which is better? and am i correct in thinking that solo artists are far more common than groups - at least relative to the 80's & 90's?
― Brio, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
was wu-tang's voltron strategy the apex of groupdom in hip-hop - which raised the expectation that everyone in a collective would eventually have their own solo stardom? did wu-style solo success ruin hip hop groups - or at least devalue them to borderline vainty projects like G-unit & D12?
― Brio, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)
Would you rather have three arms or one leg?
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)
Would you rather sweat cheese or cry glue?
Would you rather watch a monkey dance with Crazy Mary, or watch a zebra play the harp while Jennifer Love Hewitt stars in a new horror movie, I Continue to Retain the Information Regarding the Nature of Your Activities Last Summer?
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)
(Real answer: it's hypothetical.)
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)
maybe groups have been replaced by guest spots (at least in how they function on record)
― Brio, Monday, 12 April 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
are rappers more like free agents now?
― Brio, Monday, 12 April 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)
Duos & Trios represent: mobb deep, pete rock & c l smooth, gangstarr, black star, de la soul, run dmc, organized konfusion, ultramagnetic, 3rd bass, eric b & rakim
― De que estas hablando? (Tannenbaum Schmidt), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
public enemy was basically a duo too
― Brio, Monday, 12 April 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)
true or false: the predominance of hip hop solo artists over groups = dumbing down and easier marketability & simpler "branding". one star, one backstory, one message.
groups more multifaceted, funnier, more complex, harder to sell.
― Brio, Monday, 12 April 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGtOIL2vgbs
― De que estas hablando? (Tannenbaum Schmidt), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)
the real question here is "are there more solo artists now because people are greedy bastards?"
― Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
Public Enemy's whole group sitch was a response to all the duos and trios at the time, ca 1986-1987. it was meant as a return to like Furious Five, Funky 4 +1 levels of crewdom
― estela artois (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)
true or false: the predominance of hip hop solo artists over groups = dumbing down and easier marketability & simpler "branding". one star, one backstory, one message.― Brio, Monday, April 12, 2010 1:09 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Brio, Monday, April 12, 2010 1:09 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
In short: MTV
― estela artois (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)
also - why did hip hop move toward the singular voice while indie rock groups swelled onstage - with all the "collectives" and glockenspeils?
t or f: indie rock ideals are scandanavian socialism while hip hop = ayn rand(NB: i don't buy this)
― Brio, Monday, 12 April 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)
but MTV was more influential in the groups-era than in the solo artist-era
― Brio, Monday, 12 April 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)
music-wise anyway
― Brio, Monday, 12 April 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)
anyway black-eyed peas being super-humungous kind of ruins my theory anyway.
what other duo/trio/etc's are big now?
― Brio, Monday, 12 April 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)
i feel like The Man atomized the rap group into solo artists because of the sense of community projected by outfits like PE. i'm not even joking. also the rise of DAT meant a touring rapper in 1990 or so didn't need a dj, before that even a braggart solo artist like Kane would have a dj track on his record, it was never just abt him.
― tbrrprint (2) HD (zvookster), Monday, 12 April 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)
uh who are you excluding? Keith and Eric Sadler?
― but i'm also listening to all the songs on the fame monster, not just the (sic), Monday, 12 April 2010 23:37 (fifteen years ago)
sorry that was half a thought, poorly expressed.
PE was definitely a group.
I was trying to make the point that there's just 2 voices on the records most of the time - that they could have easily billed themselves as a duo (or even Chuck D & his hype man).
but they made a conscious decision to construct PE as a group - not just to acknowledge the musical input of the bomb squad & terminator x, but as a theatrical/political device w/ the S1W's & Griff - and that construction was all part of their message.
― Brio, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 01:06 (fifteen years ago)
another thought when hip hop gave a fuck about rock n roll, it was more apt to use the group construction (eg "there's 3 of us but we're not the beatles")- and rock fans (especially the punk and metal dudes who were picking up on PE) were more apt to relate to groups
― Brio, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 01:09 (fifteen years ago)
if u look at the jerk movement today it's all abt groups, like i was saying in the jerk thread a few days ago.
― tbrrprint (2) HD (zvookster), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 01:32 (fifteen years ago)
no need to look at rock n roll at all. look at doo-wop, groups doing acappella routines under bridges. hip hop, groups beatboxing and tag-team rhyming on corners, same dealie. it was organic.
prob u can trace a trend back to when majors saw the numbers young mc & tone loc were doing on west coast independents. they were followed by vanilla ice and hammer numbers. but i still think it's no coincidence that pushing solo artists ddin't involve pushing imgs of unity and cooperation.
― tbrrprint (2) HD (zvookster), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 01:42 (fifteen years ago)