let's do this
http://www.pitchfork.com/news/47161-listen-new-single-from-the-xx-angels-plus-new-tour-dates-coexist-album-cover-tracklist/
― J0rdan S., Monday, 16 July 2012 16:18 (thirteen years ago)
Some old English goth band who cares oh wait
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 16 July 2012 16:19 (thirteen years ago)
this song is fantastic
― J0rdan S., Monday, 16 July 2012 16:21 (thirteen years ago)
this is pretty good, much better than the demo version that was floating around, but tbrr I liked this idea a lot more when it was "Shelter"
― PITILESS LIVE SHOW (DJP), Monday, 16 July 2012 16:24 (thirteen years ago)
really feeling this song
― bitch I'm on the 242 (lex pretend), Monday, 16 July 2012 16:26 (thirteen years ago)
xpost from twitter: Angels', lead single from The xx's Coexist benefits from live drum rolls & 'Be My Baby' timpani, lacks a certain something i.e. Oliver Sim.
Surprised to miss his less-trained voice as a contrast for Romy's but the back-and-forth was important for me. Still, I'll probably fall in love with this v. quickly.
― twinkin' and drinkin' and ready to fly (Alex in Montreal), Monday, 16 July 2012 16:34 (thirteen years ago)
not doing much for me on first listen.
― Michael B Higgins (Michael B), Monday, 16 July 2012 16:35 (thirteen years ago)
i do love this band tho
hmmm
yeah i don't know. i ended up really love their first album after not really liking it initially.
however, bands that are so committed to minimalism like this walk a real tightrope...it's really easy to just be flat out boring if you dip your toes on the bad side of the line....like even Low -- one of the most obvious comparisons to XX outside of Young Marble Giants -- gradually got to be a more expansive and traditional "rock band' In a lot of ways
― wack nerd zinging in the dead of night (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 16 July 2012 17:35 (thirteen years ago)
Wait Oliver Sim left the band? Or is he only missing from this single?
― Moka, Monday, 16 July 2012 20:56 (thirteen years ago)
just the single
― J0rdan S., Monday, 16 July 2012 21:01 (thirteen years ago)
he doesn't sing on it.
― jed_, Monday, 16 July 2012 21:01 (thirteen years ago)
i take it he's on it otherwise though.
Each of the singers had solo tunes on the first album too.
Really love this.
― Tim F, Monday, 16 July 2012 21:06 (thirteen years ago)
man i almost completely forgot about this band, loved the first album
this is good but 'album opener' seems about right to me, there's a lot of tension that feels unreleased. then again maybe that's part of their appeal
― Al S. Burr! (k3vin k.), Monday, 16 July 2012 21:11 (thirteen years ago)
The backing kinda belongs on a Beach House album. Maybe its just the son d'aujourd'hui.
― The Painter of Blight™ (Sanpaku), Monday, 16 July 2012 22:16 (thirteen years ago)
Ned Raggett otm
― een, Monday, 16 July 2012 22:34 (thirteen years ago)
this song is a classic
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 17 July 2012 06:26 (thirteen years ago)
the drums on this are so good. the way you can hear the cymbal rippling and shivering off the big bass hits is so perfect.
the lyrics are kinda beautiful, too
life lights from your shadowit is more than i thought could existyou move through the womb like breathing was easyif someone believed me
they would be as in love with you as i amthey would be as in love with you as i amthey would be as in love with you as i amthey would be in love, love, love
and every day i'm learning about youthe things that no one else seesand the end comes too soonlike dreaming of angelsand leaving without themand leaving without them
being as in love with you as i ambeing as in love with you as i ambeing as in love with you as i ambeing as in love, love, lovelove, love, lovelove, love, love
and with words unspokena silent devotioni know you know what i meanand the end is unknownbut i think i'm readyas long as you're with me
being as in love with you as i ambeing as in love with you as i ambeing as in love with you as i ambeing as in love, love, love
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 17 July 2012 06:30 (thirteen years ago)
The xx certainly know what they're doing. Great song
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 19 July 2012 21:15 (thirteen years ago)
^^^ yeah this is a good way to put it. They've really got their aesthetic on lock.
― Tim F, Thursday, 19 July 2012 22:16 (thirteen years ago)
this is a great single
― Bee OK, Saturday, 21 July 2012 03:41 (thirteen years ago)
but knew it would be
for convenience sake:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nW5AF0m9Zw
think it's very nice, but it isn't really grabbing me off the bat. not worried, though, as the debut took a while to sink in.
― contenderizer, Saturday, 21 July 2012 04:46 (thirteen years ago)
I really REALLY like the song. Then again the debut also blew me away at first listen so I guess I'm just a sucker for the music. I absolutely love the minimal, the spatial and the sensual vibe of their music.
― Nathalie (stevienixed), Thursday, 26 July 2012 18:47 (thirteen years ago)
Judging by this song they'll get cornered as one trick ponys but I'll allow it since the first record seemed too little of a good thing.
― Moka, Thursday, 26 July 2012 20:07 (thirteen years ago)
http://disconaivete.com/post/28910164057
"Chained" appears. Took my head several measures to find the beat.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 15:10 (thirteen years ago)
okay now THIS I am grooving on instantly
― keeping things contextual (DJP), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 15:22 (thirteen years ago)
does it really end like that? because it shouldn't. Romy's voice sounds quite bad at a couple of points too. overall i like it though.
― jed_, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 15:33 (thirteen years ago)
angels is painfully good
― reductio ad burzum (flopson), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)
the way you can hear the cymbal rippling and shivering off the big bass hits is so perfect.
otm
wow these guys!
― Ówen P., Tuesday, 7 August 2012 16:28 (thirteen years ago)
does it really end like that? because it shouldn't.
they seem to be pretty comfortable with the jarring/sudden ending. i'm into it.
― 40oz of tears (Jordan), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 16:48 (thirteen years ago)
given that this is track two and angels was track one and the two songs i heard live from the back half of the album are HUGE dance bangers, i am hoping/anticipating that over the course of this album they will emerge from the cocoon of album one and force everyone to dance until they drop, and i will never have to deal with a crowd of people listening to Jamie xx's 5 minute 2step breakdown and standing still and occasionally shouting "WOO!"
― twinkin' and drinkin' and ready to fly (Alex in Montreal), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 17:13 (thirteen years ago)
aka this gives me more hope that the Swept Away I heard wasn't an in-concert-remix but the actual album arrangement in which case y'all are in for a TREAT.
This sounds even more like it! I'm sold. Already have tickets to watch them doing their thing live in a month or so.
― Moka, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 18:24 (thirteen years ago)
Glad Jaime's presence is more obvious on this song. I take back what I said about them being one-trick ponys.
― Moka, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 18:26 (thirteen years ago)
i think having angels only feature one person's vocals makes sense considering it's the opening track to the album. after all, the last album's opener didn't have ANY vocals.
but mainly i just came here to say how much i love the xx's cover of hot like fire by aaliyah.
― phantompenguin, Monday, 20 August 2012 06:04 (thirteen years ago)
album has leaked
― Number None, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 09:59 (thirteen years ago)
i know slight is their thing but this is...very slight
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 13:10 (thirteen years ago)
I've played it twice now and it's kind of passed me by. "Swept Away" is the only thing that made me sit up and listen
― Number None, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 13:13 (thirteen years ago)
yeah same except with "tides"
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 13:23 (thirteen years ago)
"our song" is not a taylor swift cover :(
(that would have been PERFECT)
― lex pretend, Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:10 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
OTM.
It barely exists.
― pandemic, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 13:33 (thirteen years ago)
Subexist
― nedless summer (Ówen P.), Tuesday, 21 August 2012 14:08 (thirteen years ago)
the thing is the first album was really slight and all but it was also pretty immediate
this one sounds like what all the xx haters said the debut sounded like
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 21 August 2012 14:19 (thirteen years ago)
Will this new one be 2012's post-club-freshers-week-comedown-man-its-got-such-a-chilled-vibe record>
― Blue Collar Retail Assistant (Dwight Yorke), Tuesday, 21 August 2012 14:21 (thirteen years ago)
*?
Um. I know we are all saying this now, but iirc it definitely took a week or two for the first album to hit me and capture my full attention/love/focus.
Perhaps it's worth giving it a little bit of time?
― twinkin' and drinkin' and ready to fly (Alex in Montreal), Tuesday, 21 August 2012 14:32 (thirteen years ago)
like, this doesn't feel as intimate or as necessary as the first one, but there's a lot here that draws me in, and the increased percussion on Reunion and Sunset is a nice touch.
― twinkin' and drinkin' and ready to fly (Alex in Montreal), Tuesday, 21 August 2012 14:33 (thirteen years ago)
that seems to be exactly wrong based on what I've heard so far (had to turn off the stream for a meeting)
nothing is as good a creation as "Crystalised" or "Islands", but nothing on the first album was as good a creation as "Crystalised" or "Islands" so I'm not really holding that against the second album, plus most of the arrangements even more precise/meticulous than the songs on the first album
― DARING PRINCESS (DJP), Tuesday, 4 September 2012 21:14 (thirteen years ago)
I suspect what people are reacting to is the loss of the second guitar?
― DARING PRINCESS (DJP), Tuesday, 4 September 2012 21:20 (thirteen years ago)
its realy sad it was a second guitar
― USADA Bin Dopen (dayo), Tuesday, 4 September 2012 21:20 (thirteen years ago)
lol
― DARING PRINCESS (DJP), Tuesday, 4 September 2012 21:33 (thirteen years ago)
it's a bit more diffuse, this record, and it sounds like they're just trying things out and often just dropping the thing that they're trying. i don't think it sounds finished. it's much less focussed than XX.
aside: i kept being reminded of other things too which is fine, obviously - the guitar on fiction makes me think of smalltown boy. swept away makes me think of peking saint by cat power. there are other things but i can't recall them now. they still have a very singular sound.
― jed_, Tuesday, 4 September 2012 22:11 (thirteen years ago)
otm about its tentativeness
― a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 September 2012 22:12 (thirteen years ago)
tentative is exactly the right word.
― jed_, Tuesday, 4 September 2012 22:16 (thirteen years ago)
you can't really blame them though. it's a huge burden to follow up a small record designed for a small audience that became a (relatively) huge thing. but it seems to me like they had a bit of a crisis of confidence. still, i think it's a good record, it's just not a perfect one (and XX is perfect to me).
― jed_, Tuesday, 4 September 2012 22:20 (thirteen years ago)
Yep Jed has clinched it.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 4 September 2012 22:21 (thirteen years ago)
Like even the more interesting beats sound uncertain of themselves, like the curtains were pulled open before they'd finished touching up their make-up.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 4 September 2012 22:22 (thirteen years ago)
the album reminds me of the 3rd lotr movie in that it feels like it should end but doesn't ~4 different times and seems even more interminable every time
― teledyldonix, Wednesday, 5 September 2012 02:21 (thirteen years ago)
I don't think this sounds tentative at all. Spacy, yes; possibly disjointed here and there, but the main difference I hear is a thinning out of the textures and, in general, faster sparse tracks without anything like "Islands" or "Night Time" to offset them. I mean, I love "Shelter", I'm not going to complain too much if half the new tracks rip it off in different ways. Also, nothing I've heard on the new album is as off-putting as "VCR".
― DARING PRINCESS (DJP), Wednesday, 5 September 2012 04:06 (thirteen years ago)
nah, tentative is exactly right. For all the talk about it being inspired by club music and so on, the band definitely sound like they were afraid to mess with the formula too much. Which is understandable really, they have a fairly unique, delicate sound. Go too far in another direction and the whole thing could fall apart
― Number None, Wednesday, 5 September 2012 09:01 (thirteen years ago)
The word tentative is not one I'd interpret as pejorative in relation to this band. I take their whole aesthetic of minimalism and deliberation as being tentative, if that makes sense. And I'm enjoying this probbaly a little more than the debut so far.
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 5 September 2012 11:56 (thirteen years ago)
i agree with j0rdan, the problem isn't so much with the sound they're going for or their overall slight aesthetic but...the thing with the debut is that the slightness and sparseness belied a real sturdiness to the songcraft and melodies, and that's just not here.
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 5 September 2012 12:03 (thirteen years ago)
What do you mean by "the songcraft isn't here"? That is a near-meaningless statement without examples/elaboration.
― DARING PRINCESS (DJP), Wednesday, 5 September 2012 13:12 (thirteen years ago)
Even then it's still massively subjective.
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 5 September 2012 13:36 (thirteen years ago)
it's still possible to back up a subjective opinion so people have a clearer idea of where you're coming from; right now the overall impression I'm getting from everyone is "I don't like this album because it isn't 'Crystalised'"
― DARING PRINCESS (DJP), Wednesday, 5 September 2012 13:42 (thirteen years ago)
My favourite tunes on the first album were "Heart Skipped A Beat" or "Shelter" or "Infinity" anyway, each going for quite a different feel within the xx's limited parameters. After the first track these tend to plough the same furrow, though that may change as I listen more.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 5 September 2012 14:03 (thirteen years ago)
streamthis is pretty impressive. they have this talent not to waste a second in their songs. they are unbelievably focussed and to the point. the music is heavy (serious & not really fun) and light (it breathes as the arrangements sound rather spare, they give the songs the air to evolve) at the same time. there is a richness in it i haven't heard for a while in new music. another proof that less can be more.
― alex in mainhattan, Thursday, 6 September 2012 21:25 (thirteen years ago)
Crystalised / Martina Topley Bird, Mark Lanegan and Warpaint.
http://soundcloud.com/euan-me/crystalised
― jed_, Sunday, 9 September 2012 00:22 (thirteen years ago)
Great cover. But it doesn't beat the original
― Shin Oliva Suzuki, Sunday, 9 September 2012 11:51 (thirteen years ago)
i agree.
― jed_, Sunday, 9 September 2012 11:54 (thirteen years ago)
New album is possibly the worst thing I've heard all year. Those lyrics! I think it probably uses about 3 chords throughout the entire album too. Unbearably boring
― marginal victory, Sunday, 9 September 2012 12:51 (thirteen years ago)
Just listened to the NPR stream, the one Alex linked above. Definitely a headphones album, in my case Koss UR40, sold for 40 bucks American. But they sound audiophile here, with Windows Media Player on 25, play it louder still and you won't be wrong. Love about half of it so far, mostly the first half. In the second half, so far I like the false endings, and the way jamie xx anxiously drops new toys in my crib just as I'm starting to get bored (nevertheless, things are otherwise getting predictable.) So the minimalist validation/tag's peeling off here. jamie should maybe just make us dance as xposted suggested, even in our headphones, but I guess I'll have to wait for the remixes. Agree that Oliver Sim doesn't groan too much here, he's cogent, but Romy Croft's voice is the one that holds me.
― dow, Monday, 10 September 2012 03:22 (thirteen years ago)
listening to this yet again, I'm kind of shocked by how out of tune Romy is in places
like, I know vocal precision isn't really her thing but Oliver was going with her more on the first album and wasn't generating really dissonant clashes on unison lines like he is here, where he's generally on pitch and she's flat
I stand by my earlier assessment that this album is the song "Shelter" refracted through 11 different prisms; since I really love "Shelter" I don't have a problem with this.
― DARING PRINCESS (DJP), Wednesday, 12 September 2012 16:27 (thirteen years ago)
I agree that "Shelter" seems to be the jumping-off point they used to create this album, but I think it also illustrates the change in their approach to lyrics. I know in the p4k piece Romy mentioned she wanted to tone down the drama in the lyrics, but honestly, I think that was one of the self-titled strong points. The arguably OTT lyrics contrasted nicely with the muted music. There is nothing on Coexist that stands out and demands as much of my attention as "I'll cross oceans, like never before. So you can feel the way I feel it too".
― scarfs, Wednesday, 12 September 2012 16:43 (thirteen years ago)
I wld say this isn't as beat-driven as the first album is
― dayo, Wednesday, 12 September 2012 16:48 (thirteen years ago)
Kind of was hoping it would be more beat-driven. Would have preferred "Islands" to be the jumping-off point.
― Moodles, Wednesday, 12 September 2012 16:50 (thirteen years ago)
btw Alfred OTM re: "Missing", it's great
― DARING PRINCESS (DJP), Thursday, 13 September 2012 20:29 (thirteen years ago)
it's officially my favorite song.
― a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 13 September 2012 20:44 (thirteen years ago)
listening to this yet again, I'm kind of shocked by how out of tune Romy is in placeslike, I know vocal precision isn't really her thing but Oliver was going with her more on the first album and wasn't generating really dissonant clashes on unison lines like he is here, where he's generally on pitch and she's flatI stand by my earlier assessment that this album is the song "Shelter" refracted through 11 different prisms; since I really love "Shelter" I don't have a problem with this.
I agree with all of this.
― LeRooLeRoo, Thursday, 13 September 2012 21:41 (thirteen years ago)
i like "shelter" better than all the songs from this album. actually i struggle to choose 'stand-out tracks' on this one
― teledyldonix, Thursday, 13 September 2012 23:17 (thirteen years ago)
"Chained", "Fiction", "Reunion", "Missing" and "Swept Away" are my standouts, with honorable mention to "Sunset"
― DARING PRINCESS (DJP), Thursday, 13 September 2012 23:20 (thirteen years ago)
so, most of them then? :)
― jed_, Thursday, 13 September 2012 23:31 (thirteen years ago)
i like missing but i still have probs with it and i feel like it could have been much much better without adding to its slightness. for one thing it should be longer with more "nothing" in it. i have a problem with the "an" in "my heart is beating in an different way" - is he trying to suggest indifferent by singing an different? if so it doesn't really work for me, just sounds awkward. if he's not doing that then i wonder why he's singing "an different" at all. romy's phrasing is a bit of a problem too. and yes, tuning problems even within their specific aesthetic.
― jed_, Thursday, 13 September 2012 23:41 (thirteen years ago)
this record still sounds like sketches to me but there's often something beautiful in a sketch that would have eradicated in a finished version so i'm (mostly) cool with that.
― jed_, Thursday, 13 September 2012 23:49 (thirteen years ago)
The guitar sound on this is killing me.
There's just this sad and aching fuzziness to it, the tone of that mandolin-plucked tremolo sound.
― Atomow dhe Kres? MY A VYNN, mar pleg! (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Friday, 14 September 2012 10:58 (thirteen years ago)
I want to know what kind of reverb they're using because they really do have that cathedral-sound going on on the guitar, it's a lovely contrast to the closeness and intimacy of the vocals. Like their lips are inches away from the mics, but the guitar amps are up on a mountainside somewhere.
― Atomow dhe Kres? MY A VYNN, mar pleg! (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Friday, 14 September 2012 11:03 (thirteen years ago)
this is pretty good considering they are just some english goth band
― Don't Go Home With Your Hadron Collider (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 2 October 2012 11:17 (thirteen years ago)
(delayed reaction in honour of the ~~reverb~~)
― Don't Go Home With Your Hadron Collider (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 2 October 2012 11:18 (thirteen years ago)
giving this another listen after i'd left it behind thinking it was ~kinda nice~, i'm finding this sketch aspect of it really striking. i can't think of anything else that has the feeling of this, like we get these little shards of beauty but then they're immediately concealed or dissipate back into the greyness of it all. it's a bit disorienting and i'm not sure if it's something to be valued, but it's certainly interesting.
or maybe i just haven't slept enough.
― hot young stalin (Merdeyeux), Monday, 4 February 2013 17:05 (twelve years ago)
When I saw them live a few months ago, there was a girl behind me who kept muttering "I hope they play [song x] ... I really hope they play [song x] ..." And then they would play song x - because they only have a couple of albums of short songs - and she would lose her shit and scream at the top of her lungs. Then she'd start muttering "I hope they play [song y] ..."
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 4 February 2013 17:25 (twelve years ago)
Every show ever tho
― flamboyant goon tie included, Monday, 4 February 2013 17:28 (twelve years ago)
For sure, but this wasn't like going to a Depeche Mode show and yelling for "Enjoy the Silence." This was one show where the act was guaranteed to play *absolutely every song* she might have requested.
When I last saw Prince the two women behind me were yelling for "Raspberry Beret" is the most angry manner possible. "Play 'Raspberry Beret,' you motherfucker!!!" etc.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 4 February 2013 17:40 (twelve years ago)
He played it, too. They were pretty happy with that.
this is my favourite album of theirs now. the unfished sound of it allows it to grow more.
― Britain's Sexiest Cow (jed_), Sunday, 26 August 2018 03:34 (seven years ago)
reunion is particularly great, i think. the way it just tries being a different kind of song halfway through. lovely.
― Britain's Sexiest Cow (jed_), Sunday, 26 August 2018 03:38 (seven years ago)
I heard this gorgeous track on a Man Power mix on soundcloud and It may be of interest to any of you that likes The XX sound.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKf6ev_HxwM
― Heavy Messages (jed_), Friday, 15 November 2019 02:45 (six years ago)
The mix is excellent, btw, and it's here: https://soundcloud.com/melodicdiggers/038-audiononism-by-man-power/comment-799590313
― Heavy Messages (jed_), Friday, 15 November 2019 02:46 (six years ago)