Radiohead? Neutral Milk Hotel? Perhaps the new Bowie?
― frogbs, Monday, 4 February 2013 21:54 (twelve years ago)
Dr Dre
― skeet-skeet-gate (Spottie_Ottie_Dope), Monday, 4 February 2013 21:55 (twelve years ago)
D'angelo
If The Smiths dropped an album out of nowhere right this very moment the internet would just die.
― The Jupiter 8 (Turrican), Monday, 4 February 2013 21:56 (twelve years ago)
oh yeah, I forgot about Dre
― frogbs, Monday, 4 February 2013 21:56 (twelve years ago)
motherfuckers act
― skeet-skeet-gate (Spottie_Ottie_Dope), Monday, 4 February 2013 21:58 (twelve years ago)
― frogbs, Monday, February 4, 2013 9:56 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
*facepalm*
― The Jupiter 8 (Turrican), Monday, 4 February 2013 21:58 (twelve years ago)
Nowadays everybody wanna talk like they got something to sayBut nothing comes out when they move their lipsJust a bunch of frogbs
― Prisoner: Cell Block J/K (snoball), Monday, 4 February 2013 21:59 (twelve years ago)
alright, I'm locking this thread
― frogbs, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:00 (twelve years ago)
wait, you can't lock your own threads on this site. W.T.F.
wait you mean this whole thread wasn't just an elaborate setup for that joek
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:01 (twelve years ago)
Beck? Radiohead?
― skip, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:02 (twelve years ago)
Neutral Milk Hotel.
― Van Horn Street, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:03 (twelve years ago)
Yeah NMH was the only artist I could think of that could potentially generate that type of "holy shit" reaction among those who worshipped Aeroplane their whole lives. MBV was like a perfect storm of an incredibly long wait and a body of work that's actually held up quite well.
Radiohead could do it - the internet pretty much exploded when In Rainbows came out. TKoL was the same I guess but I wonder if that's sort of tapered expectations a bit.
Nine Inch Nails, maybe 5-6 years ago?
― frogbs, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:06 (twelve years ago)
destroyer's followup to "kaputt" will probably crash many a site.
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:08 (twelve years ago)
PAVEMENT
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:09 (twelve years ago)
NMH otm.
Maybe the Pixies?
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:10 (twelve years ago)
slint are doing something, right? thought i read that. probably wouldn't be THAT huge though.
― scott seward, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:10 (twelve years ago)
oh yes, if Pavement announces there is a release in 2-3 days. then yeah, i can see people getting really really hyped.
― Van Horn Street, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:10 (twelve years ago)
i was talking to someone the other day about kate bush and i said if she ever decided to tour in the u.s. it would create riots in the streets. which is hyperbole but i bet she could sell out huge arenas here in minutes. so, she might be able to crash ticket sites anyway. that would be pretty major for millions of people.
― scott seward, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:12 (twelve years ago)
The remaining members of Nirvana featuring Paul McCartney.
― MarkoP, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:13 (twelve years ago)
Kate Bush has been releasing records tho. Touring would be another story.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:14 (twelve years ago)
yeah i know not the same thing but i was just thinking of some out of the blue thing that would freak people out.
― scott seward, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:15 (twelve years ago)
Daft Punk
― MarkoP, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:15 (twelve years ago)
mcartney ringo chris cornell and eddie vedder
― it was very clear that it's a sarcastic song (forksclovetofu), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:15 (twelve years ago)
im sure if the stone roses had dropped an album instead of reforming for gigs that wouldve created a big buzz
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:16 (twelve years ago)
which is hyperbole but i bet she could sell out huge arenas here in minutes.
I love Kate Bush too, but there is no fucking way she would sell out "arenas" at this point, come on.
― HAPPY BDAY TOOTS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:16 (twelve years ago)
Stone Roses are sort of unknown over here
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:17 (twelve years ago)
and mbv are?
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:17 (twelve years ago)
the huge roses gigs sold out in 5 mins here.
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:18 (twelve years ago)
points AG to the "who the fuck are Stone Roses?" tumblr
― HAPPY BDAY TOOTS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:18 (twelve years ago)
we could take an informal US poll here or something but yeah I think MBVs legend/fanbase over here is bigger
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:19 (twelve years ago)
Considering how much was written about that awful Tron soundtrack I'm sure Daft Punk could break some things
― frogbs, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:20 (twelve years ago)
it doesnt really matter as the roses big moment was those gigs. But i assure you it would be a massive deal over here
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:20 (twelve years ago)
how about the KLF?
― frogbs, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:24 (twelve years ago)
"I love Kate Bush too, but there is no fucking way she would sell out "arenas" at this point, come on."
do you have any idea how many people love her in the states? teenagers on up to oldies like me. LOTS of people who would never think they would ever live to see her live. probably the most popular "cult" artist in the states that i can think of. the only person i can compare her to is tom waits as far as having such a wide-range of fans. from people who have been fans for decades to teens.
― scott seward, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:25 (twelve years ago)
you are high
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:26 (twelve years ago)
waits doesn't sell out arenas either fwiw
but he has toured for years.
― scott seward, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:27 (twelve years ago)
she never has.
Never heard a Kate Bush song, that I'm aware of.
― skeet-skeet-gate (Spottie_Ottie_Dope), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:28 (twelve years ago)
the postal service is playing the brooklyn nets' new arena; pretty sure kate could pull that off. maybe not in pittsburgh or wherever tho
― mookieproof, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:28 (twelve years ago)
I mean maybe we're working with different definitions of "arenas" here but, fwiw, I don't think even Coldplay sold out all of the arenas they played on their latest tour.
― HAPPY BDAY TOOTS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:28 (twelve years ago)
they also tour a lot.
― scott seward, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:29 (twelve years ago)
you are underestimating the once in a lifetime angle. she has very devoted fans.
― scott seward, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:30 (twelve years ago)
I am pretty sure no person that I know who is not ilx-related has ever heard of kate bush
― iatee, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:30 (twelve years ago)
I think a new pink floyd with roger waters in the band or a new led zep album might break the internet
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:31 (twelve years ago)
she has sold millions of records here. she continues to sell a ton of records in her back catalog. and she has never performed live here. you do the math!
― scott seward, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:31 (twelve years ago)
is Big Boi on this theoretical tour with her that might sell some more tickets
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 4 February 2013 22:32 (twelve years ago)
she could change her name to kate(y) (bush) perry and try and trick teen girls into going to her stadium concert
― iatee, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:34 (twelve years ago)
harry connick jr. and chris stamey also very pissed that they were upstaged like this:
http://www.metacritic.com/browse/albums/release-date/coming-soon/date?view=detailed
― scott seward, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:52 (twelve years ago)
boards of canada, as noted above, is a very reasonable answer. there's that distance of release, obviously, but i can't argue for groups like the smiths as i know *exactly* what their next release would roughly sound like. with BoC, you get that it'll retain their most classic elements and yet at the same time - especially considering the leap to acoustic-infusion with their last release - you have little idea of what to expect. the only bands that can stir this kind of momentum are ones that are self-consciosly progressive.
― kelpolaris, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:54 (twelve years ago)
new matmos and bret michaels albums so synergistically close to each other though. good for both parties.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:55 (twelve years ago)
I'm thinking maybe A Tribe Called Quest
― skeet-skeet-gate (Spottie_Ottie_Dope), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:56 (twelve years ago)
Many interesting suggestions on this thread and many lols.
― Leopard Skin POLL-Box Hat (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:00 (twelve years ago)
The correct answer is "none". No one could do this in the same way as MBV, because we haven't been promised the new full length for two decades from anyone else. The closest name already mentioned is Aphex, if only because he's dropped hints at having this vintage arsenal of tracks to unleash, you know, one of these days, they're just sitting there in the vaults. No one else has been slavishly working out the kinks for so long that they haven't put out an lp every once in a while, reformed, or just simply said "no" like MBV has.
― Thinspo Merkin Life (Spectrist), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:06 (twelve years ago)
they haven't put out an lp every once in a while (Kate Bush), reformed (Pavement), or just simply said "no" (Smiths, ABBA)
― Thinspo Merkin Life (Spectrist), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:10 (twelve years ago)
The level of devotion from the Loveless follow-up is a horse of a different colour from Chinese Democracy or Smile, but despite the comically heavy interest for these I wonder why? Why didn't they break the internet?
― Thinspo Merkin Life (Spectrist), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:14 (twelve years ago)
Because they weren't released on the Internet?
― jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:29 (twelve years ago)
The correct answer is "none".
lol. jay-z had more buzz off an album when he was retired for like 4 years.
― d'eejban (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:31 (twelve years ago)
Chinese Democracy broke Best Buy, and Long Road Out of Eden broke Wal-Mart.
― a tidy profit in Russia (Eazy), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:35 (twelve years ago)
Whereas this is the biggest digital release since In Rainbows, no?
― a tidy profit in Russia (Eazy), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:36 (twelve years ago)
or maybe since the third girl talk album
― d'eejban (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:38 (twelve years ago)
meek mill's dreamchasers 2 has been downloaded 3.8 million times off datpiff alone, let's see what numbers MBV do http://www.datpiff.com/Meek-Mill-Dreamchasers-2-mixtape.339288.html
― d'eejban (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:39 (twelve years ago)
Yeah, completely off the map in the public eye, with only the occasional cryptic interview, and leaving Shields to low profile collab releases w Linkin Park and R Kelly in the interim.
― Thinspo Merkin Life (Spectrist), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:52 (twelve years ago)
yeah MBV has been completely out of the public eye, what with people elevating them to god status and then writing tomes about their album
― d'eejban (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:55 (twelve years ago)
Dude, to be fair, I'm only nominally interested in MBV's music (and Jay-Z's) but the crosstalk both online and irl is sorta deafening, and it's honestly pretty weird cos I've heard chatter from the shoegaze camp amongst my friends at a level equiv to duck farts across a lake for years re mbv's amazing new long awaited tuneage
― Thinspo Merkin Life (Spectrist), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:59 (twelve years ago)
right. well in my neck of the woods, this album is getting as much burn as any old album that drops with a 24-hour lead time.
― d'eejban (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:00 (twelve years ago)
and anyway, only in rock music can a band peace out for 2 decades and still come back as if they walk on water. a rapper or pop artist couldn't pull a stunt like this because people would cease to give a shit after a certain point way, way before 20 years.
― d'eejban (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:01 (twelve years ago)
popper
― buzza, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:06 (twelve years ago)
xp Good points. Artists in the future are going to have a far slimmer era of interest to fall off the radar then phoenix again, since the important peeps prob won't have full blossom careers that extend so long, regardless of genre (rock is fucking dead i've heard)
― Thinspo Merkin Life (Spectrist), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:11 (twelve years ago)
Elvis Presley
― nostormo, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:12 (twelve years ago)
Beethoven
― Thinspo Merkin Life (Spectrist), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:15 (twelve years ago)
d'angelo and maxwell and sade push the limits of my theory a bit but at least as far as the latter two go, their recent career revivals of happened almost completely outside of the internet
― d'eejban (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:16 (twelve years ago)
what about lauryn hill?
― cock chirea, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:31 (twelve years ago)
talking heads and steely dan (?) by ilx standards
― cock chirea, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:32 (twelve years ago)
sonic youth after a 10-year hiatus
lauryn... maybe. fugees reunion was a dud tho.
― d'eejban (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:34 (twelve years ago)
when lauryn announced a tour, not even new material, it got this much buzz, which = a hell of a lot among people who already care about her, but outside that you could happily ignore it. what a weird thread. j0rdan otm about how any given band with a passionate fanbase could do this.
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:42 (twelve years ago)
also are people really bringing up kate bush's sales to make the point that she's not as big a deal as...MY BLOODY VALENTINE? smh
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 07:43 (twelve years ago)
Outside of indie music circles, nobody gives a fuck. This is not like the Bowie thing the other week, or anywhere near close to In Rainbows dropping, which was all over breakfast TV in the UK.
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 08:04 (twelve years ago)
seems bigger than the Bowie thing from the other week...?
somebody mentioned SNL earlier itt: think they got a shot at appearing this season?
― Drugs A. Money, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 09:23 (twelve years ago)
The Bowie thing was all over mainstream media; this is very much saturation in a certain demographic's sphere, but little beyond that. There's also an amount of instant criticism here - because we can actually listen to the full record - that wasn't there with the Bowie thing, because that was only a single.
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 09:44 (twelve years ago)
I was bringing it up to refute Scott's point that Kate Bush could sell out arenas across the U.S.
But I'm guessing she's still better-known here than MBV is, since she's at least had a couple of minor hits.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:23 (twelve years ago)
Reformed Husker Du with all original members would attract some interest.
Based on the love the limited semi-reunion dates received, I would think a new Faith No More album would garner some buzz. Even more if Jim Martin was involved.
Maybe a Guns N' Roses reunion with the real line-up and not just fat Axl.
Talking Heads, for sure.
― Loud guitars shit all over "Bette Davis Eyes" (NYCNative), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:35 (twelve years ago)
I'll cede that it's rare for an act to disappear for as long as MBV did and have a new release be treated by most of its fans as a serious artistic statement in continuation with its legacy, rather than just a greed- or nostalgia-motivated attempt to recapture something of the past. But that doesn't mean those other attempts wouldn't get way more people excited.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 19:16 (twelve years ago)
The La's
― Mr. Snrub, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 19:18 (twelve years ago)
lol
― iatee, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 19:19 (twelve years ago)
― Drugs A. Money, Tuesday, February 5, 2013 4:23 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark
hell no
― d'eejban (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 19:23 (twelve years ago)
A new Avalanches LP would be pretty big, right?
― monster_xero, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 19:43 (twelve years ago)
only in rock music can a band peace out for 2 decades and still come back as if they walk on water. a rapper or pop artist couldn't pull a stunt like this because people would cease to give a shit after a certain point way, way before 20 years.
hence rock music = THE BEST!
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 February 2013 01:42 (twelve years ago)
yes j0rd, we know pop/rap fans hv the att spans of tsetse flies.
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 7 February 2013 01:44 (twelve years ago)
what's our kevin been up to these eight years
― mookieproof, Thursday, 4 February 2021 03:58 (four years ago)
happy tenth everyone
― mookieproof, Thursday, 2 February 2023 04:08 (two years ago)
Man that was a wild ride.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 February 2023 04:10 (two years ago)
<3
― mookieproof, Thursday, 2 February 2023 04:16 (two years ago)
mixing it hot
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 February 2023 04:21 (two years ago)
everything has to be absolutely perfect. also loveless sounds best over a boombox though, so it's a balance between those two things
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 February 2023 04:22 (two years ago)
i love mbv and i love kevin shields, but he is one of the worst influences a musician could possibly have
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 February 2023 04:23 (two years ago)
Just listened to this album for the first time... I liked it! The tracks are a little repetitive, but they're cool and sound great. It's not really what I was expecting, from the band's rep.
― listened to "Mississippi" one take too long (morrisp), Thursday, 2 February 2023 06:12 (two years ago)