J Sutcliffe - impotent bore?

As much as I may agree with you, I still think that ILM is ostensibly a music board and since J Sutcliffe is neither a critic nor a musician discussions concerning his impotence or capacity for inspiring boredom should probably take place elsewhere. I'm also of the opinion that we should make at least an attempt to maintain a modicum of civility with our fellow posters, no matter how unctuous and personally uninspiring their posts may be. Finally, I'm not convinced that the poster wasn't just using Mr. Sutcliffe's name as part of some sort of elaborate joke (there seems to be a bit of this going around) so I'm thinking that perhaps this whole line of thinking may be a bit unnecessary.

Maybe he just doesn't want spam. Who is the Englishman he's ducking again?

Meta-threads hold no interest for me and here I am posting to one, go figure.

yeah, you're probably right. This is a not completely not thought out response to the "mark s is fuctionally illiterate" thread. Whatta asshole.

funny, "not completely thought out" applies pretty well to both threads. If I were moderating I'd be inclined to delete both! What are y'all, 12? At least be funny.

feel free to delete

keep the one about me: i need to face my shame

swivelhededness is not illiteracy, mark

hurrah!!