1. "Boyfriend [insert garment name]" boyfriend jeans, boyfriend jacket. wtf?? and wtf does it even mean? no hip or chest allowance? I dont know!
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Thursday, 11 September 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago)
2. When "Pants" became "Pant"
"the executive pant"
i hate that, too.
― lauren, Thursday, 11 September 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago)
lol pant
― Surmounter, Thursday, 11 September 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago)
As far as I can tell, "boyfriend" means it won't fit, will at the very least be too big for you and at the most be cut specifically to accentuate that it wasn't made for the kind of person you are (ie not man-shaped). Honestly. Why don't you just wear his class ring wrapped in dental floss to make it fit while you're at it.
― Laurel, Thursday, 11 September 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago)
lol.
― tehresa, Thursday, 11 September 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago)
The Boyfriend Codnom
― Abbott, Saturday, 13 September 2008 00:10 (sixteen years ago)
or just wear his fucking jeans
― Surmounter, Saturday, 13 September 2008 00:15 (sixteen years ago)
/shirt
i started that campaign early on with ryan. stealing certain comfy tshirts he didn't wear much, outdated things. i have quite a collection now.
― Surmounter, Saturday, 13 September 2008 00:19 (sixteen years ago)
"boyfriend" garments are made for and sold to the unboyfriendable, right? this much seems implicit.
http://bedzine.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/au0252.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Sunday, 14 September 2008 05:40 (sixteen years ago)
that boyfriend pillow's shirt is awful. and shouldn't it be in pajamas anyway? realistically.
― elmo argonaut, Sunday, 14 September 2008 05:42 (sixteen years ago)
That is the most depressing thing I've ever seen.
My style annoyances are many.
But the most pressing right now is - cap sleeves, WTF? On women of A Certain Age, the upper arm is one of the least attractive sights in the universe. Is it too much to ask, to get clothes that cover it? Especially in the larger sizes which us fatties require. Why do they even *make* clothes over size 16 that don't have proper sleeves?
― The Lesser of Two Weevils (Masonic Boom), Sunday, 14 September 2008 12:19 (sixteen years ago)
Because people over a size 16 get hot too? I dunno, I know that's not really the answer, and you're right that cap sleeves can be deadly to arms. But not everyone who takes a 16 in the body has heavy arms, for instance.
I have probably a hundred hundred style annoyances but TBH that's style for ya. If there weren't several million people in this city making what I think are poor style choices, we would all look just alike.
― Laurel, Monday, 15 September 2008 13:42 (sixteen years ago)
While I was ambilvelant about flip-flops before I now loathe them working around students. The slapping sound makes me want to bitch slap.
― Hated like a city cop (Susan), Monday, 15 September 2008 13:45 (sixteen years ago)
Also, I'm not fond of the ruffle-front shirts I'm seeing around. I did buy a cute blouse that's nipped in the waist with some flounce at the bottom. But that's as close as I get to ruffles.
― Hated like a city cop (Susan), Monday, 15 September 2008 13:49 (sixteen years ago)
the funniest thing about katie holmes' boyfriend jeans is that she clearly has a longer inseam than tom
― bell_labs, Monday, 15 September 2008 13:52 (sixteen years ago)
That pillow upthread is a horrible thing.
― Hated like a city cop (Susan), Monday, 15 September 2008 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
Why do they even *make* clothes over size 16 that don't have proper sleeves?
wtf? some women who wear 18+ probably don't hate themselves and don't feel like they owe it to the world to hide their arms.
― horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 04:08 (sixteen years ago)
speaking of katie holmes, nicole kidman's lips look terrible.
― Surmounter, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 04:25 (sixteen years ago)
Whether or not I hate myself is not the issue. I do not like showing my upper arms, and never have - even when I was slender. I simply wish for clothing which does not cut off and provide a strong horizontal band at the thickest part of my arm. Is it self loathing to want clothes which are flattering rather than uglifying?
― The World's Forgotten Girl (Masonic Boom), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 09:49 (sixteen years ago)
my style annoyance is that k8 masonic boom has not been banned from this board yet
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago)
Oh c'mon, people wanted Ed to stay. And if you're going to ban anybody, I've got several other suggestions first.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago)
laurel you cant ban me just because i wear flannel shirts
― gr8080 (max), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago)
it can be frustrating for me shopping for t-shirts because i like a small fit, and it's hard to find something in between a baggy "men's" fit and a gay boy fit, which can cut the sleeve area a little short.
― Surmounter, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago)
xp It would have worked if it weren't for you pesky kids.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:15 (sixteen years ago)
white-framed sunglasses
tapered jeans on girls with fat thighs/big hips/treetrunk legs
hipster pants/jeans on girls with enormous muffins
dresses that look like multi coloured potato sacks
― your ass is (Rubyredd), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago)
Sigh.
#1 and #2 are favorites of mine. But that's why it's "style" and not "crime" or "punishable by exile and/or suggest-ban".
― Laurel, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago)
lol me too, Laurel. thick girls keep rockin slutty jeans, plz!
― horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago)
i don't think they look slutty - my problem is that i think they make the wearer look like they trying so hard to be trendy/hipster/whatever, i.e. "i don't care about anything except wearing whatever is the most up to the minute fashion", which i find unattractive. altho i don't actually believe that this is how laurel looks in them.
it's just a general impression i get when i'm out and about in hipsterville san francisco (and also used to see a lot in wellington, NZ)
― your ass is (Rubyredd), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago)
lol horseshoe
ummm... my friend jess used to wear things that didn't fit her. i was happy for her if she was happy with it, which she seemed to be.
― Surmounter, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago)
then she went to college and lost all the weight! which i guess was good for her wardrobe
― Surmounter, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:30 (sixteen years ago)
- kitten heels- flared jeans/trousers- maxi dresses (esp. when halter-style)- toe rings/ankle bracelets- coach logo bags - unwashed/uncombed hair (always shocked by how many women have oily, tangled bedhead in the a.m.) - flip flops (esp. when bejeweled, tasseled, etc)
...to name but a few.
― lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago)
- unwashed/uncombed hair (always shocked by how many women have oily, tangled bedhead in the a.m.)
yes! although some women pull that off like the pert plus woman
― Surmounter, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago)
and it looks like they came from swim practice or something
You can make that ANY logo bags, really. Never underestimate the annoyance power of a knock-off Dooney & Burke.
Anything Vera Bradley (those quilted paisley & calico schmattes all the city girls carry)
Leggings
― Laurel, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago)
i am genuinely mystified by this. doesn't it affect how you're perceived at work? to be clear, i am not talking about going a couple of days with unwashed hair pulled back into a ponytail. i'm talking about visible grease and weird stick-uppy bits and snarls and such on women who are clearly going to an office job.
xpost
― lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:37 (sixteen years ago)
oh, god - dooney & burke.
i'm guilty of the toe ring! it's just a plain band, and i haven't really taken it off in about 6 or 7 yrs, so i don't even notice it.
i'm pretty much anti any kind of screaming designer label.
― your ass is (Rubyredd), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago)
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:06 PM (5 days ago)
everything is singular in fashion, totally maddening. eyebrow, panty, sleeve, everything. platonic, even: "the lip is going to very full and cinematic"
i probably shouldn't be posting to this board
― "goole" (goole), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago)
She's getting close to drag queenish.
― Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago)
also guilty of leggings under dresses/above-the-knee skirts
― your ass is (Rubyredd), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago)
my hair pretty much always looks messy and greasy no matter what i do. 10 minutes waiting for a train in the summer = sweat & hair grease. i'm not purposely trying for it.
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago)
also along the lines of "pant"..."the statement xxx"
obviously worst case scenario, the statement pant
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago)
coach logo bags
Coach so debased their branding when they started vaguely imitating Gucci, et al. So sad. I used to love their stuff, now they just look like a slightly cheaper version of overything else.
How can one hate kitten heels? It's not as if they're made from real kitten you know?
― Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago)
She'd probably prefer them if they were.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago)
bell, i have to stress that what i mentioned is above and beyond normal.
xpost - actually, laurel, if you need a new pair i have a kitten i can lend you!
― lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago)
my annoyances: the way 99% of girls in their late teens/early twenties dress, ie american apparel fugliness
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago)
Laurel, kitten heels are fantastic! I agree with you on the rest though.
Also not digging toe rings (or belly things, ankle things). Sorry, J.
― Hated like a city cop (Susan), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago)
Oh Lauren, nevermind. What's your kitten issue then?
― Hated like a city cop (Susan), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago)
bell,
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0WTbx6nL9BIdnMAz1GjzbkF/SIG=12n30np0n/EXP=1221689639/**http%3A//images.ucomics.com/images/doonesbury/strip/thecast/duke2.jpg
Duke
― Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago)
ps -- that judith light pic is from a classic lifetime movie starring her and jack wagner with..get ready...a bob.
which brings up style annoyance #324: men with bobbed hair. UNSIGHTLY.
― La Lechera, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago)
Even on Prince Valiant? ;)
― Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:19 (sixteen years ago)
haaa ok i get it.
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:19 (sixteen years ago)
I might be someone who doesn't know how to walk in heels.
― Hated like a city cop (Susan), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:47 (sixteen years ago)
I typed a whopping great post about not being able to find slim cut tees anywhere (Surmounter otm) and iPhone Safari fucking crashed on me.
― King Gee Pants (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:48 (sixteen years ago)
aww Jack Wagner is on bold and the beautiful now. at the moment his character has knocked up his wife's aunt who, on the insistence of his wife and ex-wife (who is also his wife’s mom,), he had taken on a day trip to Catalina as a last hurrah since her body was rejecting the heart transplant she had after she accidentally shot herself in a struggle to get a gun away from her brother who she had found innocently showing it to the woman he was stalking when trying to explain how he hadn’t really meant to shoot his niece’s grandmother and set up his dad to take the fall but, you know, daddy didn’t pay him enough attention to him as a kid so after she got shot in the heart he ended up shooting himself in the ER next to a note to sis on a nightstand saying USE ONE HEART -->. Mostly Jack Wagner’s character sits around on this old creaky boat drinking scotch, smoking cigars and thinking about all of the related women he can knock up.
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago)
I think you guys have it backwards with 19 y/os. Wouldnt the AA wearers be the ones trying to fit in? Wouldnt the rebellious ones be wearing anything but?
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 23:42 (sixteen years ago)
OK, you've made your point, big man Elmo Argonaut. The cootie girl has no right to talk about clothes. Go ahead and ban the old woman because she doesn't fit in with your idea of stylishness. Old women should be seen and not heard - no wait, they shouldn't even be seen.
What do you think you've accomplished, by making me feel small? I hope it's made you feel better to make me feel worse.
― The World's Forgotten Girl (Masonic Boom), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 09:44 (sixteen years ago)
Trademark Tiffany jewelry, undoubtedly a graduation present from the parents― Laurel, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 20:30 (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Laurel, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 20:30 (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Anything with a trademark on, fullstop, although jewelry is particularly egregious. I am always put off from buying anything that incorporates a logo or branding. and some people always have to do it somewhere. Vivian Westwood has lost out on selling me several jumpers because of their stupid insistence on embroidering a logo on the chest.
― Drinking Island is inside every one of us (Ed), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 09:59 (sixteen years ago)
Logos inevitably make me think that the item is a knockoff.
Please direct me to heel-walking instructions. I think I should strive for more hotness this fall.
― Hated like a city cop (Susan), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:11 (sixteen years ago)
i really love logos plastered all over shit, one of my favorite 00s looks
― gr8080 (max), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:13 (sixteen years ago)
lol im just being contrarian at this point
― gr8080 (max), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:14 (sixteen years ago)
There's no way anyone would be that way on ILx
― Hated like a city cop (Susan), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:15 (sixteen years ago)
I am always put off from buying anything that incorporates a logo or branding. and some people always have to do it somewhere.
actually this is why i buy stuff at AA sometimes, because at least they sell blank clothes with no designs or logos or anything. i even bought some lol indie t-shirt online and it ended having some lame-ass graffiti-style logo on the back, which they didn't show on the website.
i should not be posting on i love style btw
― a hat check clerk at an ice rink (n/a), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:21 (sixteen years ago)
If you think that, you are probably quite stylish.
― I'm right right and you're wrong left (Susan), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:22 (sixteen years ago)
i thought of this last night on the train --
one reason i don't like the whole AA aesthetic in general (though i like their plain tshirts) is the similarity to 80s mall favorites UNITS. remember that place? you could go in there and get like a jersey top and skirt and a little bandeau thing that you could use as...a belt! a headband! a neck thing! it was hideous. it was all stretch and elastic and totally unflattering.
― La Lechera, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:41 (sixteen years ago)
Ed, I agree about visible logos, but in fact the "trademark" Tiffany jewelry is just designs that are so well known to come from Tiffany's that what looks like a silver bracelet of some design is actually a calling card. Cf the entire Elsa Peretti collection, and those mesh-like silver bracelets.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:42 (sixteen years ago)
La Lechera, OTM.
I remember UNITS well although I was in fifth/sixth-grade when I shopped there so hope I can be forgiven.
― I'm right right and you're wrong left (Susan), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:45 (sixteen years ago)
Just in case anyone cares, the things I find helpful for walking in heels go something like this:
* Plant your feet in a straight line, crossing over the other slightly when you take a step. This will make your hips do things, that's okay: you just have to go with it. * Think about taking slower steps, but longer ones...let the leg swing through the whole arc with the extra length of the heel -- your legs are effectively longer than you're used to, so slow down the individual steps.* Stand up straight, pick up your ribcage and ELEVATE. It'll put your center of gravity in a better place over your feet.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 13:46 (sixteen years ago)
aww Jack Wagner is on bold and the beautiful now.
!!
does he have anything to do with either of the illustrious fashion houses on the show?
― lauren, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:08 (sixteen years ago)
WELL...His hatred for Stephanie led him to take over Forrester Creations with Clark and his mom Jackie as the designers and Donna (Brooke's sis now married to Eric) as their lead model. The Forresters started a new fashion house called Forrester Originals. Finally, Nick was sick of running a fashion house purely out of spite so he bought Spectra for his mom (from Sally who is sunjing herself somewhere in the mediterranean and sold Forrester creations back to Eric with the proviso that he must divorce Stephanie, which he did. Now Nick (Jack Wagner) is a stay at home dad to his son Jack who shares DNA with Brooke but was given birth to by Taylor (long story).
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:52 (sixteen years ago)
well. i certainly have missed a lot.
― lauren, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:55 (sixteen years ago)
the producers promised they were going to go hardcore drama for their 25th year and they werent lying.
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:25 (sixteen years ago)
dudes wearing shirts with button-down collars and leaving the collars unbuttoned... I'm sure thiscan be done in a stylish way but usually it looks lazy/clueless
― Barack HUSSEIN Obama (max), Monday, 29 September 2008 12:40 (sixteen years ago)
Dudes wearing shirts fresh from the packet that they have not ironed first so they have three creases across their chest.
― caek, Monday, 29 September 2008 13:03 (sixteen years ago)
you've got to wash them first, no? my brother claims most garments are sprayed with some bug spray to protect them on their way from china or wherever and that shit is carcinogenic. maybe being plastic wrapped = no need for spray.
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Monday, 29 September 2008 13:09 (sixteen years ago)
I heard formaldhyde. I usually wash but have occasionally been nasty and worn clothes straight from the rack.
― Peanuts taste like peanut butter (Susan), Monday, 29 September 2008 13:13 (sixteen years ago)
Hmmmm I know with books, the books are in cardboard cartons, and then on pallets wrapped in plastic wrap, and they're stacked inside shipping containers. Before the container doors are shut, some kind of smoky insecticide is tossed in there and allowed to dissipate with the container locked up. I don't think you could say that much (any?) of it gets on the books, though. Garment packaging must be at least as thorough.
― Vampire romances depend on me (Laurel), Monday, 29 September 2008 14:10 (sixteen years ago)
Hmm these people seem very concerned about methyl bromide, even if the clothes are sealed in plastic bags, cardboard cartons, and shrink-wrapped.
They also recommend washing before wearing...I wonder what they think of the chemicals used in dry-cleaning....
― Vampire romances depend on me (Laurel), Monday, 29 September 2008 14:17 (sixteen years ago)
yeah i think thats what he was talking about. ive always washed new clothes before wearing just because I figure 10 other people have tried it on before I bought it. Also, during my short stint working on the floor in Sears, someone taking a dump in the changing rooms wasnt a rare thing.
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Monday, 29 September 2008 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
Not a bad idea as apparently methyl bromide is toxic to humans. And uh ew? about dressing rooms.
But if I can be a tiny bit cynical: that website suggests that some people are more "chemically sensitive" than others and MAY be affected by a piece of clothing IF it was stored on the bottom of a pallet (since MeBr is heavy and sinks) and IF the plastic wrap didn't protect it well enough. And they close with "People must demand that their governments stop allowing these ecologically disastrous practices. It really is the responsibility of everyone. Never stop demanding a healthy world." which makes me wonder: would they prefer Asian insect pests that we don't have yet on this continent? Oh no wait, they want you to buy their clothes that are entirely domestically grown, harvested, and manufactured. And ugly. And expensive.
― Vampire romances depend on me (Laurel), Monday, 29 September 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago)
i think we should just wash them
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Monday, 29 September 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago)
id also like to point out it was no part of my job, nor has it been part of any job i have held, to be on poop patrol or control.
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Monday, 29 September 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago)
Style annoyance: ankle boots with peep-toes. What the hell?
― Our DJ's better than all these bands (Susan), Monday, 6 October 2008 17:56 (sixteen years ago)
ugh, the hair thing i was bitching about upthread? i saw the worst (best?) example of it at brunch yesterday. an otherwise really done-up girl came in with total cavewoman hair. like, there was a giant tangle sticking off the top of her head; pieces in the back were sticking together; etc. wtf! you care enough about your appearance to keep your french manicure immaculate and like to show off your large coach tote bag, but you can't be bothered to run a comb over your head?? come on - even your boyfriend cares enough to mousse up his fauxhawk!
― lauren, Monday, 6 October 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago)
I wonder if Fancypants Manicure has her hair DONE, blown-out, etc and can't be arsed to touch it herself? That's obv not true of Everywoman on the train, though, so it can't be the full answer.
― Vampire romances depend on me (Laurel), Monday, 6 October 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago)
You know what? Peep toe boots, as a hypothetical, are fine with me. Fine-grain leather stilettos are obv not made to keep you warm or enable walking, so it's ridic to claim "THEY DON'T EVEN KEEP YOUR FEET DRY" because fashion boots were never meant to keep your feet anything but pointy.
But since PTBs have apparently been adopted by the far-flung-est tacky tack-meisters, most of them look awful. I'm sure it's possible to make versions that don't.
― Vampire romances depend on me (Laurel), Monday, 6 October 2008 18:30 (sixteen years ago)
I just think they look bizarre and rather silly. Even the high-fashion type in InStyle.
― Our DJ's better than all these bands (Susan), Monday, 6 October 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago)
I hate handbags. They are one of my 'style annoyances'. They're ugly. They're unnecessarily large. And the ones with tiny straps or handles are just impractical.
Even more, I hate being on a crammed tube journey and then seeing women carrying a massive handbag AND a purse. Why can't it just be one or the other? Why can't one just go IN the other? Esp aggravating cos so many of the handbags look deflated and empty. What exactly are they used for if a purse is being carried separately? How many extra people could be crammed on a rushhour tube if all the superfluous handbaggage were removed?
Mind you I think it's just that I don't 'get' handbags. Maybe if I understood, I, too, would be inclined to carry an unweildy, awkward large handbag in addition to a purse. Errr, messenger bag? I don't own a purse. Or a handbag, obv.
Other style annoyances: tops that are too long to be t-shirts but too short to be dresses and <A href="http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=hipster+headbands&btnG=Search+Images&um=1&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&sa=2">hipster headbands</a>.
― salsa shark, Monday, 6 October 2008 22:55 (sixteen years ago)
durr, way to use bbcode, dumdumyou get the idea anyway
What do you recommend instead of handbags that wouldn't be unnecessarily large? I find I need mine to hold at least one hardcover book and some Tupperware with my lunch in it and possibly the minimum items for an overnight stay (toothbrush, contacts, clean shirt, etc).
― Vampire romances depend on me (Laurel), Monday, 6 October 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago)
why, that sounds like a job for a nantucket basket!!!
― playing the abortion card (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 00:04 (sixteen years ago)
lol j/k
dunno, stick with it if it works for you. I'm not trying to discourage anyone from them if they like them, it's just I personally don't. and at least you're getting use out of all that space in them, unlike so many of them I see on transit that are just limp sacks. I actually get little tingles of happiness if I see someone pulling a massive book from their handbag.
well, not really tingles, but y'know. I feel like maybe being an ass about handbags isn't justified, in those cases.
― salsa shark, Tuesday, 7 October 2008 00:35 (sixteen years ago)
Wait - I don't understand the distinction you're making between handbags and purses - aren't they the same thing? Unless you're British and mean purse as in small wallet type thing?
― Fr. Jemima Racktouey (ENBB), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 00:50 (sixteen years ago)
actually, good point. I've always considered purses to be smaller, basically just something with enough space for various cards, keys, mobile, and makeup.
handbags, well, for the sake of what I've said on this thread I guess I mean things like this and this and this
so yeah I guess purses/handbags can be pretty interchangeable, I just got carried away with being annoyed and didn't clarify. it still doesn't make sense why anyone would need to carry two purses/handbags, though. I mean I get that people are going to carry handbags and purses and I don't see how else they'd get their stuff around either... mostly I just don't understand why anyone would need to carry two of them.
― salsa shark, Tuesday, 7 October 2008 01:07 (sixteen years ago)
i would put handbag and purse together, but tote in a different category. purse + tote, ok. handbag + tote, ok. but purse + handbag seems odd. i think stuff like wallets, lipstick, etc. goes in purse while books/shoes/lunch/water bottle/etc. go in a tote.
― highly theoretical, of course. (tehresa), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 02:31 (sixteen years ago)
^ Yes.
― Zangelbert Bingledack (ENBB), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 02:35 (sixteen years ago)
on a related note, i understand the frustration of people w/ too many bags on the train. i am in search of a purse that looks nice but can function as a tote because it is quite a hassle to carry around 2 bags all day. i have not found anything too my liking, though, and it is annoying.
― highly theoretical, of course. (tehresa), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago)