Albums that were great when they came out but sound dated now

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Name some albums that were GREAT (you thought they were fantastic, revolutionary, life-changing!) when they came out, but now when you hear them, they sound bad and/or dated.

Manny Parsons (Rahul Kamath), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:36 (twenty-three years ago)

S'Express "Original Soundtrack"

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:39 (twenty-three years ago)

"Use Your Illusion II"

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:39 (twenty-three years ago)

timeless

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:41 (twenty-three years ago)

This is a really flawed question.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:43 (twenty-three years ago)

dude, timeless totally sounds like shit now, i fail to see how the question is flawed?!

(actually, i know where yr coming from julio...it's the same argument we had on the thread about my snotty blog entry about "newness"...and i'll still don't agree with you, but i know where yr coming from.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Cupid + Psyche 85 - Scritti Politti
Licensed to Ill - Beastie Boys

JoB (JoB), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:46 (twenty-three years ago)

cupid & psyche is one of the greatest albums of all time, and one of the major things i thank ilm for "correcting" me on.

dead on, re. ill, however.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Virtually every album pre-1990, and a fair few after that.

Does dated=bad?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Jess are you talkin about Goldie's 'Timeless'? i assume so. and if so i'm inclined to agree with you cos it kinda blew me away in 95 but i havent listened to it for years and Goldie's descent into cockerney gangster bond baddie shenanigans has not helped either...still thinking about it, it did produce some magical moments (the intro to every track on there is pretty spectacular) but it was quite a 'here and now' piece of work, a document of the late 90s that struggles for the same relevance or indeed reverence 7 (SEVEN!) years later...

blueski, Thursday, 19 September 2002 19:56 (twenty-three years ago)

there was a thread on "dated" although i can't seem to find it. it was generally agreed that it does not = bad, although it can.

yeah, goldie. it's aged terribly in a way that, say, new forms hasn't (or esp. not black secret tech or parallel universe<>/i>), basically for the same reason that all prog does: the sheer ambition of the fucking thing makes you sit up and say WOW, only to realize a few years later that it's mostly just silly and overwrought and ambitious in the way of a college orchestra attempting to play harry partch. (a fact he felt the need to hammer home with "mother.") i mean, it should have been fairly obvious at the time ("i record my tracks in 4d"...yeah, well what about the tunes you fucker!), but i suspect this would have made it onto many best albums of the decade polls if polled even as late as 97 or 98.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:03 (twenty-three years ago)

damn, i really fucked that one up didn't i?

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:06 (twenty-three years ago)

i dunno jess, it was ambitious, self-indulgent and bloated sure (in the same way Talvin Singh's 'OK' was) but it did seem so technically hypermodern (oops) and sonically advanced then and even now you dont hear much that pushes things like that - drum n bass seems to have stood still for 5 years or more...but i still regard it as one of the most important albums in my life for the impact it made...dated as it may be

blueski, Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:08 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, don't get me wrong: obv. i liked it at one time, given the title of this thread. i sold it ages ago, actually, so i'd be interested in hearing it again for comparison...

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:11 (twenty-three years ago)

debut by bjork

Sean Peoples (speoples), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

The Strokes - the Modern Age

rms (rms), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:17 (twenty-three years ago)

debut by bjork

i think that, perhaps by virtue of it sounding 'dated' since the day it was released, debut has actually held up rather well

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:18 (twenty-three years ago)

re: Timeless

i still love the fucked up manic cyber-dub nightmare rush of 'This Is A Baad' - its also a brilliant example of the great way Goldie and Playford liked to flip the mood of their tracks...dirty basslines and fx and domineering metallic filtered breaks...suddenly a glorious sweeping pad breaks thru the dark smoke like the most intense sunshine followed by a classic but so very faint house piano lick...happier memories and tiny reminders trying to penetrate the threatening confusion and paranoia of the whirling prison the dancefloor seems to have become for these 4 minutes....mahahaha

blueski, Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:19 (twenty-three years ago)

To pretentiously carp on about an obvious point: a lot of the most "innovative"-sounding hip-hop seems to get dated within about five-ten years or so due to the constant evolution of lyrical flows and beatmaking techniques. RUN-D.M.C.'s King of Rock is probably the best example I can think of this -- two or three years prior people were still rocking disco breaks and rapping Sugar Hill Records style, and when all those heavy metal guitars and reggae beats and "all brand new never ever old school" lyrics came out people understandably flipped. But whenever I listen to it nowadays (which ain't often since my turntable died) it screams "1985!" at me and merely whispers "hey some of these beats are pretty good".

What about the other side of the argument -- albums that can you can't really picture sounding dated? Since I Left You, f'rinstance.

Nate Patrin, Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:23 (twenty-three years ago)

But covering Walk This Way w/ members of Aerosmith-dayteed.

brg30 (brg30), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:26 (twenty-three years ago)

i think that, perhaps by virtue of it sounding 'dated' since the day it was released, debut has actually held up rather well

good point. i can still pull my copy out and enjoy it, but there is something exploratory and unrefined about the whole album. i think those qualities are what gives it personality. if that was your point, then, by-golly, i agree.

Sean Peoples (speoples), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Meat Puppets' "Up On The Sun".... I still dig it, tho.

andy, Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:27 (twenty-three years ago)

(Strangely enough, the stuff on RUN-D.M.C.'s debut sounds less dated. "Sucker M.C.'s" vs. "Grindin'": FITE!)

Nate Patrin, Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:28 (twenty-three years ago)

"timeless" the track still sounds amazing to me!
but the album does sound dated.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 19 September 2002 20:38 (twenty-three years ago)

"Pump Up the Jam" by Technotronic

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 19 September 2002 22:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Orbital - Brown, much to my chagrin. I thought it'd last forever. Still, it does give the lie to the dated=bad rule, cos it still rocks...

Charlie (Charlie), Thursday, 19 September 2002 22:46 (twenty-three years ago)

"i sold it ages ago, actually, so i'd be interested in hearing it again for comparison..."

Listen to it. It still sounds great. Who cares if he's a twat.

Whereas New Forms... couple of good tunes, lots of mediocrity.

Ben Williams, Thursday, 19 September 2002 22:59 (twenty-three years ago)

definitely modest mouse's moon over antarctica, and just recently after hearing the new one, the soft bulletin.

oog, Thursday, 19 September 2002 23:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey Jess,
I'm wondering about your Cupid + Psyche turnaround. I heard an early Scritti song (forget what - must find out) on a friend's Rough Trade comp that is one of the most beautifully creepy things I've ever heard. So I was very excited to find C+P 2nd hand, then got a huge shock when I put it on. While I am loving early Human League & Depeche Mode to death (not dated - totally futuristic!), mid/late 80s synth stuff is still makes me go yuk. However there is certainly something intriguing about this album.

So how did you change your mind? Did ILM convince you to approach it from a different angle, or is it just a case of giving it another chance, repeated listenings etc?

btw I agree mostly about Timeless but the beats in the title track are classic and the John Woo 'The Killer' sample is cool.

Keith McD (Keith McD), Friday, 20 September 2002 02:38 (twenty-three years ago)

gleaming filter-disco of Fever makes Light Years sound soooo 2000 now. Light Years far more tune-stuffed, however.

alexfack, Friday, 20 September 2002 02:39 (twenty-three years ago)

i tried writing about cupid & psyche for me blog a while back but the file got eaten and i never bothered finishing it up. basically, there was a lot of talk on ilm about scritti, and then last summer that "epiphany" in the wire by simon reynolds about early scritti. so i bought c&p and had basically the same reaction you did: wtf is this hyper-glossy synthpop?! then i finally heard all of the "first-phase" scritti (the first single, peel sessions, 4-ASides) and fell in love with it, to the point where there's a thread about it on ilm where i argue with tom over the relative merits of both. (it even inspired one of the funniest things on nylpm, tom's "the sound of scritti politti is the sound of green gartside getting better in bed.") c&p went into a box in my parents attic (with a lot of my other cd's) when i moved and i forgot about it. but when i was home this summer and broke and desperate for new records, i dug it out of the box and tried it again. maybe it's just how my listening shifted over the last 12 months, maybe it's just one of those inexplicable epiphany-type thangs, but damn...it just sounded great!! i listened to it obsessively this summer (and then left it 2800 miles away in penn...arrrgh, etc.) i just think it's a masterful, obsessively crafted (everything fucking gleams, no dirt on the surfaces, which is of course the opposite from the early scritti stuff) pop record with hints of the earlier, more "difficult" scritti throughout. i'm just a sucker for that Big, trevor horn-esque sound in general. i still love the early records (the only phase of scritti i really don't like - outside of "the sweetest girl" - is the second, proto-pop rough trade era...it just all sounds kinda half-formed to me).

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 20 September 2002 03:22 (twenty-three years ago)

SST

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 September 2002 03:27 (twenty-three years ago)

haha, with the exception of sister, YES.

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 20 September 2002 03:31 (twenty-three years ago)

SST dated? Not a bad thing though, surely! I love Husker Du's eightiesness!

Keith McD (Keith McD), Friday, 20 September 2002 04:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Almost all of the later Beatles stuff (from Revolver on) sounds dated to me.

Burr, Friday, 20 September 2002 05:11 (twenty-three years ago)

The Strokes - the Modern Age

"The Modern Age" is basically a cover of Tall Dwarfs' "Crush" which is from 1984. So this is very true by definition.

donut bitch (donut), Friday, 20 September 2002 06:16 (twenty-three years ago)

"Pump Up the Jam" by Technotronic

Wrong.

donut bitch (donut), Friday, 20 September 2002 06:18 (twenty-three years ago)

"Pump up the Jam" was one of the most redeemable things about New Beat in its hey day. It's too bad there weren't other Technotronic out there to give the genre a much needed push. And the song still is better than, like, anything 'electroclash'

donut bitch (donut), Friday, 20 September 2002 06:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Ladies And Gentlemen We Are Floating In Space and Deserter's Songs - my favourite albums of 1997 and 1998 respectively and neither of them hold up well; not bad exactly but certainly not as good. Of course that's all tied up with my personal changing tastes and mindstate.

What Jess doesn't mention about Cupid and Psyche is that it has some beautiful songs on too - "A Little Knowledge"! I think License To Ill still sounds great too though.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 20 September 2002 06:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Killing Joke.

Loved 'em to bits at the time, just don;t seem to want to play 'em any more.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 20 September 2002 07:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I think Licensed to Ill sounds better now; all those Dave Fridman bombast on broadway albums have aged badly, quickly. Soft Bulletin even more so than Deserter's Songs.

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 September 2002 07:31 (twenty-three years ago)

**cupid & psyche is one of the greatest albums of all time, and one of the major things i thank ilm for "correcting" me on.**

Me too! BUT it's not half as good as Provision.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 20 September 2002 08:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Accelera Deck - Narcotic Beats - still good, but sounds dated now

gareth (gareth), Friday, 20 September 2002 08:30 (twenty-three years ago)

No such thing as dated. It's either good or you've just wised up that it's bad.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 20 September 2002 08:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, those old Dock Boggs 78s you've been listening to? C'mon man - it ain't even in stereo! Wise up!

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 September 2002 08:46 (twenty-three years ago)

''SST''

this is bullshit of course. the best of that bunch easily holds up.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 20 September 2002 09:07 (twenty-three years ago)

It holds up of course - just Spot's production sounds dated (Husker Du thought so then).

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 September 2002 09:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Dated /= 'does not hold up'

Dated = clearly of a time (and maybe diminished because of this)

eg. "Don't You Want Me"

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 September 2002 09:10 (twenty-three years ago)

"cupid & psyche is one of the greatest albums of all time BUT it's not half as good as Provision."

Neither of 'em come anywhere close to Songs To Remember as far as I'm concerned.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 20 September 2002 11:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Chelsea Girl - Nico (It's dated quality is what makes it great now.)

"Golden Brown" - Stranglers


dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 20 September 2002 11:19 (twenty-three years ago)

I really don't think being dated is a bad thing. There's "good" dated and "bad" dated.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 27 September 2004 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I would say that Pearl Jam's early records have aged considerably of course, that's probably because I've aged, too. Ten was an amazing record when I was 18; now, I'm like, wow, was I really that intense and pretentious? ;-)

But Nirvana records? To say those have dated is a totally off-the-mark assertion. Bleach sounded dated the second it was released; perhaps that was the point. The other two stand as all-time greats, among rock's finest works. The bullshit that's been on the radio ever since shows just how great a songwriter Cobain really was ... and how the power of great drum sounds never dies.

Besides, if you say Nevermind is dated, then that assumes Who's Next is dated, which is to say: Who fucking cares if the albums are truly that great?

Chris O., Monday, 27 September 2004 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Bleach sounded dated the second it was released

What exactly does that mean?

Mr. Snrub, Monday, 27 September 2004 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Any and all grunge music is ridiculously dated, but especially that GODAWFUL PIECE OF FUCKING SHIT "long lost" Nirvana song that was on the compilation that came out a couple years ago.

Mr. Snrub, Monday, 27 September 2004 21:34 (twenty-one years ago)

What exactly does that mean?

Just saying it sounds like a one-off, minimal-take recording session that cost only $600. A moment in time.

Chris O., Monday, 27 September 2004 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)

suede...by suede ! and i totally loved it at the time. not that i don't anymore, just that, well, i think it does sound dated now... maybe bernard was right to leave for conflict on production after all ! (any news from butler/anderson reunion by the way ?)

AleXTC (AleXTC), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 10:08 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
When I was reading the Blue Lines vs. Screamadelica thread, all I could think about was how dated they both sound to me.

Zach S, Friday, 13 January 2006 06:10 (nineteen years ago)

OTM, Zach. Trip Hop hasn't aged well. What I thought of on seeing this thread was the Peter Gabriel big drum sound. It might as well be a loop booming circa '85.

(I think that more than anything, reliance on new technology instead of songwriting is what leaves thigns feeling dated, and that's the mark on a lot of techno/electronic music...)

TS: Dated vs. Retro?

js (honestengine), Friday, 13 January 2006 06:20 (nineteen years ago)

yankeehoteelfoxtrot

Stephen C (ihope), Friday, 13 January 2006 07:03 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not the biggest Yankee Hotel Foxtrot fan, but what about it would make you say it sounds dated?

Zach S, Friday, 13 January 2006 07:56 (nineteen years ago)

If dated = sounds a bit 'old-fashioned'

Most of Madonna's early stuff (True Blue) sounds especially dated. There's something very thin-sounding about them - both in her pre-training voice and those horrible tinny synths.

Kate Bush's Hounds Of Love also sounds quite dated in places, possibly because it was so cutting-edge at the time. The songwriting is fucking amazing, but the drum machine programming occasionally sounds comic.

The same goes for Aerial. Wonderful songwriting, but again dated drum programming and flamenco guitar (hello? Didn't Where Do You Go? kill that sound off for at least a decade).

As for what WILL date, Gwen Stefani's L.A.M.B. will age horribly (botox to hold up ageing records not yet being invented).

I'd disagree strongly with the argument Debut is a 'dated' album though. I listened to it a short while ago for the first time after a long gap and it's amazing how fresh it still sounds now. Venus As A Boy has, especially, hardened into a bona fide classic. If any of her albums is going to age gracelessly it'll be Post.

klee (klee), Friday, 13 January 2006 10:09 (nineteen years ago)

In 2002, Yankee Hotel Foxtrot sounded innovative, groundbreaking, and general "new." In 2006, plenty of other albums sound similar, and Yankee Hotel Foxtrot sounds a little not up to speed. At least thats how I feel.

Stephen C (ihope), Friday, 13 January 2006 10:33 (nineteen years ago)

Is there a thread for albums that sounded terrible when they came out and now I can't live without hearing it evryday? 'Cos at the moment The Nightfly is in my car and no matter what I put on, and I've tried all my faves from last year, and keep putting the Nightfly back in. It could be that January in England always makes me feel slightly deranged.

Ned T.RIfle II (Ned T.Rifle II), Friday, 13 January 2006 10:40 (nineteen years ago)

Songs of Faith and Devotion

Baaderonixx, born again in Xixax (baaderonixx), Friday, 13 January 2006 10:53 (nineteen years ago)

I think Debut, while indeed having several timeless-feeling songs (Venus as a Boy, mainly), has more tracks than Post which REALLY call out the date to you: There's More To Life Than This, Violently Happy, the wussy version of Big Time Sensuality, etc. Post may have some stuff that, to a really discerning ear, date-checks it on arrival, but it still sounds fresher to me, and seems to be less obviously on-board any trend that burned out fast enough to leave date stamps.

I think the answer to this question is going to be "anything older than ~10 years, going back till you were a teenager." I note relatively few entries from the very recent past on this thread, with I think Wilco and the Lips being the only ones to get put in that box maybe? Oh, and the Modest Mouse thing which I am confused and intrigued about, would like to hear that elaborated on. I've maybe gotten a bit tired of TM&A, and I've moved on, but I don't think it dates itself.

Doctor Casino, Friday, 13 January 2006 18:32 (nineteen years ago)

http://maft.co.uk/stuff/cdlist/m-r/images/8635f.jpg

Michael Costello, Friday, 13 January 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)

Yankee Hotel Foxtrot was boring as fuck when it first came out, and now is boring as fuck, timelessly boring as fuck.

js (honestengine), Friday, 13 January 2006 18:45 (nineteen years ago)

Sebadoh hasn't aged particularly well for me. Neither has Dinosaur Jr.

I find myself not listening to Nirvana much either, but not because they weren't great, just because I invested so much mental energy into that band for such a long time, I need a prolonged break.

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Friday, 13 January 2006 18:46 (nineteen years ago)

http://maxgalleries.com/store/store-stars/images-a/moff-iaww_sm.jpg

Michael Costello, Friday, 13 January 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)

It's worth saying that the future is a very long time, long enough for a sequence like this:

fresh - dated - fresh again - dated again - fresh all over again - dated all over again

And there's potentially no end to it, except "forgotten". And even that can end with "revived!" (Like this thread.)

Momus (Momus), Friday, 13 January 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

I absolutely loved Erasure's debut back when it was released. Today, those DX7 and DX7 influenced sounds sound just as dated as most other keyboard based pop from the late 80s.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 13 January 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

I'm increasingly finding that Weezer's first two albums-- which I loved when they came out-- are annoying to listen to. I can still only listen to a couple songs on each album without feeling sick. "No One Else" and "In the Garage" in particular are still good. Most of everything else, just sounds a bit childish or something. Of course, I'd rather listen to those albums over anything that followed those two albums any day of the week.

Pantheism F. Mohair (res), Saturday, 1 November 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago)

Destroyer, ugh--hard to believe I liked it so much, now it turns my stomach

iago g., Monday, 3 November 2008 03:45 (sixteen years ago)

Chicago XIII

the salvia of a cockatrice (wanko ergo sum), Monday, 3 November 2008 03:49 (sixteen years ago)

...And Justice For All

the salvia of a cockatrice (wanko ergo sum), Monday, 3 November 2008 03:49 (sixteen years ago)

"nevermind the bollocks"
and just about every other canonical punk LP except for the ramones' LPs.

ian, Monday, 3 November 2008 03:51 (sixteen years ago)

Thankfully, I never understood the hoopla about Destroyer

Pantheism F. Mohair (res), Monday, 3 November 2008 03:52 (sixteen years ago)

Golden Palomino's This Is How It Feels. Loved the shit out of it for years after it came out -- could care less about it now.

Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 3 November 2008 04:30 (sixteen years ago)

Moby :(

Whiney G. Torture Garden (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 3 November 2008 04:41 (sixteen years ago)

Destroyer, ugh--hard to believe I liked it so much, now it turns my stomach

― iago g., Monday, November 3, 2008 3:45 AM (1 hour ago)
but "no cease fires" is still his best song!

Kevin Keller, Monday, 3 November 2008 05:03 (sixteen years ago)

Moby :(

Absolutely OTM.

Millsner, Monday, 3 November 2008 05:29 (sixteen years ago)

New Forms- Roni Size/Reprazent (1st version, haven't listened to the remake)
Untrue- Burial
Ys- Joanna Newsom

among others

Vision, Monday, 3 November 2008 06:38 (sixteen years ago)

i think i managed to wear out ys before it was officially released even. is it that it's dated or that we (read--I) listened to it too gd much.

same with last year's burial album, is it dated or are you just burnt out?

psychgawsple, Monday, 3 November 2008 07:05 (sixteen years ago)

Ys- Joanna Newsom

ha ha! i never understood the hype about her. she was annoyingly boring from the start.

alex in mainhattan, Monday, 3 November 2008 09:24 (sixteen years ago)

A lot of stuff basically founded on early digital synths and sampling:
Frankie Goes To Hollywood: Welcome To The Pleasure Dome
Art of Noise: Who's Afraid Of
Janet Jackson: Control
Grace Jones: Slave To The Rhythm

Again band doesn't neccessarily mean bad, as these sound dated mainly because they used a kind of technology that was very fresh then, as used for a few years and then largely ditched in favour of using or emulating the old analog technology again.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:15 (sixteen years ago)

Those have gone thru sounding "dated" and now they sound fresh again tho.

Nothing has transpired (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 November 2008 10:19 (sixteen years ago)

Late 80s synths will never sound fresh again. They have lost to old analog synths sounds forever. LCD Soundsystem have sounded dated from the first day they appeared on the scene and will always do as long as they insist on using those "harsh" digital sounds.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:21 (sixteen years ago)

all of them?

Ioannis, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:22 (sixteen years ago)

Merits or demerits of LCDS aside, that deliberate retro schtick is permanently modern-sounding, ironically enough.

Nothing has transpired (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 November 2008 10:23 (sixteen years ago)

Cyndi Lauper's "She's So Unusual", the synths on that are so harsh.

snoball, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:24 (sixteen years ago)

The one Cyndi Lauper album that sounds dated with way too much digital synths is "True Colors".

Geir Hongro, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:31 (sixteen years ago)

"Sgt. Pepper" is and remains a fantastic album. It does sound dated now though, mainly because of musical trends and fashions moving in the wrong directions from punk onwards.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 3 November 2008 10:34 (sixteen years ago)

I was recently listening to a Luther Vandross comp, and all that '80s and '90s electric piano wind chime MOR crappola sounds dead on arrival today. Oh wait, it did then, too.

mottdeterre, Monday, 3 November 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago)

i'm much too young to have been around when it came out, but parts of She's So Unusual don't really work the way they might have 700 blogyears ago when it was released. though "time after time" is still perfect.

Kevin Keller, Monday, 3 November 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago)

Also: of course, Goldie's ironically titled "Timeless".

psychgawsple, that may be the case (Untrue particularly).

Vision, Monday, 3 November 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago)

the track "Timeless" still cuts pretty deep tho...(so does "Angel", come to think...the seagull one = bah!)

henry s, Monday, 3 November 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago)

"Timeless" still sounds great. Partly because there was never anything else that sounded quite like it.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 3 November 2008 22:33 (sixteen years ago)

Maxinquaye pwns this thread.

Naive Teen Idol, Tuesday, 4 November 2008 00:32 (sixteen years ago)

"pwns" is dated :P

pretty hate machine r.i.p.

bnw, Tuesday, 4 November 2008 01:34 (sixteen years ago)

there seems to be something more than just production or even the instruments used on a record that make it sound 'dated'. as momus (!) hinted at before, this stuff is all cyclical, so it's interesting to consider what makes certain eras so appalled at the sounds of another.

seems that, in my opinion at least, pretty much any influential album from the late '90s sounds super dated at the moment. even records i know by heart like 'in the aeroplane over the sea' or 'endtroducing', in large part because enough time has passed for other artists to come along and dilute the hell out of the ideas on those records. in a few years they'll probably sound fresh again, or at least i'll be able to separate the original album from its legacy (hopefully).

but seriously, what albums from the time period 1996-2002 DON'T sound dated right now? anyone else agree?

bucking the trend- belle & sebastian, the avalanches, boredoms, yo la tengo

psychgawsple, Tuesday, 4 November 2008 03:16 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.