Sleeper vs The Strokes

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The Strokes. Ultra hyped, considered the saviours of rock n' roll, the best band ever, 10 out of 10 in a star starved NME.

The reality: posh, possibly manufactured, meaningless lyrcis, fabulous tunes, short live sets, shorter album, a few top singles, a lead singer who is desperately un-quotable.

Sleeper. Not hyped, considered to be a bit of a joke by NME, were big in 95/ 96 and then vanished after the third LP failed (3 out of 10 in NME), students loved them.

The reality: sexy and quotable lead singer, wrote their own songs, lyrics that aptly pigeonhole student life in late Major Britain, fab first two albums, wicked pop tunes, still sound great.

So I ask you - WHY does the NME hype The Strokes when, to my ear at least, they are good but haven't produced a tune quite as fab as 'What do I do Now?', 'Swallow', 'Alice in Vain' or 'Statuesque'.

Answers?

Calum Robert, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Un-quotable? When I saw them last novemeber Julian blasted off with, "i'm having fucking fun, even though I don't fucking look like it"

Cracked me up, he really didn't look like it until he decided to hit himself in the head with the microphone during the last song.

Pain = fun

Jeff, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Not hyped? What sort of freaky ass alternative universe do you live in? The NME was all over Ms 'I'm so controversial' Wiener like a rash in 1995.

RickyT, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

haha "wrote their own songs."

and you call -me- nu-ilm., Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Joke thread of the week!

Julio Desouza, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

That'll be 'Ms Wener' I presume but anyway... NME hated Sleeper I should add. They were gloating like buggery when the band called it a day.

As for Casablancas hitting a mic over his head - (adopts Beavis and Butthead accent) 'Uh huh huh cool'. Sorry folks, I'd far rather have my front person looking like a sassy, sexy girl next door type than some spotty posh kid.

'There he comes, she swa-ah-hah-ah-lows, that's no lover, that's a vanity thief'.

Genius.

Calum Robert, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Anyone seen this little gem?

james devon, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Wow, that's cheap.

People who like to invert and surprise, eg Mark S, should by rights come along and stick up for Sleeper.

the pinefox, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I always found Sleeper ... like ... functional. Serviceable. Just sort of there. This despite their trying to pull way too much portent out of songs that were generally limp, or maybe slightly fizzy at best.

nabisco%%, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Extra cookies for you, nabisco. I suspect, not unlike Sleeper, der Strokes will have a nice little run and then most folks will sensibly realize there isn't much substance (not synonymous with brow- furrowing significance) supporting the buzz. I mean, they're fine, but they're unlikely to revolutionize anything but the sales of Converse All-Stars. And then a half a decade or so later . . . Julian Casablancas, novelist.

Lee G, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Is This It at least provokes a bit more reaction than the first Sleeper record, though. I mean, it can at least grab you temporarily, and in good cases provoke non-stop listening for two to three weeks. Whereas the Sleeper records get put on, are mildly enjoyable, get taken off, get put on later when at a loss for anything else to put on, blah blah blah ... I mean, it's no wonder they weren't hyped as there was very little to hype about them beyond Louise making a rambunctious interview subject.

nabisco%%, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

True, I suppose. Sleeper never really made any music you could categorize as "galvanic."

Lee G, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

in the name is their ultimate truth

mark s, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Applied to every group, that could be seen as strange.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"Inbetweener" will never be as good as "Hard To Explain" in the new wave stakes. Simple as that. The second Sleeper album was mostly rubbish, the second Strokes album probably will be too

electric sound of jim, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Alright I can see I'm on my own here. Kudos to the person who mentioned that The Strokes will not revolutionise anything. I agree wholeheartedly and I quite fed up with NME's consistent hype (didn't they try this with Terris and At The Drive In and Andrew WK and... oh never mind). When I finally bought 'Is This It' I was quite surprised to find a really good collection of pop tunes that said utterly nothing to me about anything but were really rather catchy.

Sleeper are pretty much the same though and that is my point. The only difference between the two being that, if you can get rid of your snobbery towards honest throwaway indie for two seconds, Sleeper never really pretended to be anything they weren't. They wrote great pop songs, Louise sang about 'doing it till we're sore' (gasp! A WOMAN, how dare she, singing about such things - NME prove their male dominated, hushed up male dominated stance once and for all by saying Wener is simply 'a slapper'... and please hype Eminem more boys).

They made some of the finest raido friendly pop tunes of the mid nineties (need I role them off?) and for a time actually seemed to be on top of the world.

And, at the end of the day, they were sexier, sassier and had more to say than The Strokes.

Calum Robert, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"in the name is their ultimate truth"

see also Catatonia, Placebo

jamie, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

well except "sleeper" = it seems dead in the water now will be one day suddenly turn out to a big success, but by small degrees (unlike catatonia or placebo)

eg sleepers wake up

mark s, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

snobbery towards honest throwaway indie

fighting talk! i have nothing against throwaway (in fact i only like throwaway records), but i don't like honest records. i don't like sleeper that much (don't dislike them either), i prefer the strokes because they're aren't honest, they're a discopop band when good

if its any consolation, i started a similar thread about Adorable last year, and no one agreed with me, heh heh (at least i don't think they did, i can't remember, i'd best go check hadn't i?)

gareth, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Sleeper were shit. They gave corporate indie an even worse name. Wener couldn't find a tune in a bucket, and once she'd shagged all the Sleeperblokes they had no reason to exist anymore. What's there to argue about? And their (apt?) name was given to them by their record company anyways (see Radiohead)

Snotty Moore, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

and, to be honest, sleeper were hyped by the indie press

gareth, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

name only apt if you think they're going to be BIG soon as proved by science a small ways upthread

mark s, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

also louise can shag whoever she likes obv sheesh

mark s, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"meaningless lyrcis"(sic) - Lyrics about how you just got laid or how you want to get laid are hardly meaningless. Give Julian Casablancas some credit. He does get laid.

J Blount, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Sleeper did have some gd songs - 'What do I do Now?' and 'Vegas' to name two - but their recs are full of godawful filler, the Sleeper boys were a pretty poor backing group, the production was v. plodding and uninspired, and Louise said some truly stoopid things in a bid to elevate Sleeper to the top of the indie-pop shite stack. And they were always going to suffer in comparison to the competition - Oasis, Blur, Pulp - in terms of their quality-shit ratio.

'Is This It' is v. cleverly arranged/played/produced, there's almost no filler, the lyrics to 'New York City Cops' and 'Last Night' are pretty funny, and the lead singer is sexier. But I wouldn't be surprised if we have to wait five years for a 'Second Coming'-style follow up.

Calum, did you once write a review of a Loren Mazzacane Connors gig for some website or other? It's the only review that has ever prompted me to write an angry letter to the editor!

Andrew L, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

No I never wrote any such thing... sorry. Don't even know who this 'Lauren' is to be honest.

Anyhow - Sleeper actually chose their own name (they were previously called 'Surrender Dorothy' and they became Sleeper because that's then name of Lousie's favourite Woody Allen film.

I get pissed with this whole 'she shagged the Sleeperblokes' shit. Look - fuck off. Who cares? If this was a guy led group where the bloke shagged everything in sight would there be this sort of 'oh what a bastard' shit? No. Julian Casablancas admits to accepting blow jobs from groupies but hey that's cool cos he's a guy. One of the bad dates Amanda 'groupie par excellance' DeCadenat - but that's cool cos he's a guy. Led Zeppellin put sea food up a woman's twat but, hey, that's cool cos they were, like, rock n' roll.

Meanwhile Louise Wener's long term boyfriend was her guitarist, they split and she ended up with the drummer (I think that's right) who she's STILL TOGETHER WITH. So how this makes her a slapper I have no fucking idea. NME, of course, would rather hype Eminem who is a great influence on the 9 year old boys buying his crap.

Sleeper were great. A female fronted band that happened to write catchy number with, often, funny lyrics. The words to 'What do I do Now?' are far better than anything The Strokes have come up with. I mean, 'Spaceships they don't understand' - oh cheers for that mate. And the words to 'Swallow' ARE class.

Calum, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"NME, of course, would rather hype Eminem who is a great influence on the 9 year old boys buying his crap." - Calum = Jim DeRogatis

J Blount, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

TS: they name themselves after a film vs they named themselves after candy

mark s, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

they named themselves after a woody allen movie, how rock n roll. what's next - bands named after whit stillman movies? how boringly bourgeois can you get?

J Blount, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Gareth, I liked Adorable v., v. much!

Ignoring the Strokes comparison, though, I stand by Sleeper just being sort of there and vaguely interesting, and I'm actually sort of mystified that anyone really liked them: I always pictured them as one of those bands whose records people picked up fourth on their lists and then stood around saying "Sleeper? Oh yeah, that record was nice enough."

I must say, though, Calum, that I'm disturbed that you point up the complexities of Louise's sexuality as this big daring plus and then (rightly) criticize people for paying negative attention to it: the former is sort of dependent on the latter, no?

Also were their lyrics possibly only good if you caught UK references I was missing? I remember them being, say, 10% clever, 60% obvious, and 30% clumsy, with the "obvious" portion subdivided into halves (boringly obvious versus functionally obvious).

nabisco%%, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

>>> I stand by Sleeper just being sort of there and vaguely interesting

I don't think this is right. I think it's a back-projection into history of the sense that '96 indie was mediocre and anonymous'. Maybe it was - but while they were in the news, there was something much more extreme and divisive about Sleeper than that. If you were enjoying one of their songs, you wouldn't say 'it's sort of there' - you'd think, I really like this track. And if you were dead set against them, as many people were and are for various reasons, then they wouldn't be 'sort of there' - it would be a source of massive annoyance that they were still there at all, and rather than being 'vaguely interesting' they'd be 'deeply irritating' or worse.

I think nabisco's comment might possibly be accurate as a statement of how 'pop history' will regard, or does regard, Sleeper - which is fair enough; but I don't think it registers the fact of a band's presence when they are Now rather than Then.

re. lyrics: I am largely on nabisco's side: they were the sort of lyrics that people who *think* they are good lyricists write, and that make the pinefox groan with the evident gap between estimate and actuality. There is a whole sub-genre of PSEUDO-CLEVER LYRICISM within 'indie' which I may have mentioned before: Sleeper are exemplary, but Shed 7, Gene, even Blur have also given us many instances.

the pinefox, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Pinefox keep in mind that in the US there was No Opinion Whatsoever on 96 British indie, so I can only go by what was on the records. And ... well ... I can't think of anything on those records that was interesting enough to stir anyone up in either direction. What do you think it was that excited or agitated people in the UK? Gender things? Gender things are the nearest to a point-of-interest I can find on there, and even those bits were largely obvious and unsurprising. Or am I right in recalling some sort of "political" connection or tension developing between Sleeper and the N.W.O.N.W.? (I had no NME to consult that year: "Lady Love Your Countryside" references a N.W.O.N.W. single, right, but as I'd never heard the first I couldn't tell whether it was approvingly or sarcastically or just a pun.)

NB when I say they were "just sort of there" I don't mean that in a bad way. I mean, they were "just sort of there" in my record collection and in my CD changer, which is many steps above being "just sort of there" on the radio.

nabisco%%, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"I must say, though, Calum, that I'm disturbed that you point up the complexities of Louise's sexuality as this big daring plus and then (rightly) criticize people for paying negative attention to it: the former is sort of dependent on the latter, no? "

I don't think I pointed out the 'complexities' of her sexuality because there aren't any: she was a young girl who was dating a member of her band, split with him and dated another band member whom she's still together with 8 years later. I think that Sleeper did sing about British things ('The Queen is Dead' reference on 'Dress Like Your Mother' the whole lyric of 'Statuesque' and 'Shrinkwrapped') and I for one think the sex references in the songs (specifically 'Swallow', 'Delicious', 'Nice Guy Edie' and 'Statuesque') are now kinda cute. And I stand by 'What do I do Now' as one of the best break up songs ever written.

I like Sleeper a lot to be honest and never felt they deserved the shit they got from NME. Any paper that can still, with a straight face, give the new Travis LP an 8 out of 10 review and hail Andrew WK as a messiah, has its faults. I think that their 'Wener the slapper' attitude had everything to do with the repressed, upper middle class, closet sexist scribblings of such assholes as Steven Wells.

Just a thought...

Calum Robert, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

No, Calum, I mean the bit where you said: "They wrote great pop songs, Louise sang about 'doing it till we're sore' (gasp! A WOMAN, how dare she, singing about such things)." I.e., you put woman- singing-about-such-things in a list of important positive attributes, which, you know, isn't inherently valuable in the absence of a discourse arguing that women really shouldn't sing about such things.

In part what I'm saying is that I'm surprised you found lyrics like those worthy of pointing out: maybe it's just me, but I found them pretty much unsurprising and fine and once again just sort of there. I dunno, maybe if I'd been reading the NME calling her a slapper I would have cheered her on a bit more for doing it -- but I don't see any stances she took (lyrically) about sex or gender being particular inventive or controversial.

nabisco%%, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

She replied to them in the lyric for 'Lie Detector'... which is Wener's attempt at demonstrating how the press pigeonhole female leads. She would lash out at the press when given the chance to be fair to her.

I remember Justine from Elastica saying she hated taking her top off for a Select shoot, but she ended up being talked into it. Then when Elastica returned NME was more interested in whether or not she was shagging Brett Anderson than if 'The Menace' was any good (which to be fair is debatable anyway).

Quite like Louise Wener - think she took a lot of slack, made some dopey comments (her comments on vegetarians were especially uncalled for) but still released some corking songs. I guess the point I was making was that Louise sang about aggresive female sexuality, and I get the impression that it 'turned' some journalists on, but also allowed for them to pigeonhole her as a slut.

Funnily enough, the same old NME is now making a case for Princess Superstar as some feminist icon.

Calum Robert, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Both bands are unmitigated shite, and I don't really care which one gets more hype, I just ignore both of them. Can't comment on the validity of Ms.Wener as a feminist icon, as I never really got past the poverty of her tunes.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Calum

you make no sense. The only sense I can make of your comments is that you fancy Louise and do not fancy The Strokes because they are - shock, horror - rich kids.

Both bands are inconsequential like all pop music. The rate of turnover in 2002 is frightening and journalists frantically grab onto any musical driftwood press officers put their way that pleases their ears. You muppet.

Sonicred, Sunday, 2 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

stop saying "you muppet", you muppet

mark s, Sunday, 2 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Muppet is the best

Sonicred, Sunday, 2 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Louise Wener was crap on Shooting Stars, though.

Mr Swygart, Sunday, 2 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Listen to me Sonicred you little piece of stale tramp jizz... OF COURSE I fucking fancied Louise you twat, I was a straight teenaged boy!!! If I come back as a gay teenaged boy in the next life I'll be sure and let you know if I fancy The Strokes as well.

Now, matey, if I simply judged music by whom I fancied then I'd be out there buying Kylie, Sophie Ellis Bextor and fucking Atomic Kitten CDs, but that just aint so. So keep your dipshit opinions where they belong: in your diary.

I don't dislike The Strokes either - if you'd read my posts you realise I like them a great deal, fab pop tunes and all. I just happen to think Sleeper have a lot in common with them, and produced BETTER pop tunes.

Case closed. Now go drown yourself in a bath full of goat wank.

Calum Robert, Sunday, 2 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"Both bands are inconsequential like all pop music."="I am inconsequential"

cuba libre (nathalie), Sunday, 2 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Calum

you're a funny muppet too

Sonicred, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

You took that surprisingly well.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Kilian

you've clearly never bathed in 'goat wank'. It is great for the pores

Sonicred, Monday, 3 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I think the "just sort of there"-ness of Sleeper is what fascinated medium-sized Graham, ie apparently ordinarily singing "she's so small/tiny and crushed up/54 the size of a child", "This little creature/Lives in your wardrobe", "She's seen one and it looks funny/It made her cry, said "BOO" to her" ect. (Just noticed she writes in the third person, like what Tom(?) said about B+S, plus mixed with choruses in first = v.disconcerting)

I listened to S*M*A*R*T last night. I still kind of like them.

Graham, Tuesday, 4 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"you've clearly never bathed in 'goat wank'. It is great for the pores"

I find water more effective. And less laborious to obtain.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 4 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

less fun also

mark s, Tuesday, 4 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Well you can all bathe in goat wank if you don't see the underappreciated genius in those delightful pop melodies of Weners!

Calum Robert, Tuesday, 4 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Well you can all bathe in goat wank if you don't see the underappreciated genius in those delightful pop melodies of Weners!

This is the most amazing thing said on ILM possibly ever!

nabisco%%, Tuesday, 4 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

best thread ever

man, Wednesday, 24 December 2003 16:11 (twenty years ago) link

Sale Of The Century completely pisses on anything ever made by The overrated Strokes

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 16:27 (twenty years ago) link

those were the days.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 16:33 (twenty years ago) link

eight months pass...
In retrospect, this is one of the funniest threads that has ever appeared here. Gier's little comment at the tail end is the perfect punchline.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 9 September 2004 15:09 (twenty years ago) link

one year passes...
i'm only a little way in, and --- wtf, calum was on the money!!!!

N_RQ, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:39 (nineteen years ago) link

and pinefox should refer to himself in the third person more often.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Right, now put this thread back on the shelf.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:53 (nineteen years ago) link

ok, dad.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:56 (nineteen years ago) link

i can't be bother to actually read this thread, but i love the title.

mai, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh, the thread's worth reading, believe me.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:26 (nineteen years ago) link

The Strokes rock!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:38 (nineteen years ago) link

MAREKY GROUT DON'T BE PULLING A BUSTA UP ON HIS WAY DOWN!!!!YOU IS ALLL THE GUIDANCE WEE KIDZ GOT In A WORLD OF DARKNESSSS NOWW THAT CALUM ""THE BAPTIST" HASS BEEEEN BANISHED // BARRED EXILEED!!!! PERHHPAS WE SEE HIS SLIKES AGAIN IN SOMWW FOREIGN LLANFD OR NOT BUT FOR NOW MARK GROUYT MUST LIVE THE DREAM FOR US ALLL1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ps love to N_Rq mad props frrom such as such do never goo un-noticed.

GRIMEY SIMEY, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:45 (nineteen years ago) link

one year passes...

best thread ever
-- man, Wednesday, 24 December 2003 16:11 (3 years ago) Bookmark Link

OTM

acrobat, Thursday, 31 May 2007 11:25 (seventeen years ago) link

I want to see a picture of Calum! I, too, love Sleeper and all manners of britpop. I need to know if my male counterpart is hot!

Finefinemusic, Thursday, 31 May 2007 16:03 (seventeen years ago) link

I dislike both of them. But I saw both of the live at various points and The Strokes pissed all over Sleeper.

everything, Thursday, 31 May 2007 16:15 (seventeen years ago) link

That must have been some show.

ledge, Thursday, 31 May 2007 16:22 (seventeen years ago) link

Ha! Actually what happened was that the The Strokes pissed all over The Doves but unfortunately not in that way.

everything, Thursday, 31 May 2007 16:36 (seventeen years ago) link

two months pass...

I'm for the new supergroup formed by Louise Wener and journo John Harris (the friend of Damon Cunt Albarn and Donna Junkhead Matthews)

pft, Thursday, 23 August 2007 11:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Wait what?

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 23 August 2007 11:26 (seventeen years ago) link

http://vu.morrissey-solo.com/sleeper/2000/news/070320.htm

apparently.

Bocken Social Scene, Thursday, 23 August 2007 11:29 (seventeen years ago) link

That's one mixed up web link.

Velvet Underground, Morrissey Solo, then Sleeper?

Mark G, Thursday, 23 August 2007 11:42 (seventeen years ago) link

I also red it somewhere else that they play in Crouch End

pft, Thursday, 23 August 2007 11:46 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm never leaving the house again.

or

I really hope it's at the Music Palace, or whatever it's called.

Bocken Social Scene, Thursday, 23 August 2007 11:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Will Harris be the new Dimebag Darrell? Only time will terll.

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Also tell.

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:58 (seventeen years ago) link

four months pass...

I've been listening to some Sleeper this evening.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 28 December 2007 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

"Nice Guy Eddie" doesn't really go anywhere, also Louise is dressed like Molko/Jas Mann/random other late 90s "I AM SO AN-DRODGE-EE-NUZ" dude in the video.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 28 December 2007 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

"What Do I Do Now": this is pretty dull. "She's made up like glue", apparently.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 28 December 2007 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

"She's A Good Girl": horrid.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 28 December 2007 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

That's it.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 28 December 2007 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/fiction/article1525387.ece

maybe harris gave up the guardian gig to take them to the next level.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 28 December 2007 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

"softly-spoken"

nabisco, Friday, 28 December 2007 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

It's like they're trying to make Jaymc cry

nabisco, Friday, 28 December 2007 19:45 (sixteen years ago) link

they both suck, obvs

pc user, Friday, 28 December 2007 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Calum W. is a British writer and film critic. His books include Minds of Fear and Taboo Breakers and his work has been published in such magazines as Neo, Dreamwatch, SFX and Fangoria
In addition, Calum has worked as an associate producer on The Collingswood Story and Brotherhood of Blood.

J0hn D., Friday, 28 December 2007 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

i knew it!

pc user, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

In a better world The Collingswood Story would be Calum's weepy tribute to Fountains of Wayne

nabisco, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I've been listening to some Sleeper this evening.

-- Dom Passantino, Friday, 28 December 2007 18:45 (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

Proof! You are a mentalist.

Pashmina, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Calum W is a British writer and film critic. His books include Minds of Fear and Taboo Breakers and his work has been published in such magazines as Neo, Dreamwatch, SFX and Fangoria
In addition, Calum has worked as an associate producer on The Collingswood Story and Brotherhood of Blood.

-- J0hn D., Friday, 28 December 2007 21:23 (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Dude even had a cover feature in Bizarre. They've not even given me one yet :-(

Dom Passantino, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I like the Strokes. They're like a boring version of Blondie. I like boring things.

I know, right?, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

now i understand nme readers

pc user, Friday, 28 December 2007 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link

He still has the same haircut.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 28 December 2007 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Franz Ferdinand and Killers > Sleeper > The Strokes

Geir Hongro, Friday, 28 December 2007 22:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Although none of the other acts have ever made a song as great as "Sale Of The Century", Sleeper's one true classic.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 28 December 2007 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/4945/robotvp8.jpg

Noodle Vague, Friday, 28 December 2007 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Liking the Strokes puts me in a tiny minority on this board doesn't it?

I know, right?, Friday, 28 December 2007 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think so, akshully.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 28 December 2007 23:14 (sixteen years ago) link

good spelling, I may use that.

I know, right?, Friday, 28 December 2007 23:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't forget to credit me.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 28 December 2007 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.