Woooooooooooooooooooo. So excited. Hope it is as good as Distortion was.
http://cdn.pitchfork.com/media/magnetic452.jpg
01 You Must Be Out of Your Mind02 Interlude03 We Are Having a Hootenanny04 I Don't Know What to Say05 The Dolls' Tea Party06 Everything Is One Big Christmas Tree07 Walk a Lonely Road08 Always Already Gone09 Seduced and Abandoned10 Better Things11 Painted Flower12 The Dada Polka13 From a Sinking Boat
At least the cover isn't *as* ugly as Distortion's. Some promising titles too.
― a hoy hoy, Wednesday, 11 November 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)
I hope it's better than Distortion tbh. That being said, the tracks he played from Distortion when I saw him live sounded amazing.
― I never saw the advantage of peeing while standing. (Upt0eleven), Wednesday, 11 November 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)
Swerving from the unrelenting feedback pop of "Distortion," this record explores the various genres under the umbrella of folk. Stephin says, "I thought of the two records as a pair, and I initially wanted them to be called 'True' and 'False.' But I couldn't decide which I wanted to be called 'True' and which I wanted to be called 'False.'"
― caek, Friday, 13 November 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)
ominous...
the umbrella of follk
I expect "False Part 1" and "False Part 2" would be fitting names for these. It's not that I want more conventional sincerity from SM, and I don't mind his deadpan vocals (although I'm not a great fan of his singing). It's just that he never seems more than superficially engaged with a sound or a style. So many inventive, well-crafted songs in his body of works, yet nine times out of ten it leaves me cold.
― Paul in Santa Cruz, Friday, 13 November 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)
body of work
― Paul in Santa Cruz, Friday, 13 November 2009 19:43 (sixteen years ago)
Good cover... but I haven't really liked anything Merritt has done in the past 8 years or so :S
― one boob is free with one (daavid), Monday, 23 November 2009 20:32 (sixteen years ago)
Streaming now on their myspace page:
http://www.myspace.com/themagneticfields
What do we think? I have "Painted Flower" on now. It is OK. Who's singing it? It doesn't really sound like Claudia. Might be Claudia + voice effects.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 22 January 2010 01:55 (fifteen years ago)
I've listened to it just once and am pretty disappointed. It certainly does have a skewed folk feel, what with the seemingly endless zithers. Not working for me but I'll give it another shot.
― Gerald McBoing-Boing, Friday, 22 January 2010 01:57 (fifteen years ago)
Apparently they weren't allowed to use any instruments that could be plugged in, going back to the i instrumentation. I wish they'd record with keyboards again, 90s Magnetic Fields style.
― CATBEAST!! (Z S), Friday, 22 January 2010 02:00 (fifteen years ago)
"You Must Be Out Of Your Mind" has a kind of classic MF sound, wouldn't be at all out of place on Get Lost.
"i want you walkin back to me, down on your knees yeahlike an appendectomy sans anaesthesia"
joints "Coney Island / prostitutes in Thailand" in the Merritt gaudy rhyme pantheon.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 22 January 2010 02:03 (fifteen years ago)
On my first couple of listens nothing stood out except the first track. Hopefully this will change.
I wish they'd record with keyboards again, 90s Magnetic Fields style.
Absolutely.
― toby, Friday, 22 January 2010 02:04 (fifteen years ago)
Doesn't Distortion have keyboards?
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 22 January 2010 02:08 (fifteen years ago)
Pretty boring on second listen.
― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 January 2010 02:11 (fifteen years ago)
i like the myspace songs more than i, and 100000000x more than the execrable distortion. painted flower does sound like claudia, though maybe pitched up?
― iTote 2.0 (electricsound), Friday, 22 January 2010 02:13 (fifteen years ago)
you are nuts, nothing on here is close to being as surprising or exciting as the amazing "Three-Way"
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 22 January 2010 02:25 (fifteen years ago)
"i" and "Distortion" are both solid records, but "Realism" is just lacking something.
― Gerald McBoing-Boing, Friday, 22 January 2010 02:36 (fifteen years ago)
i hate distortion so much
― iTote 2.0 (electricsound), Friday, 22 January 2010 02:38 (fifteen years ago)
Why?
― Gerald McBoing-Boing, Friday, 22 January 2010 02:39 (fifteen years ago)
the songs are irritating imo, i found it to be an unpleasant listen
― iTote 2.0 (electricsound), Friday, 22 January 2010 02:45 (fifteen years ago)
Eh. Distortion had memorable songs.
― Blue Fucks Like Ben Nelson (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 January 2010 02:48 (fifteen years ago)
"Realism" reviews I've seen have been quite positive. *shrug*
― Gerald McBoing-Boing, Friday, 22 January 2010 03:02 (fifteen years ago)
I want to like this, but so far, uh,
― kornrulez6969, Friday, 22 January 2010 03:06 (fifteen years ago)
I don't love Distortion that much, but "Three-Way" is the best song they recorded in the 2000s and is superior to all but 4 or 5 of the 69LS.
Listened to everything on the myspace page, enjoyed it, it didn't grab me, but I feel their records always have to grow on you a bit, they're not a love-at-first-sight kind of act. (Except "Three-Way" dammit!)
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 22 January 2010 04:04 (fifteen years ago)
tbh I knew I was in deep shit with Distortion when everyone was giving big ups to "Three-Way" and I thought it was on the boring side!
― CATBEAST!! (Z S), Friday, 22 January 2010 04:08 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe I'll try playing the new record again, this time yelling "Three-Way!" two thirds of the way through each song, and see if it works better for me that way.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 22 January 2010 04:12 (fifteen years ago)
lool
― iTote 2.0 (electricsound), Friday, 22 January 2010 04:13 (fifteen years ago)
Three-Way is not even the best song on Distortion. Drive On, Driver and Too Drunk To Dream are A++++, Drive On, Driver in my challopsy own opinion possibly better than 100kfireflies& 3/4of69ls
― dumb mack maine follows (a hoy hoy), Friday, 22 January 2010 09:31 (fifteen years ago)
myspace doesn't want to load for me :(
Petridish review here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/jan/21/the-magnetic-fields-realism-review
Haven't heard the new album, but I agree with most of what he says about 69 Love Songs, with the exception of this "wtf?" comment:
"he looks like an academic from a minor university who's just been informed that his department's funding has been slashed"
― anagram, Friday, 22 January 2010 10:04 (fifteen years ago)
yeah he looks more depressed than that
― iTote 2.0 (electricsound), Friday, 22 January 2010 10:18 (fifteen years ago)
that was the best line in the review (low bar, i know, but i don't see what was "wtf" about it)
― caek, Friday, 22 January 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)
Well, isn't Merritt actually more famous than Rufus Wainwright?
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 22 January 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
well, whether he looks like that or not, it didn't really add anything to the review or to the way I think about Merritt. imho that kind of "trying so hard to be witty" comment is at best irrelevant and at worst annoying.
― anagram, Friday, 22 January 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)
hat kind of "trying so hard to be witty" comment is at best irrelevant and at worst annoying.
SM should take this advice for his latterday lyrics
― iTote 2.0 (electricsound), Friday, 22 January 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)
xp, are you new to the british print media?
― caek, Friday, 22 January 2010 14:15 (fifteen years ago)
no, I'm British and I've been reading music press/broadsheet reviews for years... why?
― anagram, Friday, 22 January 2010 14:27 (fifteen years ago)
just the idea of expecting to get sincerity or insight out of a guardian review
― caek, Friday, 22 January 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)
(music that is, bradshaw's film reviews are sincerely moronic)
I like a lot of the Guardian's writers e.g. John Fordham, Robin Denselow, Dave Simpson, Maddy Costa. that kind of comment is pretty rare in the Guardian imho (except in Petridish reviews).
I like Bradshaw as well.
― anagram, Friday, 22 January 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)
completely unaware of this album til today.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Friday, 22 January 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)
flippant attempts at one-liners and writers who fancy themselves as funny per se (rather than using humour to illuminate a point) are not rare in the the guardian ime. not saying this are a good thing (although i actually found that one funny), but i'm surprised you're surprised by it if you're a regular reader.
pre-ordered this album but kinda regretting it based on 30 minutes flicking through the myspace streams. we shall see.
― caek, Friday, 22 January 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
Huge let-down after Distortion imo. Sounds more like Merritt's Showtunes than any Mag. Fields album.
― Vaguely Threatening CAPTCHAs, Friday, 22 January 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)
i find this record lovely, but then i thought the last was a colossal bore.
― keythkeythkeyth, Saturday, 23 January 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)
hey everyone, Dr Morbius wants us to know he hasn't heard this
― innocent snack attack victim (sic), Saturday, 23 January 2010 03:53 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, fuck you asshole.
tour:
http://houseoftomorrow.com/calendar.php
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 27 January 2010 03:37 (fifteen years ago)
Took me a couple listens to get into this...also got my signed poster today! the Magnetic Fields are really the only band I still act like a fanboy about.
― jonathan - stl, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 03:52 (fifteen years ago)
I was happy to hear this was an acoustic record, and it's not bad. I was hoping every song would song kind of like the last song on i.
― Jacob Sanders, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 04:12 (fifteen years ago)
ok can i say a big fuck you to whoever put the cardboard thingy around my cd case too tight? i can't get the fucking thing out! this is just one of the many reasons people don't buy albums any more.
(crazily, i think i had the same problem with distortion- had to cut it open. do the magnetic fields hate me?)
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, 28 January 2010 11:42 (fifteen years ago)
this album is ... eh.
Kind of surprised, looking at youtube now, that they didn't actually bother playing loud shows for any of the distortion material. Kind of disappointed.
― thomp, Thursday, 28 January 2010 12:09 (fifteen years ago)
Merritt has hearing damage so they don't do gigs like that any more afaik.
― caek, Thursday, 28 January 2010 12:10 (fifteen years ago)
oh ok. fair enough then!
acoustic 'three way' sounds pretty odd:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUWripFBrII
― thomp, Thursday, 28 January 2010 12:12 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah so far I'm not really enjoying it. Will try again though, it's not often I buy new records anymore.
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, 28 January 2010 12:14 (fifteen years ago)
I feel like their post-69ls output can be divided into 'songs which, while clever, are set up for you to find genuinely affecting as songs' and 'songs which are basically just there to be clever and radiate their cleverness'; this seems like another step towards the latter. That said I don't think I've managed to listen to the whole thing yet.
― thomp, Thursday, 28 January 2010 12:22 (fifteen years ago)
OTM. 69LS still their best
― Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 28 January 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
I have often found his cleverness genuinely affecting.
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 28 January 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)
this album is fucking garbage.
― adam, Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:01 (fifteen years ago)
haha yeah, i fear that's sort of what my false binary up there leaves out
― thomp, Thursday, 28 January 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)
Nothing they do can compare to 69LS, but this album still has its endearing songs. Except for "We are having a Hootennany". That one is just too silly.
― juicebox, Sunday, 14 February 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
What is wrong with a silly pop song?
― keythhtyek, Sunday, 14 February 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)
never could see the point of these dudes post-cheap-keyboard-era
― snoocki (s1ocki), Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
I feel like their post-69ls output can be divided into 'songs which, while clever, are set up for you to find genuinely affecting as songs' and 'songs which are basically just there to be clever and radiate their cleverness'; this seems like another step towards the latter. That said I don't think I've managed to listen to the whole thing yet.― thomp, Thursday, January 28, 2010 6:22 AM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban PermalinkOTM. 69LS still their best― Adam Bruneau, Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:05 AM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark
― thomp, Thursday, January 28, 2010 6:22 AM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Adam Bruneau, Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:05 AM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark
Well, sure, except for the matter of their pre-69LS output.
As for the new record, "You Must Be Out of Your Mind" has now grown mightily on me. I endorse it. Not sure what I think about "Hootenany."
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 14 February 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)
otm
― Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Sunday, 14 February 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)
i dont have anything wrong with silly pop songs at all. hootennany just threw me off in the context of the album, as it is so much sillier than the others.
― juicebox, Monday, 15 February 2010 00:54 (fifteen years ago)
hootenanny is really bad and being that its early on nearly turned me off of the whole thing but this grew on me. Everything outside of that song is A or B material, even the other 'silly' song dada polka. must be out of your mind is truly one of their best ever and several others like better things, walk a lonely road and from a sinking ship are at least notable. it's nowhere near as bad as the positively GRATING distortion.
― ramadaan muhammad asalaamica rasoul allah supana watallah (jk), Monday, 15 February 2010 02:18 (fifteen years ago)
It's funny that 69 Love Songs seems like the beginning of a decline now. I wonder if it did at the time?
Still not sure about this album - it starts and ends very well, but I'm less sure of the middle. I saw them live twice this week, though, and they were fantastic both times; but apart from You Must Be Out Of Your Mind and From A Sinking Ship there was nothing from Realism among the highlights of either show.
― toby, Monday, 15 February 2010 02:51 (fifteen years ago)
it's funny, they existed mainly in the indiepop world before '69ls' and then everyone felt as if they needed to acknowledge the greatness of that record or at least the greatness of the achievement and yet ever since it has been as if the band is really mismatched to the people who would deem it necessary to assess it. clearly they will never again appeal to pitchfork nation which is where most of the people here reside and I bet stephin merrit is cheered by that.
― keythhtyek, Monday, 15 February 2010 03:22 (fifteen years ago)
On the 3rd/4th listen through I like this alot. Some really pretty arrangements here: they should seriously consider releasing a Magnetic Fields music box.
The Hootenany, man making fun of Scientology is old hat and such an easy target. Otherwise the song would be alright but I can't get past it. OTOH the opening track is amazing and "The Dada Polka" has a awkwardness that I really like.
― Adam Bruneau, Monday, 15 February 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)
I'm pretty confused by this - could you elaborate? Who is the audience that they are now matched to?
― toby, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 00:24 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, this confused me too.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 02:45 (fifteen years ago)