60s Rolling Stones vs. 70s Rolling Stones: A Poll

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Their classic four-album run (Beggars through Exile) is split between the decades; they released more music in the 60s, but were huge through the 70s. Which do you prefer?

Poll Results

OptionVotes
60s Rolling Stones 40
70s Rolling Stones 34


Mark, Monday, 4 January 2010 05:02 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.celebrityrockstarguitars.com/rock/images/BrianJones1.jpg

nicky lo-fi, Monday, 4 January 2010 05:28 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.morethings.com/music/rolling_stones/images/rolling_stones_with_brian_jones.jpg

nicky lo-fi, Monday, 4 January 2010 05:33 (fifteen years ago)

sorry. I'll stop there.

nicky lo-fi, Monday, 4 January 2010 05:34 (fifteen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

System, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:01 (fifteen years ago)

70s. sorry Brian

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:02 (fifteen years ago)

just so much garbage in their 60s output - shitty covers, thin production, quantity over quality, etc.

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:03 (fifteen years ago)

I wish I could pick 1967-73 or so.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

even though I think Aftermath & Beggars Banquet are total masterpieces, it's gotta be the 70s

Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

shakes, you could be speaking of the '70s too, tbqh

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:13 (fifteen years ago)

Sticky Fingers
Exile on Main St.
Goats Head Soup
It's Only Rock 'n' Roll
Black and Blue
Some Girls

vs.

The Rolling Stones
12 X 5
The Rolling Stones No. 2
The Rolling Stones, Now!
Out of Our Heads
December's Children (And Everybody's)
Aftermath
Between the Buttons
Their Satanic Majesties Request
Beggars Banquet
Let It Bleed

= I don't think so omar, they put out almost twice as many albums in the 6 yrs they were active in the 60s, as opposed to the 6 albums they put out over 10 years in the 70s. And while they were always shameless trend-chasers, it seems like they got BETTER at being trend chasers in the 70s - whereas in the 60s some of the hats they tried on (American r&b, psychedelia) didn't fit so well. And there's just more filler in the 60s material, stuff they didn't need to do by the time they were "the biggest rock n roll band in the world" or whatever.

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:19 (fifteen years ago)

i was thinking more along the lines of "shitty covers, thin production" more than the quantity. but i'm all about the '60s stones for the valleys being a little less egregious than the ones in the '70s (though the '70s has my favorite album of theirs...)

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:22 (fifteen years ago)

only shitty cover I can think of in the 70s stuff is "You Got to Move" off Sticky Fingers...? Are there others I'm forgetting?

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:29 (fifteen years ago)

"Stop Breaking Down" on Exile is fairly awesome

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:36 (fifteen years ago)

shitty?!?!

I have to admit to loving (or at least enjoying to some degree) all of their 70s covers.

^^Prospective Liberal Troll (will), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:38 (fifteen years ago)

ain't too proud to beg, just my imagination, cherry oh baby, stop breaking down, you got ot move... am i forgetting anything?

^^Prospective Liberal Troll (will), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:39 (fifteen years ago)

lol totally forgot Just My Imagination was a cover

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:40 (fifteen years ago)

(and of course it is awesome)

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:40 (fifteen years ago)

you all are nuts--does the phrase "suckin in the seventies" ring a bell?

iago g., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:01 (fifteen years ago)

ehh you got to move and stop breaking down are both pretty low-down and dope imo, the rest i don't like

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:04 (fifteen years ago)

ehh you got to move and stop breaking down are both pretty low-down and dope imo, the rest i don't like

― A™ machine (sic) (omar little),

I concur--those are primo stones, as good as any jagger/richards that's for sure (this poll has me in a snit)

iago g., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:08 (fifteen years ago)

songs from the 60's I love (I love a lot from the 70's too):

Not Fade Away
I Just Want To make Love To You
Little By Little
Carol
Tell Me
Can I Get A Witness
Around and Around
Time Is On My Side
It's All Over Now
Everybody Needs Somebody To Love
What A Shame
Pain In My Heart
Heart of Stone
Mona (I Need You Baby)
Little Red Rooster
Surprise, Surprise
Mercy, Mercy
The Last Time
That's How Strong My Love Is
Good Times
I'm All Right
(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction
Play With Fire
She Said Yeah
Your Better Move On
Get Off of My Cloud
Paint It Black
Stupid Girl
Under My Thumb
19th Nervous Breakdown
Have You Seen Your Mother, Baby...
Ruby Tuesday
Let's Spend The Night Together
Mother's Little Helper
She's A Rainbow
Sing This All Together (See What Happens)
Sympathy For The Devil
No Expectations
Jigsaw Puzzle
Street Fighting Man
Prodigal Son
Stray Cat Blues
Gimmie Shelter
Love In Vain
Country Honk
Live With Me
Let It Bleed
Midnight Rambler
You Got The Silver
Monkey Man
You Can't Always Get What You Want

nicky lo-fi, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

So pretty much everything except "Gimme Shelter"?

viborg, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:25 (fifteen years ago)

I love "Gimme Shelter"

nicky lo-fi, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:29 (fifteen years ago)

70s for sure. In the 60s, even at their nastiest there was still a feeling that they wanted to be liked. By Sticky Fingers it felt like they wanted to be hated and/or feared.

neither good nor bad, just a kid like you (unperson), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:44 (fifteen years ago)

70s for sure. In the 60s, even at their nastiest there was still a feeling that they wanted to be liked. By Sticky Fingers it felt like they wanted to be hated and/or feared.

― neither good nor bad, just a kid like you (unperson), Tuesday, January 12, 2010 1:44 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark

what on earth are you talking about? during the sixties they were feared and reviled by the older generation (at least in america) and they were truly menacing and progressively more creepy as altamont hit. in the 1970s they were a corporation (this is simplified but essentially true) and their badassness was essentially cartoonish. want to try again?

iago g., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:58 (fifteen years ago)

I fear paranoid drug-fueld corporations a lot more than I fear sexed up young English dudes. want to try again?

Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:00 (fifteen years ago)

The true battleground is between 1970-1976 and 1978-1986.

Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:02 (fifteen years ago)

'60s by a friggin' mile

if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:06 (fifteen years ago)

I wonder if this is a singles ppl vs. albums ppl divide in some ways - I am an albums dude and while I will rep hard for Beggars Banquet & Let It Bleed (not as big on Satanic Majesty's as most of the ppl I know are), the 70s make for better Stones albums imo. Especially Exile of course, and also Some Girls, both of which as albums tower over even the best of the sixties albums

Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:09 (fifteen years ago)

1965:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AkA-7mmjiI

nicky lo-fi, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:10 (fifteen years ago)

man I'll take the SNL performance of "Shattered" over that any freaking day

Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:15 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPKbCRkMlUM

Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:17 (fifteen years ago)

I fear paranoid drug-fueled corporations a lot more than I fear sexed up young English dudes. want to try again?

― Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Tuesday

They weren't perceived as vaguely comic rock aristos from 1973-80 compared to the previous decade? Why don't YOU and your oh-so-clever screen name fuck off. They peaked musically through EOMS (duh), and the corp made great product after that but if you are talking about the image they projected in the two decades, they weren't more "badass" in the 1970s (which is what unperson's point seemed to be). But you must have really trembled at the fascist implications of their lear jet-arena back in the day...

iago g., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:21 (fifteen years ago)

iago g take a xanax or something, it's a fucking music discussion board & you're the dude who came w/the shitty "want to try again?" crap first & now you don't like how it tastes

Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:22 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sure unperson thanks you

iago g., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:23 (fifteen years ago)

To live on this thread you must be tufftufftufftufftufftuffvtufftufftufftufftufftuff!

Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:25 (fifteen years ago)

let me know when the meds kick in so we can get back to talking about the stones instead of boring hostile posturing iago 'k

Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:28 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.open.ac.uk/Arts/history/policing/pics/200hard-men.jpg

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 02:44 (fifteen years ago)

I somehow left this little number off my list. 1968:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MISflttoPxo

nicky lo-fi, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 03:09 (fifteen years ago)

Went for 60s overall, but it was kind of hard because I consider 70s Rolling Stones generally quite OK, whereas 60s Rolling Stones was first not particularly good in 1963-65, then very good in 66-67, and then about as good as in the 70s in 1968-69.

Tied Up In Geir (Geir Hongro), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 04:15 (fifteen years ago)

I only like 70s stones

iatee, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 04:18 (fifteen years ago)

Should have bumped this thread earlier, boy. No answers for a week. 70s Stones for me. I have a weakness for the rock giants of the 70s. Just seems like an amazing time to be ruling the world in a rock band, having fun without the politics of the 60s, with which the Stones always had an uneasy relationship anyway. They were a good band for a more cynical and decadent time. Plus they did pretty well with disco.

Mark, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 04:22 (fifteen years ago)

And I agree with John re albums vs. singles; that's how it breaks down for me. I'm pretty cool with the two Hot Rocks sets as far as everything before Beggars. No way a 70s best-of would work.

Mark, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 04:29 (fifteen years ago)

60s

wanna be shartin' somethin' (WmC), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 04:29 (fifteen years ago)

In my case it's not just albums vs. singles, it's also a more general thing which is that I'll take music recorded between 1970-75 over music recorded between 1964-69 pretty much every single time.

neither good nor bad, just a kid like you (unperson), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 04:40 (fifteen years ago)

tough poll! I love pretty much everything these guys did in both time periods (and thereafter too). Arguments about toughness or badassedness don't convince me. Actually my recent favorite Stones period is what I called the "twee" period on this poll last summer, when they were far from tough in any conventional masculine sense. But their ability to roleplay served them well, because they wrote such good songs in that period that, if they'd just sold them to other bands (as they did on Immediate), then we wouldn't have "Sittin' On A Fence" or "Backstreet Girl".

I voted 60s because otherwise the best of the 60s albums and the best of the 70s albums are a toss for me, but the "twee" element of their sound really fascinates me and it's not something they ever really recovered after 1967 or so.

Euler, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 06:59 (fifteen years ago)

60s

Early Tuesday morning, a distraught Tequila tweeted (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 09:26 (fifteen years ago)

can anyone recommend a good/definitive bio of the band? seems odd but I've never really read much about them

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

stephen davis's Old Gods Almost Dead was pretty great... also, though it only focuses on their '72 US tour, robert greenfield's STP is also fab.

shart in a bag, light it on fire (stevie), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

it's not a full career bio but i can't imagine any book about the stones could capture the band better than:

http://www.amazon.com/True-Adventures-Rolling-Stones/dp/1556524005

the true adventures of the rolling stones by stanley booth.

it's only really the 69 tour that ended at altamont but it's maybe top 5 rock books ever IMO, at least ones that i've read

Na'vi Girls (Need Love Too) (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

nah I think I want a full career retrospective, something written post-70s at the very earliest

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

I wish I could pick 1967-73 or so. - OTM. 70s in a walk, tho, still.

Dino-linguist Noam Chompsky (Pillbox), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

I've not heard all the albums from either period but my heart says '70s for this one. The '60s stuff is great - I mean you're talking about nearly everything from the London Years Singles Collection for starters - but the idea of the Stones in the '70s is so much more appealing. I think I just generally like those times in an artist's career where they've more or less definied themselves, most likely reached an artistic peak of some sort and you get that "What next?" period for a while.

Gavin in Leeds, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

System, Wednesday, 13 January 2010 00:01 (fifteen years ago)

buncha philistines

shake hands with Gongo? (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 00:02 (fifteen years ago)

Quite close though.

Mark G, Wednesday, 13 January 2010 00:03 (fifteen years ago)

I just wanted to say I am really sorry unperson and Lee Dorrian...I was having a tough time that week and I don't know what happened, I am really embarrassed at lashing out like that.

iago g., Sunday, 17 January 2010 23:26 (fifteen years ago)

this is a really hard question, mainly because i'm not massively familiar with either for some reason.

piscesx, Sunday, 17 January 2010 23:55 (fifteen years ago)

When's the Stones 90s vs. 00s poll? What's that like 2 studio albums vs. 1? Does this mean they should now put out one album every two decades? So new album in 2011?

OCONDOR (Pt.1), Monday, 18 January 2010 07:10 (fifteen years ago)

The Stones made their best albums in the 70s, but their most iconic tunes and style was pretty much fully developed before the end of 69. I love Exile on Main Street, but I have to give it to the 60s.

Satisfaction
Paint It, Black
Let's Spend the Night Together
Jumpin' Jack Flash
Street Fighting Man
Honky Tonk Women
Gimme Shelter
Sympathy for the Devil
No Expectations

earlnash, Tuesday, 19 January 2010 01:04 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.