"How Heavy Metal Is Keeping Us Sane" from The Atlantic

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Interesting article in The Atlantic about heavy metal music by James Parker.

You can see the whole article at the link above, but here are some exerpts that stood out:

Since its invention (to which we will return in a moment), heavy metal has been the popular music most ardently devoted to Frazer’s underground magma pools, and most grandly expressive of their inevitable eruption. Metal’s commerce with the lower realm has been extravagant, ridiculous, and covered in glory. The sleeper parched of his dreams, or purged of his nightmares, goes swiftly bonkers: without fantasy there is no reality. It might be argued—indeed, it will be argued, by me, right now—that heavy metal has kept us sane.

It’s been 40 years since the release of Black Sabbath’s Master of Reality and 25 since Metallica’s Master of Puppets, the first presenting us with the aboriginal metal vision, the second refining that vision dramatically. And today we find ourselves in something of a metal slump. There’s plenty of it around; the kids, in hundreds of thousands, are buying albums by Disturbed or Avenged Sevenfold; longtime casualties like your correspondent are enjoying Mastodon, High on Fire, and the smoldering Zoroaster; the extremist has his niche metals—his death metal and his black metal and his drone metal and his vocals that sound like a man vomiting in a cathedral. And the hoary old gods (Slayer, Metallica) are still chucking the odd thunderbolt. But metal’s profile is low: the mega-tours seem to pass invisibly from city to city, with no new figureheads arising at whom the general populace can scream and throw turnips. Metal didn’t even dent Billboard’s top 50 best-selling albums of 2010. Prompting the question: Have we passed peak metal?

Unlikely, I think. Metal renews itself, as we shall see.

[...]

By dwelling at such length on the lyrics, and mentioning Schopenhauer, I of course risk the capital vice of the writer-on-metal: I risk being intellectual. Nothing disgusts a metalhead more than to be intellectualized. Which is not to say that he himself is without conceit in that department. The metalhead, quite counter to stereotype, is floridly pretentious. He will call his band Sanctum of Carnality, or Thy Maleficence; he will steep himself in the Stygian prose of H. P. Lovecraft, possibly the most insane overwriter since Webster; he will root through his thesaurus to find a fancy word for “dismemberment”; he will make up his own words, heavy-sounding words, like thraft (High on Fire) and cleansation (Chimaira). But all of this is best understood as a kind of voodoo, a force field of metal-ness with which to ward off the triflers and non-tragedians, while simultaneously short-circuiting the apparatus of good taste, correctly identified by the proto-metalhead G. K. Chesterton as “the last and vilest of human superstitions.” Faddists and lightweights: keep your distance. Critic: we will make your brain explode.

[...]

The great scholar of heavy metal Robert Walser, doing research for his 1993 book, Running With the Devil, interviewed a Twisted Sister fan who told him that the easy-listening music favored by her mother had made her paranoid. In Walser’s words: “It so obviously seems to lie to her about the world.” An Avenged Sevenfold fan might say the same today about the music of Jack Johnson, or John Mayer, or Jason Mraz, or any of the golden troubadours on heavy rotation at your local Starbucks. I don’t mean to be ungracious about Starbucks—I happen to spend a good deal of time in Starbucks—but heavy metal reminds me that Starbucks, like much of modern life, is a fiction. Go through the membrane, break the crust, and everything is metal.

Loud guitars shit all over "Bette Davis Eyes" (NYCNative), Saturday, 14 May 2011 09:02 (fourteen years ago)

I don't particularly agree with the anti-intellectual stance that Parker brings up. Sure there are dumbasses who like metal but I always found that a big share of us listen to NPR, act like jazz geeks who can recite who played every instrument on any album in stoic tones, and basically come off just as pretentious as fans of any more "serious" music. I think the image of the dumb metal fan is a stereotype that gets broken down time and time again and should go away.

Loud guitars shit all over "Bette Davis Eyes" (NYCNative), Saturday, 14 May 2011 09:05 (fourteen years ago)

The great scholar of heavy metal (something something]

Oh, c'mon. Anyone who would print such a thing deserves automatic brass knuckles into
the teeth. And everyone who has been on ILM as long as it's existed knows the same. It begs to be to be not taken seriously.

In fact, I'm out on a limb here. No one with a name here is going to rise to the bait.

Ha-ha. The editors at the Atlantic obviously don't know how many times Mike Saunders gets
badgered by mainstream media music types per year about the origins of metal.

There was a Clint Eastwood movie that turned on the phrase: "A man's got to know his
limitations."

Gorge, Saturday, 14 May 2011 09:46 (fourteen years ago)

I like that he called GK Chesterton proto-metal.

Nate Carson, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 02:06 (fourteen years ago)

everything is metal

O_O

markers, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 02:26 (fourteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/2ATfU.jpg

markers, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 02:27 (fourteen years ago)

xpost

Then Tom Lehrer was power metal.

Gorge, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 02:27 (fourteen years ago)

"he will root through his thesaurus to find a fancy word for “dismemberment”; he will make up his own words, heavy-sounding words, like thraft (High on Fire) and cleansation (Chimaira)"

Yes, he will.

Thraft of Cleveland (Bill Magill), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 20:22 (fourteen years ago)

blehhh

scott seward, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 20:35 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.