Accounting for Taste....

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Lifted from the "200 best albums of the 20th century" thread....

/I don't like it when influential music mags say something is "The Best" as its a fact. It's their opinion...It is the very essence of rockism/
Could we have a ruling on this use of "rocksim" by one of the in-house experts on its meaning? (I have a feeling the answer is no, we cannot.)
-- DeRayMi, September 14th, 2002 11:08 AM.

is answered by a sarcastic article from Brunching Shuttlecocks....
http://www.brunching.com/features/accountingfortaste.html

_______________________________________________________________________
Some people think that music preference is just a matter of personal taste, that the music you listen to is no better than the music anyone else listens to. That's just stupid. If their music is just as good as your music, why aren't you listening to it, instead? Clearly, your music is better, because you like good music.
But how to convince those around you that their preference in music is misguided and wrong? It's clearly not enough to point out that your music is good and theirs is bad; if they wanted to listen to good music, they'd already be listening to yours. Stronger measures are in order. Luckily we at the Brunching Shuttlecocks are here to provide you with a quick course in how to demolish the musical taste of others.
The first and most important step is to determine whether your adversary's music is more popular, or less popular, than your own. From there, simply use the following guidelines:

Their Music is Less Popular
People who like less popular music than you are just trying to impress their friends and peers, as well as random strangers. Heterosexual men, in addition, are just trying to get into the pants of aesthetically-misguided women. The important thing here is that they don't actually like the music, no matter how much they protest otherwise. Their so-called musical "taste" is merely an exercise in self-conscious pretension.

Their Music is More Popular
People who listen to pop music (where "pop music" is relative to your own tastes) are brainwashed by the music industry. They listen to their music only because they are told to by masses of suit-wearing advertisers and the mainstream (where "mainstream" is relative to your own tastes) music critics they hold in their custom-tailored pockets. End listeners are merely a money-delivery device for their corporate overlords, like an ATM that buys concert T-shirts. The listeners do not actually enjoy the music they listen to; they merely think they're enjoying it because they're too weak-minded to form their own opinions.

Difficult Cases
You may run into trouble when dealing with someone who listens to music that's approximately as popular as yours. Which are they, you may ask, brainwashed or pretentious? Happily, the answer is "both." You can use either argument effectively, or combine them into a truly devastating tsunami of rhetoric.

Finally, some people listen to music that is enormously popular, but largely ignored outside of a particular market. These include country-western music, Spanish-language music, and Christian contemporary. You may be able to get by with a dismissive exhalation when the subject comes up, because fans of this music are often, oddly enough, more interested in listening to it than arguing its validity, but when in doubt you can always assume that these people simply don't know any better.

Summary (In Clip-And-Save Format)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


  • People who like less popular music than yours are pretentious poseurs.
  • People who like more popular music than yours are brainwashed marketing slaves.
  • People who like music different from yours, but similarly popular, are pretentious brainwashed marketing-slave poseurs.
    When in doubt, people who like music other than yours just don't know any better.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
With any luck, an ignorant world will soon be forced to recognize the truth and purity of your musical tastes. Good hunting!
_______________________________________________________________________

Isn't this mentality not only the essence of Rockism but of every musical -ism, including popism, indi-ism and polka-ism?

a smug article

Lord Custos Alpha (Lord Custos Alpha), Wednesday, 18 September 2002 14:30 (twenty-two years ago)

It's funny because it's true!

kate, Wednesday, 18 September 2002 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

The article doesn't clarify how you'd ENFORCE your musical tastes on the blinkered philistine non-creative garbage who have tastes that differ from our own. Pity.

Lord Custos Alpha (Lord Custos Alpha), Wednesday, 18 September 2002 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)

pure gold....if they don't come around you can always just shoot them too.

Regarding the original post: I'm curious, when did Magazines (music magazines in particular) became reputiable sources of the truth, or even fact?

( I assume you fall into category "Their Music is More Popular" ;) - although that could possibly mean I'm a pretentious wanker...but hey, I've been accused of that before...)

dsico

dsico (dsico), Wednesday, 18 September 2002 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

(I assume you fall into category "Their Music is More Popular" ;) - although that could possibly mean I'm a pretentious wanker...but hey, I've been accused of that before...)
If *I* personally fall into any category it's that I'm half-hip and half-unhip. I'm both too much of a mainstreamist to leverage enough indie-cred to be cool, but I'm also too much of an obscuranist to ever fit into the Ken'n'Barbie world of mass-produced pop.
But then again, the whole point of the article is that the writer was pretending to be a pseudo-Aristole; trying to pidgeonhole (or shoehorn) everybody until a very bad worldview.
Essentially it's like the old religious double standard: "Theres two kinds of people in the world....the Wonderfully blessed heroes like me, and the crack-smoking homo-Satanists like THEM."
Except without the possibility for redemption or the humility of the truly graceful.

Lord Custos Alpha (Lord Custos Alpha), Wednesday, 18 September 2002 21:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm also too much of an obscuranist to ever fit into the Ken'n'Barbie world of mass-produced pop.

Betrayed by your own words!

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 19 September 2002 12:58 (twenty-two years ago)

WOOP WOOP WOOP ROCKIST ALARM WOOP WOOP WOOP

(Then again, I AGREE WITH HIM, ha!)

Nate Patrin, Thursday, 19 September 2002 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)


Betrayed by your own words!
I stand by every syllable. Anyone with more than 1 pound of silicone or 10oz of synthetic collagen in their body no longer qualify as human anymore. Let The Clones be Culled, I say!

Lord Custos Alpha (Lord Custos Alpha), Thursday, 19 September 2002 17:54 (twenty-two years ago)

two years pass...
phlar

phlar, Saturday, 23 April 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)

twelve years pass...

:-O

Video reach stereo bog (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 February 2018 11:00 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.