Is dance music starting to have a heritage as potentially irritating as that of rock music?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Well?

With the CRISIS ahem see other thread, in dance music, isn't nostalgia getting everywhere like a particularly nasty STD or something? Either nostalgia or just plain fantasy, I open Muzik and it's all those were the days, this is how we got where we are now, this is what we are, this is how much fun it was, rave on.


And then I open Mixmag and it's all "hey look now people dance on pogo sticks, no really they do, some people genuinely do, believe us, go do out, please, honestly if you join this scene it might actually exist". (sorry Anna but that's the way it feels a bit, less about music and more about anything periphery to it that will do). I mean it's all so frustrating to someone who genuinely believes the music SCENE itself is worth getting passionate over and that listening to music is still a part of y'know, dance music.

Am I the one refusing to accept that dance is over or something? I mean I think of all my friends and there's plenty going on for them in dance too, maybe the old days were great but fuck it I wasn't around, so as far as I'm concerned it's all right here and right now.


I mean supposedly dance music is dead and you'd think all the magazines would be dying for genuine actual evidence to the contrary, and then Fatboy plays on the beach to TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND FUCKING PEOPLE and he doesn't get a front page?????? It's one of the biggest concerts ever!!!!!!!!!!!!! I mean what the fuck is going on, there goes my idea for a piece to someone with the time to do it but to hell with it, it had to be said.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 19 August 2002 12:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe it's commercial pressure or something, re the magazines, I'm not necessarily blaming anyone..........but at the same time I'm never a fan of blaming "the man" either.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 19 August 2002 12:09 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't steal *everything* you know

The Man (mark s), Monday, 19 August 2002 12:14 (twenty-three years ago)

dance music has always suffered from it was better in 87/88/90/92/94/95/96/98/00/yesterday 3.45 pm

always. but then also, what do you mean by dance music? treating it as a 'whole' the idea of crisis is ludicrous (really the fear is 'i've latched onto scene x' and i don't want to have thrown my lot in with the wrong scene - fear that scene y is better)

speaking for sub genres, i think it is a lot easier to to pick highs and declines (jungle 94, speed garage 97, bleep'n'bass 91 etc etc), the decline of one sub-genre matched by the rise of another - or the metamorposis between

but yes, its not so much that dance music has grown itself a heritage (although, of course, it has) but also that its rediscovering the roots and strands, so its extending its heritage backwards (the year zero of 87 theory seems to be on the wane now)

gareth (gareth), Monday, 19 August 2002 12:28 (twenty-three years ago)

I suppose I mean clubbing, really, maybe half the problem is the big bucks commercial scene since I got involved has always been trance and hard house anyway and I never liked that so I can't see any change. I don't know...

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 19 August 2002 12:33 (twenty-three years ago)

In the US, dance music has taken a number of recent blows, and emphasis on "the classics" can get a little nauseating from time to time, but I don't think its past will ever get that stuffy.

Andy K (Andy K), Monday, 19 August 2002 13:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Something wot I wrote on this:

"I thought that the simplest explanation for the success of School Disco was that the clubbing generation have gotten old enough to start getting hits of nostalgia; the exhaustion with the superclubs is not so much an exhaustion with dj culture (though that may well be part of it) but an exhaustion with the new, which doesn't ever match up to the rose-tinted glasses of a) the good ol' days or b) the songs of one's youth. The reason it's a club event and not a pub or a rock concert is that this audience have been clubbing all their lives and are used to it now.

The superclubs are also on the decline because the lines of people's tastes are increasingly demarcated - people go out to jungle nights or garage nights or tech-house nights or hard house nights or all four over a weekend, but there's no longer the unified audience to fill a venue like Cream, and there won't be until another sound garners the same mass culture appeal that the second wave of trance had."

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 19 August 2002 13:58 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm not sure i agree tim. especially about schooldisco. i think schooldisco only creamed off the floating vote, and the hits of nostalgia, i mean, the nostalgia that schooldisco plays on is nothing to do with dance music, so this would have been present 5,10,15 years ago? and the demarcations don't seem any stronger than, say, 96 (with the obvious exception of uk garage). superclub had become defaultclub, yes, but only due to lack of a heavyweight alternative

gareth (gareth), Monday, 19 August 2002 14:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Schooldisco did exactly what Gareth says I think.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 19 August 2002 14:33 (twenty-three years ago)

The tightwire in a "night out" is between stuff you know and new stuff you have to grapple with - especially acute in a DJ set - where you not only know the songs but you know those particular RECORDINGS of those songs.... they bump up against recordings and songs you have no idea about... you're changing status by the minute, from in-the-know to neophyte. this is part of the thrill of club nights for me, the DJs making me helpless and comfortable by turns. In NY especially there's now a real move towards the familiar - THANK GOD - often, i like songs i know!! - what's important to ME anyway isn't whether something's old, new, etc, it's the ATTITUDE that informs the combination of what must necessarily always be old and new at the same time - "oh bondage, up yours" for instance was BRAND NEW to me the first time i heard it at Motherfucker

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 19 August 2002 15:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I think this fragmentation of "dance music" and the seeming urge to rename & classify every variation upon it with a brand new name (Garage, 2 Step, Speed garage, Gabber, Schooldisco, you know, the whole 4-page litany, with 4 subgenres created and thereby regimented, monthly) is the death of it. At that point the openmindedness of any possible crowd wanes as they expect only that subgenre to be played (any variance is alternately praised as endlessly creative or reviled as "cheese" or "too difficult", depending). It's all electronic music and environs, and I think these magazines are making a good thing quite sour. I try to stay away from them. They depress me mightily.

matt riedl (veal), Monday, 19 August 2002 15:47 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah matt, sometimes the things you know AREN'T particular recordings but particular sub-genre strategies that you've become cozy with, and the thrill is in finding the minute variations that the DJ manages to eke out within this narrow band. I have zero problem with this approach, done well - I've just gotten a slew of old "Chicago Underground" records and they're all at the same tempo, same bassdrum sound, a delight to play together because the building-blocks all sound the same (tho they have radically different foreground frills) so you can get super-sneaky. As far as I can tell Ronan's question is "what the fuck is going on" in re dancemags saying we R in decline - maybe what is going on is a consensual alibi for DANCEMAGS THEMSELVES heading into decline, as the best dance music is becoming irrefutably better and more imaginative than ever before and so impossible to apply the old "another stomping deep house workout" templates to?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 19 August 2002 16:31 (twenty-three years ago)

One quick question: why is Schooldisco considered part of, ahem, "dance" culture? Because it takes place in a club? Clubs have metal, rock, hip-hop, indie, etc etc nights as well. This doesn't get them a piece in Jockey Slut now, does it?. Surely the cunts listening to "Can't Take My Eyes Off You" are a different breed of cunt to the cunts listening to Mauro Picunto?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 19 August 2002 17:03 (twenty-three years ago)

it isn't considered part of dance culture!

gareth (gareth), Monday, 19 August 2002 17:05 (twenty-three years ago)

easy answer here seems that it's not the culture dying down (though I think it is, but that's another thread)--it's the fact that the mags have covered this shit for YEARS and unless/until there's a major upsurge that makes, however surface-only, what's going on now look/seem irrelevant, it's all but impossible to keep saying the same thing ("250,000 people! massive!") over and over for a decade-plus without wanting to smash heads in. in sort, I think the mags are going thru at least as many growing pains as the music itself; both are at a mid-70s style impasse, waiting for something new to emerge. still plenty of good shit to go around, but the culture seems to lack a center, which helps make things (a) feel unified and (b) feel all-of-us galvanic rather than subset-specific cool/interesting/diverting.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 19 August 2002 17:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth- so why is it covered by the dance press?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 19 August 2002 17:23 (twenty-three years ago)

I went to the Big Chill at the weekend, which probably doesn't seem relevant.


But, there was something about the sight of the hordes of three-wheeled pram pushing 30-something media professionals chowing down on organic vegeburgers and sitting around listening to Plaid that chilled my soul.


Musically, dance is getting better all the time, as Tracer says. Culturally it's in trouble because it just isn't naughty anymore. The Big Chill was enough to confirm for me that i never want to go to a festival again for fear of ending up as the male equivalent of those middle-aged women wearing angel wings when they really shouldn't be. And all the dance writers are similarly convinced somehow that dance music is on the cusp of becoming desperately uncool and they want a get-out clause.

Jacob, Monday, 19 August 2002 18:03 (twenty-three years ago)

dom, i think they cover it because of its challenge from without to clubland dominance. also, as a phenomenon it is interesting.

gareth (gareth), Monday, 19 August 2002 18:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Dance culture is an avid recycler of course, but I don't know if you can see that as a stagnation. The recent remakes of "Go", "Do You See The Light", "Show Me Love", "U Got 2 Know", "No Limit", "Papua New Guinea", "Cafe De Mar", "Eternal Spirit", "Club Bizarre", "Superstring", "Gotta Let You Go", "James Brown Is Dead", etc could be seen as a "tribute", but at the same time, these remakes are very much in tune with what is produced now. The nostalgia is more in the hooks/melodies than in the actual production and composition itself. So in that way it's not comparable to, say, The Strokes or Nickelback or Zoot Woman.

Anyway, it's indeed true that the crowds dance music draws are incredible. This summer alone we've seen probably more than a dozen events with an attendance of 200.000+ Europewide, and scores of 50.000+ events every saturday. With so many big events, it's not hard to see why "regular" club attendance is falling.

Siegbran Hetteson (eofor), Monday, 19 August 2002 19:22 (twenty-three years ago)

well, Cactus and Grand Funk Railroad and Uriah Heep drew big crowds in the '70s and that didn't make 'em any good.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 19 August 2002 19:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Did Cactus really draw big crowds ever?

Kris (aqueduct), Monday, 19 August 2002 19:36 (twenty-three years ago)

It's one of the reasons I've always disliked Daft Punk's "One More Time." Actually, the main reason is that I don't think it's got a very good beat -- it's just that monotonous 4/4 thump, too slow and lazy to really get you excited. So all that the song's got going for it is the vocodered chorus line, and I can't stand the simpering, whiny tone. It's a fake nostalgia: not reminiscing over any actual moment or era, but instead waxing nostalgic about nostalgia itself. Maybe that's a peculiarly postmodern feat for the dancefloor, but the gimmick doesn't do much for me.

Dare, Monday, 19 August 2002 19:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Dare, how can I put this delicately?

That one paragraph says so many things that are wrong that I had to read it twice to make sure that I wasn't hallucinating it.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 19 August 2002 21:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Dance music now feels like rock music in 1975, and I'm a Pink Floyd fan. Either the latest Mixmag or Muzik (I was flicking through in Smiths) has an article about how old the big headline DJs are, and they're spot on. How old is Pete Tong? I still listen to him on Friday evening if I'm driving somewhere and nod my head to that "do you remember house music?" record while knowing that this is absolutely wrong, a culture needs flowing water or it will stagnate.

Mike Ratford, Monday, 19 August 2002 21:53 (twenty-three years ago)

its a really interesting time for dance music in that nothing seems that interesting anymore - due to various reasons, not least the media's dubious assumption that guitar-fuelled rock n roll is somehow more exciting and inventive again. as i've said in previous posts i dont believe there's much (if anything) to 'invent' rhythmically that hasnt already been attempted with success. there are many genres of dance covering the full range of danceable tempos from reggae to hip hop to house to hardcore psychedlic trance to gabba. out of these i'd say hip hop was the genre thats still has a little unexplored territory (think Anti-Pop Consortium and beyond for easy reference I guess, 'Ghost Lawns' is the most interesting and different hip hop track i've heard this year) but the rest just rely on reproducing tried and trusted formulas all too easily...that may be a horrendous generalisation but anything over 160bpm tends to be limited in terms of ideas because its so geared towards JUST energetic dancing and its not that difficult to make people dance, esp, with the drug influence so synonomous with dance music at this tempo...and of course reggae will always be there but will there be new benchmarks and what will they consist of?

so it looks like we're going to see more of the same, dynamic dance music with fx galore that could probably have been made in the 90s but was actually made last week. this is no big deal as the likes of FC Kahuna have made good strong primarily dance albums this year. but listen to the new Underworld album and you feel they're not offering anything new, just more of the same - pleasant as it may be but no longer that sense of newness. thats progress i guess. but just where and how do things progress now? or are we regressing?

blueski, Monday, 19 August 2002 22:24 (twenty-three years ago)

if newness of the soniX is your fix, blueski, Underworld is prolly the wrong dealer - check out the Kompakt thread for some good ideas!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 19 August 2002 22:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Mike R, I sorta have to disagree with the age comments you made: dance is one form of music where you're completely free to just be the age you are, it doesn't need to be marketed with a face attached. I don't have to think about what Pete Tong looks like or how old he is to appreciate his music (I don't actually like what he does particularly, he's just the name you mentioned). My age is one of the few things about me I can't change, much as I'd prefer to. There's plenty of new, young approaches to this music, and it doesn't matter how old the people behind those approaches are. 14? 50? Don't care. That said, it's still possible to outlive your welcome, but that results in a lack of popularity, not a lack of quality per se.

matt riedl (veal), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 14:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Thing is, it IS interesting, I can name single after single after single that's dead interesting, really fantastic, and the DJs I like aren't Sasha or Tong or Carl fucking Cox either, if mags would start giving the likes of Carter, Morillo, Emerson more hype they could just alter who people percieve as superstar DJs. I don't really care but just to show that this notion of decline is false.

The fact is dance music itself is fine, it's this weight of crossover dance "giants" that's causing the constant insecurity and self assessment. Are we ok? Was it better then?


It's ironic how like someone banging pills the whole thing is, am I fucked up now? God I swore I was feeling happier 10 minutes ago? Was I? Shit maybe not, I don't know. Does everyone think I'm an idiot?


And so on and so on. Dance music is fine, it just needs to believe in itself a little more.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 14:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes!

Dance music is so over. There is still good stuff coming out, but no new ideas.

But please resist the 1975/we need a new punk comparisons. So rockist ;)

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 20 August 2002 14:54 (twenty-three years ago)

I was wondering if dance is actually dying, if it's something to do with the regressional aspect to much of the mainstream. I was reading Dare's contentious post on Air and I have to say I agree with it, and what's more interesting is that in relation to the earlier material, although it was uhm, more nostalgic perhaps, retrospective, I felt the last record was sludgy, half hearted.

I find that in Fatboy's stuff too - he writes that shit in his sleep. Sounds almost... cynical, to me. And it makes me wonder whether the 250,000 who pitched up on Brighton beach just wanted an excuse to get high in the sun on a slow weekend or whether the Fatboy can draw that many people on his name... And if so, what do they want from him?

I suppose what I'm askin' myself is what do people want from Dance now? All this bullshit in the press about Garage Rock and all is surely because the rockers wanna believe the guitar hasn't expired. It's that inherent belief or faith, maybe, that rock's lovers and indeed detractors would say permeates the rock fan's musical outlook. And it's pushing everybody to hype hype hype anyone who piks up a six stringer and pounds out a few tinny riffs. With dance, I dunno, is it any different? I'm just askin' man...

Roger Fascist, Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh jesus all of you......


Just cos you didn't like the last fucking Chems record, or Fatboy Slim isn't as good as he used to be is hardly cause that dance is dying. I mean it's my fault for starting a thread I now feel only about 5 people can talk sensibly about anyway, bands who make albums are nothing to do with the dance music I'm talking about. I'm talking about clubbing, and it clearly isn't dead, by any means, as I say it's about singles and I can name a whole load of great singles, more interesting than the albums anyway.

The problem is that with the lack of a massive crossover band to accompany all the great underground stuff, people just don't get the current scene in the slightest. In the past to some extent the big artists were a reflection of the underground, if not always a vivid one, now however club dance music and commercial album dance music is totally fucking different.

To be honest, I know plenty Fatboy fans, or Underworld fans, or Orbital fans, they're all my friends, but I can't imagine them listening to a recent house mix album and really liking it.

And Roger, people came to see Fatboy DJ, he's never done a live set before in his life, I reckon the reason they went is that he has a reputation as a brilliant DJ and he is the most crowd pleasing all around good guy I play anything jock around nowadays. Bring your girlfriend, bring your wife, bring your fucking kids, Fatboy=universal appeal through the medium of good poppy house music.

Crossover dance might be dead! Oh damn, how awful that's three less albums a year in my stereo.....

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:09 (twenty-three years ago)

It must be hot under that collar of yours.

Roger Fascist, Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:13 (twenty-three years ago)

No actually I just got in from work and I decided after a shirt all day I'd wear a t-shirt so I'm not too bad, despite the lack of any beer in the fridge or other refreshment.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:21 (twenty-three years ago)

I should say that I still really like dance music, and that I still like some of what's being made. But it worries me a lot that "Weak Become Heroes" is my favorite song of the year--it's a fucking nostalgia song for rave! What is THAT?! (I mean, it's a great song--I think it's rave kultcha's "Night Moves," another song I love--but really....)

I'd love to hear Ronan's thoughts (and everyone's) on this.

M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:22 (twenty-three years ago)

To expand though, part of my thinking when I started this thread was that someday in the not so distant future you'd have dance fans talking about Underworld and Fatboy and the Chemical Brothers and Orbital and other artists I love in the same infuriating way that some rock fans talk about Hendrix, or whoever. One thing I love about dance music is the absence of any hierarchy, of any overbearing accepted opinion about who is best or what is the done thing. Obviously it's not that perfect but there is that feel to dance music, and I fear the day when genuinely good stuff becomes the tool of evil. And young people my age ending up despising all these great bands in the same way say I might despise Hendrix et al (not for their music but for what they've come to represent)

Just saw your post Michaelangelo, as I finished this one. I guess I have no nostalgia to work with for rave so I'd say that Weak Become Heroes is just a celebration of rave and shudder ecstacy culture. The way I feel about it (the xpress2 or ashley beadle or whoever remix) is that it is the greatest and most accurate artistic expression of how I love clubbing, and what a night out clubbing involves. Coupled with the video it's like the essential guide.

It worries me that my favourite song of the year is "Lazy", I mean I could have at least picked some techno or something obscure, it's just not trendy at all. Ahem.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:29 (twenty-three years ago)

ronan: In the past to some extent the big artists were a reflection of the underground, if not always a vivid one, now however club dance music and commercial album dance music is totally fucking different.

eh? when was this not the case exactly?

matos, i think this is nothing new either, nostalgia has always been high up in club culture

and i have no idea what rock bands like underworld and the chemical brothers and fatboy slim have to do with anything anyway

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:33 (twenty-three years ago)

I think dance could use a good canon, myself. But I wouldn't put Underworld et al in it.

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:37 (twenty-three years ago)

PS: Please explain where the "underground" is currently located. Thanks

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 20 August 2002 15:52 (twenty-three years ago)

part of my thinking when I started this thread was that someday in the not so distant future you'd have dance fans talking about Underworld and Fatboy and the Chemical Brothers and Orbital and other artists I love in the same infuriating way that some rock fans talk about Hendrix, or whoever

you mean the way fans of those groups ALREADY TALK ABOUT THEM, don't you?

M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 16:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Ben you seem to have an idea already so why should I bother you.....


I think there are fans of those groups who might do that, but in general I don't think it's too bad yet. I realise nostalgia has always been around in dance but now it's coupled with this "crisis" it seems ten times worse. Not only was it better in the old days, there now is no future either apparently.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 16:59 (twenty-three years ago)

The old nostalgia was "hey that tune was great" and then some kind of modern context, or just a decent honest celebration of the thing. The new one is this insipid fucking "let's not talk about nowadays" crap.


Yes that's right, nostalgia aint as good as it used to be.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 17:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Ronan, to be clear, I'm quite aware of the difference between dance records and 'pop' electronica -- different modes of production (vinyl vs. CD), different modes of consumption (club vs. home listening & 'indie club), etc. While I wouldn't say that they have nothing to do with each other, obviously the latter has less to do with the question you asked. I intended my comments on Daft Punk to just be a very tiny subset of your larger discussion. Of course it may be foolish of me to search for an 'authenticity' somewhere, but maybe that extra remove from the recognizable underground of indie labels is another thing that bothers me about the song: nostalgia for a scene that doesn't need it. Someone else might say they have nothing to do with each other, I don't know.



But obviously I'm not qualified to discuss 12-inches currently being released, quality, sub-genre blends, all that ... I don't even own a record player! Sorry if I'm infecting your thread.

Dare, Tuesday, 20 August 2002 17:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Dare, my comments weren't directed at you so much as people coming on who did seem oblivious, I still disagreed with you.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 17:50 (twenty-three years ago)

First of all can we seperate nostalgia for clubbing experiences versus nostalgia for the music itself?

If we can, then let me say that in terms of 12"'s, dance music is more vital, in terms of the amount of quality releases, then it ever has been. This seems to actually create a problem, because there is less immediacy when going to the store to shop. I can imagine that when house or d&b or whatever was new, all the tracks, being so fresh and exciting, seemed good, and there was less need to be as selective, and hence objective and distanced, from the music. Part of the nostalgia may be for the excitement felt by those who shopped when, for instance, acid house came to England. They may have had only ten or twenty records to choose from, and no back catalog to pore over.

As for the club scene, clubbing has been commodified, and it is harder to find the personally transcendant and socially trasgressive moments that make the culture meaningful They are still there however, and sometimes the bullshit and beauty coexist.

A good example of this is a trip I made to Boston's Avalon/Axis club last winter. For those many who don't know, Avalon is THE super/stupor club of Boston, and Axis is the smaller club nextdoor that is connected. One of the headliners was Dubfire from Deep Dish, and I assumed that he would be playing in the main room. I walked in and it was a miserable scene. Lame old men trying to hit on cheesy young girls from the suburbs is not my idea of a great night out. After a while, feeling that dance music was over and that I had wasted my money buying turntables, I walked into the other room and found Dubfire spinning dark, dirty, tribal tech-house for a great, sweaty crowd. Almost everyone in the room was dancing, and there was little of the meat-market feel of the other room. It turned out to be one of the best nights out I had ever had.

As for the potential for an irratating heritage, I think that dance heritage will never be as bothersome. Partially this is due to the fact that the music is more important than the lyrics. If one finds Derrick May pretentious, one can still enjoy his music on the dancefloor. If one finds Bob Dylan pretentious, it is much more difficult to listen to his music. And saying "I don't like Bob Dylan" to the average canon-enforcing rockcrit will always be more blasphemous (to him/her) than saying "I don't like Derrick May" to the average canon-enforcing dancecrit.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 18:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean it's my fault for starting a thread I now feel only about 5 people can talk sensibly about anyway, bands who make albums are nothing to do with the dance music I'm talking about.

If you want to alienate the majority of listeners from a genre, declaring yourself "Ronan Fitzgerald, PhD in Danceology" is probably the best way. 'Sorry man, you just don't get it, and I'm not even going to WASTE my BREATH on you because my time is so precious that to discuss it with you would ruin my chances of writing the definitive book on the synth patches in xxx deleted Orbital b-side?'

Maybe the answer to your question is in the answers you decided weren't by those five people whose responses are worthy of your time: because the Chems and Fatboys of the world have released albums that are a) dance oriented; and b) still sounding pretty good several years after their relase. While these album artists might not be your idea of the Clubbing Scene, they certainly came out of it, hence the growing disappointment when The Single Of The Week simply isn't as good as the stack of tapes you've got sitting in your car, something that was less likely to happen when the idea of a 'dance album' that wasn't a compilation would never have been expected to reach a wide audience.

Dave M. (rotten03), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 18:42 (twenty-three years ago)

One thing I love about dance music is the absence of any hierarchy, of any overbearing accepted opinion about who is best or what is the done thing.

!!!! Ronan, I want to live in your world.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 18:50 (twenty-three years ago)

My point was that people are coming along using Fatboy and Chems albums to judge the entire dance genre or to talk about it, which is pretty obviously not worth the effort. I don't know if you'll forgive my frustration that ILM only likes albumdance music, but that's what it is, so make up your own mind. It's not about a phd in danceology, it's just that I don't think dance music is on the wane, and I resent people who don't seem to know anything about it beyond the albums in the album charts suggesting this is the case, hell I resent the people who do know better suggesting this is the case too


Your point seems to be that those bands are better than the entire scene, based on the fact that they make albums and not just one off singles, or compilations of one off singles.


(It's true though Dan!)

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 18:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Axis is the smaller club nextdoor that is connected

Can you tell me more about that, actually? Terrastock just got moved there. Good ventilation, places to sit, etc.?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 18:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree quite alot with Aaron, especially about Deep Dish.

(I rarely declare myself Ronan Fitzgerald PHD in anything so I think I can get away with it once)

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 18:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Ned - Avalon is a big room with a high ceiling. There is a balcony facing the stage (which is used on dance nights for faux-exotic stage shows, aka girls in semi-tribal outfits dancing). There are bars on either side. The high ceiling is above the dancefloore actually, while the side areas have lower ceilings and there are columns supprting those. In the corner at the back of the room (ie the side with the stage), there is a door that leads to Axis. I don't remember there being a stage in Axis (I was really dancing that intensly), only a booth. I dunno if there will be bands there or not. Just in case, I should say that Axis is a a square-shaped room, and the dancefloor is submerged. There is one bar at the back, and there low baclony on all sides except that of the booth.

Regarding places to sit, I imagine that there will be more on a non-dance night. I think Avalon is a little cooler temp. wise than Axis, but this may have something to do with the anecdote above. :-)

I go to school near Boston and am interested in Terrastock, if only because of the hype on ILM. Could you maybe tell me more about the bands on the appropriate thread? Thanks!

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 19:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Here for more general info. They said it was specifically going to be in the Axis, though given their usual two-stage set-up being in both venues seems to make more sense.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 19:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know if you'll forgive my frustration that ILM only likes albumdance music, but that's what it is, so make up your own mind.

That's fine if that's what you really think (and I think you're not giving ILM's dance taste enough credit) but if you're really worried about the possibility of alienating future audiences with a Dance Canon, then you probably shouldn't complain that 'none of you people really know what's going on, only I do.' You specifically said that you dislike Hendrix not for his music, but for what he has come to represent (ie a certain form of snobbery against new music - "nothing new could ever be this good"). But as soon as you start looking down on people who are enthusiastic but don't know as much as you do, you're separating yourself into an elite group. Those other people will rightly be pissed off, as you once were at rock fans, and go off and do their own thing. My point here is not about albumdance vs. clubberdance, it is that canons are based on snobbery, and you were being a colossal snob back there. If people post ill-advisedly on your threads, perhaps you'd be better off ignoring them or gently pointing them in the right direction, instead of pissing and moaning about how you're surrounded by imbeciles.

Your point seems to be that those bands are better than the entire scene, based on the fact that they make albums and not just one off singles, or compilations of one off singles.

What I was trying to say was that to have a music with no 'hierarchy' or 'overbearing accepted opinion', you need a certain degree of disposability. Singles used to be more disposable, not because they weren't as good then but simply because they were produced in smaller quantitites and were allowed to go out of print. Dance mags didn't spend the majority of their time talking about the 12"es of last year or whenever because they became rare and most people either couldn't get them or didn't have them in the first place and couldn't find them any more. When albums by the Chems and Fatboy Slim came out and got huge (funded by record companies that can afford to keep these albums in print long after their release), they were no longer disposable. So, now that a lot of people have the same four or five albums in their collection (as opposed to the relative few who might have kept the same 12"es from back in the day), the mags know that talking about older things that most of their readers know and like will sell more issues than talking about newer things, which are by their very nature somewhat hit or miss.

Dave M. (rotten03), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 20:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think I was being snobby in the way you suggest, I was annoyed at people judging a genre on a few bands who don't really have alot to do with it in my opinion, I think for a discussion to take place people needed to know what I was talking about at least, and that it wasn't a crossover dance thing really I meant. But be that as it may.

Anyhow I don't think people reading dance mags are all looking to see stuff about Chems and Fatboy, nor are the magazines talking constantly about them. I think it's more a case of talking about the past with a vague nostalgia unwilling to go into great detail. Also features like Muzik's this month, THE TRACKS THAT SHAPED DANCE MUSIC TODAY, like ten classic tunes, and with each one another 3 classic tunes we'd never have had without the ten classic tunes.

My point about Fatboy et al seems to have muddied the water a little since it's not to do with the magazines so much, I was just speculating that at this rate in a few years we'll actually have a canon. At the moment the nostalgia is for the time before the massive dance bands.


Also I don't think it's true that the 12"es of last year are rare is it? At least the ones this year certainly aren't, hell you can get most of the tunes on CD too.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 20:36 (twenty-three years ago)

good point Ronan, its too easy to think instantly of Fatboy, Chems, Underworld an co when assessing the status of dance music - i'm totally guilty of it but thats because these artists have for so long been the barometer of dance music's global success on a commercial level and even an artistic level. some of the best ideas in dance tracks over the last few years came from Norman Cook, Rick Smith/Emerson, Liam Howlett, Rowlands & Simons, Massey, Rollo etc. - they ARE the hierarchy i guess. of course there are plenty of other excellent records and producers who will never attain such a high profile but deserve just as much if not more credit (everyone i namechecked was British for starters, whoops).

i think we're hearing dance tracks today that are just as great as ones from 5 or 10 years ago. they'll ALWAYS be great new house/techno/breakbeat/whatever tracks just as there will always be great new rock/guitar based tracks or cheesy pop tracks, whatever you want to call them. but for me one thing that gave dance music an extra edge over rock was it was genuinely newer because the technology used to make it was new. now its not, so dance music loses that edge naturally. i believe this is the reason why some people feel dance music is in stagnation and losing popularity. but this does not really matter.


blueski, Tuesday, 20 August 2002 20:49 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know if it's mental conditioning or what, but I can get more fun out of one great dance single these days than I ever got from good albums or even great albums back in the day.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 20:54 (twenty-three years ago)

interesting....is that because its like an enormous wave of euphoric release comprised of variously pitched frequency modulations and oscillations compressed to buggery and packed into a 4-7 minute outburst?

or would you rather not analyse that so much? what are your favourite dance tracks at the moment Ronan?

i'm going for this lot:


Gerling 'Dust Me Selecta'
Janet Jackson & Beenie Man 'Feel It Boy' (maybe this doesnt count but its the Neptunes again and funky as ever)
Ladytron 'Seventeen'
Royksopp 'Remind Me' (the single mix)
Underworld 'A Hundred Days Off (Album)
Sonic Animation 'I'm A DJ'
FC Kahuna 'Machine Says Yes' (Album - STILL)
Audio Bullies - Hit The Ceiling
Supermen Lovers - Diamonds For Her
Chemical Brothers - Electronic Battle Weapon 6' (not THAT keen on this actually but will drop it in anyway)

fuck, just realised how out of touch i am with the American producers with this list, perhaps someone can update me?


blueski, Tuesday, 20 August 2002 21:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Deadly Avenger 'Day One (F.S.O.L. Cosmic Jukebox mix)'

this is fucking ace by the way - did Deadly Avenger actually get that album out yet? he is superb

i guess i love dance albums (!)

blueski, Tuesday, 20 August 2002 21:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Cosmos-Take Me With You

ILS-Next Level

Underworld-Two Months Off.

Herbert-Schmoov

Royksopp is wicked, prefer the single mix alot. Also I'm really feeling Adam Beyer's Ignition single, going to see him this weekend.


Oh yeah and Harry Choo Choo Romero Featuring DJ Lace-Keep Your Head Up, major where's your head at influence but it's like a grunge samba party really, HCCR is going to become my new DJ god, I just fucking know it.

What's that Supermen Lovers track go like? I'd heard their new one is kinda harder than that catchy little Starlight number, is there anything distinctive I'd know?

(also liking Kid Kreme-To Get Down)

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 21:11 (twenty-three years ago)

yeh 'Diamonds For Her' is a little harder, more pumping glitzy house than the disco vibe

where do you hear these tracks first? do you DJ and hang out in the shops for a good couple of hours every saturday? are you a regular clubber (unlike me, argh the shame) lunging over the dj booth with a notepad or you just got the right internet/radio stations on? why not collect all 3 badges for true dance guru supremacy?

blueski, Tuesday, 20 August 2002 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Regular clubber, like 2 or 3 times a week if I have the money. At the mo' I go to a breaks night every thursday, and to see a big DJ every Saturday, I get in free to the big djs cos I do some writing or failing that cos my mate is support DJ. He also helps me out with the names of stuff, but it comes to a point where you know more stuff than you don't, it's like what's the name of those 6 new tracks.


Except with techno, i confess I'm not very good on techno, even though I enjoy myself alot at Billy Nasty, Dave Angel and their ilk.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 21:19 (twenty-three years ago)

who are the DJs here?

I have found that since I started a few years ago, my perspective has totally changed. Being so close to the music because I have to listen to 20 new records a week (at least) and sort, I have, in the past, become nostalgic. Then, however, I realised that the nostalgia was for the shock of the new, and NOT for any particular style of music, or even era. This certainly plays a role. All of the particular sytles/years that people are nostalgic for (1989 acid house 1992 breakbeat hardcore 1994 jungle) happen to be instances where a large number of people were turned on to the music. People mistake their nostalgia for the feeling of wonder for nostalgia for the era itself.

As for the whole 12" versus album debate, those of you who might celebrate the album (especailly those by such groups as Underworld and Orbital, who are, in some ways, as much rock stars as dance artists) as (more) representative of the scene should know that this can be misinterptreted by the techno evangelists as a desire to return to the world of rock which is artists/authenticity/albums/canonical instead of scene/less self conscious/singles/personal pleasant rememberances (yes this is a generalization). Most of the time, however, the techno evangelists need to realize that most people don't know where to go and what to buy after the albums by big artists (I started with the big groups but now I know more). That is why we should all buy more DJ MIXES!

As for canons, I think that the process has already begun (every story about Detroit is pretty similar).

Lastly, best-tracks-evah lists are a way of legitimizing the ahistroical nature of the music. It is (or was) a modernist project, after all.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)

has there been a "best DJ mix" thread? if not, I am gonna start one!

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 21:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Aaron do you like Deep Dish much?


I'm beginning to think they have redefined prog as something wonderful, really fucking fantastic. That track Morel-The Faggot Is You (Deep Dish remix) is unholy.


(there has but start one anyway)

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 21:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Junk Science is classic.
Haven't heard much else to be honest. I am from the DC metro area, so I am certainly proud that they put us on the map.
As for redefining prog, I am not sure but I get that impression. I think they have taken some elements of the deeper side of tech house (like Timewriter... do you know him? If you want mellow synth pads and soaring strings and house beats and emotional music, get his album Jigsaw Pieces (Plastic City) it is a motherfucker!) and have made them palatable to a prog audience. I certainly find their stuff interesting, and there are a million great releases on their label (and a million duds as well). As for Morel, I can't get past the vocals.

I think that what makes them great is that they take in more influences then other prog acts... too much prog is anonymous, defined by a lack of that certain "jack" quality that is so important to techno/house. Deep Dish know their house and techno, and seem to be able to add more funk to the prog mix, as well as a sense of humor, which Sasha and Digweed may have personally, but which doesn;t come out in the music I have heard.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 22:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Junk Science is classic.
Haven't heard much else to be honest. I am from the DC metro area, so I am certainly proud that they put us on the map.
As for redefining prog, I am not sure but I get that impression. I think they have taken some elements of the deeper side of tech house (like Timewriter... do you know him? If you want mellow synth pads and soaring strings and house beats and emotional music, get his album Jigsaw Pieces (Plastic City) it is a motherfucker!) and have made them palatable to a prog audience. I certainly find their stuff interesting, and there are a million great releases on their label (and a million duds as well). As for Morel, I can't get past the vocals.

I think that what makes them great is that they take in more influences then other prog acts... too much prog is anonymous, defined by a lack of that certain "jack" quality that is so important to techno/house. Deep Dish know their house and techno, and seem to be able to add more funk to the prog mix, as well as a sense of humor, which Sasha and Digweed may have personally, but which doesn;t come out in the music I have heard.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 22:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Junk Science is classic.
Haven't heard much else to be honest. I am from the DC metro area, so I am certainly proud that they put us on the map.
As for redefining prog, I am not sure but I get that impression. I think they have taken some elements of the deeper side of tech house (like Timewriter... do you know him? If you want mellow synth pads and soaring strings and house beats and emotional music, get his album Jigsaw Pieces (Plastic City) it is a motherfucker!) and have made them palatable to a prog audience. I certainly find their stuff interesting, and there are a million great releases on their label (and a million duds as well). As for Morel, I can't get past the vocals.

I think that what makes them great is that they take in more influences then other prog acts... too much prog is anonymous, defined by a lack of that certain "jack" quality that is so important to techno/house. Deep Dish know their house and techno, and seem to be able to add more funk to the prog mix, as well as a sense of humor, which Sasha and Digweed may have personally, but which doesn;t come out in the music I have heard.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 22:12 (twenty-three years ago)

how the hell did that happen? I am sorry!

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 22:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Supermen Lovers has a new track?! I must download this imediatly!

Chupa-Cabras (vicc13), Tuesday, 20 August 2002 23:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Just to return to the original proposition, cunts like overanalysing dance much like cunts like overanalysing rock, so yes, it is starting to have a stinky 'heritage'. All the factors are there- 'it doesn't mean anything anymore','it was better in my day', 'these kids today don't know what a pill is no more' etc. 200 000 Cockneys will turn up in Brighton to watch free tennis if the weather's nice, so this year's Big Beat thingy meant fuck all culturally. Hiphop is now stuck in 1975 incidentally- twenty years from invention, big business takes over, so mainstream it no longer offends etc etc. But that's not the issue here.

Snotty Moore, Wednesday, 21 August 2002 00:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Hip-hop started in 1975. Use other metaphors please.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 21 August 2002 02:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree about Deep Dish, they are fiends. I heard an Essential Mix they did that just slays any other mixed set I've heard this year. When I get my other computer back, I will figure out the date of it (as I believe they have done several). That Playgroup - DJ Kicks that MMatos reviewed is fearsome as well, seems very in line with those Disco Not Disco comps.

Dave M. (rotten03), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 02:09 (twenty-three years ago)

but I haven't reviewed it yet! (am in the process of doing so right now, actually....)

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 07:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I've yet to check out Deep Dish live but there's just this unique thing going on in their mixes, as Aaron said it's like progressive house concept wise, but it's just so different to Sasha et al. Also they put the Chemical Brothers Spiritualized remix on one of the Yoshitoshi mixes and you've got to respect that.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 10:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Lots of good dance tunes at the moment, all across the board (trance, hardstyle, electro, techno, house, even some good new D&B). As long as you don't expect much from the big name Album Oriented Dance (this really should be a new category), there's plenty of fresh material for any DJ.

Matanka "Lost In A Dream (Push Transcendental Remix)"

Cosmos "Take Me With You"

Chew Fu Phat "Without You"

Tok Tok ft Soffy O "Day Of Mine (3Phases Mix)"

Who Da Funk "Shiny Disco Balls"

2 Players "Signet (Plastic Angel Remix)"

Cappella "U Got 2 Know (RAF Zone Remix)"

DJ Marky & XRS "LK"

Laidback Luke "Popmusic"

Knee Deep "Nassau Rules"

Exposure "Magic Impuls"

Beginerz "Reckless Girl"

Different Gear "A Bit Paranoid"

Colonel Abrams "Trapped 2002 (Zombie Nation Remix)"

Alive ft DD Klein "Alive"

JCA - I Begin To Wonder (Bini & Martini Club Mix)"

Jurgen Vries "The Theme"

Westbam ft Nena "Oldschool Baby (Instrumental Remix)"

Mauro Picotto "Back To Cali (Push Remix)"

Siegbran Hetteson (eofor), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 11:12 (twenty-three years ago)

man, i love that westbam tune!

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 11:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, and it drives me *nuts* because I can't remember what tune it is based on. Wasn't it something from 1991 from Go Bang! records????

Siegbran Hetteson (eofor), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 11:43 (twenty-three years ago)

drugs, rock and roll, shiny disco balls!!!

I love that tune, it is fantastic. You all NEED that Harry Choo Choo Romero thing Keep Your Head Up though, it's fantastic. Siegbran have you heard what they've done to Cosmos? There's a vocal mix now, Lottie played it when I saw her recently and it was kind of good.

I also forgot to mention anyone who likes the sort of subtle coolness of voodoo ray, check out Contemplation by Josh One, either the original or the King Britte funk remix, the two are linked in my head.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 11:57 (twenty-three years ago)

i don't know siegbran, i just thought it was new?

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 11:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Thanks Ronan, I'll check those Romero & Cosmos tracks out when I'm at the shop tomorrow. Gareth, listen to the Instrumental Mix of "Oldschool, Baby", you'll notice. It's not so obvious in the Deutch-English mixes, but it's based on a VERY well known classic freestyle/techno LFO-ish track and I can't remember. AAARRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

Siegbran Hetteson (eofor), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 12:50 (twenty-three years ago)

And just for the hell of it, I'd like to repeat my recommendation for that Push remix of the Matanka track. A huge, fat, pumping monster once it finally gets going at around 3:30. Zero cheese and a lovely oldschool 909 drumtrack. Good to know that Belgium can still do other things than churning out horrible generic poptrance...

Siegbran Hetteson (eofor), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 13:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Belgium=Kid Kreme and Junior Jack yes?

Fucking house genius right there.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)

one year passes...
This was a great thread, the kind you don't get any more.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 December 2003 11:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually, it's really interesting how the history gets re-written every few years.

Like a few years ago the 'key' 70s tracks would all have been stuff like Loose Joints, 'Que tal america', Manu Dibango, Crown Heights Affair etc.

But now all the hype is around Klein and MBO, Moroder, Kraftwerk - more the kind of stuff I guess that would have been referenced back in 95-96 when Detroit techno was all the critical rage.

And, actually, the way that techno is back in from the cold again in terms of people admitting it as an influence...

Jacob (Jacob), Monday, 1 December 2003 11:21 (twenty-two years ago)

this maybe of interest to some ILM folk:

REPETITIVE BEATS - A SOCIAL HISTORY OF ELECTRONIC DANCE MUSIC

Alerted by a message via Yahoo Group: ElectroDiscoPunks

REPETITIVE BEATS

6 Music, the BBC Digital Channel, is broadcasting a documentary
called 'Repetitive Beats - A Social History Of Electronic Dance
Music' this week. The first part is tonight (Monday 1st December) at
21.00 - 21.30 UK time, followed by three further parts at the same
time on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. The series is presented by
Andrew Purcell.

You can check it out live via the internet at: 6 Music

Tonights programme includes Kraftwerk, Frankie Knuckles, Kevin
Saunderson, Marshall Jefferson, Danny Rampling, Norman Jay, A Guy
Called Gerald and the Chemical Brothers. I was also interviewed,
suffering from a severe case of laringytis following a full-on
weekends clubbing in London, including the Electro Empire night, Low
Life and David Mancuso's London Loft,

Also useful music resource: Electrofunkroots

DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 1 December 2003 11:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Every musical genre has a heritage and a historical canon, and it is just bollocks not to realise that.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 1 December 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe the much-chuckled-over proliferation of subgenres was the dance genre's attempt to evade this, an attempt which turned into a meta?

dave q, Monday, 1 December 2003 11:55 (twenty-two years ago)

You get this kind of thread anymore? of course you do!

"it were all great threads round here last year ye know"

Nonsense.

jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 1 December 2003 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)

that's ile regulars for you.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 1 December 2003 12:28 (twenty-two years ago)

tell me about it

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 1 December 2003 13:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Geir is bullying me above, anyway he's not read the thread title perhaps.

I don't notice this problem so much in the (depleted) dance press these days, with the emergence (in some cases re-emergence) of people like DFA, Ewan Pearson, the Rapture, Black Strobe, Lu Cont, etc they have gone back to being excited. I guess the broadsheets got a whack off this crisis talk a year too late or so but it's all but gone now.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 1 December 2003 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)

despite thinking the last two years have been great i am still worried about the next two (maybe that's why)

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Everybody's making end-of-year lists and realising that it's been a great year, so the dance-is-doomed idea has taken a back seat. But circa May 2004, it'll be back.

Siegbran (eofor), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 18:20 (twenty-two years ago)

it's a real mix and match year mind you, I think as regards house my top 20 last year is significantly better than this year, but maybe that's just the sliding ecstacy scale. I don't think so really though, Cosmos or the LRD Remix of Silver Screen or Carnival by Archigram really are 3 amazing records.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 19:36 (twenty-two years ago)

do you think you would rate Linus Loves with those if it WASN'T such a straight lift of Stevie Nicks or is that not an issue?

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 11:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Not quite I don't think, what do you reckon? It's far simpler really isn't it?

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)

i suppose so, but simplicity itself not so bad, 'So Much Love To Give' obv. reference - what makes that better i'm not sure offhand but it just seems better somehow

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)

oh i remember now it's the old 'enter your hi score!' aspect :)

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I think reverance for a genre's heritage is inevitable, though, don't you? Hell, even Punk Rock --- a genre arguably birthed out of disdain for rock's heritage -- has spawned legions of archival collectors (self included) who cherish artifcacts of its auspicious origin. It's unavoidable, I think.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Ronan, what is your top 20 of the year?

Jacob (Jacob), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 14:30 (twenty-two years ago)

haha I haven't made it yet, I had to do one for a mag here last week and I couldn't think of 20 house records I wanted in it, ok so that's not the end of the world but last year I did a list of 40 no problem.

I think my number 1 this year is still Speedy J's remix of Ignition Key by Adam Beyer.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

were you asking cos you think this has been a better year?

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)

i hope Siegbran is working on a mix at the mo and that explains his absence. many of my favourite dance tracks this year have stemmed from his recommendations and mixes.

top housey tunes of 2003 for starters...

Alan Braxe & Fred Falke 'Rubicon'
Audio Bullys 'The Snow'
Basement Jaxx 'Right Here's The Spot'
Archigram 'Doggystyle'
Legowelt 'Disco Rout'
Adam Beyer 'Ignition Key (Speedy J mix)' - but how well can you dance to it REALLY?!
The Paradise 'In Love With You'
Linus Loves 'The Terrace' or even the vocal version which i likes
Space Cowboy 'Just Put Your Hand In Mine/Crazy Talk'
Saffron Hill 'My Love Is Always There'
DJ Gregory 'Attend I'

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.