I have to say, they're still shamelessly derivative, but I'm still kinda diggin' this.
― Alex in NYC, Monday, 4 May 2009 20:11 (fifteen years ago) link
the horrors - classic or dud
I really should listen to this, I loved Sea Within A Sea or whatever its called, but I just can't find myself caring enough to find it.
― Trust (a hoy hoy), Monday, 4 May 2009 20:17 (fifteen years ago) link
It's totally derivative, and I guess that is why I didn't connect with it on first spin.
But the second time, I really dug it.
― litcofsky, Tuesday, 5 May 2009 07:12 (fifteen years ago) link
i like it mostly for the production, it sounds great. the songs mostly seem ok to me, but mostly as excuses for all those bizarro washes and swoops (courtesy i assume of geoff barrow).
― would you ask tom petty that? (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 5 May 2009 13:03 (fifteen years ago) link
agreein with tipsy. wish the singer was interesting or had some kind of ability to come up with memorable vocal melodies.
― GÖTT DAT SCHING (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 5 May 2009 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link
Is "Who Can Say" the single? It should be, since it was the only song that grabbed my attention on the new album. (For those whistly seagull-flocking synth hooks, mainly. And the deadpan spoken word part over guitar buzz, I guess. Etc.) I wanted to get into the whole album (liked their EP okay a few years ago, and they seem cheesy in a cute way), but couldn't.
― xhuxk, Tuesday, 5 May 2009 16:09 (fifteen years ago) link
it's pretty good, nothing special, but by no means something that won't have short-term staying power
lol faint praise
― sorry for british (country matters), Tuesday, 5 May 2009 23:22 (fifteen years ago) link
Listened to both that first e.p. and the full debut today, and enjoyed both considerably. Will pick up the new one shortly.
― Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 6 May 2009 01:48 (fifteen years ago) link
"RIPPAH.... JACK THA RIPPAH!
― Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 6 May 2009 01:49 (fifteen years ago) link
This album is better than LJ's faint praise indicates, I think, and the closing number "Sea Within a Sea" is pretty amazing. Interesting textures production-wise throughout, for which I suppose we can thank Geoff Barrow's input.
― zero learnt from nero (Neil S), Thursday, 7 May 2009 10:13 (fifteen years ago) link
The final track *is* amazing, yes. Not disputing that, not at all.
― sorry for british (country matters), Thursday, 7 May 2009 10:48 (fifteen years ago) link
*REALLY* quite different from Strange House.
― Alex in NYC, Thursday, 7 May 2009 11:52 (fifteen years ago) link
Love the first track. It's very 'Chameleons playing Isn't Anything on acid' isn't it.
Love it so much it's taken me 2 minutes to realise that Spotify has played it a second time.
― new drone spider (j.o.n.a), Thursday, 7 May 2009 19:12 (fifteen years ago) link
Really, really digging "New Ice Age", which seems to be a track not so beloved of the reviewers. It and the two long ones are the album's pinnacle imo
― sorry for british (country matters), Saturday, 9 May 2009 11:02 (fifteen years ago) link
Listening to a few tracks from Primary Colours and they're not really grabbing me at the moment. I hear the easy reference points (JD, JAMC, MBV and anything generally post-punk/goth) but it's not set fire to my ears or anything. I suppose it's nice.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, 15 June 2009 14:54 (fifteen years ago) link
Oh, forgot to mention Faith/Porno-era Cure. Not a bad reference point.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, 15 June 2009 14:56 (fifteen years ago) link
Yeah, I'm still enjoying "New Ice Age," but I can see this dropping off my "must-hear" list very swiftly.
― Alex in NYC, Monday, 15 June 2009 15:25 (fifteen years ago) link