― the pinefox, Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Either
1) describe it
or
2) enact it
― Dave225, Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave q, Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― bc, Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― mt, Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
And tell us the truth about the new LP. We need to know!
― the pinefox, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave q, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
He also says that the Boss has discarded ambiguity by writing re. 911. I'd say that the opposite might be true. He could be essentially UNambiguous by attacking US immigration policy etc - but for a liberal (esp in USA?), 911 precisely provokes ambiguity: ie. 1) yes wasn't it terrible, but 2) hey, we'd better not just go out and bomb more innocents to show how tough we are. Right?
That reviewer is a shmuck - he likes lousy records, then he knocks the Boss. Q, I seriously want to see what you think of him.
― Lord Custos III, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s, Friday, 26 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew, Sunday, 28 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― chris, Wednesday, 31 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave q, Wednesday, 31 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andy K, Thursday, 1 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Michael Daddino, Thursday, 1 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave q, Friday, 2 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jeff W, Friday, 2 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Didn't he write loads of absolutely filthy songs in the early days and do them live but never release recordings? What's the Bishop in Bishop Danced?
15 listens in and The Rising is his best full-rock album since Born To Run.
― chris, Friday, 2 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Michael Daddino, Friday, 2 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 2 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Actually, this is just an excuse for me to applaud the magazine for being in the vanguard of ironic kitsch reappropriation. The portrait of the writer, David Skinner, is a brave attempt at rehabilitating one of America's most unheralded vernacular arts: crappy big-head caricatures (the kind you find in parks division). James Lileks must be SO jealous.
Also, 'Bruce Springsteen: Writer' = Bob Dylan: Writer?
― the bellefox, Monday, 1 November 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!st, Monday, 1 November 2004 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― the bluefox, Tuesday, 2 November 2004 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)
http://education.guardian.co.uk/conferences/story/0,14077,1558664,00.html
― the bellefox, Tuesday, 30 August 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)
― Popli Kid, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 07:02 (twenty years ago)
Racing In The Street
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 11 February 2009 08:49 (seventeen years ago)
Dancing in the Dark’s good, huh?The verses are a little bit imperfect, a little bit bleary. He’s writing a book? He works the night shift? It swirls together, like his restlessness and boredom swirl into his sexual energy. What stops it from being just another Springsteenian trying to get out of Winesburg, Ohio is the romance - we don’t know if it’s dead-end or not, and neither does he, and maybe it is, but it makes everything better for a little while, and makes another life seem possible.The chorus is just miraculous, the chord change on it, when the whole song shifts, a real escape seems possible, but it goes minor again real quick, and we’re back in that groove.Bruce’s lyrics often feel mashed into place, the meter every which way, him just playing with the placement of the words, wrapping them round his finger and making them do what he wants, and that’s true here too. Look at the words on the page and try to make them fit into the rhythm - it’s an adventure. But when he sings it they all just unspool like it was all just part of the way he talks. I don’t know how he remembers all those words, and how they need to get said, in order not to blow the song up. I guess he’s been doing it while now.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 23 May 2025 23:09 (nine months ago)
Famously a song he cranked out at the last minute at the request of the label, who wanted a hit. Hence a lot of the song's lyrical subject matter, though it's also in some ways a snapshot glimpse of the depression he was starting to struggle with at the time.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 May 2025 23:41 (nine months ago)
In some ways it’s a parody of a Bruce Springsteen song. Every trope is there. But there are these little callbacks, little flourishes that make it tick. The “man” repeated in the middle of the first two verses, as they get more fraught, and each time leading to a feminine resolution, or at least the hope of one, with “baby” addressed at the end of them. Maybe she’s got the way out. “Nowhere” might lead to “somewhere” in the second verse. By the third verse he can’t wait until the end of it to talk to his baby, the thoughts of her barge in, he’s not just hungry, he’s STARVING. And then the last chorus - he would have been completely justified in just repeating it the way he’s repeated it til this point but he takes a little victory lap, adds a couple more details, that it’s not just the boredom, it’s a broken heart, and it’s not just stagnation, it’s the fact that he’s making too much of it, stewing on it, that has to stop.
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 24 May 2025 13:39 (nine months ago)
Can you tell I’m learning this on guitar? It’s an easy and very satisfying song to play but the words are weirdly hard to remember. There’s not a natural logic to them. Sort of like Ripple by the Grateful Dead - just a lot of barely connected images and impulses.
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 24 May 2025 13:53 (nine months ago)