Ramones v. Sex Pistols

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Come on! Who d'ya like?

Mark, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ramones means ALL Ramones, even the late-80s stuff.

Mark, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Really just trying to stir up some USA/UK animosity.

Mark, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Johnny Rotten wore a swastika but Joey Ramone sang about being a Nazi ("Today Your Love, Tomorrow The World") even though he's Jewish. Ramones win on those credentials alone.

Nate Patrin, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Ramones had superior songs. On the other hand, I suspect ver Pistows influenced/inspired more bands that I actually like.

Then again, I'm currently listening to 'Hey Matthew' by Karel Fialka and really enjoying it, so my judgement might be suspect.

clotion, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Break it down into two categories: i) songs; and ii) philosophy.

Mark, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Ramones win on any platform other then pure single awards for Anarchy In The UK. I mean the Ramones LOVED 60s pop, hell they did an album with Phil Spector, The Sex Pistols, um Im not sure what they loved.
While I like both The Ramones have a special place in my musical heart for writting poop like I Wanna Be Your Boyfriend and The KKK Took My Baby Away merely because they would sing it with as much honesty/emotion (cynical ro otherwise) as Brittney Spears would sing Hit Me One More Time.

Mr Noodles, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

songs - ramones

philosophy - ramones

J Blount, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Love'em both. The Ramones did it first, the Ramones did it better, the Ramones did it longer, but still.....the Pistols somehow managed to capture the imagination a bit better.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

b-but alex it's apples and oranges

mark s, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

b-but mark s, you can only compare apples with oranges! never with other apples...

anyway, Ramones all the way...

why?

songs. don't know many, would like to know more, but Beat On The Brat is a favourite
philosphy. cleverer/dumber
image.
potential for ironic appreciation...(heh heh)

gareth, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Heh - I'd never actually heard the first Ramones alb until a couple of months ago - I was shocked by how much the Clash (and other English punkers) had ripped off that rec.

Which is why I'm voting for the Pistols. And the singing is better.

Andrew L, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ramones

1) they look cooler
2) johnny ramone is a great guitarist
3) the sex pistols have all that horrible art scene baggage and mcclaren
4) i dislike rotten
5) the ramones had better tunes

jel --, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Ramones covered The Ronettes.

The Sex Pistols covered Eddie bloody Cochran.

THE RAMONES WIN!!!

speak of the devil, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what jel said

also is it impossible for anyone to write about mclaren without using the word 'svengali'? i've always hated that word.

geeta, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I prefer Green Day.

Funny thing is, I actually do.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sex Pistols movie: "The Great Rock'n'Roll Swindle" Ramones movie: "Rock'n'Roll High School"

Obviously, the Ramones are better (PJ Soles notwithstanding).

Nick A., Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Ramones were rock'n'roll classicists trying to revive the genre eg named after McCartney, working with Phil Spectre, Do Your Remember Rock'n'Roll Radio etc.

The Pistols sounded like they wanted to destroy rock'n'roll and thus win easily.

stevo, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Spectre" = yr subconscious disagrees w.you stevo

mark s, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I vote Ramones.

Sean, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

unreservedly Sex Epistles. as stevo says, most american punks revered the canon and wanted to fit into it.

jamie, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"unreservedly Sex Epistles. as stevo says, most american punks revered the canon and wanted to fit into it."

Wouldn't this describe all of the sex pistols except for johnny rotten?

Nick A., Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree with nearly everything said here in favour of the Ramones and in favour of the Pistols. I basically love the Ramones more (and they were hilarious on their very first UK tour) because of their astonishing initial impact on me in 1976 and they made more good records and kept entertaining me for quite a few years, but I remember being convinced for about six months that the Sex Pistols were the most important and greatest band in the world, and I hold on tight to that feeling too. I don't want to pick a side here.

Martin Skidmore, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Pistols, because they WERE the greatest and most important band of all time.

Justyn Dillingham, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the word "svengali" makes me think of Ron Jeremy ewwww. Ron Jeremy is more punk than either. don't make me explain.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Explain please.

J Blount, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

GeeTa SeZ:

also is it impossible for anyone to write about mclaren without using the word 'svengali'?

I wd prefer it if everyone used words like "l4m3r", "Mother phucking lamer", "nob" etc to describe the VILE & ODIOUS mclaren

Norman Phay, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

mclaren's ok: the film that paints him most odious is the one he himself made, after all => eg he created the myth of wicked mclaren

did you know that the actual (=fictional) popstar that svengali created/manipulated was a girl called trilby, whose trademark was the kind of hat we now know as the etc etc?

there was a doc on ron jeremy on c4 on monday: i was going to post abt it => he seemed sad, really (not sad as in lame, sad as in lonely: all the pr0n starlets wuv him like their funny fat elder brother, true, but no one finds him glamorous... obv they also all have hardcore sex w. him but this is somewhat devalued emotional currency in the context)

mark s, Friday, 31 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Johnny Rotten rules because he auditioned for the job with Alice Cooper's "Eighteen."

Joey Ramone rules because he was a bar mitzvah boy from Forest Hills.

They both rule because their initials are "JR" and so are mine.

You know who else rules? Jonathan Richman.

Jody Beth Rosen, Saturday, 1 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

one month passes...
ANYWAY... IT DOESN´T MATTER. PISTOLS OR RAMONES. ROTTEN OR RAMONE . WHAT REALY MATTERS IS ROCK AND ROLL...

ALL WHAT WE EAR TODAY CAME FROM THEM......

Juan Sesto, Friday, 19 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

''ALL WHAT WE EAR TODAY CAME FROM THEM......''

That would be depressing if it were true. It's a good thing it's bullshit!

''The Ramones were rock'n'roll classicists trying to revive the genre eg named after McCartney, working with Phil Spectre, Do Your Remember Rock'n'Roll Radio etc.''

Agree.

''The Pistols sounded like they wanted to destroy rock'n'roll and thus win easily.''

sure but they ended up reviving rock. After all you can't destroy it by using rock riffage.

JUlio Desouza, Friday, 19 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don´t think so...

JUAN SESTO, Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

two years pass...
"Anarchy in the UK" is sooo much better than anything the Ramones ever did

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 15 August 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

unreservedly Sex Epistles. as stevo says, most american punks revered the canon and wanted to fit into it.
-- jamie (child_psycholog...), May 31st, 2002.

What are you even talking about? The New York punks (with exceptions, I know) were a crazy lot of artists.

"We were going for the preppy look, we just wanted to turn the rock iconography on its head." - David Byrne, not particularly sounding like someone trying to fit into the canon.

David Allen (David Allen), Sunday, 15 August 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Just seeing a photo of the Pistols in an April 1976 issue of Melody Maker - a photo alone - changed my life, and my musical path, forever. That's a testament to the exhiliration promised by their very existence. I've never felt anything like it before or since. We couldn't find the EMI "Anarchy" single in Atlanta, but we pounced on "GSTQ" on its release, and its effect was absolutely devastating. (Ditto for the flip, "Did You No Wrong.")

Conversely, I knew of Ramones from the Voice, Rock Scene, etc., and I loved the first two albums, "Leave Home" particularly. I saw Ramones on their initial Southern foray in November 1976 - idiots in the Atlanta audience were throwing ashtrays and beer bottles at them... Dee Dee absorbed several direct hits. I danced throughout the entire show in a thick, scratchy grey wool suit and took a few black plastic ashtrays to the back of my head as well.

Don Fleming and I saw the Pistols' debut American gig together at the Great Southeast Music Hall in Atlanta (a foul strip mall dive). They were completely fucking un-together musically, but the sheer energy they emitted swept the audience into an astonishing frenzy. The clips from "DOA" and "Filth" do not lie - most folks had no clue about Sex Pistols, and dressed as though attending a midnight showing of "The Rocky Horror Picture Show." Of course, I'm quite certain that had Don and I peppered the lads with questions about The Slits or Subway Sect they would have told us to fuck off straight away... What a fucking circus.

As to their music, I can't bear to listen to any Ramomes after "Leave Home." That's just my opinion, mind you. Those first two albums are magnificent, almost perfect.

The Pistols album still blows my mind. Bill Price and Chris Thomas produced the living shit out of that album - it's completely amazing, utterly absorbing throughout. I adamantly disagree with those who say that it was "over-produced" - it's a relevatory work. Rotten's vocals are untouchable, peerless. "New York," "Bodies," "Holidays"... Holy Shit! Even better, "Satellite," the b-side of the "HITS" single. Words fail... Only Stooges begin to approach the unhinged ferocity they displayed on the song.

Verdict? A draw, of course! How can one compare? Both deserving of endless praise.

TS

Tom Smith, Sunday, 15 August 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Ramones all the way for me, but Tom is right on about Leave Home being the absolute pinnacle.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Sunday, 15 August 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Tom Smith OTM.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 15 August 2004 22:51 (twenty-one years ago)

TOM OTM

the music mole (colin s barrow), Sunday, 15 August 2004 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd like to see someone around today as popular as the Sex Pistols calling Bush, Blair, etc. a "fascist regime". Now someone like the Dixie Chicks say one sentence about being embarrassed by Bush, and they get boycotted.

wetmink (wetmink), Sunday, 15 August 2004 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)

"boycotted" is an extremely MILD term for what happened to the sex pistols after bill grundy/"god save the queen."

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 16 August 2004 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Well gawdamn Mr. Smith, that was quite the post. Stick around! I strongly suspect Alex in NYC will soon recruit you as a brother in arms.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 16 August 2004 05:38 (twenty-one years ago)

The Damned

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Monday, 16 August 2004 09:10 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.