― blueski, Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― blueski, Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:15 (twenty-three years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andy K (Andy K), Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 October 2002 22:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 3 October 2002 23:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 3 October 2002 23:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 October 2002 23:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lek Dukagjin, Thursday, 3 October 2002 23:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 3 October 2002 23:24 (twenty-three years ago)
Question: can a band really sue over a sample that they sampled in the first place? Sounds pretty dodgy to me...
― Charlie (Charlie), Thursday, 3 October 2002 23:31 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin carmody (robin carmody), Thursday, 3 October 2002 23:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin carmody (robin carmody), Thursday, 3 October 2002 23:47 (twenty-three years ago)
Yup!
Of course, if you don't have clearance yourself, it isn't very wise to do so.
Come to think of it, it may make more sense if it was Eric B. and Rakim and co. who sued M/A/R/R/S, and perhaps Coldcut fought for a chunk of that settlement, since it was their remix in question?
Hmmmm... with the SAW involved as well, very interesting story here that someone knows but obviously none of us here do!
― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 3 October 2002 23:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 4 October 2002 00:20 (twenty-three years ago)