Secret Histories of the Musicverse

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
What stories have you made up from half-heard or half-remembered facts about bands that turn out to be more interesting than the actual stories?

(question mainly so I can finally get this story out of my head. Partly inspired by the excellent Dirty Vicar)

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Beatles are a part of the world we all live in, and I've been aware of them for as long as I remember. They're a perfect narrative: four young lads start out playing other people's exciting music, and then magic happens, as it always does, and the smart one and the cute one write perfect pop. They become the biggest band in the world, our representatives in the Solar System. Then the world gets a lot stranger, and they get stranger with it, until... something happens, I was never clear what. The perfect pop song turns into walls of feedback, and dies away.

The need for narrative is the need for metaphor, the need to link what we see to what we've seen. It can help, but oh, it can hurt. How many bands have dashed themselves on the rocks of becoming the new Beatles? How much damage was done to the solo careers of John and Paul (and George and Ringo) by the knowledge that they used to be in the Beatles? But our stars have to be collapsible: to live in the lives of everyone, they have to be able to fit in the spare bits, between work and the shopping list.

I ended up in front of the Beatles Anthology when it was shown on the telly, and was struck by how, after the serious problems during The White Album, they recorded another album, saw the writing on the wall, but weren't happy enough with what they'd just done to let it be the last album, and went back to get it right one last time.

Shortly afterwards, I was letting my overstuffed paypacket turn me into a vinyl snob, and I noticed that my local record shop was selling the LPs, as new (They still make them, because, y'know, people still buy them). So I bought them, and went home to trace the story, with a brief stop by the internet to find out the release order (I am a geek).

And it sounded great, the best investment I ever made. And at the end, the perfect end to the perfect story: after the odds and ends of Abbey Road, John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Starr head back into the studio to record Let It Be, and magic happens. They're the Beatles again, and they're having a great time. The songs rise to the occasion, sounding like a band having straightforward fun, with The Long and Winding Road and Two of Us adding a note of ending, and never ending. The perfect stop to our cartoon boys.

And then I checked our friend the internet again, and horrible facts struck. Let It Be was the album they couldn't be having with, and Abbey Road was the one they recorded last but released first. You just can't find a good reality these days.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

that's fascinating... I've never heard Let It Be, but have long been interested by it as a concept.

so you're saying it's not as bad as trend people say?

one thing I wonder with Let It Be - it was famously remixed by Phil Spector after the Beatles and George Martin gave up on it. But is there a pre-Phil Spector version of it knocking around.

buying ALL of a band's recorded output in one go and listening to it consecutively is such a great thing to do.

DV, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

**But is there a pre-Phil Spector version of it knocking around**.

Loads. Usually called Get Back or The Get Back Sessions or The Twickenham sessions - the tracks from Let it be + alternative takes + more rock n roll covers etc. I might have read somewhere recently (mojo?) that they're putting an official version out soon. Could have imagined it though.

Dr. C, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

>so you're saying it's not as bad as trend people say?

Tuesday, Thursdays and Fridays it's my favourite Beatles record. I read on AMG that it's "The only Beatles album to occasion negative, even hostile reviews", which bewilders me. Abbey Road sounds so much more like they're phoning it in to me.

Let It Be, Get Back and Across The Universe appear on Past Masters Vol.2, and I think at least two of them are pre-Phil versions.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Let It Be is a better Laibach album than Beatles album.

Winkelmann, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

not to forget the lovely "two of us" on Let it be. There is a very moving rendition of "the long and winding road" -pre spector choir choruses- with just macca and his piano in the Let It Be film.

as to your request for stories, I have indulged in conscious sophistry all my life, and it has made me very tired.

pulpo, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Let It Be is the weakest Beatles album IMHO, apart from Across the Universe.

chris sallis, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Abbey Road is my favourite.

Keith McD, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Let it Be by the Beatles vs Let it Be by the Replacements.

Lord Custos IV, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the answer is obvious: "Let it Bee" by the Voice of the Beehive.

doom monger, Thursday, 11 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.