― Derek Dalek (Derek Dalek), Tuesday, 24 September 2002 17:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 24 September 2002 17:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 24 September 2002 18:53 (twenty-three years ago)
If I were him, I wouldn't be in a big hurry to make a "comeback" record. What's the point? His legacy is cemented, he doesn't need or want the extra scrutiny/publicity, he definitely doesn't need the money...
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 24 September 2002 18:59 (twenty-three years ago)
Except it's only a year and a half since The Truth ;)
― Ben Williams, Tuesday, 24 September 2002 19:06 (twenty-three years ago)
LET ME HAVE IT ALL by Jeroen Berkvens & Walter Stokman An"on the road" documentary about the search for Sly Stone: The musical genius behind Sly & the Family Stone. 48:00http://www.noterik.nl/neter/pag7.htm
― sander, Tuesday, 24 September 2002 20:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Tuesday, 24 September 2002 20:31 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm continually flummoxed by the oddly common observation that Sly "disappeared" or fell off or whatever in the 70s. Sure, the band mutated - pretty much all of the original members left except for Cynthia Robinson - and he no longer had any hits, and he didn't perform live at all, but so what? The actual records he put out stand up just as well as his earlier stuff. I'd like to see someone argue that "High On You" has more filler on it than, say, "Dance to the Music" (the album, not the single). His 70s albums are loaded with inventive arrangements, great hooks, funky rhythyms, clever lyrics - everything that ever made Sly great to begin with.
required reading: "In Their Own Words: Sly and Family Stone". Amazing. Would've been a nine million times better rock-n-roll archetype movie than "The Doors".
I agree with Chaki about Prince btw - he may not make solid albums anymore, but at least he's always got a couple tunes on every album that shine through. So I won't diss his recent output to hard.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 24 September 2002 20:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Tuesday, 24 September 2002 21:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 24 September 2002 21:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 24 September 2002 21:38 (twenty-three years ago)
My point is that sly's post fresh records werent as bad as they were really saddening, I was gonna say depressing but that's too harsh a word. Because to me even in their most lively moments, That pain he showed in riot cripples him . To me the motif that made Riot such a powerful record IMO, is that sly learned the lesson that truly great humanists pay a brutal price. Most people didnt forget that Sly made some of the most enduring dance music ever, they never remembered . Next to "ray charles not making any good music since his post heroin period." and " roberta flack not being authentically black or soulful( OH JESUS I HATE THAT ONE)", the notion that sly's was some funky dance clown is one of rock-critcisms biggest myths. To make music as bright and as beautiful as Stand, man you got to have one hell of a sensitive soul. To me what made riot frighteningly real was that it was that soul slowly--- to sound campy but the word cant be avoided--dying. He'll he even said it on the record.
What makes parts of fresh and high on you,Small talk, heard ya missed me, and even the attempt at a return to form in aint but the one way hard to stomach for me, isnt so much as their bad, ( ( but man you gotta admit even in sections of " high on you" the drugs took over)but they are extensions of that death. That sense of pathos really never left him, even in his brightest periods afterwards. But maybe im just feeling too much, but one of black music's primary tenants is emotional revalation,artists either letting you in to so see an aspect from who they are from some aspect of a gospel setting, (be it blues jazz soul etc). Listening to Stand and listening to riot is like being with a loved one and being with a loved one when their about to die. And sly's music, no matter how good it could get afterwards, was just a reflection of that death.
just my opinion.
― robert lashley (brotherman), Wednesday, 25 September 2002 00:31 (twenty-three years ago)
Sly lost it. No, really, he did. Prince is still amazing. FACT!
― Sean (Sean), Wednesday, 25 September 2002 01:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 25 September 2002 03:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― robert lashley (brotherman), Wednesday, 25 September 2002 15:18 (twenty-three years ago)
Happy 68th.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YI9RGK9iyNo
― clemenza, Tuesday, 15 March 2011 13:47 (fourteen years ago)