soulseek/kazaa - how long left ?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
there's a big new 'clampdown' by the b.p.i. according to :

http://www.guardian.co.uk/internetnews/story/0,7369,803413,00.html

it's hilarious ! today is 'digital download day' !!
you can - for £5 - burn 5 tracks to a cd !!
hahahahahaha!
what peter gabriel's got to do with it all
god only knows.

so...is soulseek beneath the radar or something
cause it's still kickin, and it's still *ace*
and seemingly no-one's heard of it !
there's also an article in 'the face' about how sad the end
of napster/audiogalaxy was, and i'm like, 'hello?'

every day is digital download day !

£5 for five tracks. oh my sides.

piscesboy, Thursday, 3 October 2002 11:09 (twenty-three years ago)

i read about a new advert that has britney squalking 'Would you go into a shop and STEAL a cd? well, that's what people are doing with 'our' music everyday when they download mp3s'

fuck you brit, i thought you were punk bitch.

but, *whisper it* sulseeque is ace as fah, how can they take it away from us? please, i couldn't go on without it, i'm a geeky student.

sF, Thursday, 3 October 2002 11:15 (twenty-three years ago)

They really have fucked up their PR on this one - you dont have to pay anything, you get £5 "worth" of credits free.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 3 October 2002 11:18 (twenty-three years ago)

''i read about a new advert that has britney squalking 'Would you go into a shop and STEAL a cd? well, that's what people are doing with 'our' music everyday when they download mp3s'''

yeah i saw that as well. they are trying to reason with the consumer. it's such a laugh.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 October 2002 11:29 (twenty-three years ago)

piscesboy, i wouldn't worry about soulseek. i remember reading a quote from nir saying that, even post-audiogalaxy mutiny, its user base is roughly about one percent of kazaa's.

that puts it *very* low on the riaa's 'to do' list; by all standards its still a very grassroots thing

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 3 October 2002 11:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah soulseek is nowhere, especially in America. It started off as a mostly electronic-music filesharing thing so I dont think it got the massive college-user and general uptake that a'galaxy and kazaa had/have.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 3 October 2002 11:56 (twenty-three years ago)

ludicrous - kazaa is useless ! there's not even half the stuff
that slsk has. am keeping slsk 2 myself from now on, lest the
riaa find out about it !

piscesboy, Thursday, 3 October 2002 15:34 (twenty-three years ago)

At last the musical wasteland of college students benefits me vis-a-vis *oul*eek (of course aside from the cultural elitism afforded by my superior tastes).

Leee (Leee), Friday, 4 October 2002 04:54 (twenty-three years ago)

five years pass...

Soulseek is still up, and it doesn't seem like RIAA concentrate as much on Soulseek as on various Torrent and DC networks.

Why?
I have a theory, although RIAA obviously cannot say it loud.

Soulseek is known among its users for having a larger percentage of users with a music interest that is way above average. If you are looking for alternative/indie, underground dance/hip-hop, old albums from the 80s or before, really old oldies etc. then Soulseek is the place to search, whereas if you want typical current hitlist stuff or very mainstream back catalog stuff you are likely to find more at DC or Torrent.

So, accordingly, SLSK has another type of users. Is it possible that RIAA knows that when someone downloads an album from Soulseek, said person is more likely than DC/Torrent users to:
a) go out and buy the album afterwards in the shops if he likes it
b) tell to all his friends that it's a great album and tell them they should go out and buy it too

So, is it possible that RIAA have a knowing tactic here, that they simply don't touch Soulseek much because they know they probably benefit more from Soulseek than from the other networks?

Geir Hongro, Thursday, 15 November 2007 11:09 (eighteen years ago)

or it might be because they're more interested in the filesharing networks that are more likely to hold the big selling artists and there is 'more to lose'

laxalt, Thursday, 15 November 2007 11:43 (eighteen years ago)

I think that's pretty much the first half of Geir's (reasonable enough) argument.

The Reverend, Thursday, 15 November 2007 11:45 (eighteen years ago)

Also, a lot of the stuff that might be more prevalent on slsk than your average file-sharing might be non-RIAA.

The Reverend, Thursday, 15 November 2007 11:47 (eighteen years ago)

I think it's because the RIAA have soul. I don't even know what that means because I am DRUNK.

Spencer Chow, Thursday, 15 November 2007 11:48 (eighteen years ago)

by 'kickin' i meant *still alive* u understand not like 'kickin' as in that phrase youth tv presenters of the late 80's thought The Kids actually said.

pisces, Thursday, 15 November 2007 13:38 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.