I'm seeing a lot more digital "re-creations" of old recordings, particularly jazz. Most recently, Zenph Studio put out an album, Piano Starts Here: Live at the Shrine, in which scratchy, mono recordings of Art Tatum were re-recorded using MIDI files and a Yamaha Disklavier Pro concert grand piano. The recordings are presented in both 5.1 and binaural versions. I was dismissive when I first read about the CD, but the incredible sound won me over. Still, I'm not sure how I feel about digitally messing with the originals. http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:3nfoxzejldae~T1
Fake stereo has been around for decades, of course, and they're usually pretty indefensible. In recent years, however, there have been a number of decent-sounding releases of pre-stereo material. In particular, I love Billie Holiday's "Love Songs" on Nimbus, which does a nice job of isolating her voice. (In "Let's Dream in the Moonlight," she sounds like she's standing right next to you — chills.)I expect we'll be seeing a lot more of these digital re-creations. Is it blasphemy, or is the end result the only thing that matters? I doubt Billie Holiday would have a problem with the way her voice sounds on the Nimbus release, or Tatum with how he comes across on the Zenph CD.
― Jazzbo, Monday, 27 October 2008 19:11 (seventeen years ago)
it probably sounds more like what people at the concert heard, but its still digital fakery, which makes me a little uncomfortable.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Monday, 27 October 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)