How far can liking Hip Hop or R&B go before you start inviting accusations of tokenism?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I listened to a lot of this type of music as a college student and was often met with perplexion from my peers who felt that listening to this type of music constitued an apologia on my part, a guilty desire to be "up with the community!" I tried to explain, no, really, I just like the music, but was met with bemused smiles. Now that I have safely returned to the Brit pop ghetto I can turn this question over to you, dear posters.

Mary (Mary), Friday, 11 October 2002 01:35 (twenty-three years ago)

If the only hip-hop record you have is It takes a Nation of Millions...and you've only played it twice...and only for the benefit of showing off that you have it.

Lord Custos Alpha (Lord Custos Alpha), Friday, 11 October 2002 01:51 (twenty-three years ago)

nailed it in one.

tylero, Friday, 11 October 2002 02:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, wait...better answer...
If the only hip-hop record you have is Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'em...and you've only played it twice...and only for the benefit of showing off that you have it.

Lord Custos Alpha (Lord Custos Alpha), Friday, 11 October 2002 02:13 (twenty-three years ago)

If the only hip-hop record you have is It takes a Nation of Millions

Cameron Crowe/Nick Hornby to thread!

Jody Beth Rosen, Friday, 11 October 2002 06:37 (twenty-three years ago)

It Takes A Nation Of Millions... is still my favourite record! It was when I didnt listen to much hip-hop or R&B and it is now I listen to lots and lots (not expert-level amounts but still a lot). Liking it so much actually retarded my appreciation of hip-hop because I was expecting that sort of thing from every hip-hop rec I heard until I realised that was being a dick about it. I wonder if this is because:

a) I'm still a tokenist at heart.
b) It's a great record.
c) Both.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 11 October 2002 06:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Tom is OTM.

Incidentally - why are hip-hop, dance and electronica fans who only own a couple of rock records (by, say, Radiohead or the Beta Band) never accused of 'tokenism'? Smacks of inverse snobbery to me.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Or Ice-T with his Phil Collins record (actually I think Ice-T prob. had lots of AOR records so scrap that example).

The reason, Matt, I suppose, is that it's intrinically hard for a minority group to exercise 'tokenism'.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:05 (twenty-three years ago)

But surely hip hop and RnB are hardly 'minority' music (if we're speaking along musical and not racial lines here), let alone dance music? In the UK and Europe at least all three genres are just as popular and prevalent, if not more so, than rock.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Tokenism definitely works with subgenres of rock i.e. my G'n'R album is so much my token hard rock album it hurts.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:17 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm talking at the level of the colour of the audience.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry - that's not very clear. I was kind of mixing up a response to you and Tom. Black people are in a minority (and oppressed economically blah). The sensibility that might lead a liberal white person to tokenistically have a hiphop record (yes, lots of other people will just buy it cause they like it, of course) can't really apply in reverse. That's what I meant.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:24 (twenty-three years ago)

This reminds me of Storytelling...

nathalie (nathalie), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:25 (twenty-three years ago)

it all comes down to mandingo cliché..

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Can I cut to the chase and get this "X person went to see OutKast and complained the audience was 75% white, does this make them less authentic?" question over and done with?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Incidentally - why are hip-hop, dance and electronica fans who only own a couple of rock records (by, say, Radiohead or the Beta Band) never accused of 'tokenism'? Smacks of inverse snobbery to me.

Mod Up: +1 Insightful.

Lord Custos Alpha (Lord Custos Alpha), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah Matt - I realise now that your initial point wasn't a race thing at all. Ignore me.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:39 (twenty-three years ago)

With regard the OutKast thing, I should mention that I find the idea of using the racial makeup of a band or artist's audience as a barometer of "authenticity" to be distasteful at best.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Why is the OutKast audience mainly white?

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Probably a combination of ticket prices, the culture of going to see live music as opposed to clubs, raves or sound clashes, the fact that Miss Jackson was all over most kinds of radio in a way in which other hip-hop records might not have been, and that Stankonia was a pretty consistent album which attracted the Q readers.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:51 (twenty-three years ago)

OK, so apart from the the 'black hip hop fans aren't really into live concerts', that leaves the Miss Jackson airplay and Stankonia being a consistent album. So the album thing is just it being good, yes (or is consistency a white thing?) That leaves the airplay. Why did it get so much more airplay than other hip-hop records?

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:54 (twenty-three years ago)

[I'm just trying to pin down what distinguishes crossover records]

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Dick Clark and his secret cabal of minions officially bless the album and allow it to cross over.

Lord Custos Alpha (Lord Custos Alpha), Friday, 11 October 2002 10:57 (twenty-three years ago)

"Why did it get so much more airplay than other hip-hop records?"

Because it's better. It's better than most records.

Also, possibly because it was a pop song first and foremost? Because the subject matter was pretty universal? Because of the humility? Because it was less "intimidating" or "threatening" to the casual listener than say, Jah Rule or even Eminem? I really don't know.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 11 October 2002 11:05 (twenty-three years ago)

In the UK at least Ms J became a huge crossover hit at a time when hip-hop in general was getting bigger radio play than ever, too - the Wu Tang Clan of all people had a top ten hit the month before too.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 11 October 2002 11:16 (twenty-three years ago)

But how many white people know what it was even called? *Everyone* knows Miss Jackson.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 11:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry - Ms.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 11:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I dont think there's any great racial or cultural mystery N. - crossover records from any genre tend to be great pop records as well as great [genre] records.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 11 October 2002 11:25 (twenty-three years ago)

plus hasnt it been said for so long now that in both the US and UK its white teenagers and twentysomethings that account for the majority of hip hop sales? i have no idea how such a statistic would be acquired so its bogus to say the least but the enormous popularity of the music across the racial/cultural spectrum is undeniable as the charts - and the streets - prove

blueski, Friday, 11 October 2002 11:41 (twenty-three years ago)

i have no idea how such a statistic would be acquired

Piece of piss to research this and weight the findings against the total market. So it's probably true.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 11 October 2002 11:52 (twenty-three years ago)

crossover records from any genre tend to be great pop records

Ignoring the objection that this is begging the question, what about Public Enemy then? Or are they great pop as well?

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 11:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Crossover singles I meant.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 11 October 2002 11:59 (twenty-three years ago)

The reason dance or hiphop fans aren't accused of it is because almost anyone who is in anyway serious about liking music starts off with rock.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 11 October 2002 12:00 (twenty-three years ago)

P.E. had great hooks/samples but i dunno if thats enough for something like 'Fight The Power' or even 'Give It Up' (which i liked a lot) to constitute great pop...the latter DID do quite well in the UK charts though (top 20) and the interesting thing about P.E. is some of their hardest tracks did the best sales wise (thinking of 'Cant Truss It, Shut 'Em Down and Night Train from the poor 'Apocalytpse 91 album)

blueski, Friday, 11 October 2002 12:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Thank goodness Gareth IS in America!

(Ronan - counter-example: DJ Shadow, no?)

Tom (Groke), Friday, 11 October 2002 12:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Cameron Crowe/Nick Hornby to thread!

Nup, Hornsby's down with LL Cool J, fooh! "Goin' Back To Cali" is amongst Nick's top5 records of all time according to the German edition of "Rolling Stone"

Liking it so much actually retarded my appreciation of hip-hop because I was expecting that sort of thing from every hip-hop rec I heard until I realised that was being a dick about it

Yeah Tom, same thing here- except it was "Fear Of A Black Planet", not "It Takes A Nation..."

the fact that Miss Jackson was all over most kinds of radio in a way in which other hip-hop records might not have been

This is one of the reasons I love Outkast so much- they are the closest thing to an universally adored group that I've ever seen in my life- the Hip-Hop Heads love 'em, the Indie Kids love 'em, the Teenyboppers love 'em, even the Old Skool Metal fans begrudingly admire them- EVERYBODY fucking loves Outkast (well, maybe not the Nu Metal fellas, but oh well.) I don't really feel like finding out why, I just wanna celebrate that fact.

Daniel_Rf, Friday, 11 October 2002 12:05 (twenty-three years ago)

'almost anyone who is in anyway serious about liking music starts off with rock'

i suppose this could well be true but i'm uncomfortable with it somehow, maybe just because that wasnt the case for me (at least its not like i was a rock fan who one day realised dance or hip hop could actually be quite good) - but surely its more a case of everyone starts off with POP because you love that as a child and it forms the basis of your relationship with music and your tastes will then grow and diverge from that once you're old enough to appreciate more whats NOT pop music and what that means

blueski, Friday, 11 October 2002 12:07 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't remember loving pop as a child, or any music really, when I was very young, except the Beastie Boys-Fight For Your Right, I must have been 4 or 5 at the time.

Tom:How do you mean? I'm confused.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 11 October 2002 12:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean that I think most of the people making hip-hop, for instance, love music and their 'first love' was hip-hop. I think also people of your age in the states, eg Ethan, are quite likely to be hip-hoppers first and foremost. Actually Nelly is saying exactly this in the latest issue of Q! He's saying that the people growing up now have no idea of hip-hop as something 'new' or to be 'got into', it's just what there is. It's the argument Gareth always makes which is why I mentioned him.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 11 October 2002 12:11 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think it's like that here yet by any means, it's not even like that with dance here either, unless I can't see myself as a good example of how it might be.

I just can't imagine accusing someone of having token rock albums because everyone is so constantly smacked across the face with the Beatles and other mainstream rock stuff past and present. They aren't token rock albums, they're still percieved as essentials or something similar.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 11 October 2002 12:14 (twenty-three years ago)

interesting to see how those born AFTER the emergence of hip hop and dance music in general perceive those genres now they're the status quo...they may be the ones who feel they do not need to consider the roots of the music and can just take it in any direction they like cos its 'their' music too now

blueski, Friday, 11 October 2002 12:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I guess I'm saying there are so many canonical rock albums and there tends to be more of a consensus surrounding them so if you have a VU album or a Beatles album and loads of dance records it's not a token album, you just have a Beatles album, I mean why wouldn't you, they are the Beatles afterall etc.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 11 October 2002 12:19 (twenty-three years ago)

And I think this shows there is still a general mistrust of hiphop/dance etc in terms of creating fantastic "timeless" ahem albums.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 11 October 2002 12:23 (twenty-three years ago)

perhaps more time is needed for those timeless albums to establish themselves? i notice in hip hop that the first two P.E. albums, first De La Soul and 'The Chronic' - and 'Endtroducing' if you were gonna pidgeonhole it, are all now considered in such a way but with house/techno/breakbeat its been an even shorter time that albums have actually been coming out but even in 5-10 years i dont know if things like 'Homework' and 'Dubnobasswithmyheadman' will be considered like that, or whether they're really cut out for that pedestal anyway...then again Kraftwerk albums and first two Orb albums are considered classic in electronic (if not dance) music by many

blueski, Friday, 11 October 2002 12:33 (twenty-three years ago)

What's wrong with tokenism?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 11 October 2002 12:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Where's that Tokenism: classic or dud? thread, or did I dream it?

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 13:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh no!! Everyone's contributed wonderful thoughts and I realize that the question itself was misleading. I didn't mean 'tokenism' in terms of the records as tokens, but rather 'tokenism' as trying to exhibit a sense of identity with the race(s) normally identified with hip hop. Actually, I had many of the hip hop/ r&b rekkids; thus the problem was not having one or two records and thinking I was down, but rather having alot of records and not thinking anything of it, but my friends wondered why I wouldn't just conform and listen to U2 or Nirvana or something (this was circa '92-94). Have I thoroughly confused everyone now? Anyway, carry on, this is still an interesting discussion and I sincerely hope Nick Hornby hears the call and comes to thead (on this misapplied meaning; I don't think he could be accused of the other tokenism...

Mary (Mary), Saturday, 12 October 2002 02:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I didn't mean 'tokenism' in terms of the records as tokens, but rather 'tokenism' as trying to exhibit a sense of identity with the race(s) normally identified with hip hop.

I'm pretty sure it's okay to say "black people."

Why is the OutKast audience mainly white?

All of rap music's audience is mainly white. Percentage wise, Outkast I'm sure has more whites to blacks then say Big Tymers though. (Stray thought: Wouldn't all the sampling in rap, and hell everywhere else, be considered a form of tokenism?)

The reason dance or hiphop fans aren't accused of it is because almost anyone who is in anyway serious about liking music starts off with rock.

I think this is generational and is fading fast. Another reason might be shh guilt.

bnw (bnw), Saturday, 12 October 2002 04:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think it's fading really, and I stand by my reasons above. It'll take about 30 more years of hiphop being on top for it to really go away.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 12 October 2002 13:54 (twenty-three years ago)

"almost anyone who is in anyway serious about liking music starts off with rock."

that's really not true for a lot of people in the US. Hip hop was a national phenomenon by the early 80s. You might get away with replacing "rock" in your sentence with "pop", meaning stuff that's on the radio, but MANY people's first musical love was hip hop. I DJed a party awhile ago and played a classic hiphop track from 1995 and two girls came up to me and asked me if I would play some hiphop!! they didn't even recognize it as that genre as such - I'm guessing, but to them it seemed like beats and rhymes constituted the neutral definition of music full stop.

Mary you say that tokenism as you meant it is "trying to exhibit a sense of identity with the race(s) normally identified with hip hop" - again, why is this bad?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 12 October 2002 19:00 (twenty-three years ago)

tracer your dj story has given me hope for the human race

s trife (simon_tr), Saturday, 12 October 2002 19:14 (twenty-three years ago)

A well-timed entry into the thread.

Rockist Scientist, Saturday, 12 October 2002 19:20 (twenty-three years ago)

it was "Whutcha Want" by Nine -- !!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 12 October 2002 19:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually, I think most people who are seriously into music come to it either through chart pop, and in some cases even possibly classical.

I'd say liking rock is more widely a second step in the evolution of people's musical taste, I know it was with me.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 13 October 2002 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)

tracer, the wedding is back on!

boxcubed (boxcubed), Sunday, 13 October 2002 18:19 (twenty-two years ago)

'black hip hop fans aren't really into live concerts'

Can I nominate this for Misconception Of The Year?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 14 October 2002 11:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Mary you say that tokenism as you meant it is "trying to exhibit a sense of identity with the race(s) normally identified with hip hop" - again, why is this bad?

Tracer: 'I think it's ok to call them black people now' hahaha... Hmm... where I went to high school (fairly integrated school in Nothern Virginia, circa late '80s, listening to Rob Bass & DJ EZ Rock and PE was fairly standard... But when I arrived at college, private school in NYC cirica early '90s, some of my (white!) friends were confused by my record collection...

To answer your question, an interesting one, I guess it's not bad, per se, but it exhibits a sense of guilt at white privilege and suggests that one's likings are dervied from this sense of guilt, rather than from a pure--just liking the music--vantage point. Maybe, if guilt exists, it means that you think this is good for 'black' people, and want to support it as such...

I think your question is refreshing though--'why is this bad'--its seems that it is often conncected to some kind of self-hatred on the part of the 'white' person, an uncomfortable-ness with 'who they are'--again, you might be right ask, 'why is this bad?'

From Tom's thread, though, does anyone not listen to this type of music, I am reminded that now hip hop/ r&b is so 'commercial' (gasp!) that no, probably no one would have a problem with it or with anyone listening to it...

A good or bad thing? Refer to that thread to find out...

Mary (Mary), Monday, 14 October 2002 12:52 (twenty-two years ago)

eight months pass...
Now that I have safely returned to the Brit pop ghetto...

You might like to know that Dangermouse and Jemini have an album out called "Ghetto Pop Life"!

(And it's got a song called "I'ma Doomee" heh.)

mei (mei), Saturday, 28 June 2003 09:27 (twenty-two years ago)

"almost anyone who is in anyway serious about liking music starts off with rock."

And what about classical traditions? Strongly religious people who get into church music? Pop fans? Non-westerners? Folkies?

mei (mei), Saturday, 28 June 2003 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)

haha - Matt DC actually plays the 'reverse discrimination' card!

James Blount (James Blount), Sunday, 29 June 2003 08:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Waitwaitwait. How did I miss this the first time around:

'black hip hop fans aren't really into live concerts'

Matt? Hein?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 29 June 2003 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)

IT'S ALL MIMED!!

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 29 June 2003 15:27 (twenty-two years ago)

haha - Jah Rule! some clueless muhfukkers on this thread! (thanx to whoever revived, nu-ilx don't look so bad now!)

James Blount (James Blount), Sunday, 29 June 2003 19:58 (twenty-two years ago)

(hah I like how I didn't miss it the first time around, I was just a lot nicer about it)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 29 June 2003 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)

"almost anyone who is in anyway serious about liking music starts off with rock."

that's really not true for a lot of people in the US

Its not true for Ireland either. I got serious about music through indie-dance type stuff like Orbital, Underworld, Massive Attack. I know plenty of people who never cared about any music until Straight Outta Compton/The Chronic/36 Chambers/... Given that some of them later decided that GnR/Metallica was better, rock seems to be the thing that needed to be "got in to."

Fergal Cussen (Burger), Sunday, 29 June 2003 21:25 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.