Pavement or Big Star?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

I found this on the internets (@limedbagels.blogspot):

3. "We Dance" is one of those songs that can wrack you with emotion one minute and leave you in fits of laughter the next. The way Malkmus delivers 'pick up some Brazilian nuts' is hilarious, sounding like something a stoner lazily murmurs to his dog. But when the drums fall out later in the song, leaving S.M. alone with a simple and surprisingly heartfelt suggestion, it feels like it could have come from any Big Star record (a band which aren't as good as Pavement, I'd argue). It contains its power in the way it comes out of left field after the 'Brazilian nuts' bit, not to mention the flowing water effects and brief scat singing.

Was Pavement a better band than Big Star? NO POLL

amazing disorder (rip van wanko), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 12:45 (fourteen years ago)

related: Otherwise Cool Bands Ruined By Their Irritating Fans

amazing disorder (rip van wanko), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 12:47 (fourteen years ago)

September Gurls vs. Summer Babe fite

Harrison Buttwhistle (NickB), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 12:48 (fourteen years ago)

for me personally, September Gurls by miles

amazing disorder (rip van wanko), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 12:50 (fourteen years ago)

'we dance' reminds me of the kinks more than big star

decent skinsmanship (Michael B), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 12:54 (fourteen years ago)

if you are interested in reading the rest of the (good) piece on Wowee Zowee, click

amazing disorder (rip van wanko), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 12:54 (fourteen years ago)

The comparison intrigued me because I guess I'm not used to comparing such a stridently 'indie rock' band with an older sacred cow. I'm not sure which side I take, yet,

amazing disorder (rip van wanko), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 12:57 (fourteen years ago)

big star v replacements v pavement. replacements win.

Spikey, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 13:30 (fourteen years ago)

I could probably listen to more Pavement, but they never put their souls on the line like Big Star frequently did.

http://tinyurl.com/koalalala (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 16:30 (fourteen years ago)

how are we to know?

otherwise, and twat (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 16:32 (fourteen years ago)

trick question -- s.m. has no soul

mookieproof, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 16:40 (fourteen years ago)

Very comparable for me: 1) I'm not as big on either one of them as most people are, but 2) both have two or three songs that I absolutely love ("Perfume V"/"Cut Your Hair," "September Gurls"/"Thirteen"/"The India Song").

clemenza, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 17:01 (fourteen years ago)

FWIW, "We Dance" was compared to The Frogs back in the day.

It is interesting that both bands put out their best work on #3, following a #2 that did better than #1, though lower in quality. Summer Babe vs. Feel as an artistic statement vs. September Gurls vs. Cut Your Hair.

I would kinda like to hear a SM album after he cracks up and starts washing dishes for a living, but not sure that's ever going to happen.

dlp9001, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 17:49 (fourteen years ago)

Always felt the opening chromatic riff of Crooked Rain ("Silence Kid") was an obvious homage to the opening of #1 Record ("Feel").

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 17:57 (fourteen years ago)

It is awfully Big Star, now that you mention it...

dlp9001, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 17:59 (fourteen years ago)

God help us all when they finally use "Range Life" as the theme song for "That 90s Show".

http://tinyurl.com/koalalala (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 18:01 (fourteen years ago)

FWIW, "We Dance" was compared to The Frogs back in the day.

It was also compared to "Stroke it Noel" in the first review I read upon its release (in Spin, probably), which the blogger quoted in the initial post seems to remember too.

andrew m., Wednesday, 10 November 2010 18:08 (fourteen years ago)

I don't hear that but I def get a Hunky Dory era Bowie thing goin ahn.

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 18:16 (fourteen years ago)

Ah, side by side w/the Big Star thing. I must have blocked that out.

dlp9001, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 18:21 (fourteen years ago)

There's another review from the time citing Frogs, but damned if I can remember where it came from....

dlp9001, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 18:23 (fourteen years ago)

I don't think I even know anyone who likes Pavement anymore, really, aside frm a couple 90s fetishists

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 19:57 (fourteen years ago)

father to a sister of a thought sounds vaguely big star-ish....

it's apples and oranges, and completely different eras. how can you compare two bands like that or determine which is 'better'?

drug stealer, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:04 (fourteen years ago)

I don't think I even know anyone who likes Pavement anymore, really, aside frm a couple 90s fetishists
thanks to the reunion aren't they bigger than ever?

tylerw, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:12 (fourteen years ago)

This is a much more apt comparison than BS/VU, and harder to choose.

Unfrozen Caveman Board-Lawyer (WmC), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:17 (fourteen years ago)

"I don't think I even know anyone who likes Pavement anymore"

you know me! i'm scott!

scott seward, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:18 (fourteen years ago)

you 90s fetishist!

tylerw, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago)

this comparison is funny - it works on kind of a formal level in terms of both bands being more than willing to disguise pop smarts with willfully slapdash musicianship but in a funny way the effects produced are completely different, especially lyrically. Pavement's stuff is so emotionally distant and opaque, whereas most of Big Star's material conveys the impression of being painfully confessional and heartfelt.

the Whiney G. Weingarten Memorial 77 Clique (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago)

it's true, i'm all about the 90's. got my buffalo tom tickets yesterday! geezer lake are opening!

scott seward, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:20 (fourteen years ago)

You know, what Big Star needed was some guy in the background, banging on some bongoes and screaming the SUCH A DRAG part of "You Get What You Deserve".

http://tinyurl.com/koalalala (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:21 (fourteen years ago)

saw a sad st. johnny cd at the thrift store this morning. i shed a tear and pored out some crazy horse malt liquor.

scott seward, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:22 (fourteen years ago)

man if your pores are leaking malt liquor maybe you should cut down a little dawg

the Whiney G. Weingarten Memorial 77 Clique (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:23 (fourteen years ago)

that's what i get for posting whilst eating a sandwich. mmmm, sandwich....

scott seward, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:25 (fourteen years ago)

Shakey otm - Pavement are great in so many ways, but those ways don't include lyrical depth or emotional weight. If you riff on lots of random topics that fit your song's metre, you're going to hit on something that evokes an associative emotional response in the listener, but that's not exactly proof of your mastery of songwriting.

seandalai, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:12 (fourteen years ago)

agreed that shakey makes a good point, and i also completely understand that chilton may have had a harder life than anyone in pavement, but both bands seem to be pretty 100% reppin themselves, be they aloof brats or wrecky emo messes -- dont think there's a reticence on pavement's part to "be real" or whatever.

i like pavement a little better, but i consider it a personal choice, not a response to any objective mandate or whatever. and "we dance" is in my top five pavement songs!

69, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:16 (fourteen years ago)

those ways don't include lyrical depth or emotional weight

sez you!

otherwise, and twat (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:17 (fourteen years ago)

Witty lyrics are "deep" and "emotional."

otherwise, and twat (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:18 (fourteen years ago)

If you riff on lots of random topics that fit your song's metre, you're going to hit on something that evokes an associative emotional response in the listener, but that's not exactly proof of your mastery of songwriting.

If you go into the studio as fucked up as Chilton was, you're going to hit on something that coheres into memorable performances, but that's not exactly proof of your mastery of songwriting.

otherwise, and twat (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:19 (fourteen years ago)

I love them both, for very different reasons, but, no offense, I don't get your reasons at at all. Most studio adventures are serendipitous, and, more importantly, editing at the microphone or mixing board are just as valid indicators of "mastery."

otherwise, and twat (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:21 (fourteen years ago)

i mean, alex chilton wrote some really fucking awesome songs about some really really deeply painful shit (and also some lighter fare). let's give em BOTH credit here.

69, Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:22 (fourteen years ago)

I guess the one Big Star album sounding the most like Pavement is "Third" and I prefer Pavement then. But "#1 Album" is still so much better.

You're Twistin' My Melody Man! (Geir Hongro), Wednesday, 10 November 2010 23:42 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.