Future of Classical Music

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Have we done this?

What's the future of classical music?

- Museum piece?

- Dissolution into other contemporary genres eg. classical electronic and musique concrete into contemporary electronica.

- A separate, distinct, continuum of trained composers and players who keep the classical oevre alive and produce new music in the same canonical tradition?

phil, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

if classical music will not be able to alter and renew its own defintion, it is dead for sure.

in fact acts like boards of canada, akufen, techno animal and Oliver Lamm are making music on the edge of classical music, avantgarde and pop/dance.

there lies the future of classical music. and ofcourse there will always be the need of playing old ancient stuff again and again and again and again....

theo ploeg, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The future of classical music? Condemned to movie trailers and compliations for baby. The future of composition? Yes, IDM and similar fare. The monitor is the new parchment.

tyler, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Not trance

Honda, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I love Boards of Canada to death, but I will be extraordinarily surprised if anyone in the classical music scene would even consider them to anywhere near their genre (which is about 8 million genres in and of itself, mind you). One thing about classical music that escapes many fans of rock/pop/dance/hip-hop/r&b/fill-in-your-non- classical-genre-except-jazz is that people who are into it tend to be much more into the performance aspect rather than the compositional aspect. It's cool and nice when John Williams writes (or recycles) a score for a movie, but people are much more likely to be interested in Yo-Yo Ma's take on a particular cello sonata, or Josh Bell's interpretation as a solo violinist, or a Met production of "Fidelio" from a given year. The performer's interpretation will often supercede the composer's intent and do so to a degree that is unheard of in other genres outside of intentionally-wacky cover versions.

Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Wendy Carlos, man...

Keiko, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Stuff along the lines of Takemitsu, I'd say, and probably some more chamber-like efforts in those minimal/expressive areas. I think the classical canon is its own scene and if anything will have less and less to do with idm/electronica/etc stuff. IDM & electronica will of course begin to think of themselves as "replacement classical" genres but the discipline really isn't comparable.

John Darnielle, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What do you mean by "classical"? Symphonic music? I don't think someone like Pierre Henry or John Cage should be considered classical music.

Mark, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm guessing there will be more Debussyish melodic music written. People are sick of irony and anti-music. and usually IDM doesn't have much to do with performance, but neither did Morton Subotonic. I think if it comes more from the acedemia side than the clubs side it could be considered classical.

A Nairn, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

three years pass...
I've been thinking about this lately and I realized that to a certain extent I don't care. I love classical music, and I will keep loving it and keep listening to recordings, and when I'm more financially sound I'll buy a symphony subscription and I don't care if most of the people in the audience are twice my age. Because everyone else just doesn't know what they're missing. Attempts to make classical music "more accessible" and "more contemporary" are all fine as long as they're done on classical music's own terms. I'm all in favor of attractive young musicians performing especially energetic and unstuffy versions of great pieces. Orchestras should do their best to remind people that classical music was never *supposed* to be stuffy until a bunch of stuffed shirts came along and made it that way after the fact. But I don't want to see great orchestras doing the music of Guns and Roses.

And no, IDM doesn't have much to do with classical composition.

Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 4 December 2005 07:36 (twenty years ago)

b-b-but "november rain"!

The Great Pagoda of Funn (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 4 December 2005 07:40 (twenty years ago)

Ha, that was why I free associated to G'n'R in the first place.

Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 4 December 2005 07:46 (twenty years ago)

It is rather funny how people who want to believe their music is "serious" and "challenging" often claim inheritance from classical music.

Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 4 December 2005 07:53 (twenty years ago)

it's because we regard it as a field that takes a lot of training and discipline. and it is, compared to the populist inclusivity of rock music.

The Great Pagoda of Funn (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 4 December 2005 08:07 (twenty years ago)

"challenging" is a weird, loaded word though.

The Great Pagoda of Funn (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 4 December 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)

Folks, classical music is doing just fine and will continue to thrive. There is an enormous amount of diversity, craft, and sonic innovation going on at the moment. It's profile may be low and its audience small, but so what? There are brilliant composers and conductors working today, ranging from entirely computer-based composition to all manners of orchestral. There are also numerous blogs devoted to contemporary classical and a handful of composer or performer blogs detailing the many micro-developments in the scene(s). This year's Pulitzer Prize winner in classical music teaches at my university and is very active and very much around, whether it's in the music library or conducting. You are free to hate the music, of course, but to deny that it's dead is misguided, and rather naive.

Tate (Tate), Monday, 5 December 2005 00:07 (twenty years ago)

*hahaha, "to deny that it's alive and well" was supposed to be the thought there last line lol

Tate (Tate), Monday, 5 December 2005 01:01 (twenty years ago)

the classical I'm listening to lately - Berg for example - is so modern that the me of a few years ago would be/is horrified to hear about it

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Monday, 5 December 2005 01:06 (twenty years ago)

I love BoC as much as the next bloke but I also don't think they are the future of classical music. Regarding performances over compositions, for me, that's half-right. I'll listen to anything new but as performances for a piece begin to accumulate, the work itself becomes more interesting.

aworks (aworks), Monday, 5 December 2005 02:33 (twenty years ago)

yeah, calling IDM or Electronic music the future of Classical is just about the dumbest thing i've heard in ages. Why would anyone associate the two genres? Because they both involve no vocals?

Brett G. (Brett G.), Monday, 5 December 2005 02:56 (twenty years ago)

Because they're both intelligent. Except for IDM, which is not intelligent.

moley (moley), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:02 (twenty years ago)

I remember a tour of Australia by Orbital and (erm) Cosmic Baby which billed them as 'the Mozarts of techno'. This was in 1991.

moley (moley), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:03 (twenty years ago)

yeah, calling IDM or Electronic music the future of Classical is just about the dumbest thing i've heard in ages. Why would anyone associate the two genres? Because they both involve no vocals?

-- Brett G

Can be driven on long, slowly unfolding, complex melody lines... abscence of geetars = OMG NOT ROCK, not disco, not 'live' music, more like modern compostion?? must be... ??

fandango (fandango), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:07 (twenty years ago)

i have no idea what fandango just said...

Brett G. (Brett G.), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:11 (twenty years ago)

sorry... that did come out rather obtuse.

I think people associate IDM & Classical together for the lack of trad. pop structures & straightforward melodies. For not being rock OR 'dance' music (sometimes). For being more like art than 'tunes' on occasion, for being premeditated, challenging music.

Is that better? I'm not sure it is :/

fandango (fandango), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:15 (twenty years ago)

no, i get that, but i think it's really silly. it's not quite rock, it's not quite dance, it's not jazz...it must be classical!!...?

Brett G. (Brett G.), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:17 (twenty years ago)

fair enough... I can see why people might associate IDM & Modern Classical myself. But boy it's hard to explain why, I just resorted to sarcasm & confused everybody instead!

fandango (fandango), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:20 (twenty years ago)

B-b-but probably the majority of composition majors I know who are under 30 are way into IDM, electronica, and/or post-rock, including, uh, me. Especially if they're into electronic/electroacoustic comp. I think you can totally hear its influence on a lot of recent electronic compositional music. Doesn't mean they're the same thing or that one will dissolve into the other but the distance might not be as great as some people think.

AFAICT, stylistic fusions (like this) probably are the future of the music. Especially in Canadian music, seems like the happening stuff's usually in the vein of cross-cultural fusions + fusions across genres or high-brow/low-brow lines (unibrow?) , often with some debt to minimalism and usually keeping some choons in. Or maybe I'm just exaggerating the importance of stuff that I like.

Sundar (sundar), Monday, 5 December 2005 06:08 (twenty years ago)

yeah, i think electroacoustic composition is the missing link here.

mies van der roffle (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 5 December 2005 06:13 (twenty years ago)

IDM is probably in far more serious danger of dying than classical music.

Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Monday, 5 December 2005 06:14 (twenty years ago)

HAHA, great new handle as always Jody.

Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Monday, 5 December 2005 06:14 (twenty years ago)

sundar it may even fuse w/GRIME

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)

Tate, have you got any links for contemporary classical blogs? I'll Google, but, y'know, I'm a lazy, lazy man.

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:52 (twenty years ago)

all arvo part all the time

firstworldman (firstworldman), Monday, 5 December 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

Alex Ross has a nice blog, and links to others.

(weird subtitle though: er, "the" music critic for the New Yorker?)

Lukas (lukas), Monday, 5 December 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

I don't see any new pieces of music to be composed that will find their way into the classical canon.

As a matter of fact, there have been none since "Bolero".

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 22:19 (twenty years ago)

This thread is like debating the future of the Latin language...

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Monday, 5 December 2005 23:10 (twenty years ago)

That post was like dancing about the future of cliches.

Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Monday, 5 December 2005 23:12 (twenty years ago)

Amity, see the links at Alex Ross' blog, as mentioned just upthread. He has divided them by composer, performer, etc

The Rambler is a good place to read. He also knows jungle and follows grime, is a musicologist himself and very smart, very judicious, very well-rounded

http://johnsons-rambler.blogspot.com/

Kyle Gann is a composer, journalist, and teacher whose point of view is downtown nyc post-cagean minimalism. He also has a great webcast of new music.

http://www.artsjournal.com/postclassic/

From these you'll be able to find plenty, just follow the links

Tate (Tate), Monday, 5 December 2005 23:19 (twenty years ago)

Amity, see the links at Alex Ross' blog, as mentioned just upthread. He has divided them by composer, performer, etc

The Rambler is a good place to read. He also knows jungle and follows grime, is a musicologist himself and very smart, very judicious, very well-rounded

http://johnsons-rambler.blogspot.com/

Kyle Gann is a composer, journalist, and teacher whose point of view is downtown nyc post-cagean minimalism. He also has a great webcast of new music.

http://www.artsjournal.com/postclassic/

Also Greg Sandow:

http://www.artsjournal.com/sandow/

From these you'll be able to find plenty, just follow the links

Tate (Tate), Monday, 5 December 2005 23:21 (twenty years ago)

ugh, browser fuckup, apologies

Tate (Tate), Monday, 5 December 2005 23:22 (twenty years ago)

I myself am waiting for perved goth glam to inherit the classical tradition, wherein all the rich oldsters go to the Kennedy Center hear a gentle night's performance of The Anal Staircase as sung by noted diva Marc Almond.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 5 December 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

yeah, calling IDM or Electronic music the future of Classical is just about the dumbest thing i've heard in ages. Why would anyone associate the two genres? Because they both involve no vocals?

Every choral, oratorio, art song and opera singer in the world now wants to kick you squarely in the nuts.

Dan (No Respect) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 5 December 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

I don't see any new pieces of music to be composed that will find their way into the classical canon.
As a matter of fact, there have been none since "Bolero".

i know its geir, but this has to be one of the dumbest posts i've read in 3 years of reading ilm.

zappi (joni), Monday, 5 December 2005 23:35 (twenty years ago)

Geir likes to pretend that Britten and Stravinsky don't exist.

Dan (Psymphony of Psalms? War Requiem? Bueller?) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 00:04 (twenty years ago)

Cheers Tate.

Geir batshit as per usual.

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 00:12 (twenty years ago)

How many tunes by Britten or Stravinsky are familiar to the man on the street?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 00:50 (twenty years ago)

I don't know, let's call him.

Sincerely, (Paul in Santa Cruz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:07 (twenty years ago)

Forget Stravinsky -- has Geir never heard of Aaron Copland?

Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:13 (twenty years ago)

both barbers adagio & orffs carmina burana are pretty well known to the man in the street geir.

zappi (joni), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:41 (twenty years ago)

Leonard Bernstein also wrote some pretty popular stuff if I remember right.

Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:46 (twenty years ago)

Geir, since when has the classical music canon been determined by the man in the street?

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:50 (twenty years ago)

Geir, since when has the classical music canon been determined by the man in the street?

It never has, but it usually does become familiar to the man on the street after a while. The man on the street is certainly familiar with "The Four Seasons" and "Eine Kleine Nachtmusik", both of which are clearly part of the canon more than most other works.

Barber's "Adagio" and "Carmina Burana" may be known to lots of people, as may also "Fanfare To The Common Man", "Rhapsody In Blue" and parts of "The Planets". But generally, 20th century "classical" music has struggled to get the same impact with the man on the street as its 18th and 19th century counterparts.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 03:21 (twenty years ago)

i'm pretty sure that the vast majority people in the 18thC didn't hear much music at all (bar hymns) let alone recognise it.

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)

Classical music is still something of a presence in the mainstream psyche thanks to films though.

Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 03:31 (twenty years ago)

I was about to argue with Geir but actually, the more I think about it, a popist classical canon that put Pachelbel's canon, the Star Wars theme, the "Hallelujah" chorus from the Messiah (but not the less-catchy parts), the arpeggios in "Eine Kleine", Prelude and Fugue #1 but nothing else from The Well-Tempered Clavier, etc at its front and centre would be really interesting in its own way.

Sundar (sundar), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 07:34 (twenty years ago)

"But I don't want to see great orchestras doing the music of Guns and Roses."

But this is the kind of crossover that some orchestras might need to get into if they're to stay viable! Its the same w/the classical rec industry that has to back commercial winners to keep issuing the 'good stuff' which makes a loss. I guess the q wd then be something like: is this situation a good thing?

There's a really good quote (its on Gann's blog from earlier this year) from Lou Harrison on the classical DIY wing that you all should hunt down and then maybe we can get over this fretting abt whether classical music might "die" or whatever - i dunno, every year there's millions of artciles on how classical music is finished but it won't go away. The grim reaper should hurry up!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 13:50 (twenty years ago)

"Well rounded" ... I prefer slim and chiselled, myself. :-)

Sundar - you can also include the second movement of Gorecki's Third Symphony (composed 1976) in your popist classical canon. Anyone who's ever seen a Holocaust documentary will know that one.

The whole 'man on the street doesn't recognise it, therefore it's in crisis' is a tired argument, isn't it? I'll be honest, if you play me certain bits of Beethoven's 9th Symphony I couldn't be guaranteed to recognise it. And why does this standard only get applied to classical music? Is anyone fretting that IDM, say, is in a crisis because your average man on the street hasn't heard of Black Dog or Squarepusher? (And they haven't.) Classical's standards are impossibly high for itself, yet for its overall impact on how the music we hear day to day (in films, TV, radio, adverts, etc.) is shaped, very little else comes close. Not to mention the fact that it is classical composers and performers who have almost entirely shaped how we think about music and musicians today.

The 'museum piece' part of classical music is in difficulty, financially speaking, because it's expensive to put on, fewer people are interested in it, and the industry is reluctant to change anything to make people interested. *shrugs* Luckily, all the interesting, living stuff has never been healthier - self-publishing is cheap, new music performers are better and more numerous, there are plenty of venues, a dedicated and growing audience, and there are so many good composers that people actually worry that there might be too many. Seriously.

If you think there's no future in "classical" music, go down to a venue like the Warehouse in Waterloo, London (or its equivalent in your town) and see some new music. If you still think it's dying a slow death, then fine - you don't care for it, so no need to worry about any crisis.

The Rambler, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 14:01 (twenty years ago)

Yeah I've been going there - I saw the premiere of 'Traumwerk III' by James Dillon last week.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

Rambler OTM.

Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)

two years pass...

Revive (as I wait for Tropical Storm Kay to rip the roof off my home (j/k)). Any current composers doing interesting -- even new -- things with classical music? I loved the eerie/beautiful version of The Sinking Of The Titanic that Gavin Bryars and Phillip Jeck and Alter Ego released earlier this year (tho I think Bryars wrote the piece itself in the sixties, so it isn't that new).

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 18 August 2008 16:25 (seventeen years ago)

what are the most significnt classical works of the last 15-20 years?

Milton Parker, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:39 (seventeen years ago)

Excellent! Thanks. I screwed up by typing "Classical-Music" as a term in the search engine.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 18 August 2008 16:41 (seventeen years ago)

The future of classical music is like the past of classical music. It has been a museum piece since around 1900 anyway, and those so-called "contemporary" works will never become classical as they will be forgotten because of their lack of recognisable tunes.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 18 August 2008 20:52 (seventeen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v165/noodle_vague/conductorbot.jpg

Noodle Vague, Monday, 18 August 2008 21:00 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.