So, the point: Should ambition matter? If degree of difficulty is a consideration in pop criticism, should it be? And, dare I say, how, if at all, would that differ in different genres? (Are typically rock pretenses, concept albums such as Prince Paul's Prince Among Thieves for instance, a bad thing for hip-hop?)
― Scott Plagenhoef, Friday, 27 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I also don't feel that "ambition" is necessarily a degree of difficulty thing. A concept album isn't that hard otherwise everyone and their brother wouldn't have done one. In the specific case of 69LS, even huge fans of the album admit several tracks should've been snipped; same with the White Album. If the ambition leads you to put forth lesser material in pure reach for said ambition, then it's done nothing but detrimented your output, and that's just not a Good Thing in my mind.
― Ally, Friday, 27 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
69LS is an ambitious project that triumphantly succeeded, because it was undertaken by someone with the ability to see it through. Other ambitious projects might be undertaken by less talented people, and fail, and possibly (or possibly not) we can then forget about them, if we agree that they failed.
But I have not answered the question. Does artistic ambition matter?
Yes.
― the pinefox, Saturday, 28 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Obviously _69 LS_ hit you strong and deep, and that's great. _Loveless_ did the same for me. For me *alone.* If others agree with me, great, but I'm not about to force the issue.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 28 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Much as I love the Primitives' first LP.
Ally said, in effect, that everyone had made a concept LP by now. Is that true? I thought concept LPs were way out of fashion. Either way, I think (once again) that we need to ask what concept LPs offer, not just to the *listener*, but to the *artist*. If I'm not mistaken, the concept LP is a tool for getting songs written. Choose your concept, and the songs start writing themselves, or at least they come a lot more quickly than if you're trying to write them 'discretely'. Writing 'conceptually' is, among other things, a means to being more prolific. Lots of songwriters would like to be more prolific: and some of them discover this way of doing it.
― the pinefox, Sunday, 29 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I undertook a project a couple of years ago, to write about my favourite 100 singles of the 90s. I did it. Some of what resulted was rubbish but it contributed to the project as a whole. You might or might not consider that 'artistic' - I don't think it was but I don't think it's meaningful - but the point is that the "ambition" of the project is part of the overall effect and should be considered as such. Is ambition always a good thing? No, but that's not to say people shouldn't give it a shot.
― Tom, Monday, 30 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― the pinefox, Monday, 30 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tim Baier, Monday, 30 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)