― Manny Parsons (Rahul Kamath), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:43 (twenty-three years ago)
(actually, i know where yr coming from julio...it's the same argument we had on the thread about my snotty blog entry about "newness"...and i'll still don't agree with you, but i know where yr coming from.)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― JoB (JoB), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:46 (twenty-three years ago)
dead on, re. ill, however.
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)
Does dated=bad?
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― blueski, Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:56 (twenty-three years ago)
yeah, goldie. it's aged terribly in a way that, say, new forms hasn't (or esp. not black secret tech or parallel universe<>/i>), basically for the same reason that all prog does: the sheer ambition of the fucking thing makes you sit up and say WOW, only to realize a few years later that it's mostly just silly and overwrought and ambitious in the way of a college orchestra attempting to play harry partch. (a fact he felt the need to hammer home with "mother.") i mean, it should have been fairly obvious at the time ("i record my tracks in 4d"...yeah, well what about the tunes you fucker!), but i suspect this would have made it onto many best albums of the decade polls if polled even as late as 97 or 98.
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― blueski, Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Peoples (speoples), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― rms (rms), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:17 (twenty-three years ago)
i think that, perhaps by virtue of it sounding 'dated' since the day it was released, debut has actually held up rather well
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:18 (twenty-three years ago)
i still love the fucked up manic cyber-dub nightmare rush of 'This Is A Baad' - its also a brilliant example of the great way Goldie and Playford liked to flip the mood of their tracks...dirty basslines and fx and domineering metallic filtered breaks...suddenly a glorious sweeping pad breaks thru the dark smoke like the most intense sunshine followed by a classic but so very faint house piano lick...happier memories and tiny reminders trying to penetrate the threatening confusion and paranoia of the whirling prison the dancefloor seems to have become for these 4 minutes....mahahaha
― blueski, Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:19 (twenty-three years ago)
What about the other side of the argument -- albums that can you can't really picture sounding dated? Since I Left You, f'rinstance.
― Nate Patrin, Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― brg30 (brg30), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:26 (twenty-three years ago)
good point. i can still pull my copy out and enjoy it, but there is something exploratory and unrefined about the whole album. i think those qualities are what gives it personality. if that was your point, then, by-golly, i agree.
― Sean Peoples (speoples), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― andy, Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nate Patrin, Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 19 September 2002 22:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― Charlie (Charlie), Thursday, 19 September 2002 22:46 (twenty-three years ago)
Listen to it. It still sounds great. Who cares if he's a twat.
Whereas New Forms... couple of good tunes, lots of mediocrity.
― Ben Williams, Thursday, 19 September 2002 22:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― oog, Thursday, 19 September 2002 23:22 (twenty-three years ago)
So how did you change your mind? Did ILM convince you to approach it from a different angle, or is it just a case of giving it another chance, repeated listenings etc?
btw I agree mostly about Timeless but the beats in the title track are classic and the John Woo 'The Killer' sample is cool.
― Keith McD (Keith McD), Friday, 20 September 2002 02:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― alexfack, Friday, 20 September 2002 02:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 20 September 2002 03:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 September 2002 03:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 20 September 2002 03:31 (twenty-three years ago)
― Keith McD (Keith McD), Friday, 20 September 2002 04:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― Burr, Friday, 20 September 2002 05:11 (twenty-three years ago)
"The Modern Age" is basically a cover of Tall Dwarfs' "Crush" which is from 1984. So this is very true by definition.
― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 20 September 2002 06:16 (twenty-three years ago)
Wrong.
― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 20 September 2002 06:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 20 September 2002 06:20 (twenty-three years ago)
What Jess doesn't mention about Cupid and Psyche is that it has some beautiful songs on too - "A Little Knowledge"! I think License To Ill still sounds great too though.
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 20 September 2002 06:47 (twenty-three years ago)
Loved 'em to bits at the time, just don;t seem to want to play 'em any more.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 20 September 2002 07:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 September 2002 07:31 (twenty-three years ago)
Me too! BUT it's not half as good as Provision.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 20 September 2002 08:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Friday, 20 September 2002 08:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 20 September 2002 08:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 September 2002 08:46 (twenty-three years ago)
this is bullshit of course. the best of that bunch easily holds up.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 20 September 2002 09:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 September 2002 09:08 (twenty-three years ago)
Dated = clearly of a time (and maybe diminished because of this)
eg. "Don't You Want Me"
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 September 2002 09:10 (twenty-three years ago)
Neither of 'em come anywhere close to Songs To Remember as far as I'm concerned.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 20 September 2002 11:08 (twenty-three years ago)
"Golden Brown" - Stranglers
― dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 20 September 2002 11:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 27 September 2004 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)
But Nirvana records? To say those have dated is a totally off-the-mark assertion. Bleach sounded dated the second it was released; perhaps that was the point. The other two stand as all-time greats, among rock's finest works. The bullshit that's been on the radio ever since shows just how great a songwriter Cobain really was ... and how the power of great drum sounds never dies.
Besides, if you say Nevermind is dated, then that assumes Who's Next is dated, which is to say: Who fucking cares if the albums are truly that great?
― Chris O., Monday, 27 September 2004 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)
What exactly does that mean?
― Mr. Snrub, Monday, 27 September 2004 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr. Snrub, Monday, 27 September 2004 21:34 (twenty-one years ago)
Just saying it sounds like a one-off, minimal-take recording session that cost only $600. A moment in time.
― Chris O., Monday, 27 September 2004 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 10:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Zach S, Friday, 13 January 2006 06:10 (nineteen years ago)
(I think that more than anything, reliance on new technology instead of songwriting is what leaves thigns feeling dated, and that's the mark on a lot of techno/electronic music...)
TS: Dated vs. Retro?
― js (honestengine), Friday, 13 January 2006 06:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Stephen C (ihope), Friday, 13 January 2006 07:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Zach S, Friday, 13 January 2006 07:56 (nineteen years ago)
Most of Madonna's early stuff (True Blue) sounds especially dated. There's something very thin-sounding about them - both in her pre-training voice and those horrible tinny synths.
Kate Bush's Hounds Of Love also sounds quite dated in places, possibly because it was so cutting-edge at the time. The songwriting is fucking amazing, but the drum machine programming occasionally sounds comic.
The same goes for Aerial. Wonderful songwriting, but again dated drum programming and flamenco guitar (hello? Didn't Where Do You Go? kill that sound off for at least a decade).
As for what WILL date, Gwen Stefani's L.A.M.B. will age horribly (botox to hold up ageing records not yet being invented).
I'd disagree strongly with the argument Debut is a 'dated' album though. I listened to it a short while ago for the first time after a long gap and it's amazing how fresh it still sounds now. Venus As A Boy has, especially, hardened into a bona fide classic. If any of her albums is going to age gracelessly it'll be Post.
― klee (klee), Friday, 13 January 2006 10:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Stephen C (ihope), Friday, 13 January 2006 10:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned T.RIfle II (Ned T.Rifle II), Friday, 13 January 2006 10:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Baaderonixx, born again in Xixax (baaderonixx), Friday, 13 January 2006 10:53 (nineteen years ago)
I think the answer to this question is going to be "anything older than ~10 years, going back till you were a teenager." I note relatively few entries from the very recent past on this thread, with I think Wilco and the Lips being the only ones to get put in that box maybe? Oh, and the Modest Mouse thing which I am confused and intrigued about, would like to hear that elaborated on. I've maybe gotten a bit tired of TM&A, and I've moved on, but I don't think it dates itself.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 13 January 2006 18:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Costello, Friday, 13 January 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)
― js (honestengine), Friday, 13 January 2006 18:45 (nineteen years ago)
I find myself not listening to Nirvana much either, but not because they weren't great, just because I invested so much mental energy into that band for such a long time, I need a prolonged break.
― kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Friday, 13 January 2006 18:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Costello, Friday, 13 January 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)
fresh - dated - fresh again - dated again - fresh all over again - dated all over again
And there's potentially no end to it, except "forgotten". And even that can end with "revived!" (Like this thread.)
― Momus (Momus), Friday, 13 January 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 13 January 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)
I'm increasingly finding that Weezer's first two albums-- which I loved when they came out-- are annoying to listen to. I can still only listen to a couple songs on each album without feeling sick. "No One Else" and "In the Garage" in particular are still good. Most of everything else, just sounds a bit childish or something. Of course, I'd rather listen to those albums over anything that followed those two albums any day of the week.
― Pantheism F. Mohair (res), Saturday, 1 November 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago)
Destroyer, ugh--hard to believe I liked it so much, now it turns my stomach
― iago g., Monday, 3 November 2008 03:45 (sixteen years ago)
Chicago XIII
― the salvia of a cockatrice (wanko ergo sum), Monday, 3 November 2008 03:49 (sixteen years ago)
...And Justice For All
"nevermind the bollocks"and just about every other canonical punk LP except for the ramones' LPs.
― ian, Monday, 3 November 2008 03:51 (sixteen years ago)
Thankfully, I never understood the hoopla about Destroyer
― Pantheism F. Mohair (res), Monday, 3 November 2008 03:52 (sixteen years ago)
Golden Palomino's This Is How It Feels. Loved the shit out of it for years after it came out -- could care less about it now.
― Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 3 November 2008 04:30 (sixteen years ago)
Moby :(
― Whiney G. Torture Garden (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 3 November 2008 04:41 (sixteen years ago)
― iago g., Monday, November 3, 2008 3:45 AM (1 hour ago)but "no cease fires" is still his best song!
― Kevin Keller, Monday, 3 November 2008 05:03 (sixteen years ago)
Absolutely OTM.
― Millsner, Monday, 3 November 2008 05:29 (sixteen years ago)
New Forms- Roni Size/Reprazent (1st version, haven't listened to the remake)Untrue- BurialYs- Joanna Newsom
among others
― Vision, Monday, 3 November 2008 06:38 (sixteen years ago)
i think i managed to wear out ys before it was officially released even. is it that it's dated or that we (read--I) listened to it too gd much.
same with last year's burial album, is it dated or are you just burnt out?
― psychgawsple, Monday, 3 November 2008 07:05 (sixteen years ago)
Ys- Joanna Newsom
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 3 November 2008 09:24 (sixteen years ago)
A lot of stuff basically founded on early digital synths and sampling:Frankie Goes To Hollywood: Welcome To The Pleasure DomeArt of Noise: Who's Afraid OfJanet Jackson: ControlGrace Jones: Slave To The Rhythm
Again band doesn't neccessarily mean bad, as these sound dated mainly because they used a kind of technology that was very fresh then, as used for a few years and then largely ditched in favour of using or emulating the old analog technology again.
― Geir Hongro, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:15 (sixteen years ago)
Those have gone thru sounding "dated" and now they sound fresh again tho.
― Nothing has transpired (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 November 2008 10:19 (sixteen years ago)
Late 80s synths will never sound fresh again. They have lost to old analog synths sounds forever. LCD Soundsystem have sounded dated from the first day they appeared on the scene and will always do as long as they insist on using those "harsh" digital sounds.
― Geir Hongro, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:21 (sixteen years ago)
all of them?
― Ioannis, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:22 (sixteen years ago)
Merits or demerits of LCDS aside, that deliberate retro schtick is permanently modern-sounding, ironically enough.
― Nothing has transpired (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 November 2008 10:23 (sixteen years ago)
Cyndi Lauper's "She's So Unusual", the synths on that are so harsh.
― snoball, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:24 (sixteen years ago)
The one Cyndi Lauper album that sounds dated with way too much digital synths is "True Colors".
― Geir Hongro, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:31 (sixteen years ago)
"Sgt. Pepper" is and remains a fantastic album. It does sound dated now though, mainly because of musical trends and fashions moving in the wrong directions from punk onwards.
― Geir Hongro, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:34 (sixteen years ago)
I was recently listening to a Luther Vandross comp, and all that '80s and '90s electric piano wind chime MOR crappola sounds dead on arrival today. Oh wait, it did then, too.
― mottdeterre, Monday, 3 November 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago)
i'm much too young to have been around when it came out, but parts of She's So Unusual don't really work the way they might have 700 blogyears ago when it was released. though "time after time" is still perfect.
― Kevin Keller, Monday, 3 November 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago)
Also: of course, Goldie's ironically titled "Timeless".
psychgawsple, that may be the case (Untrue particularly).
― Vision, Monday, 3 November 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago)
the track "Timeless" still cuts pretty deep tho...(so does "Angel", come to think...the seagull one = bah!)
― henry s, Monday, 3 November 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago)
"Timeless" still sounds great. Partly because there was never anything else that sounded quite like it.
― Geir Hongro, Monday, 3 November 2008 22:33 (sixteen years ago)
Maxinquaye pwns this thread.
― Naive Teen Idol, Tuesday, 4 November 2008 00:32 (sixteen years ago)
"pwns" is dated :P
pretty hate machine r.i.p.
― bnw, Tuesday, 4 November 2008 01:34 (sixteen years ago)
there seems to be something more than just production or even the instruments used on a record that make it sound 'dated'. as momus (!) hinted at before, this stuff is all cyclical, so it's interesting to consider what makes certain eras so appalled at the sounds of another.
seems that, in my opinion at least, pretty much any influential album from the late '90s sounds super dated at the moment. even records i know by heart like 'in the aeroplane over the sea' or 'endtroducing', in large part because enough time has passed for other artists to come along and dilute the hell out of the ideas on those records. in a few years they'll probably sound fresh again, or at least i'll be able to separate the original album from its legacy (hopefully).
but seriously, what albums from the time period 1996-2002 DON'T sound dated right now? anyone else agree?
bucking the trend- belle & sebastian, the avalanches, boredoms, yo la tengo
― psychgawsple, Tuesday, 4 November 2008 03:16 (sixteen years ago)