RFD: Madonna

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The new single "Die Another Day" deserves its own thread. So, microhouse or not? what does it mean. could it be unironically "postmodern feminist"? hard? does the suspended vocal of "day" fit with the boys/dilemma pattern? how much cooler would it be if she said "canonize this"

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 2 October 2002 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't wanna think about it!

I just wanna dance dance dance!

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 2 October 2002 18:15 (twenty-three years ago)

i misread this. thought it said 'masonna'.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 2 October 2002 19:03 (twenty-three years ago)

"Die Another Day" = a less-annoying version of "Music".

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 2 October 2002 19:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I still want to know if it's my hero Jacques!

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 2 October 2002 19:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Where have y'all heard this?

Spongebob, Wednesday, 2 October 2002 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)

a less-annoying version of "Music"

So is most anything ever recorded, though. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 October 2002 20:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh it's much much much much much better than "Music". It's the first Madonna single in ages that I don't think is directly referable to some other non-Madonna song that is superior, mainly because I'm not sure if anyone's tried glitchy string-riffing electro apart from her. Plus it is all about pyschoanalysis! At first I thought it was about an infant consciously working him/herself past the Oedipus/Castration. Except then she says "I'm gonna destroy my ego", which sorta puts a spanner in the works.

BEST SONG EVAH?!?!? ;-)

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 2 October 2002 22:53 (twenty-three years ago)

It's the first Madonna single in ages that I don't think is directly referable to some other non-Madonna song that is superior

Ha! Brilliant observation, and yes, quite good. Though the lyrics are generally ignorable, but I would say that. ;-)

I'm not sure if anyone's tried glitchy string-riffing electro apart from her

*thinks a bit* Wait, I figured it out. This is the song that trumps Vespertine in sound and intent.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:32 (twenty-three years ago)

unwashed?

download here

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:35 (twenty-three years ago)

*thinks a bit* Wait, I figured it out. This is the song that trumps Vespertine in sound and intent.

*muffled laughter*

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:36 (twenty-three years ago)

At me or with me, Mark P? ;-) I can understand it either way! But the way Tim phrased made me think of what Bjork is allegedly supposed to be doing the whole time.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:38 (twenty-three years ago)

at, ned. but this and this time only, i promise. (i'm dismissing all the radiohead/sigur ros jabs as occupational hazard and not symptomatic of raggett as a whole)

as a sorta aside, both the arcade and the soft pink truth remixes of new bjork single "it's in our hands" PISH all over this madonna song

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:41 (twenty-three years ago)

and i *like* the madonna song, even tho some of the sounds are a bit dated (esp. that flanged mirwais synth bauble thing)

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:43 (twenty-three years ago)

no, seriously. if i was in a clubbb i'd MUCH rather hear either of these bjork remixes. they smoke.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:48 (twenty-three years ago)

The Radiohead jabs? But I like them a lot, have seen them four times, etc....now, replace Radiohead with Coldplay, and you're quite right. ;-) And yes, Sigur Ros=codswallop, but hey.

I am increasingly serious about the random Bjork comparison, though, and you have to look at it from a general point of view. If you describe Vespertine to someone who hasn't heard it ("Well, it's got some glitchy sounds and some strings and...") and then play "Die Another Day" -- well then. :-) I haven't heard these remixes of which yer speak, though (in fact, I didn't even know there was a new Bjork single).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:49 (twenty-three years ago)

It's good, but I wish Madonna's vocals were less Madonna-ish.

Jody Beth Rosen, Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:49 (twenty-three years ago)

tho some of the sounds are a bit dated

Are they? I don't bother paying attention anymore to what is or isn't dated, honestly. There's too much to keep up with.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I really like it as a Bond theme. I wonder how it compares to recent Bond themes. I never heard the Garbage one. Wasn't Bjork set to do one once? Maybe it just seemed like she should have.

Arthur (Arthur), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:52 (twenty-three years ago)

Pulp was supposed to do one as well, and when they didn't get the comission -- 'logically,' it went to Sheryl Crow, who despite whatever Tom might say is an agent of Satan and a miserable excuse for the invention of recorded music -- it ended up on a B-side as "Tomorrow Never Lies." Understated but I liked it, though "I Spy" was the better all around candidate.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Are they? I don't bother paying attention anymore to what is or isn't dated, honestly. There's too much to keep up with.

haha ned = madonna!

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:56 (twenty-three years ago)

But that's a compliment, surely. :-) Though lord knows these past ten years aren't a patch on the ones before. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Bjork wouldn't be fit to record on that horrid Chris Rock/Anthony Hopkins spy flick, let alone Bond.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Bjork should co-star in a sequel to Mitchell where she gets to get freaky with Joe Don Baker, only to have him dump her for Tori Spelling.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 3 October 2002 01:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Considering Joe Don has been in some of the recent Bonds, that way the, er, 'glamour' could rub off. Among other things, if they recreate the tender bed scene from the first Mitchell.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Damn, Nicole!!!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:03 (twenty-three years ago)

I am increasingly serious about the random Bjork comparison, though, and you have to look at it from a general point of view. If you describe Vespertine to someone who hasn't heard it ("Well, it's got some glitchy sounds and some strings and...") and then play "Die Another Day" -- well then.

b-b-b-but the strings are barely a vital part of vespertine! there's a way heavier reliance on choral bits, music boxes, harps etc. are bjork and string octects now so inextricably linked that people just assume that violas and somesuch must be buried in the mix somewhere? anyways, the madonna single is, fundamentally, a dance track whereas nothing on vespertine is, so the comparison barely gets off the ground from my pov

final trainspotterish, purely incidental bit of sinewy icelandic fluff: bjork recorded a bond theme post-post but ultimately put the kybosh on its release -> "not enough feeling" (i am very loosely paraphrasing)

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Bjork wouldn't be fit to record on that horrid Chris Rock/Anthony Hopkins spy flick, let alone Bond.

oh it's so on.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:04 (twenty-three years ago)

bjork recorded a bond theme post-post but ultimately put the kybosh on its release -> "not enough feeling" (i am very loosely paraphrasing)

Yeah, she wanted to be "feeling" some fine Joe Don Baker ass instead. Fuck Pierce Brosnan!

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Bjork is the spiritual grandmother of Ashley and Mary Kate.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, she wanted to be "feeling" some fine Joe Don Baker ass instead. Fuck Pierce Brosnan!

err, okay.

i have no idea who joe don baker is, but i can see already that this is going to be a slap fite. therefore, bedtime!

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:10 (twenty-three years ago)

If only more people knew and loved Joe Don Baker, he could learn to love himself.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:11 (twenty-three years ago)

are bjork and string octects now so inextricably linked that people just assume that violas and somesuch must be buried in the mix somewhere?

Use public image here, Mark P, especially in America. Her most notable media appearance in recent years has been for the Oscars a while back (with, of course, strings), and then the album which nobody heard except her fans is bandied about in general crit-speak with the general terms I described above re glitch etc. That's the way I kept hearing about it before it finally came out! I'm not so much interested in the reality of Vespertine -- I have it around here somewhere, I guess it was nice and all but I've only heard it the once -- as the perception of it, and the perception is way more known than the music.

anyways, the madonna single is, fundamentally, a dance track whereas nothing on vespertine is, so the comparison barely gets off the ground from my pov

I dunno! Seems to suggest that Madonna is not afraid of taking it directly to the charts. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:12 (twenty-three years ago)

If only more people knew and loved Joe Don Baker, he could learn to love himself.

And there's plenty of him to love.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm sure Joe Don loves himself on a regular basis.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:22 (twenty-three years ago)

When he thinks about him, he touches himself. Oh-oh-oh.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:23 (twenty-three years ago)

so, to sum up:

ned, 10:32pm: *thinks a bit* Wait, I figured it out. This is the song that trumps Vespertine in sound and intent.

ned, 11:12pm: I'm not so much interested in the reality of Vespertine -- I have it around here somewhere, I guess it was nice and all but I've only heard it the once -- as the perception of it, and the perception is way more known than the music.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh jesus, this is fucking terrible! What the hell are you guys talking about? My god. The orchestration in this piece is just horrific. Those swirling string lines, those trite trumpet calls, ugh!@# Oh god, it just reached the ballad bit, *vomit*. Her voice even sounds terrible. Have I downloaded the wrong mp3? My sister just stuck her head in the door and said "What the hell is this crap?!" Here here to that.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:34 (twenty-three years ago)

sorry to stay on this, but the mind boggles:

anyways, the madonna single is, fundamentally, a dance track whereas nothing on vespertine is, so the comparison barely gets off the ground from my pov

I dunno! Seems to suggest that Madonna is not afraid of taking it directly to the charts. :-)

or just that they're COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.

i mean, why does 'fear' have to enter into it? by that logic, dead can dance were a bunch of quivering pussies.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, why not, Mark P? It was an impulse thought on the first hand, and then the more I thought about it the more I realized what I was actually framing it against. That's the advantage of the Net and instant response. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh jesus, this is fucking terrible! What the hell are you guys talking about? My god. The orchestration in this piece is just horrific. Those swirling string lines, those trite trumpet calls, ugh!@# Oh god, it just reached the ballad bit, *vomit*. Her voice even sounds terrible. Have I downloaded the wrong mp3? My sister just stuck her head in the door and said "What the hell is this crap?!" Here here to that.

haha andrew did you download the fake off soulseek? that, if i'm not mistaken, is the german eurovision entry circa 1998 or sommat

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, why not, Mark P? It was an impulse thought on the first hand, and then the more I thought about it the more I realized what I was actually framing it against. That's the advantage of the Net and instant response. :-)

haha that's it, i wash my hands of this completely. this thread is like a ned raggett bizarro world where you make no sense whatsoever!

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:38 (twenty-three years ago)

or just that they're COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.

Maybe, I dunno. It's an interesting little conceit, and maybe that's all it is. :-) I'd rather hear the Madonna single again over Vespertine, in any event.

i mean, why does 'fear' have to enter into it? by that logic, dead can dance were a bunch of quivering pussies.

Ah, they were making more money for 4AD than anyone else. They never had to be afraid. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Heavens, Mark! I'm just working through a train of thought in public, is all. You never have?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Aaaaaaaaahhh. The song I was commenting on above was the James Bond Soundtrack version. Steer clear of that, then.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:41 (twenty-three years ago)

I just downloaded another version and it was the intro section looped over about 6 times. Looks like the record companies have started a campaign of misinformation, so to speak.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Just go to the link Mark P provided above, it's there...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay, I think I've got the real version now. They went completely bezerk on the vocoder, flanger, and pitch adjustments on her voice, didn't they? This is really, really boring. There's just nothing here worth commenting on.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Heavens, Mark! I'm just working through a train of thought in public, is all. You never have?

as the archives can verify, never to completion. ;)

i'm just saying that listening to a record more than once (in passing, i gather) would probably be a reasonable pre-requisite before speaking for its sound, much less its intent.

far be it from me to oppose anyone's active thought process, but you seem to want the right to comment authoritatively on the music while not having to be too bothered by, er, what it actually sounds like.

i see a bakery box under your bed and icing on your lips!

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:54 (twenty-three years ago)

haha ned would never comment authoritatively on anything.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Nah. Just sporadically -- and subjectively. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 02:58 (twenty-three years ago)

But then again, Sterling -- neither would you. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 03:14 (twenty-three years ago)

It does sound an awful lot like "Music". Frankly it gets worse for me when I think of it as a Bond theme, not better. There's a high bar there!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 3 October 2002 03:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Though I like the way the strings just stop short n ting

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 3 October 2002 04:23 (twenty-three years ago)

The song is great, but I hate those lyrics! I mean, the "die another day" part is ok, but what's with that "analyze this" bullshit? I could have lived a happy life without hearing a song that namechecks Sigmund fucking Freud, for chrissakes.

geeta (geeta), Thursday, 3 October 2002 04:45 (twenty-three years ago)

i thought it was name-checking billy crystal

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 3 October 2002 06:47 (twenty-three years ago)

This is brilliant, very impressive, Music was pedestrian diluted french house, pretty boring and shit, even her vocals here are about 20 times more interesting than they have been in years.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 3 October 2002 10:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Let's just be clear that this is not the first hit song about psychoanalysis:

"Jacques Lacan ......
Jacques Lacan,
Jacques Lacan let me rock you,
Let me rock you Jacques Lacan,
Jacques Lacan, it's all I wanna do...
Jacques Lacan, cuz I feel for you"

Also, "Die Another Day" is fantastic. I really like the glitched out vocals and how it's not just some electroclashy Miss Kittin b-side knock-off.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 3 October 2002 15:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Now that I'm all sorta thinking I like Madonna, I've been trying to download this track, and the Windows media track linked to above is all stuttering and unlistenable, even on my office computer's T1 network line. Went to Amoeba and it's not out yet I guess. I bought a used copy of "Music", though. I'll let you know how it is later.

Sean (Sean), Friday, 4 October 2002 05:01 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, it's ace; but the "sigmund freud" bit is cringeworthy and then some.

toby (tsg20), Friday, 4 October 2002 11:43 (twenty-three years ago)

It's a fun song, and finally for once, a modern-sounding Bond theme! I remember expecting the Garbage song to sound really cool, but it was dumb. This is good.

Vinnie (vprabhu), Friday, 4 October 2002 17:45 (twenty-three years ago)

four weeks pass...
has anyone noticed that in the video she puts on tefillin?! and the hebrew letters burned into the electric chair after she disappears are lamed hay and vad = (in english) luv. and apparently stand for the opening words of the twenty fourth psalm, "The earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof."

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Sunday, 3 November 2002 10:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know whether to hate or like it: It's so Freudian in its references to ego, sex, religion,... The obv reference to a delay in gratification, in particular sex (die another day > orgasm as death of ego, blablabla). It's not a climax in her career but, as always, together with the video its VERRRY GROOVY.

nathalie (nathalie), Sunday, 3 November 2002 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)

like it then.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Sunday, 3 November 2002 10:56 (twenty-two years ago)

letters are one of the names of god apparently, as to be repeated over and over in the ecstatic kabbalah to subordinate the self to the divine. which is to actual kabbalism like pretending you are ryu in streetfighter and shooting fireballs is to actual tai chi.

but then reading a book and notating it v. v. densely hardly makes for compelling television.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 3 November 2002 20:22 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.