― , Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ally, Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nicole, Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Robin Carmody, Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Arguing aggressively over music: dud.
"Vehemently" sounds like it falls into the second category.
It's a shame the rock/rap thread ended up like it did because these are important questions - very important ones. But we've discussed important questions here before without calling each other morons and fuckwads, too. So something was different, and it was mostly the tone of the posting. If we want to talk about this kind of stuff, might I suggest leaving it a couple of weeks and then not being so belligerent about the questioning? Or the replying for that matter.
― Tom, Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The important thing here is that, while all music comes from the same foundation (ie, sound waves), it can sound vastly different and inspire vastly different emotions in the people who listen to it. That's what makes it worth discussing.
At any rate, I don't think the point of the rap thread was that rappers are better than rockers. It was that rappers are not worse than rockers. It's also dangerously simplistic to isolate music as the only external influence on a person's behavior.
― Dan Perry, Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Geordie Racer, Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― DG, Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― neuro, basking in the glory of a job well done, Wednesday, 25 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
A) Winding up everyone (evidence most likely being the question we are here answering) B) Making generalised statements about varied classes without ever bothering to answer any questions as to why C) Imitating Flat Eric
This was a multiple choice question.
I want to take back my original answer and make it read this: You may ask yourself, why such a big suit? You may ask yourself, couldn't this suit be taken in a little? You may ask yourself, self, why did I buy this suit?
That amuses me far more right now.
I refuse to answer this question seriously until Mr. Wind Up bothers to answer the question as to how the generalised lyrical content of hip hop is any more or less negative than the generalised lyrical content of rock music.
or is this just more words on a page ?
― MC hammin' in up + BIG wILLIE sTALIN, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Geordie Racer, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― the pinefox, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― , Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nick, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Robin Carmody, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
to answer the question in *this thread* here's how rap is different: it comes from street corners and rhyming contests. the art of the put- down. samplers, turntables, cheap electronics. hip hop is inherently social. it takes a force of effort make make hip hop nonconfrontational. that is very different from any other kind of music i can think of.
there's a lot of wack MC's. anything that can be marketed and exploited will be, and hiphop is a worldwide phenomenon whose moneymaking potential has yet to hit a wall.
as has been discussed the same was true for metal in the 80s. hard men who'd been around the block a few times. same appeal. and the same misogynistic and violent crap was all over the airwaves. there was good metal but you had to look.
p.s. we've just finished a century of english poetry in which hardly anything rhymed because rhyming's kind of, well, "sissy". now it seems the hard men do nothing but. confusing, no?
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
WTF with the "positive" requirement for hip hop? There are many examples (Blackalicious, Common, Missy, Lauren Hill, De La, Tribe, Black-Eyed Peas, Outkast, Talib Kweli, Prince Paul, Stetsasonic, Company Flow, Michael Franti, etc. etc.) -- but that's not the point.
Would you rather the Velvet Underground concentrated on the positive aspects of their lives?
In fact, I'm hard-pressed to think of any "positive" rock music I like. The Gories are my favorite band though so make of that what you will.
"So I leap through And dominate the microphone I speak through I'm writin' for the people - bite if you need to I can see through And see dat You saw an MC and tried to be dat That MC you saw ME Can you believe dat? And agree dat True lyrics will always suffice? And R.E.A.L. meanin' Rhymes Equal Actual Life Is the true essence and ebony Trace your record sales G Somethings are pure luck others things are meant to be I bet they'll mention me In the next century "KRS-One innovator in early rap poetry" Simultaneously you will be forgotten While in the year 2000 Criminal Minded will STILL be rockin' You waste your time battlin' me I got mine happenin' see You should of thought G You should of thought sooner instead of battlin' me you need to plan your longevity Before you die broke like Sammy Davis Jr. The solar followed by the lunar Followed by the solar Followed by McDonalds and Coke Cola The point is that Whatever the outcome of the battle the battle goes on with more french fries and soda
- KRS1
― Tracer hand, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracey Horny, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― ethan, Thursday, 26 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Charles Moore would jump at the above phrase ...