called speedway. there’s also a boys band called speedway. so now they’re called lovewood. i’ve got a few other little projects. me and my friend dave have a project called dry riser. i’ve got another one called death quigley. he’s going to be killed off in a bizarre gardening accident. that’s going to be very shoegazey.

cf: i was googling you, and all of your press is foreign, from spain or france have you been touring abroad?

mark: yeah. we get asked to play in spain and france more than we do here, and japan.

cf: where are you most famous.

mark: apparently we are poptones’ biggest greek sellers.

cf: how wonderful.

mark: we’ve never actually been to greece. i like greek food and i like some bazouki music. i do algebra, so that’s quite greek.

roger: it’s nice getting invited to play festivals across the world.

cf: you’re playing the benno festival in sweden.

mark: oh i didn’t know it was benno. i’m happy about that.

roger: we’re going to play in italy because this single mum with two kids got in contact with us cause she really liked the album. she works in the arts. she’s got a friend who finances gigs, and we’re going to play on a wood stage surrounded by olive trees on the beach in ravina. it sounds like it’s going to be an audience of about 17 people, but she’s going to fund it.

cf: what’s the best fan gift you’ve gotten?

mark: photos from keiko.

roger: photos from fans we met. we get records. we’re not at that stage. i don’t think we ever will be at that stage.

cf: that’s okay. you can walk around manchester without being mobbed.

roger: absolutely.

cf: your website reveals your love of brazilian and french music. do you like any new artists from those places?

mark: that’s a good question. i got into this brazilian guitarist called baden powell…

cf: i saw him play at the blue note.

mark: oh you’ve seen him! i’m jealous now, envious. he’s amazing, isn’t he? i got into him when i was about eight; my dad was into him. we used to listen to him on the car stereo. i’m aware of people like jobim. i don’t know many contemporary brazilian artists, so if you’ve got any recommendations…

cf: there’s a guy in new york called vinicius cantuaria. it would be great if you guys could play with him.

mark: i love bossa nova stuff. sometimes it can get too surgery and horrible like any music. but if you find the right thing it’s amazing. baden powell got pneumonia and died quite quickly last september. someone was recommending claudine longet to me yesterday, she does a lot of brazilian covers.

cf: i think she does a lot of covers period. are you addicted to anything?

mark: coffee. i thought i was addicted to museli.

roger: cigarettes.

cf: what’s your day job?

mark: i’m a lecturer in statistics and maths at the university of manchester. cool, isn’t it? what’s the chickfactor on that? minus 27?

cf: what’s in your fridge?

mark: some lemongrass, but i can’t work out if it’s mine or my flatmate’s - it looks like it’s gone off. a piece of ginger root, can of muji oolong tea. and five pints of milk, semi-skimmed.

roger: milk. cheap bread. red wine. mold. not a lot. nothing with muji written on it, i know that.

cf: i love muji.

mark: i recommend their tea. my flatmate is really into cooking things that stink.

cf: i noticed you’ve done some tv music. are there are programs you’d like to see your music used for?

mark: documentaries are good.

roger: the world at war. if jacques tati was still alive…

mark: bunuel if he was still alive. some murder mystery with diana rigg in it. i see her as the detective having a dinner party, someone getting bumped off.

roger: there’s going to be an instrumental on the album, it’s probably going to be the title track, which would work beautifully in a chase scene.

mark: if they’re on horses, not sure about motorbikes.

roger: quite a comic chase.

cf: you guys do instrumentals very well. you both write them too.

mark: yeah. our guitarist think that roger’s written the same one three times.

roger: five times. he thinks it’s the same one.

mark: we’ve got six songs on the album that are tare the obvious collaboration between the music and the vocals. then of the other four, we just took two each and that’s the personal thing, doing your own instrumental.

cf: where do you write?

mark: just in my bedroom. it’s always seem to be not on the ground floor.

cf: then you’re an appropriately named band, unlike most bands.

mark: what? full of hot air? absolutely.

cf: what’s alan mcgee like?

roger: what we k now of him, which is not a lot. we have not spent many hours with him, extremely intense, apparently genuine but again very difficult to say, and genuinely, well, he just wants you to feel wanted. i didn’t expect that. he seems to be positive about everything he says. even if we get negative press he sort of diverts it away from us and takes it on himself. so far, so good.

cf: did he wine and dine you?

mark: no, he did have lunch with us, but it was just like sitting here talking to you. it really was. when we first met him, my ankles were going a bit. but once it got past that initial bit, it was fine. i like spending time with him, you kind of feel like you’ve got to get your five minutes in while you’re talking to him, then he’s be off somewhere else. to his enormous credit, i don’t know how many different projects he must have…

roger: we don’t know if he sleeps.

mark: … he seems able to remember what was going on quite well. he used to ring us up a lot, but now he does email. i like him. he’ll tell you what he thinks, he’s not a yes man in any way. he’s not going to say you’re going to be the biggest band in the world; he’s going to say "you’re not going to be the biggest band in the world."

roger: he has said that, quite literally.

mark: which might surprise you, gail.

cf: you seem okay with that, are there any good smiths-related folktales around manchester?

roger: not really. i was just reading that interview david was doing with vini reilly about morrissey. morrissey was a bit of a loner till they hit it big.

mark: you saw johnny marr buying a sandwich.

roger: i did. couldn’t tell you what sort of sandwich it was but it was definitely him. he looked like the bastard son of liam and noel. very strange.

cf: what kind of musical backgrounds do you guys have?

roger: i had violin lessons for about three weeks.

mark: i had three guitar lessons and two piano lessons. self-taught.

cf: were your families musical?

mark: a little bit. my mom and dad both read music and play the piano and my dad did a bit of classical guitar. they can do it all theoretically, i do it all by ear. i do it from memory. i like of like the classical styling. i’ve got the old fingernail.

cf: those are good for spanish guitar.

mark: it’s a real bugger to keep clean.

cf: what men’s fashion accessory would you like to see revived?

roger: a cravat. when we went to japan, i was amazed at how many ties and cravats we saw. and hat. sock suspenders.

mark: a cravat and a hat.

cf: what was your first concert?

mark: everything but the girl, sheffield university. 1983? ’84?

roger: either altered images or the stranglers. both with my sister. there was a competition on local tv to design the costume for clare grogan from alter images and (my sister) won. the prize was, they were going to make the outfit, she was going to wear it on the night, and you’d get front-row seats. it transpired that we got seats right at the back, and no costume was made and it was a crap gig. so i’ll put the stranglers.

cf: what do you read?

mark: i’ve just read haruki murakumi’s new book, sputnik sweetheart, fantastic. i recommend it. i love his stuff.

roger: i don’t read that much but when i do it’s strange fiction, a bit of agatha christie, listings magazines.

cf: what’s the worst job you’ve had?

mark: i was scared of dogs when i was little so as a version of therapy i got a job in a kennel and i had to take four dogs for a walk. i swear it contributed to the length of my arms. i had to walk them around in a field while they went for a crap. then clean out the kennels. and put food in the bowls. i think that was my least favourite job.

roger: i was a glass collector at hacienda. but the boss there gave me a bin bag of about 60 agatha christie books - that’s where i got them all.

cf: was it kind of fun working there?

roger: no. not on that end of it. i thin it was during that period when it was still quite a happy-happy place to be. to go to as a club, not to actually work there,. on really hot nights, they’d make me and my friend go up to the glass roof and slide panes of glass off so the heat would go through, we would clamber across this glass roof, while the other one held your arm. if there were no glasses to be collected, they’d make us go outside and sweep around the building. one new year’s eve party, a huge night, i it was like 30 quid to get in, and half eleven, they took all the till taking and put them in the back, safe ground, it must have been 20 grand. fireworks went off at midnight, and a spark lit and burned all the takings of the night.

cf: have you heard about the file, 24 hour party people?

roger: yeah.

cf: are you going to be extras in the film?

roger: no.

cf: who would you want to play in the film? ian curtis?

mark: we don’t really look like anyone.

roger: i’ll be the hacienda glass collector.

hellophilinjail, Tuesday, 3 September 2002 19:38 (twenty-three years ago)

the chickfactor black and white ball

Starring: FUTURE BIBLE HEROES (featuring Stephin Merritt and Claudia Gonson from the Magnetic Fields), CAMERA OBSCURA, THE MONTGOLFIER BROTHERS, THE CLIENTELE, THE WOULD-BE-GOODS, A GIRL CALLED EDDY, THE PINES, PIPAS

new york magazine *chickfactor* will celebrate its 10-year anniversary with two evenings of stellar pop music at london's bush hall september 28-29. acts scheduled to appear are....

Saturday, Sept 28

Camera Obscura

The Montgolfier Brothers

The Would-Be-Goods

The Pines

Sunday, Sept 29

Future Bible Heroes

The Clientele

A Girl Called Eddy

Pipas

doors 715; start time 730; 10 pounds per nite; 17 pounds for both
http://www.bushhallmusic.co.uk/

butphili'minjail, Tuesday, 3 September 2002 19:41 (twenty-three years ago)

does that mean that the next edition of Chickfactor is bloody finally going to be out?

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 3 September 2002 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)

three weeks pass...
Coming back from holidays in sunny South West France, I found the album in my post on Friday. Absolutely breathtaking. Otherworldly daydream music on relation issues. Pure genius. The voice is less low and grave than on the first album. What I like most about the songs is the incredible tenderness again, the smooth flow.
Track # 9, "think once more" is probably the most impressive instrumental I have ever heard in my life (39 years). Slightly wistful of course. It has this Satie quality, simple, light and beautiful as if I had heard it before.
#3, "be selfish" has this Cocteau Twins night music feeling with much more space. Sad and wise. I find it astonishing that the melodic line is so simple and repeated about a million times without ever getting boring or annoying.

Thank you doomie for the hint.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 29 September 2002 20:16 (twenty-three years ago)

nine months pass...
this album truly is a gem. the title track has not been out of my head for three straight days. this world needs more Montgolfiers.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Saturday, 5 July 2003 08:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I picked this up for £4 on Sunday and I'm glad it was cheap cos on the first two listens I thought it was drowning in a sea of timidity and pathetic good intentions. I'll give it some more time. Track 3 made me think of all those weird European television programmes about longlost daughters of millionaires who get driven around volcanic coastlines looking for their real parents that you get shwon in Year 7 French and don't like or understand.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 7 July 2003 12:22 (twenty-two years ago)

its not as good as the first one nick, i dont really like this album

gareth (gareth), Monday, 7 July 2003 13:09 (twenty-two years ago)

the title-track, though, ye gods! saddest, sharpest, sweetest song in the world, ever.

Sean M (Sean M), Monday, 7 July 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)

it's way way better than the first. less gnacky and more quigleyish. which is how i like it. roger quigley is my favourite lyricist at the moment.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 7 July 2003 22:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Some Montgolfier/GNAC news

Corporation Pop presents

TRANSFIGURATION
THE ALPHA TAPES - LIVE
+
GEORGE
THE MAGIC LANTERN - new album
+
gnac
selected instrumentals

"a night of hidden gems and secret soundtracks"

The King's Arms
Bloom St., (Just off Chapel St.)
Salford
M3
UK
(Newly Refurbished Upstairs Room)

8pm, Saturday 2nd August, 2003

£2.50

www.corporationpop.com


Additional information :

Transfiguration will be playing music from their soundtrack inspired album The Alpha Tapes. Guest Vocalist Roger Quigley (The Montgolfier Brothers), will be on hand to reprise his vocal performances on the album. Some tracks getting an outing for the first time here.

George will be playing their unique blend of percussion trolley melancholia and electronic joy from their new album The Magic Lantern, forthcoming on Pickled Egg Records.

GNAC will be performing a selection of instrumentals taken from the extensive GNAC album back catalogue. GNAC is the solo project of Mark Tranmer (The Montgolfier Brothers).


The King's Arms is a fine Salford boozer, just 5 minutes walk from Deansgate in Manchester city centre, with a newly refurbished upstairs room. Some of you may remember it from last year's In the City.

David Sherman, Tuesday, 8 July 2003 10:09 (twenty-two years ago)

two weeks pass...
Unfortunately, the above gig (2nd August, 2003) has been postponed to some time later in the year.

David Sherman, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 09:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Really didn't like it.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)

what can i say, sucks to be you.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)

now i've read your review i wish i hadn't been less polite.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 09:55 (twenty-two years ago)

-less

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 09:56 (twenty-two years ago)

now i've read your review i wish i hadn't been less polite.

That's confuzzled me.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 09:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh well.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 09:57 (twenty-two years ago)

seriously, did roger quigley steal your girlfriend? i can't fathom your vitriol otherwise. and what's with "so shoot me for not being indie enough"? who are you, trife?

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 09:58 (twenty-two years ago)

"some pussy indieboy’s insipid romantic wet dream given aural life"

the dude is writing about his own divorce. there's no fantasy involved. your interpretation baffles me.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 09:58 (twenty-two years ago)

It's just a record, Jim. Admittedly one that I found rubbish and pointless and emotionally limp.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)

and did being personally insulting to its creators seem *that* worthwhile? i don't care that you didn't like it. but you've insulted people who *do* like it as well. maybe you'd like to think about that for a moment.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 10:01 (twenty-two years ago)

N. was OTM about the laughably excessive vitriol of Dom, Nick etc the other week, but I can't remember on which thread he said it. There's something very studenty about it all - a weird form of overcompensation.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 10:11 (twenty-two years ago)

add alex in nyc and dj martian and amt (at certain times) to that.

I used to do that at one time I guess but then you've got to stop hating on fans etc.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 10:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Happy to see you as well, Jim! I'm on the TN board most office days. Did you read my news?? It's on the 'aw crap' messasge.

I did learn one other thing - what the name of the Management Company is. That review was drivel!

Pogo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Chris Martin has set the template for vocalists world wide.
HAHAHA!

i also did a review of this absolutely fabulous album last year. for those who are interested. it's here.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I liked the review Alex! The Montgolfier Brothers did not create an album but a cinematic Mike Leigh world with their plaintative observations of a dying love.

Pogo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:35 (twenty-two years ago)

strange obsessional hatred of McGee
Where exactly are you getting this idea from Pogo?

personally insulting to its creators
Likewise Jim, where are the personal insults?

let's mention the coldplay 'bedwetter's comment'
Which didn't get mentioned. But it strikes me as rather self-defeating for McGee to decry Coldplay as bedwetters and then release this.

context of your hatred
I don't hate it, or I wouldn't have given it nearly 6/10, I just think it's a bit rubbish and pointless.

The reviewer ends the review with a quote, seemingly taken at random from a child's movie from the eighties or a discarded Abba song
Actually taken from a Boo Radleys song, the significance of which I'll leave for you to figure out, Sonny.

and Poptones is connected to Telstar, which is a BMG company. not EMI.
That may be so Jim but it says EMI on the sleeve of the copy I have.

laughably excessive vitriol
That really wasn't vitriol at all. It was saying something is 'vaguelly rubbish'. My whole point is that The World Is Flat didn't inspire any passion in me in either direction.

I used to do that at one time I guess but then you've got to stop hating on fans etc.
Julio I like you but you hate on everyone.

you've insulted people who *do* like it as well. maybe you'd like to think about that for a moment
Anyone who takes a record review, especially one not written about them, to heart needs to think about priorities for a few moments.

OK so my review sucked and was pointless, I recognise that and I'm OK with it, but there actually is some reasoned thought, description and criticism in the 3rd & 4th paras.

This is yet another example of why you should never upset the schmindies, because they get upset terribly easily.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Chris Martin has set the template for vocalists world wide.
I did not mean this as a good thing, which ought to be apparent from the context of the line in the review.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:42 (twenty-two years ago)

wow! that song's about his IRL divorce? that really adds an extra weight and sadness to it.

the review's rubbish, certainly, but you know now pitchfork are giving all the indiepop records 8.7s and 9.1s I guess there's a gap in the market for this sort of thing.

blimey jerry, glad you weren't my tutor! ;-)

pulpo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:46 (twenty-two years ago)

The Montgolfier Brothers did not create an album but a cinematic Mike Leigh world with their plaintative observations of a dying love.
You got this out of a random indie-emotive-bullshit generator program, right?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:49 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie, just out of interest, how do you see this one compared to the first? because i still cant get past the production on the new one. it still sounds like an indie record to me, whereas the first had a more undefinable quality

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:51 (twenty-two years ago)

i had no problem with the review nick, but there seemed to be a disparity between the mark and the review itself, you seemed to hate it a lot more than a '6' would indicate. a 6 is the mark of an ok record, a record that isnt bad at all, a record that has nothing wrong with it, a record you dont want to play again though. the review itself seemed to suggest you liked it a whole lot less than that though

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Aye, you're right there Gareth, and that's what I regret about it. The thing is that records which make me go 'meh' I often find myself getting really worked up by, especially when I was hoping they were gonna be ace, which I was with this. But no. I'll stick with The Strands and If You're Feeling Sinister.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 11:58 (twenty-two years ago)

The review is rubbish - at least the reviewer recognises his own rubbishness (even though defeat strangely does not compel him to try harder but instead become bitter?).

The difference between the albums, for me, at least Gareth, is that the first does have a strange musical quality but the partnership is stronger on the second one and possesses a stronger narrative quality on a whole. I will have to give it more thought, Gareth, as I find the differences indefinable at this moment and I have to start writing my book outline for some publishers.

Schimdies? You are the one who wrote the rubbish review. If your aim was to upset the schimdies (which was obvious) just admit that was your intentions because clearly it was not on the music.

Pogo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)

My aim was not at all to upset the schmindies; it was to express my 'meh'ness about a rubbishy record that I'd hoped would be good. The thing is with schmindies that they're always so fucking precious and easily-slighted that they cannot bear to have anyone voice an opinion which is at odds about the beautiful, tear-sodden plaintiveness of their schmindie record of the week.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)

No, I'm not upset. I just reviewed your review and pointed out the pointlessness of what was on offer for myself. Your 'opinion' was not an well thought out or expressive to cause me upset. If you are going to review, just try some of the basic rules of reviewing to place it within a certain picture of why you didnt like the review. I was just shocked at the pointlessness of it, that was all.

Pogo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)

As was I with the record, Sonny.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)

You still have not given me the context of why. Instead you have given me flippant student-like answers. That is all. Just think about framing and logic next time you attempt to review. You will be surprised how well it will work out for you.

Pogo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Like, who do they sound like? What are the influences? Who are the peers of the Montgolfier Brothers. How has the influences failed them. Why? What could have been done to make it better? Essentially, logical reasons on why the record failed to ignite your imagination.

Pogo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)

They're not logical reasons on why it failed to ignite my imagination. The logical reason (and when did logic ever come into liking music?- that remark I wouldn't expect from you of all people) is that I felt it was emotionally flat and unexpressive, pressing a pre-defined set of buttons which I find predictable and lazy. it inspired no emotion in me, not wonderment, not sadness, not joy, not regret, not anything. What do their peers and influences matter? I was reviewing a single record, not a scene or lineage.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)

i do think the second record has less atmosphere than the first. The first one had a weird kind of school playground world weariness ('always the last to know') that was sad but quite cosy and somehow innocent. The second one also has killer tunes and production, but generally seems more depressed, more grown up, less beautiful. I like 'em both an awful lot though.

pulpo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)

i am very sorry for all the people who don't get this album. there is a whole world of emotion, intensity and wisdom you miss out on. i don't know of any album which has transformed the pain of a divorce so adequately into music. i am almost inclined to say that just for this record the break-up was worth it. that's very selfish and mean but often pieces of art where the artist had to bleed for (without necessarily knowing of this) are the ones which move me most (nick drake anyone?). and i don't really care if it sounds indie or not, that is so irrelevant in view of the beauty of this record.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)

(without necessarily knowing of this) should read
(without me necessarily knowing of this)

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Do you think that had more to do with the subject matter, Pulpo? I found 'The World is Flat' intensely beautiful and yet, very very personal. The music, on the second time was structured moreorless like a score, and the lyrics are able to bring a cinematic quality (maybe the flat voice brings out the stories more for me?) to the songs. 'The World is Flat' is an uncomfortable album, marked by serious depression and contemplation of dying love - not a grandiose album, full of soulful platitudes but a quiet album...of the desperation of what happens when your partner leaves you, the strange thoughts that come into your head and Roger gives voices and sings those uncomfortable thoughts outloud. Intensely quiet but uncomfortable.

Pogo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I kind of agree with Alex about those who don't 'get' the album.

Pogo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:27 (twenty-two years ago)

often pieces of art where the artist had to bleed for (without necessarily knowing of this) are the ones which move me most

You see I just find the idea of this abhorrent.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:28 (twenty-two years ago)

It reminds me 'Blood on the Tracks' or 'Closer'...

Pogo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah I find it abhorrent too, but it's an aside from alex that's maybe more about him than the record.

'pogo'/doomie it probably is the subject matter being a bit more harrowing. still remember some gorgeous melodies on it, tho'.

pulpo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Well I always hated Dylan.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)

is an interesting topic for sure. what if a record that an artist had to bleed for, and you could hear it in the music, what if, years later, it turned out to be a ruse, and the guy was having a great time, would it diminish your love for the record? why? what would have changed in your own life? how it related to your own life? if it soundtracked difficult/important/special times in your life, but had a different birth to what you had imagined, would it change how you had listened to it back then? how you imagined it?

or what if a record you thought laughable and trite, turned out to have been the inner soundtrack to terrible times for the protagonist. would it change how you thought about it?

i only like trite music, so my opinion is of no consequence here. for me, only the trite conveys pathos, but for those who look for depth and meaning in their music, how would the above set of circumstances change things for you?

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)

and at least your review got people talking nick!

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)

JTN OTM though I've no real desire for a second Montgolfier Brothers album, good luck to 'em though I liked the first one well enough.

Gareth OTM about emotional wreckage and music-making. Cheap (OK £9.99 from Select-A-Disc) holidays in other people's misery, nein danke.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:35 (twenty-two years ago)

But Pulpo, when it is done well, as the Montgolfier Brothers have done it on 'The World is Flat'... I guess that is why I think 'Mike Leigh' when I listen to the The World is Flat.

Anyways, I have to go!!!!! I'm procrastinating. I've got shitloads of writing to do.

More later.

Pogo, Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:37 (twenty-two years ago)

You see I just find the idea of this abhorrent.
i know what you mean, nick, there is something obscene about it. i guess you need to have been in a similar situation to connect to this album. like pogo said it is very personal and intense. but on the other hand there is also a bukolic calmness. deep and light at the same time. a miracle. i like to think that it helped quigley to overcome the break-up. to my ears it sounds like that at least. this is the kind of confessional music i love in the vein of neil young, joni mitchell, nick drake, red house painters, belle and sebastian, american music club etc.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)

is an interesting topic for sure. what if a record that an artist had to bleed for, and you could hear it in the music, what if, years later, it turned out to be a ruse, and the guy was having a great time, would it diminish your love for the record?
this of course could never happen to me (;-)). and if it would i don't think i would feel cheated by the artist. i would feel cheated by myself, my inability to distinguish the false from the true. but if a record would succeed in fooling me in this way it would surely be even a bigger masterpiece from the artistic stance than the "normal album the artist has bled for". this is a discussion touching the problem of authenticity. i think we have done this before and i don't want to do it again.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Because authenticity is a crock.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:54 (twenty-two years ago)

isnt music artifice?

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 13:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Precisely.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 13:03 (twenty-two years ago)

But there is convincing artifice and non-convincing artifice. Nick's straining for effect in his overblown response to a "meh" record is the latter.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)

the authenticity discussion is useless. i'd like to turn it around:

concerning the world is flat i didn't think of it being autobiographical in the beginning. at least this wasn't important for me to love the record. the revelation that it was didn't diminish my appreciation for the record in any way ;-)

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)

''I used to do that at one time I guess but then you've got to stop hating on fans etc.
Julio I like you but you hate on everyone.''

not true at all.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 23 July 2003 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)

one month passes...
anyone know a johnny lovewood?

alan gubby, Wednesday, 10 September 2003 10:05 (twenty-two years ago)

seven months pass...
Southall Riot no longer exist.I lost contact with Phil over a year ago when it seems he went to live in the South of England.
Their own website has added nothing for a year.
I have a more or less complete collection of Southall Riot,all signed as well.

RICHARD ASTLEY-CLEMAS (the family cat), Tuesday, 4 May 2004 18:32 (twenty-one years ago)

that's sad about southall riot. they made mostly very good records

the surface noise (electricsound), Tuesday, 4 May 2004 23:24 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
new ep, journey's end, is enjoyably bleak.

dh, Saturday, 30 July 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

three months pass...
it's a fabulous e.p. indeed. the last track is majestic. makes me think of roman architecture. they're really something else.

Klas, Wednesday, 9 November 2005 01:19 (nineteen years ago)

it's very pretty. the songs aren't *quite* as good as the best ones on the world is flat, but the actual sound is vastly better.

john p. irrelevant (electricsound), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 01:37 (nineteen years ago)

i just downloaded this ep after never hearing or knowing about them before and.....WOW. this amazingly beautiful. especially the first song called journey's end. i dont think i've heard a more beautiful song in years. and they're playing in london tomorrow!

Lovelace (Lovelace), Friday, 18 November 2005 03:36 (nineteen years ago)

how were they live?

dh, Thursday, 24 November 2005 11:48 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
I have only just found The Montgolfier Brothers and 17 stars is the most beautiful/magical album. My favourate songs have to be even if my mind cant tell you and pro celebrity standing around. Both make me cry.

Jewelz, Monday, 13 February 2006 01:38 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
and now i love *between two points*

Jewelz, Monday, 27 March 2006 01:29 (nineteen years ago)

eighteen years pass...

"Between Two Points" covered on the new David Gilmour album.

djh, Saturday, 25 May 2024 06:04 (one year ago)

three weeks pass...

Released as a "single" yesterday. It's, um, not really for me but I enjoyed reading that Gilmour had presumed it was a "hit" and loads of people knew it.

Includes a guitar solo.

djh, Tuesday, 18 June 2024 22:18 (one year ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.