Neo-Nazi Rock, Eminem + Free Speech Debate

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
A local neo-nazi band are apparently hiring council run rehearsal space anonymously leading to calls for them to be banned. The elected official responsible, a left-leaning liberal, seems genuinely unsure how to respond comparing the situation with the debate around Eminem.

What advice would you give him?
What do you think he should do?

stevo (stevo), Sunday, 13 October 2002 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Cynical answer: that what pleases his constituents most.

Or he might consider giving a rallying speech about artists throughout history having objectional viewpoints, and pointing out that a rehearsing nazi band hardly presents any real danger to anyone.

Or he should add a clause to the rental policy that explicitly forbids musicians with whatever political opinions to rent rehearsal space.

Or he might declare that this is a non-issue and tell people to grow up.

Or he could applaud it on the grounds that far too many nazi bands can't handle their instruments properly, and therefore, rehearsing is a very good idea.

Siegbran (eofor), Sunday, 13 October 2002 19:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i think they should be allowed to rehearse. slippery slope saying which opinions are acceptable

gareth (gareth), Sunday, 13 October 2002 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)

but the best way around these kind of things is often some kind of fudge, rather than a 'one size fits all' answer

gareth (gareth), Sunday, 13 October 2002 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)

If it were my rehearsal space, they could fuck right off, but if it is government property they have the same right to it as anyone else. If they commit some sort of crime (I don't know if Inciting Racial Hatred is on the books in Holland, for instance), come down on them as heavy as possible, but until then, forget it.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 13 October 2002 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)

It depends on the nature of the lyrics of said punk band, surely? Are they are neo-Nazi's just whacking out Ramones covers (which I doubt)? Are they singing songs entitled things like 'Kill All The Pakis', or less overt variations thereof?

If it's the latter, then it is actually incitement to racial hatred and therefore shouldn't be allowed. Whatever your opinion on Eminem, his lyrics do have the defensive saving grace of ambiguity.

Gareth talks about the "slippery slope" of banning them, which is something a lot of left-liberals say, and they do have a strong case. Unfortunately, a lot of them tend to gloss over the equally slippery slope of allowing them to play. So assuming you don't support the free circulation of child pornography and racist propaganda, then everyone believes in censorship to some degree. There may be a slippery slope, but what's the best way to make sure you stay at the top rather than sliding down one side or another?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 13 October 2002 20:13 (twenty-two years ago)

If there is a law in the Netherlands similar to that against 'Inciting Racial Hatred' I'm confident they're breaking it. Some of their lyrics translate as follows:

We are the elite, death to the parasites
We will save civilisation from corruption and slavery
We are the elite, death to the parasites
Supporters of multiculturalism will end up against the wall

I am so sick of the hypocrites
that spend cheap summer holidays enjoying the Turkish coast
And then return and tell everyone without being asked
that the Turkish bastards don't do anything but steal
And those white women, crying on the television
Multi-cultural marriage, and one or three bastard children
Then kidnapped and taken away to a land in Africa
Those bitches are so stupid, it's punishment for their treason

The main man in this band was prominent in a small Dutch neo-nazi party subsequently banned by the government.

stevo (stevo), Sunday, 13 October 2002 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, ban them then.

Any "free speech" arguments here can surely be countered with the accusation that these are the very people who seek to take away the aforementioned freedoms that liberals holds so dear.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 13 October 2002 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

That seems to be good evidence for a prosecution, and in that case I think they shouldn't be given facilities.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 13 October 2002 21:06 (twenty-two years ago)

They could be prosecuted for stupidity at least...

Siegbran (eofor), Sunday, 13 October 2002 21:27 (twenty-two years ago)

How did he compare this with Eminem?

Mark (MarkR), Sunday, 13 October 2002 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

quadruple the rent. banning them would only give them more publicity than they deserve. ignoring them might be more effective. and if they're really "the elite" as their lyrics suggest, how come they need to actually RENT rehearsal space? and from a government body, no less! wow...how ANARCHIC, guys!!! btw, does axl rose write all their lyrics?

angelo (angelo), Sunday, 13 October 2002 23:28 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm not sure i buy the argument that because someone is anti free speech they shouldnt be afforded free speech

having said that, i know its a thorny issue, which is why i said the fudge thing, banning things tends to send it underground, i don know

gareth (gareth), Sunday, 13 October 2002 23:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Benjamin Franklin: "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty."

jack cole (jackcole), Sunday, 13 October 2002 23:58 (twenty-two years ago)

The KKK just gave a lecture at a public library here in Virginia (in an area where the population is more than half black) and more protesters turned out than supporters -- they were basically revealed in public for the idiots they are. It was a much more powerful and positive display than forbidding them from speaking at the library. Not saying what works here works in Europe, though.

Mark (MarkR), Monday, 14 October 2002 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)

"Any "free speech" arguments here can surely be countered with the accusation that these are the very people who seek to take away the aforementioned freedoms that liberals holds so dear."

I don't think free speech arguments should ever be countered. Lord knows, I find these people repulsive, and I know they would like to banish a lot of the freedoms that liberals enjoy, but one of those freedoms is being able to express yourself through music. If you deprive one person of this right, there's no telling where it will end. It's unfortunate, all the same, and part of me does want to see these guys getting flogged in the streets! This side of me must be reined in, though, in the interests of fairness.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 14 October 2002 07:52 (twenty-two years ago)

If the band are only rehearsing, take their money. Find out when they play a gig and turn up in force to kick the fuck out of them. people should be allowed to do what they wish in private, and banning them won't change their point of view. Remember how much pricks like this love to feel oppressed and righteous.

threemetalinsects (threemetalinsects), Wednesday, 16 October 2002 07:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Update:
The Alderman responsible says he is against taking legal action against them preferring to introduce anti-discriminatory 'house rules' for the rehearsal space. He reasons the band would then be forced to sign a contract to continue using it and ‘lose face’. The Christian Democrats and leftist parties on the council want them banned. An anti-racist organisation thinks there is sufficent grounds to take legal action against them. The rehearsal space is just a short distance from where I live.

stevo (stevo), Wednesday, 16 October 2002 08:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Where is Momus to assert that since these guys rile so many people up they must really, really be onto something fab and moderne?

J0hn Darn1ell3, Wednesday, 16 October 2002 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Why is singing about killing "Pakis" worse than singing about killing trife niggaz or killing your mother or killing everyone?

Kris (aqueduct), Wednesday, 16 October 2002 17:59 (twenty-two years ago)

If they're just rehearsing, then they aren't actually performing for an audience in public. So the content of their songs isn't even being communicated to anyone. (Not that I think that should be prevented either...)

But, like, if a tree falls in the woods, you know?

And just because they profess to be nazis - only means that they have the spine to tell people what they believe. If they were only thinking Nazi thoughts, they couldn't possibly be banned. Unless they are conspiring to bring harm, they have every right to assemble on govt/public property.

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 16 October 2002 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)

There's a show scheduled this friday at which a neo-nazi band was to play. Until a few days ago, however, no one knew that the band was a neo-nazi band and they aren't going to be allowed to play. It's in a private space (a 'house') so the call is up to the people who live there, and there stance on it is just that they don't want their shit getting wrecked in the brawl that will ensue... you see, Dropdead (anarchist, pro-animal rights, pro-equality, etc.) are playing as well and it's likely that the two groups of fans will be more than a little confrontational towards each other.

Ian Johnson (orion), Wednesday, 16 October 2002 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)

and what about kill all white men by nofx, that very prejudice ;)

todd swiss (eliti), Wednesday, 16 October 2002 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
I, as a person in a real punk band who's main message is anti-racist, am totally against any form of propaganda that boasts or promotes racism, prejudice, or discrimination in any way. I believe in unity and the beliefs and messages of these people prevents that. Now whether or not they should be banned, of course they should be. Anything that threatens the security and well being of any number of people should be eliminated.

B.C., Wednesday, 22 October 2003 02:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Banning people just for being assholes and singing about it is a stupid idea. If you don't like what they say, don't listen to them, it's not a threat until they put action behind their words. If they do they should be treated like any other criminal. I don't even agree with the idea of "hate crime". Righteousness among the powerful is much more dangerous than hate propaganda from a puny collection of poor trash. Who's done more damage to the average american, terrorists or the Bush administration?

sucka (sucka), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 08:03 (twenty-one years ago)

".... how come they need to actually RENT rehearsal space? and from a government body, no less! wow...how ANARCHIC, guys!!!

Oh deary me - where do I start with this one: they are very clearly by definition NOT anarchists - in fact in may ways they're the complete antithesis of anarchists!

Personally I think they should be actively encouraged to rehearse there.

And once they've booked their rehearsal session, I think the details should be passed to every many militant anti-racist / anti-fascist activist / organisation in a 50 mile radius.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 09:09 (twenty-one years ago)

What is the big difference here? Neo Nazis hate people from non-Western cultures. Eminem hates homosexuals. I would call that two sides to the same story...

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 12:08 (twenty-one years ago)

No argument from me Geir.

I'd happily encourage Eminem to rehearse there then tell all the local Gay and Women's Rights groups when he was going to be there in exactly the same way.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 12:15 (twenty-one years ago)

six months pass...
I personally think that the neo-nazi band should be allowed to rehearse, it's a free country, let them hold their ideals with no outside interference. If they want to sing about hatred and fascism to a crowd that believes in the same ideals than it shouldn't be anyones business but their own. If you don't like it, don't listen to it. Now, if they start playing shows and violence insues and people are getting harmed both physically or verbally than obviously an intervention is needed to secure and satisfy the publics needs. This does not mean that security shall come directly from the police. Trouble may arise from that idea. Why? because police will interveen with the macho mentality of "crack-skulls" and that will only create more conflict. Perhaps some sort of hall could be rented out or given up upon the owners consent to hold weekly debates and have speeches from both sides, or any and all sides that have an opinion of the neo-nazi's opinion, this way, everyone can collectively express their ideas to the opposing side and some sort of balance can be created through mutual consent of both parties, rather than cops crackin' skulls for the sole purpose of making the local residents feel safe. pooty poot poot poot.

belvedere, Friday, 30 April 2004 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.