2008

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

How was it for you?

Poll Results

OptionVotes
Good. Several great releases but not a groundbreaking year like.... 22
Great. One of the very best, a landmark year with too much to keep on top of. 16
Disappointing. Apart from a few things, not much to keep me interested. 12
Average. Some good stuff but nothing extraordinary about it. 11
Dunno. Too busy catching up on old music or doing other things. 8
Wretched. One of the worst years, roll on 2009. 7
Too early to say. 2


Billy Dods, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 13:52 (sixteen years ago)

Disappointing.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 14:33 (sixteen years ago)

every year is average

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 14:34 (sixteen years ago)

every year is awesome

t_g, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 15:29 (sixteen years ago)

Good. Several great releases but not a groundbreaking year like....

a hoy hoy, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 15:29 (sixteen years ago)

Great. One of the very best, a landmark year with too much to keep on top of.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 15:29 (sixteen years ago)

This has been my most enjoyable and exciting year for music this decade (although 2007 comes close). But that's as much to do with the shows I've seen, as the records I've listened to. Very tempted to say that every year since 2002 has been an improvment on the year before it.

mike t-diva, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago)

oh wait this is music?

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 15:42 (sixteen years ago)

average, but with a lot of 'dunno' being applicable.

mark e, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago)

write in: unicorns

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago)

Barbeque Sauce instead of:

beggin-ass keith (The Reverend), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago)

Dunno, average I spose.

sonderangerbot, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

Good or bad, this means you guys heard EVERY album put out this year. Congrats on your hard work.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 17:10 (sixteen years ago)

I love music.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 17:10 (sixteen years ago)

Au contraire, it's asking what your take is based on what you've heard this year. Even if you've only heard a handful of tracks that's fine. Not looking for an olympian overview as to its place in history, more interested in the personal response.

Billy Dods, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago)

i hav heard every album and single as well as 85% of remixes

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago)

for music, awesome, for not music, wretched

Suggest Ban Permalink (contenderizer), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago)

There's nearly always fantastic music simmering under in genres that this forum never seemed to embrace (folk, ethnic pop, critically reviled electronic subgenres like psy and downtempo, stuff the Wire files under Out Music and Modern Composition). For the genres it collectively likes (slightly leftfield pop in english and whatever electronica flavor is hip this month), there's been a lack of emergent directions/narratives for a few years. So on the whole its been average.

To my ears, its been sometime since I've come to like a genuinely new genre with a strong identity (and attendant rules & culture). At least nothing with the magnitude these breakouts (things I like, there is no objective taste): 1969-funk, 1971-krautrock, 1975-post-Philly disco, 1977-punk, 1980-post-punk/proto-goth, 1983-new wave singles, 1986-American noise indie, 1990-shoegaze, 1993-drum & bass, also IDM, 1994-triphop, 1999-microhouse, 2000-electropop revival, 2003-disco punk. Mind you I wasn't around for the first 6 of those "epochal" years, but I can sort of reconstruct a narrative of highs and lows (ala the stoned Tony Wilson in 24 Hour Party People) with a well-tagged mp3 library.

I am hearing a more musical use of samples in indie pop this year (not as novelty, not as layered noise, and not as theft of an original's context or melody), but its diffuse and no scene has coalesced yet. Maybe next year.

derelict, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago)

good

k3vin k., Wednesday, 17 December 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago)

this was the year I reediscovered pp music...so it was GREAT for me! :D

insufferably annoying (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

System, Monday, 29 December 2008 00:01 (sixteen years ago)

probably no worse than last year IF I'd been quite as excited by the whole conglomeration of Funky/Wonky/Dubgrime as some seem to be.

I think it's exciting that those kind of genres have finally begun to bump and grind into each other in a more organic, fluid and plain more productive/exciting way than we've been used to recently (there's a damn good reason I've left Dubstep-Techno off that list zzzz), kind of an old-school.

If I'd cared about Balearic at all (I might yet, but honestly not given it any attention).

But without that, or anything much of interest happening in regular electronic/dance I've gotta go with WRETCHED.

On the upside, I've not seen a LOT of live gigs this year, but when I have a couple have absolutely floored me, and unexpectedly. So I haven't quite lost the faith just yet.

fandango, Monday, 29 December 2008 00:24 (sixteen years ago)

to be honest i think every year is good! Guess I'm optimistic.

Majority of my listening this year though, apart from Lil Wayne and some other big albums, was old stuff. Lots of Hank Williams, Caetano Veloso, Woody Guthrie, Violeta Parra, etc.

what U cry 4 (jim), Monday, 29 December 2008 00:26 (sixteen years ago)

and jazz.

what U cry 4 (jim), Monday, 29 December 2008 00:26 (sixteen years ago)

more old-school pre acid-house, pre "strict genre" (but scaling back a little from the obnoxious artificial crayzy early 00's "eclecticism") that's meant to say. Sorry I don't rate The Avalanches ILM lol

fandango, Monday, 29 December 2008 00:27 (sixteen years ago)

A lot of bands whose albums I was anticipating turned in lemons (Mercury Rev, Wedding Present - to name two off the top) and it was hard to remove the bad taste of so many disappointments for a while, but there was a lot of great stuff now that I'm looking back and hearing other people's best of's. 2007 was better though.

Cunga, Monday, 29 December 2008 00:40 (sixteen years ago)

There's nearly always fantastic music simmering under in genres that this forum never seemed to embrace (folk, ethnic pop, critically reviled electronic subgenres like psy and downtempo, stuff the Wire files under Out Music and Modern Composition). For the genres it collectively likes (slightly leftfield pop in english and whatever electronica flavor is hip this month), there's been a lack of emergent directions/narratives for a few years. So on the whole its been average.

This paragraph goes from OTM to OffTM so quickly.

Дyo! (The Reverend), Monday, 29 December 2008 00:49 (sixteen years ago)

I think you wanted me to choose "Disappointing" even though I don't think 2008 could be accurately labeled as such (if we're talking about music).. I wanted to choose "below average" above "disappointing" but that wasn't an option.

There were a handful of very good albums from 2008, but jesus what a horrible year for singles.. (whereas 2007 was the opposite, making them pretty much equally below average).. For the world at large 2008 was several steps down from last year.. for personal business it was a minor step up... but I'll just stick to ranking music to keep it easier.

billstevejim, Monday, 29 December 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago)

Disappointing-to-wretched

baby got bahn (country matters), Monday, 29 December 2008 16:37 (sixteen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

System, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 00:01 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.