Records You Think Are Profound

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Andrew's search for profundity on ILE inspires me to ask this - tell me about some records you think are profound. It's common for people to dig at bands and songs for not being 'deep' but an actual claim of psychological or philosophical depth is much rarer - and yet surely that's what's being implied in any criticism of bands for being shallow or meaningless. (Some ILM writers - Marcello most notably, but also Anthony and I think Sterling - aren't afraid to invoke ideas of profundity and claim that the music they're talking about is meaningful, others shy away from the notion.)

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 29 August 2002 14:17 (twenty-three years ago)

But it's such a hard thing to describe how depth can be found when what for one is honestly soul-wrenchingly deep can for another be a grinding of wheels or worse. Which may seem obvious, but to invoke my own eternal icon -- I've tried to describe as best as I can the sheer sense of stunned sublimity, the truly overwhelming awe that "Soon" did for me the first time I heard. Profound, but in such a personal and yet intangible way -- words literally fail me.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 August 2002 14:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Profound music. That's a tall order Tom =)

When I was a "yoof" I thought the Smiths could do no wrong and would sit for hours in my bedroom with "Asleep" on replay, trying to work out if Moz was either contemplating suicide or turing in early for the evening.

Of course, when I discovered "the pot" everything I listened to, from The Monkees "Another Pleasant Valley Sunday" to Michael Nyman's "Drowning By Numbers" soundtrack was deeply, deeply profound.

Eventually though, I discovered the trying to find something profound in music is a wild goose chase. Deeper meaning comes from the people you choose to surround yourself with, life experiences both good and bad etc.

Music, in my opinion, props up the way we feel at a given moment, an aural stimulant that either heightens or lower emotions created out there in the so-called "real world", away from the turntable or cdplayer.

Derek Dalek (Derek Dalek), Thursday, 29 August 2002 14:31 (twenty-three years ago)

i don't really understand the word, or the question. i think theres an implication that this is held in the lyrics (or is this a misreading?), which cuts out great swathes of the music i like. i suppose, on occasions, i have thought The Fall circa 80-82 as profound, but then, i'm not sure what i mean by that.

my glib answer, which i'm afraid isn't glib at all, is that only the trite is profound, and only the profound is trite. if you see what i mean?

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 29 August 2002 14:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth I was going to put you as my example of an ILM writer who shies away from the notion!

No I don't think it implies lyrical content though obviously some people will be looking for profundity within lyrical content. A depth of personal feeling - as with Ned above - would be an appropriate way to approach the thread.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 29 August 2002 14:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth - MES was genius at articulating his haphazard, raging, tramp-at-a-bus-stop internal dialogue both via his lyrics and his band's music. That's kinda profound, I spose.

Venga, Thursday, 29 August 2002 14:43 (twenty-three years ago)

You mean like if someone said that The Soft Bulletin and Yoshimi had moments of depth and profundity and all that? In particular "Waitin' for a Superman" and "The Spiderbite Song" and "Do You Realize?" and "It's Summertime" and "Fight Test"? Shit that could conceivably change your life in the right mood? Stuff like maybe you just found out that the woman you love might have some kind of shitty disease and you're all freaked out and suddenly you're on a walk at 5:30 a.m. after having not slept all night and "Do You Realize?" is playing in your Discman and suddenly tears are fuckin' pouring down your face? Like that?

Don't you think that if anyone (and I'm not saying it's me, mind you) were to be stupid enough to admit something like that that he'd just get laughed at and scorned with all kinds of snide comments? What kind of moron would ever open him- or herself to that kind of vulnerability?

Come on. No one's gonna fall for something like that.

Matt C., Thursday, 29 August 2002 14:43 (twenty-three years ago)

a depth of personal feeling is surely something different. otherwise the implication is that i (or person x who doesn't 'get' the concept of profundity) isn't really that bothered about records, or has no great love for particular records. this, it seems to me, is a different thing altogether

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 29 August 2002 14:43 (twenty-three years ago)

venga, i don't really see MES in that way (not in the falls best period anyway), i was thinking about this the other day and he actually reminded me, in a way, of Iain Sinclair, an ability to get the feel of a city/area, perhaps in a way that is different from the usual tack, and in a way i can relate to more

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 29 August 2002 14:46 (twenty-three years ago)

OK - can "profound" be defined as to how it could apply to music? If it is simply "depth of feeling" then it's no more or less useful than shopworn music-words like "soulful" or "heavy". "Profound" - to me - implies something that reveals a deep truth. Something "profound" changes the way we look at everything else. I think reactions to music are too personal to really be considered to be "profound"

I'm not doubting that the moments you guys described above may have changed your lives - they were profound to you, no question. But aren't the associations you're drawing a little bit like someone who says, "I realized I was in love with my wife-to-be during a thunderstorm. Thunderstorms are so profound."

What I mean is - the moment during the thunderstorm may have been "profound" to that person and thunderstorms now carry a special personal meaning to that person, but that does not make them profound to me.

btw I am not in any way mocking Ned or Matt C.'s answers or doubting their sincerity... my point is more about semantics I guess.

I'm going to look up "profound".


Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 29 August 2002 15:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I think most of the records I like to listen to frequently (including the ones I stop listening to) are profound. this perhaps has more to do with my relationship with them than the 'records themselves', but if you think so, then I'll be happy to say that I think my relationship with those records is profound, and talk about that instead.

this means though that I don't think listing them is any more or less interesting than listing what I normally listen to, aside from the list having 'profound' at the header instead of 'what I like this month'.

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 29 August 2002 16:01 (twenty-three years ago)

and - yes, I have some records that I feel more strongly about, ones that feel more meaningful and profound to me than, say, the marshall mathers lp. but I think taking only those to be the profound ones is shortsighted. or nearsighted. or something.

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 29 August 2002 16:02 (twenty-three years ago)

i suppose it would be difficult to say something is overarchingly profound from the entire universe, but it should be easy to point records that are profound in relation to one's self. speaking for myself, as one who was never exposed or really sought out anything musicwise before college (i just suffered through other people's choices be it my parents or peers), I would say the most profound record in my life was Daniel Johnston and Jad Fair's selt titled record on 50 Skidillion Watts. It turned the key so to speak both musically and lyrically -- for me at least, it was discovering that all music wasnt Howard Jones or Bon Jovi or the Beatles -- it didn't suck after all. It was the first record I actually liked and had something to say to me.

jack cole (jackcole), Thursday, 29 August 2002 16:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Hard to say, everybody’s got their something...

For me at least: Loveless is the record that truly meant something to me. Not in the superficial way, but in a personal way. It was music that was so intangible yet somehow seemed to express everything I was feeling. Without specifically addressing anything in the way say, Joy Division expressed specific thoughts & emotions, but in a cerebral and heady mix of pure emotion.

Can’s Tago Mago was pretty profound too, but for different reasons.

Juan Marquez, Thursday, 29 August 2002 16:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Eventually though, I discovered the trying to find something profound in music is a wild goose chase. Deeper meaning comes from the people you choose to surround yourself with, life experiences both good and bad etc.
So does music that capture or examplify or maybe just happens along at the right time become profound? Nevermind seems the obvious example. Zen Arcade would be another for me, both personally and for how I see music or even as I was hearing music. Even reading that it was all just a dream (wtf do you mean Mr.Azerrrad? are you sure, damm you) didn't change my opinion of it.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 29 August 2002 16:19 (twenty-three years ago)

no offense again - but so far "profound" seems to mean "spacey" - music with lots of long whale-music interludes and not-too-relevent-to-everyday-life lyrics. maybe this is music that leaves a lot of open spaces for people to think in and have their own profound thoughts?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 29 August 2002 16:22 (twenty-three years ago)

here's another one for you then, fritz: james brown.

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 29 August 2002 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)

I am very ambivalent towards the use of the word profound to describe music. The word profound in itself is rather problematic I find.

Somehow profound seems to imply meaning but something meaningful is not yet profound. Concerning music the most obvious thing which could be meaningful are the lyrics. Concise lyrics which describe universal truths or situations could be profound. Like maybe the lyrics of Bob Dylan, John Lennon and Joni Mitchell. The lyrics of New Order would mostly not qualify to be profound in this sense and probably neither in the other sense mentioned in the next paragraph. But their music could well be profound.

On the other hand profundity seems to suggest something difficult to grasp, a meaning which we don't get immediately but which we think is hidden behind. Something almost mystic, rather unclear. This connotation of profound can be applied both to the lyrics and the music itself.

The first band which came to my mind when I read the word profound in your post, Tom, was already mentioned before: Joy Division. Their dark, powerful music seems to hide a secret. The same is true for their lugubrious lyrics. Of course Ian Curtis suicide adds to this.
Another band which I occasionally find profound are Godspeed YBE!. Their last double album Lift Up Your Skinny... as most their music had this apocalyptic, foreboding feel both in the music and in the few spoken word samples.

Profound and shallow are often not very far apart. The Flaming Lips have been mentioned upthread. When reading what Wayne Coyne wrote about his last two albums on his (or the record company's site, I don't remember) it gave me the impression that his music and lyrics (or the story they tell) are very well thought out. On the other hand when I recently listened to The Soft Bulletin I had the impression that this is really the most bland and empty record on earth. Grateful Dead, Yes and other progrock bands also walk on the edge of both extremes. It seems profound in the beginning but then it is just noodling, bombast and kitsch.

People have said before that their relation to certain music is profound and they hesitated to call the music itself profound. That shows that this term is problematic when used outside our direct experience.

I'd prefer to use the terms complicated or difficult instead of profound as they are more easily measurable and less subjective.

I really hope I got the italics right!

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Thursday, 29 August 2002 17:23 (twenty-three years ago)

In my admittedly confused brain, profundity and auterishness are somewhat at odds with one another. When something feels profound to me, it feels as if its creator has stumbled upon something special - tapped into something they didn't realize they were going to tap into. That feeling of "whooooa, we've really done something here now haven't we..." - Flaming Lips, for example (since they've been discussed upthread) (and judging from what little I've heard) have too much of that self-conscious Creating Important Meisterwerks element to be profound. I think profundity is (semantically, not actually - isn't that always the case?) closely tied to inarticuability, mystery, uniqueness. _Fourth Drawer Down_ and _Sulk_ by the Associates I'd say are quite profound (especially the former) - admittedly, though, these are recent acquisitions, things I'm currently obsessing over (which lends a lot of credibility to Josh's earlier statements). My list (as of now haha) would also include pretty much anything by Slowdive, and _Computer World_, but not much else I can think of right this second.

Clarke B., Thursday, 29 August 2002 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Profound:
Characterized by intensity; deeply felt; pervading; overmastering; far-reaching; strongly impressed...

The problem is to what do you assign this term:
The intellect? Emotions? Technical prowess?

Is it something you find in the music itself or is it something that arises from our shared (or your personal) experience of the music/lyrics?

The function of some music is in itself profound, even if its execution is not universally respected or understood...for example John Coltrane's quest for nothing less than Truth and the Mind of God during his hour-long trance-like "apocolyptic" solos.

Must music reach the edge of human expression (perhaps transcending these limits) to be profound? Or would something which embodies a certain human experience with great purity in a way that anyone can understand be profound as well? One could argue that Hank Williams had a profound understanding and ability to express the contents of a broken heart.

Seems like one of those questions that can only breed more questions...

Ryan McKay, Thursday, 29 August 2002 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)

it's almost a cliche by now, but this record affected me deeper than i thought was possible

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 29 August 2002 21:27 (twenty-three years ago)

i had an argt w. dr vick abt how shallowness is bettah: i never win, she is tuffer than me

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 29 August 2002 21:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I tend to agree with Fritz. There are definately moments when you listen to a particular song/album that could be considered profound, but it is only a moment and you will probably never have it again. When I was younger I would attach great importance to songs that caused these moments and then thrash the absolute hell out of them, generally feeling nothing at all.

big E.D (big E.D), Thursday, 29 August 2002 22:17 (twenty-three years ago)

is it too easy to reach for country here? "Shadowland" by K.D. Lang

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 29 August 2002 22:56 (twenty-three years ago)

mark s - in most swimming pools, it's a continuum - and guess which part is "for grownups"!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 29 August 2002 22:57 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't generally think of profundity as physiological or philosophical depth so much as "why is this connecting with me while that there which is so similar on the surface isn't"? I guess it's some sort of covert novelty or something (actually "ambushed by unexpected emotion" would pretty much cover it). I'm not sure I have the means to explain what I mean, but I find all kinds of profundity in things like well-recorded 70's drums (cf. Triumph and Styx!), the way the Raincoats seems to be trying to squeeze every last idea out of the e-minor arpeggio on Odyshape and somehow sidestep rock and roll altogether in the process even though rock and roll has been steadily squeezing the juice from the e minor arpeggio since day one, the fact that bubblegum lowlifes like the Strokes have turned the most obvious chord progressions and melodies into ones that I feel like I've been waiting my whole life to hear (only on "Someday" and "Hard to Explain", but that's all they're playing on the radio anyway); fuck, there's even something profound in how desperately synthetic the vocals sound on the new Creed song. These things are EVERYWHERE.

Kris (aqueduct), Thursday, 29 August 2002 23:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Profound = Visibly Problematized Ethos (this occured to me walking from work today).

I think "Dilemma" is profound but not "Hot in Herre". "Lookout Weekend" by Debbie Deb but not "Family Affair" by Mary J. Blige. Dig?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 30 August 2002 02:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Does Debbie Deb have a best-of?

Kris (aqueduct), Friday, 30 August 2002 02:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Similar to Sterl I think, I find profondity in conflicted emotions or small victories, hard fought. A bit of joy or solace coming through in a crushingly sad song. Or a touch of melancholy in something freewheeling and joyous. I often find in these singular moments within songs, mainly where the song change moods. Radiohead does this with "Let Down" about 3/4's of the way through when the vocals start to overlap and things start to lift off. There is a Beth Orton track on Trailer Park in which when the chorus comes around, the organ/keyboard climbs up a couple notes. I notice it everytime I hear it and always gives me a bit of a rush. So to me it's in those moments I feel the song shift and me shift with it. In short: to be moved.

bnw (bnw), Friday, 30 August 2002 03:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I think most of you are being much to woolly in your definition of 'profound'. Music sums up big emotions, so to sort out what is meant in this case surely w've got to be pretty narrow in our definition or just about everything that really, really affects us will come under this label somewhere?

I think profudnity is more than a vague mysterious quality - I think it actually means there is wisdom in there: ie, either in the sound or in the lyrics, someone has got hold of a truth that is both vitally importnat, and very hard to get hold of, and the listener can join them there and get hold of it too.

Shit, and to think I used to hate hippies like me.

Such things are more often laid bare over an album's worth, or even several album's worth of music. Burning Spear is for me the profoundest artist: I can burrow further and further into the music, finding deeper and deeper meaning in the words and the way they are sung, in much the way religious people meditate on a text and have profound insights. If I had to pick one song it would be 'Children' or 'Red, Gold and GFreen'

Joy Division, too - and here I think it's possible to pick out some tracks that really do SAY something as well as just evoking it. 'Insight' is profound. 'Heart and Soul' is profound.

Paddy McAloon can do it too - often in a couple of couplets, the bastard. Throwaway profundity stinks.

Pop music can be at its most astonishing when this quality is ahcieved in a single song. For my money, 'Surf's Up' manages it in spite of the verbiage; so does '(White Man) in the Hammertmith Palais', in spite of - or even becuasue of - the political posturing.

I could go on a long time about eahc of these songs (and many others), quoting lyrics and bits of music, but I might get some loud e-crys to 'shut up!'

jon, Friday, 30 August 2002 06:25 (twenty-three years ago)

To me, profound means 'imparting a moral.' I often have dreams where the 'moral' is sort of semi-spoken at the end; for example, last night I had a dream about my mother solving the mystery of my stolen car because she was a good 'people person' and found out secrets from the secretary at the theives' auto workshop. The moral was 'everybody has different talents.' So, I find Daniel Johnston, Ice T, Shakira, The Shaggs profound, for the probably ridiculous reason that their songs contain such clear moral messages. I don't find Robbie Williams profound, even though his songs are strings of 'messages,' because I don't think you can find morals except through suffering, and he always sounds so glib. It's probably not even the case that he hasn't suffered, I guess it's just a technical trick to be able to convince the listener that you have done.

maryann, Friday, 30 August 2002 06:56 (twenty-three years ago)

thieves! (not theives)

maryann, Friday, 30 August 2002 07:04 (twenty-three years ago)

b-but he had to work with gary barlow!!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 07:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Ivor Cutler's I'm Happy - I'm Happy and I'll Punch the Man who says I'm not...

spiffy james, Friday, 30 August 2002 07:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Laughing Stock - Talk Talk
Astral Weeks - Van Morrison

gazza, Friday, 30 August 2002 08:23 (twenty-three years ago)

I just wanted to say something about non-lyrical music too. I thought about it and the two things that come to mind as profound non-lyrical music, for me, are Pachelbel's Canon and Sonny Rollin's music for Alfie - this is probably quite disgusting to people who care about jazz! The reasons these pieces of music appear profound to me are complete opposites: Pachelbel's Canon seems to suggest the possibility that there is a peaceful, architectural, spacious order to nature, and Sonny Rollin's music suggested the possibility of loving the more joyous, vital, chaotic nature that rushes towards you instead of being ... worshipped. But in both cases, I felt as if the musician had a message that could help you be reconciled to nature, I suppose.

maryann, Friday, 30 August 2002 09:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Something that you can listen to more times than other things without getting tired of it, different angles on it reveal themselves without the listener having to look TOO hard. Or, could I write an entire book on thoughts inspired by song? Most profound I can think of at the moment - Parliament's 'Mothership Connection'

dave q, Friday, 30 August 2002 10:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Profundity in essence can't be measured man, nor confined. It is a relationship confined and defined entirely by an individual. To verbalise it is a task that approaches the paradoxical since profundity exists and registers experience as a non-verbal impacting. That said the task of attempting to do so is not without merit: so then profundity is the the glittering, the weight, the scale, the fascination, the layers of the onion, the fire, the inspiration - it is the pull, the attraction, the revulsion, the jubilation and the despair. Profundity is the communication that registers and operates beyond communication.

Most profound: right now it's a revisitation to Zimmerframe's Blood on the Tapes (gimme the acoustic versions of these jewels over the electric anytime).

Roger Fascist, Friday, 30 August 2002 10:26 (twenty-three years ago)

i hate the "non-verbal" but i wub the "layers of the onion" (haha because each one is in fact a NEW SURFACE) => i am INFINITELY SUPERFICIAL hurrah

(of course i am attracted to the "non-verbal" because i hate it: it is my prey and i SHALL skin it)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 10:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmm, looking back at my "can't be measured man, nor confined. It is a relationship confined" I am tempted to think I don't know what I'm talking about. What I think I was trying to get across is that profundity perhaps does not exist outside or beyond the individual.

No Mark: with each layer of the peeling onion your are fascinated = you are Postmodern. There is no escape, even if you pickle it, or yourself.

Roger Fascist, Friday, 30 August 2002 10:56 (twenty-three years ago)

i am immune to the word "postmodern", which has even more ridiculously contradictory meanings than the word "influence": hence i conveniently choose it to imply all the good complimentary stuff in this instance

haha "pickling" isn't a bad concept to introduce tho, as "profundity" to me is merely a kind of passive-aggressive embalming (it SAYS "this work is too too marvelous for words and thus beyond undersdanding" but it MEANS "i alone am deep enough to graps how deep my hero is, and my failure to articulate that stands as proof: you with your big words are a minnow in a tank of great white whales")

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:17 (twenty-three years ago)

"Truth is the only profound."--Adi Da

DeRayMi, Friday, 30 August 2002 11:28 (twenty-three years ago)

ADI DA

DeRayMi, Friday, 30 August 2002 11:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I am just a stupid fan-girl who likes to gossip (apparently), I do not deal with profundity.

Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Why don't I ever understand a word of what you write, Mark? Are you profound? Or am I stupid? Or both? Or neither?

Some people say Hegel, Heidegger and Adorno were profound. I don't know as I never understood them. Shouldn't profundity be clarity?

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:47 (twenty-three years ago)

short answers: "He Stopped Loving Her Today" and "Love Will Tear Us Apart." both from the same year, frighteningly enough.

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:49 (twenty-three years ago)

"a clear idea is a little idea": edmund burke

I too associate clarity w.lack of depth, but I am unconvinced that lack of depth is (automatically) a good thing. I am a Gemini.

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 12:01 (twenty-three years ago)

depth = dud
clarity = classic

Edmund Burke? Don't know him, an obscure British historian from the 19th century? In any case he didn't like and get maths, then. The realm of clarity and beauty. That quotation is really utter bollocks. I have another one but have to look it up at home.

Love Will Tear Us Apart? Why? That's the only JD song I hate. And the title seems to be right out of a bad kitsch movie. Really bad taste in hindsight. Proves again that the extremes overlap.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 30 August 2002 13:07 (twenty-three years ago)

But profound means deep!! Its use as a word of approval = full-on Romanticism. Burke = the prior 18th-century theorist of the Sublime, Alex, and thus the Romantic movement generally. He was certainly an anti-classicist.


mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 13:18 (twenty-three years ago)

(oh look, actually i meant to say unconvinced that DEPTH = automatically a good thing)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 13:19 (twenty-three years ago)

(i am still a gemini)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 13:22 (twenty-three years ago)

(blah blah blah)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I am a Gemini.

The most useful piece of information on this thread.

DeRayMi, Friday, 30 August 2002 13:34 (twenty-three years ago)

I like all the following artists, records, and approaches:

La Monte Young is more profound than Steve Reich but Tehillim is more profound than "Two Sounds". Julian Bream is more profound than Eliot Fisk. Moving Pictures is more profound than 2112 (is more profound than In the Court Of the Crimson King). Boston was more profound than Joy Division. The Beatles were more profound than the Velvet Underground. Jimi Hendrix was more profound than Led Zeppelin. "Out On the Tiles" and "Dancing Days" are more profound than "Stairway To Heaven". Both "Wish Fulfilment" and the Bad Moon Rising suite are more profound than "The Diamond Sea". "I Know It's Over" is more profound than "How Soon Is Now?". Concrete Blonde's "Joey" is as or more profound than any pop song I can think of at the moment. Andrew WK is more profound than Radiohead is more profound than System Of a Down. Writing a vicious letter with or without sending it is more profound than going for a jog is more profound than punching a wall is more profound than crying is more profound than getting trashed. Acing your exams is more profound than just about anything.

sundar subramanian, Friday, 30 August 2002 13:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark: profundity" to me is merely a kind of passive-aggressive embalming (it SAYS "this work is too too marvelous for words and thus beyond undersdanding" but it MEANS "i alone am deep enough to grasp how deep my hero is, and my failure to articulate that stands as proof: you with your big words are a minnow in a tank of great white whales"

For real? The first part might be near to the mark but the second part... that's far too easy.

RogerFascist, Friday, 30 August 2002 13:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Dance Hall Days by Wang Chung is profound. Everybody Have Fun Tonight is not.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 30 August 2002 13:54 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not comfortable using "profound" to describe music.

DeRayMi, Friday, 30 August 2002 13:59 (twenty-three years ago)

My quotation in the original:

Tief sein und tief scheinen. - Wer sich tief weiß,
bemüht sich um Klarheit; wer der Menge tief scheinen
möchte, bemüht sich um Dunkelheit. Denn die Menge
hält alles für tief, dessen Grund sie nicht sehen kann:
sie ist so furchtsam und geht so ungern ins Wasser.

[Nietzsche: Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, S. 240. Digitale Bibliothek Band 2: Philosophie, S. 67482 (vgl. Nietzsche-W Bd. 2, S. 144)]

and in my crap translation:
Being and seeming profound. - Who knows himself deep, strives for clarity; who wants to make the crowd think he is deep, strives for obscurity. As the crowd thinks everything deep, of which it can't see the bottom; it is so fearful and doesn't like to go into the water.

Another good short French quotation by Vauvenargues which sounds like a compromise:
La clarté orne les pensées profondes (translate yourself)

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 30 August 2002 14:09 (twenty-three years ago)

"Profundity" seems to imply some sort of content. I'm not sure that music has content, or if so, what that content is. I have some vague Susanne Langerish idea about music presenting the form of emotions (whatever that means).

DeRayMi, Friday, 30 August 2002 14:10 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, i've always liked that nietzsche quote too, alex (i like FN best when he's harrying romantics — it's actually what i meant by "they are my prey i shall SKIN them") (FN's turn against the profundity industry came pretty much out of his turn against Wagner, when he realised how much of RW's off-stage sales-pitch was just blather...)

but "striving for clarity" doesn't just mean juggling with prefabricated journalistic slogans either (i'm not accusing you of this at all, alex, but in a awful lotta writing, accessibility just means it's been translated into some pre-digested formula you already knew you knew)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 14:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Striving for clarity implies the struggle for meaning, not its readymade packaging.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 30 August 2002 15:07 (twenty-three years ago)

so when no one knows what the hell i am talking abt it is becz i am Keeping It Real!!

that's a joke btw (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 15:16 (twenty-three years ago)

I am so glad I pissed off Alex in Mainhatten. I can retire now.

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 30 August 2002 15:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Oops got bored out of retirement now. [[checks watch]] what's for lunch, everyone?

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 30 August 2002 15:35 (twenty-three years ago)

The struggle not being "I'm the artist -- you do the struggling with what I mean" but rather hearing the artist grapple with things as yet unclear to all parties involved.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 30 August 2002 16:02 (twenty-three years ago)

You didn't piss me off at all Michelangelo. You just didn't answer my question. That's not exactly the same.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 30 August 2002 16:06 (twenty-three years ago)

The word "profound" makes me uncomfortable too--Wagnerian leitmotifs start to echo in my subconscious, dredging up disturbing half-synonyms like "Important."

That said, of course there's music that makes the bottom drop out of my heart, that takes me past my limited sense of self. (Though often that just means I need a sandwich). Usually it's smaller pop moments, rather than attempts at grandeur, that trigger this response. The Shakira song where she says the dude gives her a reason to shave her legs every morning makes me cry. So does Blink 182's "First Date"--songs about insecure boys always floor me. Call it the profundity of the everyday.

Of course, then there's soul, which I'll leave someone else to root around in.

I'll second Matos on "He Stopped Loving Her Today." And "Love Will Tear Us Apart" why the hell not. Here are two guys smack up against something so much bigger than themselves they can only gasp in awe/terror/confusion. That seems like a good place to look for profundity.

Both court schlockiness too. Is that a neccessary prerequisite for pop profundity?

Keith Harris (kharris1128), Friday, 30 August 2002 16:27 (twenty-three years ago)

I hadn't thought about Wagner when quoting this, Mark. But what you say makes a lot of sense. It could well be inspired by Nietzsche's split/liberation from Wagner (when he found out how shallow (that's not necessarily my pov) this guy and his music were). But in any case it is rather universal, if you want deep. So occasionally I understand what you write, Mark.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 30 August 2002 16:54 (twenty-three years ago)

First thing to mind when seeing thread title: XTC's Skylarking, and no, my copy does not include "Dear God." The whole life-story sequencing of the tracks starts as an opportunity for cleverness, turns into an opportunity to inject serious themes, and at the end, for me, winds up honestly, deeply profound. The looseness of the "theme," which seems to have been thrown over the whole thing halfway through the process, means that we're not hearing about a particular life but about life as a whole, making each of the events generic, inevitable. And right where we pass how old Partridge was during the album's recording, things fall apart into a miasma of middle-aged strain and uncertainty -- although with the beautiful, peak-of-album stab of childhood that hits back in "Mermaid Smiled," which I'm absolutely appalled got smacked off of the record to leave middle age as all God-questioning and soul-circumnavigating.

Anyway then death, and I think the way it's executed, musically as much as lyrically or conceptually, is possibly the most "profound" thing I own. "Dying" and "Sacrificial Bonfire" at the end. Just massively perfect, massively affecting. I mean, this is a look ahead at death -- a band finishing their concept with the part we can't know about -- and instead of some overblown This is Death thing it's just (1) an anxious, frightened song about cancer, tea cosies, and shrivelled-up noses, and (2) a peaceful post-death eulogy in XTC's pastoral English-harvest mode, a crematory burial, a fond farewell. I can't say enough about it.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 30 August 2002 18:20 (twenty-three years ago)

"Dying" makes me shiver. It's death, actual death as lived in the modern world, which is mostly being up before dawn, sitting awkwardly in waiting-room chairs, bringing people coffee. Wearing a clean shirt. Being helpful. Putting the flowers in water. Shaking hands and blinking and picking up food, old doilies and being frightened.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 30 August 2002 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

"The struggle not being "I'm the artist -- you do the struggling with what I mean" but rather hearing the artist grapple with things as yet unclear to all parties involved."

Yes. I think any sense of the profound in music has to be the product of a movement from one point to another, whether within the song or within the context surrounding the song (ie. the profound song might be unified, but it can only then be profound if its unity is part of a broader disunity. "Profound" = realisation, epiphany, acquiesance, unveiling. Thus there is always a sense of uncertainty to the song (inherent or contextual) because it is an arrival.

This is maybe why I often find final album tracks are fourth singles to be profound (from DJ Shadow's "You Can't Go Home Again" to Britney's "Born To Make You Happy"). It's also why The Avalanches strike me as profound - their "take a little journey" approach to their album was more explicit than on most mix albums, seeking to narrate a story of conflicting emotions arriving at unity.

Depending on how you look at it, pop is often ill-suited to this sort of profundity because a good pop song frequently strives to evoke a sort of journeylessness - the "out of time" aspect of the endless party - although the truth is that the move towards journeyless can itself seem profound. I haven't quite worked out why or how though (help plz!). Nonetheless it's easier to spot profundity in a pop star whose career offers a sort of narrative (would Madonna's "Oh Father" or "Substitute For Love" ever have struck critics as being profound if it came from a new artist?).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 30 August 2002 23:52 (twenty-three years ago)

this help? (a classic, from the first month of In Review back in 2000)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 31 August 2002 03:25 (twenty-three years ago)

As something that perfectly states and examines a feeling previously unaddressed in music, with perception, precision, clarity and depth, I'd nominate the Goffin-King song Will You Love Me Tomorrow, preferably in the cool, clear Shirelles version.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 31 August 2002 09:49 (twenty-three years ago)

glad someone mentioned XTC. Yacht Dance is profound. Clever man, Mr Patridge (and I'm writing this in Swindon !!!)
or rather NEAR swindon
well, nearish...

jon, Saturday, 31 August 2002 17:39 (twenty-three years ago)

one year passes...
I was thinking of the (few) criticisms of Bonnie Tyler on the Total Eclipse thread, and then I was thinking about what I like in pop music, and that reminded me of this thread.

So revive.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)

isn't the crux of TEOTH's appeal the majestic nature in which it goes from sombre piano-led confessional to resolute progression (key change of 'turn around' refrain) to big fat sloppy chorus which SOUNDS like hope in all but the lyrics? is this profound at all?

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 11:28 (twenty-two years ago)

This shit is deep, man.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Andrew WK's Got to Get It.

Go listen to it. Now.

Francis Watlington (Francis Watlington), Thursday, 30 October 2003 00:41 (twenty-two years ago)

francis OTFM.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 30 October 2003 01:12 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.