What makes coFlow "avant-garde"?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I ask b/c the recent fites made me put on "The Cold Vein" which I never listen too (I also abandoned the el-p solo) and I'm confused. Is it because you can't dance to the beats? Is it because it uses big words about different things than usual? Is it because the beats are inventive or the samples are unique and sometimes bodily or the tone is dark and gritty?

These are all cynical answers I know. I always think of "avant-garde" as a head-first leap into something new and unexplored, opening new possibilities. But I don't hear new possibilities in this, but more like the self-proclaimed "avant-garde" of industrial and goth bands. What bothers me, I think, is that it feels like they could actually make something which didn't feel disjoint if they wanted to, and could launch into something which hung together well and in an interesting way rather than pulling at its own seams like there's a constant interrogation of purpose which is stalled halfway through. Is this the defamiliarization of hip-hop? But what then does it teach us or open for us to hear?

How does this fit into any notion of the avant-garde outside of Skinny Puppy's "make it disturbing and difficult and don't settle down and use funny harmonics" notion? And why are the tracks which leap off the album as standouts those which (like "Straight off the D.I.C.") feel the most traditional? (and even then it just makes me want to hear "California Love").

I think the avant-garde label is affixed to their deep cynicism towards traditional hip-hop elements, and the *disdain* the avant-garde has for the popular rather than any of the positive qualities of actual avant-garde. And ultimately, doesn't the experiment fail because the straight mcs are necessary to carry the beat which the production avoids?

Also, what emotions does coFlow trigger? I have unease, a sort of frustrated urge to groove, a bit of a "good god this is oppressive" headache, and a bit of the "i'm a replicant of the hard streets burning away humanity to soldier on" feel like looking back at memories of burned childhood photographs. Not a celebration of humanity against the machine, or an expression of humanity THROUGH machines, but a trent reznor-ish man-into-machine adolescent revenge fantasy. If this was the popular music of our time I would fear more for society than I currently do.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:09 (twenty-three years ago)

it IS boring!! god, it's like listening to the rza on some 8-bit sampling shit with some guys who used to go to art school mumbling overtop. (haha replace it with some indie rock guitar loops and it could be patrin's beloved anticon!!)
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the second track sounds like if preemo dropped a couple dat's into his toilet tank like 2000 flushes. (damn, that's pretty close to an el-p rhyme!)
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the problem with coFlo is they didn't go far ENOUGH - i want to hear about structural characteristics of monosaccharides and what they plan to do about it
-- Tracer Hand (tracerhand@yahoo.com), September 25th, 2002. (tracerhand) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

yeah it was always so ninth grade like dude if youre so into bugged out mental science how come youve only read philip k dick !!
-- simon trife (r55r5@=/9+-9/), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

el-p tries to pull kool keith on the opening to track 3 circa black elvis (er, wait, does this mean he actually predicted it? black science fiction by white guys is so complicated), but unfortunately he then turns back into el-p "dropping so much shit his ass needs a diaper" (actually, that was a juss rhyme from track one, but whatever.) i just remembered that track he guested on the quannum record...when you're getting schooled by lyrics born, you've got a problem!!
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the idea that Brandy has a song that sounds like Grindin?
-- Tracer Hand (tracerhand@yahoo.com), September 25th, 2002. (tracerhand) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 4: "we hate it when these mc's try to fuck with us"...el-p sure likes to say "corporation" even tho it's gotta be one of the most awkward words to drop into a rap in history. (he also likes to say "pedophile" a lot, make of that what you will.) there's some horns in this track; where's all the sci-fi beatscape shit!?
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

dude missed the point, it wasnt that keith was just on some space shit or whatever he was on some FUNNY space shit!! el ps idea of a joke is end2end burners
-- simon trife (55tt^^@/*=-), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

tracer i meant 'what about us', its a difft rugged style than grindin but i bet r jerkins and chad neptune were thinking about the same robot pussies when they cooked the tracks
-- simon trife (545tr@44), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fuck this thread
-- Nate Patrin (natepatrin5500@msn.com), September 25th, 2002. (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

jess youre doing that track by track awfully fast, its almost as if youre only listening to the first thirty seconds of each song!!
-- simon trife (4rr5@yt/9+-9/+-), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 5 has some nice spinchter opening epmd bass-shit going on, i'll admit. big juss is the best part about co flow; i wonder if it was just him and not el-p if we'd hate them as much. otherwise it just sounds like yr typical 95 undiehop. they shout "big juss!" like a track from moment of truth ("it's preemo, guru and something something!")...more coflow prescience!
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PATRIN ALERT!!!
-- simon trife (o0;.0@8.;=/+-=), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well jeez it's not like somebody used my name in conjunction with some stupid junior high bullshit joke OH WAIT
Christ, you people wanna be retards without the unwelcome intrusion of people you talk shit about, then be retards on IM.

-- Nate Patrin (natepatrin5500@msn.com), September 25th, 2002. (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Remember when El-P and Sole battled each other? "By calling yourself independent you belittle the whole movement!"
Trife have you heard the new Xzibit? As polished Dre-funk-commercial as he gets, it makes a pretty good case for new roughness.

-- Honda (onehalf@sbcglobal.net), September 25th, 2002. (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

nate you just published your first review and it was about anticon! we weren't talking shit!! (it was a good review, btw.)
simon, how dare you?? i'll have you know i listened to the whole of the last track.

anyway, track 6 contains the line "in bizarro world where co flow is the new pop sensation", so maybe you're right after all, simon!!

-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 7 is some "turntablist" shit. oh no!! the goverment is out to get us!! OH NO!!
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

if this was spin, i'd call track 8 "gnostic rza-influenced hiphop that sounds like it was recorded in a masoleum." it actually sounds like it was written and programmed in the time it took to get the tape rolling and not in the good way.
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

co flows realest moment was that anticon dis track where they sampled the dude saying they were the best and called it linda tripp, thats just all purpose
-- simon trife (uok@78=/-/), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well I'm not on Anticon's dick or anything (find me ONE EXAMPLE on this board where I was), I just liked that album out of sheer circumstance regardless of label affiliation. "Nate's beloved Anticon"... christ, man.
-- Nate Patrin (natepatrin5500@msn.com), September 25th, 2002. (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 9 is more preemo shit (in other words it moves by standing still, rather than turning around in circles like the rza, uh, flavored shit does), nice descending xylophone (?) melody in the background. this might sound good if it was on, say, the rj-d2 album without the rapping.
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

nate you know i hear you, i wish youd post to ALL my threads!!
-- simon trife (6tjhyf6@343), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

no
-- Nate Patrin (natepatrin5500@msn.com), September 25th, 2002. (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"But unlike other independent-minded hip-hoppers -- who view mainstream rappers like Nas and Jay-Z as vapid and commercial -- El-P isn't interested in overthrowing hip-hop's gangsta elite. "It's not about us versus them," El-P maintains. "It's about who makes the better record." He even rejects the "independent" tag, which connotes left-of-center purists, for his own label. "Independent?" he asks angrily. "What the fuck does that mean? I put out Cannibal Ox on Def Jux. That's some straight-up street shit from Harlem." And he becomes infuriated at the suggestion that hip-hop might currently be drowning in it own vanity. "Hip-hop doesn't need to be saved from itself," he says. "The music has a built-in sense of survival.""
...

-- But Wait! (zzz@zzz.com), September 25th, 2002. (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and honda i havent heard the new x but i plan on picking it up, i love forty days and forty nights and his last one was good too
-- simon trife (3@akj8*/*/), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 10 is MORE preemo shit, at least of the "come clean" variety. i wonder why everyone sez co flow is so influenced by the wu (well, i mean they ARE, but...) "syncopated shit"...could this guy syncopate ANYTHING?!
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 11 ACTUALLY BANGS. but it's all over in 34 seconds!! why?!
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 12 is a freestyle. PASS.
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i should clarify that track 11 "actually bangs" in the style of, say, hard dj shadow tracks.)
track 13: "i've been nastiest one since birth." where were nas's lawyers that day? "as i flow fluently"...um...uh...um...

-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fuckyoufuckyoufuckyou, El-P ROOLZ!
(ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha)

Anyway, the new thing is the whoo-whoo theremin from Brandy's "Full Moon" which is also on the new 112.

-- Sterling Clover (s_clover@empty.org), September 25th, 2002. (s_clover) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 14: my bellybutton has this really fucked up odor today. can you tell i'm getting exhausted with this? this track is a lot more like the typical atypical arrhytmic coflow of legend.
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 15 predicts bollywood hiphop by 5 years!! okay, not really. can i just say that it's better than talvin singh?!
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 16 sounds like dj cam recorded underwater.
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

jess you blockhead, fire in which you burn is to truth hurts as gift of gab is to eminem
-- simon trife (664u@j/9-6+), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jess, it's "I drop so much shit my anus needs an icepack," which you have to admit is a lot better.
-- Clarke B. (clarkebo@yahoo.com), September 25th, 2002. (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 17 is almost dainty. um, at least for the first 20 seconds. oh wait, this is the one where el-p moans about his step-daddy! i will say that i vaguely respect him for this song, since showing weakness in hiphop is a bit like being masculine in indie rock! i do like the stalker horns creeping through the mix.
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"fire in which you burn" = "and now, along extra-long raga by ravi shankar."
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and sadly fire in which you burn is one of their only three good songs (along with vital nerve or patriotism)
-- simon trife (65thu6yu@32), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

haha jess what about showing weakness in hiphop that only indie rock dudes listen to??
-- simon trife (hukmurkm@3434), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

along = another. krusty must be turning over in his grave in shame.
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'rory bellows'
-- simon trife (yrjiyrjn@5ryg5), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 18: who knew hell was a week being trapped in the basement of fat beats with only stretch armstrong for company!
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i knew that
-- simon trife (7ujy@43tf), September 25th, 2002. (simon_tr) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

track 19: ...
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thank god that's over! now where's my fucking jean hersholt humanitarian award?!
-- jess (dubplatestyle@hotmail.com), September 25th, 2002. (dubplatestyle) (link)

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:20 (twenty-three years ago)

sterl you should have called this thread "why do people think "klanky" = "avant garde"?"

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:23 (twenty-three years ago)

v. funny jess but I also want real answers, like from nate and j0hn and stuff.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Like this is where you talk about what makes the beats good and why the dissonance is avant-garde boundary pushing consciousness-expanding dissonance instead of (or along with being) headache-inducing dissonance and hell even why the echo-laden janky vocals call into question the role and construction of narrative, etc.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:32 (twenty-three years ago)

okay, real answer:

i was talking to ethan tonight, and i said that it wouldn't really bother me if someone sat down and did a track by track pisstake of a fall record. to which he replied: "i couldn't even listen to the fall. at least i UNDERSTAND co flow. on some level it makes some kind of horrible sense."

i'm too tired right now to really put this into context, but i think it's revealing.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:34 (twenty-three years ago)

also: when did hiphop just stop being futuristic and actually need to comment on futurism?

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Also I can hear asperationalism in plenty of so-called undie like blackalicious and the native-tongues legacy and hell even kool keith -- that sense of "fuck you thugs, I'm getting out of here, and yeah I read books" but this smacks of despairationalism. Also keep in mind that I cut my teeth on gorecki and feldman and loads of kronos recordings when I was fifteen and still like them and have no gripe with "avant-garde" music per se, but rather just don't get this.

And I think there's plenty of worth in a fall comparison with the noise/rantization of traditional forms, except that when I "get" the fall I hear a whole world of genres within them, like they have the secret of rock and replicated inside the secret is the whole of rock. I don't hear that with coFlow. Is it there?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:40 (twenty-three years ago)

in listening to the co flow record today, i realized that much of it doesn't sound "futuristic" at all. it just sounds like mid-90s nyc hiphop with really shoddy production values.

sasha frere-jones on the wu-tang clan: "the rza was building a new house for hiphop, a place to mourn and think and wander. if anyone happens to dance or have fun along the way, bully for them. funk was never really part of the plan. the mc's would handle that as they saw fit."

i think it's wholly possible co flow built their entire career/aesthetic out of misinterpreting this goal.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:50 (twenty-three years ago)

avant-garde WITH RESPECT TO WHAT is probably a crucial thing to say in any good answer to sterl's q.

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:51 (twenty-three years ago)

or: can introverted gnosticism and hyper-masculinity exist within the same framework?

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 05:51 (twenty-three years ago)

How curious that neither the Def Jux or Anticon/Mush contingents ever refer to themselves as being avant-garde. Oh well.

jack cole (jackcole), Thursday, 26 September 2002 06:45 (twenty-three years ago)

yes, very clever jack.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 06:54 (twenty-three years ago)

here is your cookie.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 06:56 (twenty-three years ago)

You're right. It probably isn't important that neither Anticon or Def Jux consider themselves avant garde or even promote themselves as such. It also probably isnt important that neither contingent has an agenda to uplift hip hop or destroy hip hop or whatever. Certainly, none of this to say anyone should like or hate either Def Jux. Each should be judged on their merits and faults -- but the merits and faults of what they produce and not because of some false dichotomy between the backpackers and the mainstream.

For someone who has such a large appreciation for chartpop, Jess, you certainly have a preoccupation with "cred."

jack cole (jackcole), Thursday, 26 September 2002 07:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Although I put Cannibal Ox on my top albums list last year, in retrospect, it was a reluctant choice more for the idea of it than the album itself. I definitely get the stalled-halfway feeling. El-P's production style borrows a lot of sounds that are associated with avant garde music, mostly on the abrasive end of things, but it's a formalistic relationship... he pounds everything into (barely) functional hip hop tracks. I mean, I worshipped Wu and stuff as a youngster so hearing The Cold Vein didn't defamiliarize so much since it seemed only to add a layer of noise and perhaps a rhytmic twitch. Dare I say that dissonance is "window-dressing". He does do this incongruous-sequencing thing where tracks tend to mutate and switch beats amd things which can be interesting in that it further emphasizes hip hop's disintegration quality of being made up of little sample snippets that don't always hold together.

About the emotional thing, El-P is really effective at oppressive kill-joy anti-feelings for people who find masochism in excessive stoicness. He sometimes slips in some moody organ chords or something to cultivate little post-RZA omen moods which are still suffocating half the time. When I saw CanOx live the crowd was completely fucked, attempting to have a good time but falling apart to the fractured rhythms. I like the man-into-machine texture of things but it seems more caught in the middle of referrents that I like more isntead of actually triumphing as some crazy innovative juxtaposition.

Sterling, have you heard Dalek? Surely it sheds light on the subject here...

Honda, Thursday, 26 September 2002 08:34 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't really speak for anyone else who likes or liked CoFlow but I liked "The Fire In Which You Burn" because I was attracted to its inhumanity - it was so abstracted and anti-funk it soulded like it was made by Daleks. It wore off quickly - I'm still fond of it but mostly because I'm fond of the effort I put into liking it - and the rest of Funcrusher Plus hardly registered: I decided after many similar false starts all over the musical spectrum that I preferred my fun uncrushed, thanks.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 26 September 2002 10:43 (twenty-three years ago)

(I) said that it wouldn't really bother me if someone sat down and did a track by track pisstake of a (F)all record.

Aren't you the same guy who the other day called someone a "cunt" and "retard" because that person didn't think the Streets album was all that hot? I'm guessing you don't like the Fall all that much if someone could go through any album track by track and negatively comment on it, because you go batshit over little things.

Vic Funk, Thursday, 26 September 2002 11:07 (twenty-three years ago)

"I'm guessing you don't like the Fall all that much": this is quite a bad guess

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 26 September 2002 11:19 (twenty-three years ago)

1970s: Rock is well into its third decade and while it continues to be ridiculously successful certain people think that the predominance of ponderous prog-rock and virtuoso guitar theatrics are harmful to the genre. They react with danceable, pop-influenced yet viscerally sexual, fashion-conscious and tough-guy-ethos infused punk. Eventually punk merges with a few compatible genres such as funk and reggae to create "post-punk". The movement is hailed as a "return to rock's roots".

1990s: Rap is well into its third decade and while it continues to be ridiculously successful certain people think that the predominance of danceable, pop-influenced yet viscerally sexual, fashion-conscious and tough-guy-ethos infused gangsta and "player" rap are harmful to the genre. They react with ponderous "abstract" rap and virtuoso turntable theatrics. Eventually underground rap merges with a few compatible genres such as IDM and glitch to create whatever it is you call Prefuse 73. The movement is hailed as a "return to hip=ho's roots".

Not a judgement call -- just a contrast I find pretty interesting.

As far as the persona of Co Flow/Can Ox, I think part of it is the "survive and defeat all rivals" ethos of the modern-day concept of battle rap taken as a personal musical credo and infused into general life. It's in the lyrics -- El-P's flow reminds me of a man onstage feverishly clutching a mic trying to get as many fatal jabs at his opponent in the shortest possible amount of time, and I can understand if it sounds grating if you're used to laconic g-funk style or linear storytelling raps.

Something I gotta correct: "I think the avant-garde label is affixed to their deep cynicism towards traditional hip-hop elements" -- er, I thought the underground rap types were all feverishly devoted to defending the traditional hip-hop elements i.e. MCing, DJing, b-boy dancing and grafitti. I've read interviews with Company Flow where they basically say that if you don't know where rap's place is in the hip-hop scheme of things that you should probably reconsider being an MC. If you want to deride indie rap, deride them for giving too much of a fuck about traditional hip-hop elements.

I'll be here to answer other questions and get mocked later.

Nate Patrin, Thursday, 26 September 2002 11:43 (twenty-three years ago)

By 'hip=ho' I of course meant hip-hop and yeah ha ha ha he said "ho".

Nate Patrin, Thursday, 26 September 2002 11:43 (twenty-three years ago)

(D)on't mind (V)ic, (M)ark, he's not as bright or clever as he tries to pass himself off as. (N)ote the clever spealling (sic) flame(.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 13:42 (twenty-three years ago)

it's one thing responding to someone's arguments, but spelling, Jess? I believe your slip is showing.

Also, Patrin is OTM on his analysis of the Dej Jux strain.

Then again most of arguments I've seen against underground hip hop on ILM usually do come down to some sort of "authenticity" paradigm revolving around "street" cred or race, etc.

jack cole (jackcole), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:04 (twenty-three years ago)

cole you moron, i was mocking him for attempting to mock me for my spelling/grammar! do you have some sort of bizarre filter that makes your hate for me shut out all logic or what?

and why do you insist on creating boogeymen "on ILM"? just for the sake of argument?

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:09 (twenty-three years ago)

It'd be nice if the notions of "avant-garde," "authenticity" and "cutting edge" were relegated to the dustbin where they belong, for all types of music.

hstencil, Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:11 (twenty-three years ago)

what makes coflow 'avant' is that they ride on the experimental horse.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:12 (twenty-three years ago)

hstencil would be right if it wasn't for the existence of experimental horses DO YOU SEE?!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Nate is right about the elements thing though - most underground/backpacker/whatever rap (not El-P stuff really, but things like J5, People Under The Stairs, most Rawkus stuff) turns me off because it seems really conservative musically. (The authenticity thing is a bit of a side issue for me because as a Brit I am always already inauthentic as a hip-hop listener.) Def Jux and Anticon stuff sounds more weird/aggressive/difficult and I can respect that but it's not what I'm looking for in hip-hop, which I like because it's constantly innovating within a super-accessible framework like all my favourite old styles did in their prime.

Non-US hip-hop I enjoy because even though much of it sticks pretty closely to a Rawkus or Premier or mellowed-out RZA template musically, either language or accent pretty much forces MCs to flow differently.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:14 (twenty-three years ago)

i mean, jack, we're talking about a guy so desperate to find things to mock about me that he calls me "jessica" and posted an email i sent him back in the day to his website with little [sic]'s following every word that should have been capitalized. you'll have to pardon me if i'm not going to be rushing to deconstruct his "arguments."

and yes, nate is right about the 4 elements; considering that co flow called one of their ep's "end to end burners", which had to be one of the first major graf references in hiphop in some time.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:18 (twenty-three years ago)

everyone is ignoring my wu-tang quote above, and i think it's more prescient than that deserves, especially considering tom's thread today.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Jess I started a thread because of it!

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:22 (twenty-three years ago)

haha note "considering tom's thread."

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh. Duh. Sorry!

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:25 (twenty-three years ago)

hstencil's position — as stated above — *is* jess's and ethan's position, as far as anything they actually say goes (as opposed to the stuff that keeps getting projected all over them by the generic massed hatas, re authenticity and such)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:26 (twenty-three years ago)

(nate is a jethan-hata but not generic obv)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:28 (twenty-three years ago)

I really love Cold Vein. I think the lyrics are brilliant, the flow is great, the beats/sounds are wonderfully grimy and in their own way funky. It always weirds me out when people who like hip-hop say they don't get it, because it's so immediate for me and it fits right into a long tradition of grimy New York hip-hop. Never listened to Funcrusher Plus. Put on Little Johnny every once in a while when I feel like listening to fucked up beats (they don't get much more fucked up). Bought the Anticon CD, sold it right away--just didn't do anything for me... I remember guys mumbling, odd samples and not much sense of rhythm. Like the odd Anti-Pop track, enjoy their overloaded lyrical approach, don't think the beats match up. Like some Prefuse, quite lovely sometimes, bland other times, but I like the connection between glitch and scratch rhythms, I think it's valid.

Don't really care about all the ideological stuff.... it's way overloaded. Probably don't agree with the undie rhetoric, but don't have any trouble ignoring it and think that some good music is being made in spite of it...

Ben Williams, Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:31 (twenty-three years ago)

most underground/backpacker/whatever rap (not El-P stuff really, but things like J5, People Under The Stairs, most Rawkus stuff) turns me off because it seems really conservative musically

I agree completely, which is why the Can Ox record completely bowls me over. I dunno what kind of hip-hop fan this makes me, but I pay more attention to the mood and feel of a song than I do to the lyrics. Just the way I am with all music. But with Can Ox, the mood forces me to listen to what VA is saying. I love the production. I forget exactly what my Voice Pazz & Jop quote was about Can Ox, but something along the lines of it sounding like a fucked up Brian Eno record. Which I'm sure I'll get trashed for saying here.

Yancey (ystrickler), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, I suppose you calling me a "moron" isn't going to make me love you any more, Jess. I'm silly that way. Tee hee hee hee.

jack cole (jackcole), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:36 (twenty-three years ago)

ethan once tried to sell me on a mike ladd record by saying it sounded like before & after science. it was both the first and last time i ever trusted an ethan p recommendation. (barring the eminem show.)

jack you make the mistake of thinking i give a fuck one way or the other. i just don't like being misquoted or misrepresented in a public forum. you can do whatever you want to misrepresent me in your little fiefdom.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:38 (twenty-three years ago)

When I wrote about The Cold Vein for an Addicted to Noise best of 2001 ballot I described El-P's production in a film-analogy sense: "[E]xpanding on the Blade Runner b-boyisms of his previous crew Company Flow's instrumental "Little Johnny From The Hospital" and creating the hip-hop version of Terry Gilliam's "Brazil" filtered through the rotting corpses of neighborhoods from the first scenes of "Superfly"." (If I'd written this yesterday I'd probably throw in a Dario Argento/Goblin reference too.) For some odd reason I think of films more often with El-P productions than any other hip-hop (or hip-hop-derived) producer other than maybe DJ Shadow. It could be some vague "wobbly 1950s 16mm projector audio track" undercurrent plus the alternately epic/suspenseful bombast of the beats. Maybe.

Nate Patrin, Thursday, 26 September 2002 15:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm listening to The Cold Vein now for the first time in months - the production is very atmospheric, the sounds interesting, the beats sometimes fussy sometimes just there, and the rapping sounds like a finger jabbing towards a human face forever. So I get a sort-of opposite impression from Ben - the production lures me in but the flow makes me tune out the rapping. Every time I do tune in enough to catch a rhyme I think it's pretty clever, though.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:12 (twenty-three years ago)

hstencil's position — as stated above — *is* jess's and ethan's position, as far as anything they actually say goes (as opposed to the stuff that keeps getting projected all over them by the generic massed hatas, re authenticity and such)

Er, I've seen a few things that have stated "Pop Rapper X is better than Undie Rapper Y because X is more 'real,' 'street authentic,' 'connected to the masses,' etc." Or the inverse: "Y is less 'real,' 'more cerebral,' 'underground,' etc." I think both approaches are pretty silly for pretty much all music, but esp. when you're talking about a genre who's first real achievement in the pop sphere of things was the Sugar Hill Gang. I mean, this debate is as old as hip-hop itself, and it's not going anywhere, and honestly you'd think after 25+ years, it'd get kinda old. That's my take, anyways.

hstencil, Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:14 (twenty-three years ago)

i wonder if it's something about being autumn again. (not that it matters since it's still 80 fucking degrees here...)

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Is Aesop Rock considered part of the Company Flow crowd? I think he already addressed this issue pretty well with "Save Yourself".

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Like, I was going to go to this DefJux concert, but then I decided not to.

Dan I., Thursday, 26 September 2002 17:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Aes is a Def Jukie and appeared on Fantastic Damage so yeah he's like a hanger-on.

More preposterous than any Def Jux foofaraw I've heard is Talib Kweli rhyming "where were you the day hip-hop died" on his otherwise not-that-stupid Reflection Eternal album.

Nate Patrin, Thursday, 26 September 2002 18:04 (twenty-three years ago)

New datapoint. Listening to Fantastic Damage now and I like it lots more than The Cold Vein, mainly because the drums seem less bent-for-the-fuck-of-it and there's more big buttrock 80s synth/guitar sounds. Much more polychromatic and with some jump-up funk.

Also, people should note that everybody calls coFlow avant-garde and so the self-label hardly matters. That would be like nabisco complaining about the "post-rock" sameness coming out of Chicago and stencil replying "hey! they didn't ASK to be called 'post-rock'!" Also, regardless of if they call themselves avant-garde or not, are they? Or are artists only what they say they are?

Also, there is an absolute distrust for traditional hip-hop elements. Otherwise the beats and MCing would (duh) sound more traditional.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 26 September 2002 18:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Well you know they could just be trying to evolve the elements instead of distrusting and supplanting them. El-P doesn't exactly seem the "fuck Rakim" type to me.

Of course if they stuck to the traditional elements they'd get lumped in with J5 et al. and called "conservative" so I guess it's damned if you do etc.

Nate Patrin, Thursday, 26 September 2002 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean though, it doesn't feel like exploration so much as disruption, y'know?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 26 September 2002 19:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Like I want somebody to try to capture what makes coFlow unique, rhyme and beatwise, and how these particular things are important and good and even "progressive".

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 26 September 2002 19:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Dead to me as can be.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 27 September 2002 17:05 (twenty-three years ago)

truly a living tradition! i stand thoroughly corrected!

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 17:09 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah jess, you forgot woody allen!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 27 September 2002 17:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Just because it doesn't matter to you doesn't mean it doesn't matter to someone.

hstencil, Friday, 27 September 2002 17:26 (twenty-three years ago)

so does latin, but that doesn't mean it isn't a dead language!

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 17:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually, there are parts of Switzerland were people speak a variation on Latin. But anyway, you're just being a pedant for the sake of it. Fine.

hstencil, Friday, 27 September 2002 17:30 (twenty-three years ago)

haha you're trying to school me on some cats in switzerland who still speak a derivation of latin and you're calling me a pedant!?!

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Jess, there's nothing you've brought up that's truly disputed my point. You're being contradictory for the sake of being so, not because you have any true point or stake in what you're stating.

hstencil, Friday, 27 September 2002 17:32 (twenty-three years ago)

i can't dispute your point because you believe that just because people are still making and enjoying a certain kind of music that means it's still a viable, working tradition which holds cultural currency in the mainstream of society! which does damage to my entire sensibility!

anyway, ilm only uses english ironically.

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 17:36 (twenty-three years ago)

If you're talking about so-called "mainstream society" (which I'm not sure you'd even want to define such an indefinable notion, but anyway) there's plenty of your so-called "dead traditions" that hold much more "cultural currency" than Company Flow or undie hip-hop or anything else in the pop music sphere. Ever read the Sunday NY Times? 18th and 19th Century classical gets more column space there than Britney Spears (and it's one of America's most widely read newspapers).

hstencil, Friday, 27 September 2002 17:40 (twenty-three years ago)

we also have very different ideas of what dictates the cultural currency of mainstream society too! and you used "so-called", eww!

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 17:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe you should get out more. Of your own little world, that is.

hstencil, Friday, 27 September 2002 17:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah jess, the 21st century is so last year.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 27 September 2002 17:47 (twenty-three years ago)

wow, the irony is delicious.

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 17:48 (twenty-three years ago)

And the point you're trying to make Sterl is what exactly? I like plenty of music from now. I just think it's ridiculous to claim that that's all that matters not only to me, but to anybody else. Why's that so difficult for you to understand?

hstencil, Friday, 27 September 2002 17:50 (twenty-three years ago)

but that's not what we're saying at all!!

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 17:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Then tell me, what are you saying?

hstencil, Friday, 27 September 2002 17:54 (twenty-three years ago)

haha -- hstencil, if hip-hop spans too much to be meaningful, what about "18th and 19th Century classical" which is too open ended since it means every performance of many things from the 18th century till now?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:00 (twenty-three years ago)

exactly what i was saying eight posts ago!

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Of course it's open-ended. I never claimed that it wasn't.

The point is, even though that stuff isn't brand new, it's still viable because people still care about it. Can you dispute that?

hstencil, Friday, 27 September 2002 18:03 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know which "stuff" you mean because the term "18th and 19th Century classical" means everything and nothing and shouldn't be used.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:06 (twenty-three years ago)

yes! but not right now, because i have to go out (of my own little bubble, aka my apartment)! sterl, hold the thread down until i get back! (or, er, not.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)

"18th and 19th Century classical" is a lot more specific than "cutting edge" or "avant garde." Either way, you still haven't answered my question.

hstencil, Friday, 27 September 2002 18:08 (twenty-three years ago)

that's two centuries of music, and really three depending on how you make the case! how can that mean anything specific?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:11 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm lost

mark s (mark s), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:16 (twenty-three years ago)

answer my email then you tosser!

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:18 (twenty-three years ago)

just kidding about the tosser part

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:19 (twenty-three years ago)

I am lost too: what is this undie thingy?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:27 (twenty-three years ago)

hstencil come back and answer my question and I promise I will answer yours. pleeeeaaaase?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:29 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm too tired to think

so expect more inconsequential ilxor rambling forthwith

also i tried to play cold vein earlier on, but then i took it off and played mobb deep instead

top of the pops was AWFUL (except for busted and pink obv): i try to like bon jovi and i try try try but he is clammy

sara cawood introduced aqualung by saying "and now, for those of you who think the charts are too full of pre-fab pop..." and supergrass and beanie man were playing LIVE!! what tiresome prauncing is this? listening to neptunes "live" is like eating blue maggot sushi with corned beef

mark s (mark s), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:29 (twenty-three years ago)

you watched top of the pops! tosser!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:30 (twenty-three years ago)

i was ravenous for musical ideas

mark s (mark s), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:45 (twenty-three years ago)

you was ravenous for molecules

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 27 September 2002 18:50 (twenty-three years ago)

haha mark that's okay everything's gotten much "worse" since the last email anyway.

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 27 September 2002 21:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay I am too lazy to wait for hstencil to come back so I will answer. It is a devious TRAP and an EVIL PLAN, see? If he answers with a good definition of "18th and 19th Century classical" (i.e. composers such as xxx and yyy and of a certain sort who produced under certain conditions for certain patrons over a certain period) and agrees that definition would have held twenty years ago and will hold next year -- then it is clearly DEAD because genres are kept alive by their contestation. If he answers that well you can't define "18th and 19th Century classical" because it is constantly being interpreted in new and different ways by generations for their own use and that composer xxx and yyy only provide the source material (and that e.g. brotzman's (i think) jazz interpretations fall in that rubric) -- but that it is nevertheless a concrete term, then he yields that "hip-hop" and even "avant-garde" (tho it is a much different case) are actually valid terms to use and debate.

Either way his worldview crumbles in a pile of illogic and hasty accusations. Muhahahahahaha!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 27 September 2002 22:58 (twenty-three years ago)

i've barely read an eighth of this thread so i don't know if this fits here at all but this is a really worthwhile el-p interview
15:00 - 19:00 is especially relevant to what's being discussed here

marek, Friday, 27 September 2002 23:27 (twenty-three years ago)

I've barely read an eighth of this thread because it's so FUCKING REDUNDANT

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 27 September 2002 23:30 (twenty-three years ago)

bitchin.

that interview probably should have gone onto that other ethan v. patrin thread actually.

, Friday, 27 September 2002 23:34 (twenty-three years ago)

1970s: Rock is well into its third decade and while it continues to be ridiculously successful certain people think that the predominance of ponderous prog-rock and virtuoso guitar theatrics are harmful to the genre. They react with danceable, pop-influenced yet viscerally sexual, fashion-conscious and tough-guy-ethos infused punk. Eventually punk merges with a few compatible genres such as funk and reggae to create "post-punk". The movement is hailed as a "return to rock's roots".

vs.

"The blues had a baby and they called it rock and roll."

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 27 September 2002 23:39 (twenty-three years ago)

rock's roots as fast teenage music, not its roots in whatever it was before it became rock, is how I read this.

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 27 September 2002 23:42 (twenty-three years ago)

and also note that Patrin should've reversed the order of Patrin's last two sentences

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 27 September 2002 23:43 (twenty-three years ago)

(grrr. bad self-editing. "Patrin should've reversed the order of THE last...")

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 27 September 2002 23:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Whoops

Nate Patrin, Friday, 27 September 2002 23:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Holy shit, his mocking "it's on MTV, I hate it! Everything independent is the BEST!" voice (around 16:35) cracked me the hell up. He also seems to be holding up the whole independent ethos as a financial "don't get jerked" one than an aesthetic one.

Nate Patrin, Friday, 27 September 2002 23:59 (twenty-three years ago)

22:30-25:50: Why El-P's production sounds like that. "I'm a child of the '80s... I'm inspired by crappy '80s synth music. I'm inspired by Men Without Hats. I'm into something that's jagged... I'm into the idea of bringing beauty out of a bunch of jagged things." Plus: Minnesota name-check!

Nate Patrin, Saturday, 28 September 2002 00:09 (twenty-three years ago)

hstencil come back and play!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 15:35 (twenty-three years ago)

This thread has been relegated to the end of the street where the streetlamps get fewer and there are no bars.

Come let us discuss the SHOCK of the new and the SHROUD of the past!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 15:36 (twenty-three years ago)

also nightmares preying on the brains of the living: classic or dud!!

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 15:52 (twenty-three years ago)

sterling, hstencil's mom won't let him out this week. He has to move this week, and she won't let up on him.

jack cole (jackcole), Tuesday, 1 October 2002 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually, I couldn't respond last Friday because I was on a flight to go see my mom (and the rest of my family) last weekend. Close enough though, jack.

hstencil, Tuesday, 1 October 2002 18:33 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.