Prince remasters - will we ever get them?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

According to AMG, Warner has rereleased all of Prince's 80s albums in Japan last year. However, I can't find any info on whether these are remasters or the same old CDs. Would anyone happen to know anything about them? Anyway, this information together with the Ultimate collection would seem to suggest that any possible feud between Prince and Warner isn't really stopping them from remastering the albums if they so choose. So why aren't they doing it? There are lots of more obscure albums that have gotten remastered, and I think most Prince fans would agree that the CD versions actually would benefit from remastering, or at least the albums from Purple Rain to Lovesexy would.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 11:39 (seventeen years ago)

Lovesexy needs to be remastered, and presented as seperate tracks.

like a Song thrush on honey (stevie), Tuesday, 23 September 2008 11:45 (seventeen years ago)

current versions of lovesexy are seperate tracks.or did i just get lucky ?

mark e, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 13:05 (seventeen years ago)

My copy has only one track too, but according to Wikipedia newer CD printings separate it to 9 tracks.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 13:13 (seventeen years ago)

ah, we had a thread about that before, right ?
In the meantime I've bought ultime and the remastering really makes the tracks better. still, there are too few tracks from the 1999/lovesexy era on it... I would still buy all these albums again were they properly remastered (if someone from warner reads ilx !).

AleXTC, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 13:40 (seventeen years ago)

I tried to search for "Prince" and "remaster", but didn't find anything. Maybe this was discussed in some general Prince thread?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 13:45 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, I guess it wasn't a specific prince remasters thread.
I seem to remember you were in it since I think I was discussing it with you, though !

AleXTC, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 14:25 (seventeen years ago)

i would love a lovesexy with separate tracks and a remaster of 1999 (this is the only one that bothers me sound-wise, although a new dirty mind would probably sound good).

Jordan, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 14:57 (seventeen years ago)

all the albums between 1999 and lovesexy (including the black) need a good remastering badly. they're all so flat and lack... I dunno, power. It's particularly obvious when one of these tracks play randomly on my ipod, following more recent or better mastered tracks.

AleXTC, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 15:07 (seventeen years ago)

We also need a comprehensive 12" version w/ b-sides compilation. But we all know this.

matt2, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 15:11 (seventeen years ago)

the remix disc on ultimate is not really good (not 12" or b-sides only though).

AleXTC, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 15:17 (seventeen years ago)

Check out the reissue schedule on Allmusic:

http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=23::839~T2

The Japanese branches of Universal, WEA, Epic, JVC, BMG, Virgin and EMI are going nuts reissuing stuff. A lot of it is remastered, but it's hard to get proper information on them, let alone decent prices. Stop taunting me, Japan!

Fastnbulbous, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 16:20 (seventeen years ago)

i've never understood how japan has the sales & tours of all musicians ever

Jordan, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 16:29 (seventeen years ago)

Can someone explain the incredible complicated world of Prince's labels and albums and related hoo haa?

There was a thread on this.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 18:46 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, but on that thread people seemed to assume some legal dispute between Prince and Warner seems to be stopping Warner from remastering the albums they own the rights to. But the Ultimate collection seems to have proven that assumption wrong, so I can't really see what's stopping them from reissuing the albums? Surely most Prince fans belong to the exact age group record companies are going after these days, i.e. people who still buy albums instead of downloading them.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 23 September 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)

japan's getting all this because japan still has a music economy

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 04:13 (seventeen years ago)

So... which came first, the chicken or the egg?

ilxor, Thursday, 25 September 2008 02:16 (seventeen years ago)

That is, does a healthy music economy lead to more reissues? Or do more reissues result in a healthy music economy?

ilxor, Thursday, 25 September 2008 02:17 (seventeen years ago)

the former

Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 25 September 2008 02:20 (seventeen years ago)

and the latter too, but if you don't have anything to start with, you can't reissue anything by definition

Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 25 September 2008 02:22 (seventeen years ago)

all the albums between 1999 and lovesexy (including the black) need a good remastering badly

Why not the first four?

Geir Hongro, Thursday, 25 September 2008 07:59 (seventeen years ago)

true. don't know why I forgot to include dirty mind and controversy. the first two, the reason is that I only have them on vinyl so I never listen to them on my ipod so I never noticed a sound problem (plus I don't like them as much as the other ones).

AleXTC, Thursday, 25 September 2008 10:09 (seventeen years ago)

The first two are obviously not as good as his later output (particularly not the debut) but that doesn't mean it wouldn't be natural to include them in a remaster series.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 26 September 2008 01:15 (seventeen years ago)

Sorry but the first two are as good as the rest and a million times better than anything he's released for 20 odd years...why does "For You" get such a bad rep...

sonnyboy, Friday, 26 September 2008 09:14 (seventeen years ago)

It has a few jams, but its not all that.

Darryl Strawberry (The Reverend), Friday, 26 September 2008 09:26 (seventeen years ago)

YAHHH!

Perry-Como-Zombie-Memorial-Radio-Now! (Ioannis), Friday, 26 September 2008 10:26 (seventeen years ago)

^^^

Darryl Strawberry (The Reverend), Friday, 26 September 2008 10:31 (seventeen years ago)

...

Ioannis is all "YAHHH TRICK YAHHH" (Ioannis), Friday, 26 September 2008 10:41 (seventeen years ago)

why does "For You" get such a bad rep...

Well it does have "Soft And Wet" and maybe a couple of other great tracks, but it was from "Dirty Mind" onwards that his genius really started to shine. Not claiming it kept on shining all the time although I would at least rank his most recent three albums as slightly better than the first two. "3121" is in fact not only slightly better either.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 26 September 2008 12:03 (seventeen years ago)

Musicology was great, 3121 better... Planet Earth, not so much. At least the couple times I've listened so far.

ilxor, Friday, 26 September 2008 13:33 (seventeen years ago)

No way are his two first albums "better than anything he's released for 20 odd years"! He could do tight jams back then, but he hadn't yet properly developed his knack for beautiful melodies and sonic experimentation. Albums like The Love Symbol, Emancipation, Gold Experience or 3121 beat those first two 1-0.

Tuomas, Friday, 26 September 2008 14:04 (seventeen years ago)

well, I like 3121 but there's nothing on it or since alphabet street that is better than "I wanna be your lover", "why you wanna treat me so bad" or "i feel for you", so...

AleXTC, Friday, 26 September 2008 15:05 (seventeen years ago)

He's got a new book out

http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2008-05-31-books-expo_N.htm

curmudgeon, Friday, 26 September 2008 18:50 (seventeen years ago)

Rumor had it that the very private star would play, but few could have predicted the hour-and-15 minute set, with a band and backup singers, free to those with invitations.

uh, i would have been pretty surprised if he threw a party and didn't play for at least an hour and 15 minutes

Jordan, Friday, 26 September 2008 18:58 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2008-09-25-prince-21-nights_N.htm

A different USA Today writer talked to him---

Behind closed doors, they'll tell you it's over," he says. Record companies can't profit unless they retain ownership of artists' work, "and that's why labels are in a bad situation. People with content are going to win."

And yet Prince is sitting on loads of content in search of a platform. After blazing a trail online as an independent distributor, he grew disenchanted with the Internet and in 2006 shut down his 5-year-old New Power Generation Music Club. No official Prince sites remain (3121.com consists of a blank screen). Posting Prince content draws cease-and-desist orders.

Cyberspace "is a black hole to me," he says. "YouTube is the hippest network, and they abuse copyright right and left. You see a song like Purple Rain turned into Pure Cocaine; what should my response be? I chase the money to find out who's behind it. It's a matter of principle. I don't want my music bastardized."

He's not impressed by iTunes' terms or sales projections ("They give you a figure that's embarrassing").

curmudgeon, Friday, 26 September 2008 19:10 (seventeen years ago)

Shouldn't Amazon.jp have english info on most of this stuff

Kramkoob (Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃), Friday, 26 September 2008 19:20 (seventeen years ago)

"I'm single, celibate and sexy," he says with a laugh. "I feel free."

Jordan, Friday, 26 September 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)

He declines to play The Divine, a song so "mind-blowing" he doubts he'll ever release it.

lol

Jordan, Friday, 26 September 2008 19:33 (seventeen years ago)

haha, i love prince's 'this is too genius to ever let anyone hear it' statements.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 26 September 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)

If it was recorded before 1988, I bet he's right.

Not that they sound paricularly great. But for whatever reason, I've never been pining for these records to be reissued.

Naive Teen Idol, Friday, 26 September 2008 19:46 (seventeen years ago)

id like remasters/deluxe editions if they come with some unreleased tracks and for the 80s albums, the full 12" versions of the songs too.

titchyschneiderMk2, Saturday, 27 September 2008 09:40 (seventeen years ago)

ten months pass...

http://prince.org/msg/7/314399

so they exist ! but only in japan...
seems great.
I may order them right now...

AleXTC, Thursday, 6 August 2009 11:02 (sixteen years ago)

don't think they're actual remasters though.

Crackle Box, Thursday, 6 August 2009 12:30 (sixteen years ago)

those look great.

i wouldnt mind remasters with remixes and b-sides though.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Thursday, 6 August 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)

hmm, i'm pretty sure they're just reissues on shm cds. nice that they come with all the posters and stuff though. if you get one be sure to let us know what they sound like.

i used to read pr1nce.0rg years ago and they're a bunch of nutjobs, i wouldn't trust much of what is said on there.

the records sound much nicer than the cds with 80s warner stuff imo. esp the 12s, controversy and erotic city both sound amazing.

Crackle Box, Thursday, 6 August 2009 14:52 (sixteen years ago)

Waiting for the real deal, I guess. First generation Warner CDs sound better than other CDs. And also, Warner remasters tend to be the best sounding remasters. So just waiting for them to appear before or since then.

Tied Up In Geir (Geir Hongro), Thursday, 6 August 2009 23:38 (sixteen years ago)

First generation Warner CDs sound better than other CDs.

That other first generation CDs, I mean.

Tied Up In Geir (Geir Hongro), Thursday, 6 August 2009 23:38 (sixteen years ago)

i think my original cds are absolutely fine. plus i have the lps too. i dont really care about remasters so much.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Friday, 7 August 2009 11:35 (sixteen years ago)

remasters will probably just mean = louder/more compressed/cleaner, but that doesnt necessarily mean better.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Friday, 7 August 2009 12:00 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.