http://gofugyourself.celebuzz.com/2008/10/13/83234053-thumb-420x629.jpg
― quincie, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:14 (seventeen years ago)
hahaha OK that post was a dizaster
mod can u help fix size?
― quincie, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
love that outfit
― Surmounter, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:20 (seventeen years ago)
even the VBS? I mean you can't tell me La Lohan does not own a strapless bra.
Also: feet.
― quincie, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:21 (seventeen years ago)
god where do we start with this one? the hooker shoes, the oddly pale feet, the bra strap, the checkerboard?
xxp lols
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:21 (seventeen years ago)
I mean I think I could even support the dress if worn correctly. But the bad hair extensions, pale feet, orange everything else? And SS OTM re: hooker shoes.
― quincie, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)
I must, however, compliment her eye makeup!
― quincie, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:23 (seventeen years ago)
i dont know. shes still kind of perfect if you ignore the outfit
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:23 (seventeen years ago)
shoes are awesome, as are the diamonds, and the bra.
pale feet are weird.
― Surmounter, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:24 (seventeen years ago)
i cant see any diamonds? maybe im still blinded from the diamonds i saw on her yesterday when E showed some old footage of her at the venice film fest
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:26 (seventeen years ago)
lols
maybe just silver? whatever's dangling from her neck
― Surmounter, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:28 (seventeen years ago)
yes pls thx:
http://www.usmagazine.com/files/lindsaylohanring.jpg
― Bright Future (sunny successor), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
i have those shoes in cotton candy pink btw. lesson: dont buy something just because its pink and shiny.
― Repair is the dream of the broken thing (sunny successor), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:42 (seventeen years ago)
Are her hands pale in that top photo too, or is it just my monitor? Gloves + socks = golf tan? Either way, v. strange w/ the shoes.
― Jaq, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:50 (seventeen years ago)
On one hand: She's beautiful. On the other: That is not a whole skirt.
You are all OTMMMMMMM about the feet, that's just BIZARRE. Do you think she even cares anymore?
― Vampire romances depend on me (Laurel), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:55 (seventeen years ago)
it's fake tanner, jaq. that's why it's so patchy.
― lauren, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:57 (seventeen years ago)
also: does her stylist care anymore?
― Repair is the dream of the broken thing (sunny successor), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)
OK I've changed my mind on the dress. There is no way it could ever not look like it came from Forever 21.
― quincie, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 17:01 (seventeen years ago)
maybe if it was accessorized differently... it's hard to pair a very short skirt with high stiletto heels and bare legs and not end up looking cheap.
― lauren, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 17:05 (seventeen years ago)
the outfit looks even hotter to me now that the picture is downsized. but the feet are still pretty terrible.
― Surmounter, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago)
whoa, what is up with those pale feets??!!
― "I'ma lose my religion and go secular on you, boy" (Ioannis), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
rolling celebrities looking like hobos thread for i love style
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 19:05 (seventeen years ago)
I love go fug yourself. Although i don't think that's the worse I've seen.
― You know I'm a G 'cause I got a gmail (Susan), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah see I think this thread should be about ppl who are trying too hard NOT to look like hobos and are instead making terrible mistakes in the opposite direction.
More pics ppl!
― quincie, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)
hobos vs hookers neverending territorial conflict spreads to the internet!!
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 19:24 (seventeen years ago)
nothing to do with Lindsay, hopefully..http://www.tamponcrafts.com/images/earring.jpgBloody Tampon earrings!
― mineminefusic (Finefinemusic), Friday, 17 October 2008 20:35 (seventeen years ago)
Dear God.
Also I hate nearly every single thing about that outfit LL has on. I think she or her stylist has really bad taste.
― Zangelbert Bingledack (ENBB), Friday, 17 October 2008 20:41 (seventeen years ago)
i'm surprised people find it so shocking! it doesn't seem that loud to me.
― Surmounter, Friday, 17 October 2008 20:43 (seventeen years ago)
I'm not sure that "LiLo does something in poor taste" is shocking, precisely....
― Vampire romances depend on me (Laurel), Friday, 17 October 2008 20:44 (seventeen years ago)
it's not loud, really, but i don't think it's a very good look. plus there's the weird fake tan issue.
― lauren, Friday, 17 October 2008 20:45 (seventeen years ago)
right, i'm just surprised it could look like a DISASTER. it seems kind of plain to me.
― Surmounter, Friday, 17 October 2008 20:47 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah it's not loud it's just ugly.
― Zangelbert Bingledack (ENBB), Friday, 17 October 2008 20:47 (seventeen years ago)
well, go fug yourself has to fill up those pages somehow.
― lauren, Friday, 17 October 2008 20:50 (seventeen years ago)
what's so ugly about the actual outfit, is what i don't get? is it the shoes? i find the dress really cute? not that i don't think the shoes are amazing too, but i guess i can see how they could be more contentious.
― Surmounter, Friday, 17 October 2008 20:53 (seventeen years ago)
i didn't read the original post on gfy, but i'd hazard a guess that the completely uneven application of orange fake tanner has a lot to do with it. and the exposed bra strap, i suppose. but mainly, i blame the tanner.
― lauren, Friday, 17 October 2008 20:58 (seventeen years ago)
right.
― Surmounter, Friday, 17 October 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)
BLOODY TAMPON EARRINGS????
― DC Purrman (sunny successor), Friday, 17 October 2008 23:54 (seventeen years ago)
Surmounter - fwiw I think the dress is horrible. It looks like something a 7th grader would have worn in 1989 but not in a good way if that could ever be a good thing. I have never been a fan of the one long sleeve one sleeve less thing and the material is gross too. I don't know - I just think it's awful and would be bad even with a perfect application of tanner.
― Zangelbert Bingledack (ENBB), Saturday, 18 October 2008 00:18 (seventeen years ago)
GUYS
― DC Purrman (sunny successor), Saturday, 18 October 2008 01:56 (seventeen years ago)
uh what i get for not being around much i guessi mean lol:tampon-applicator flute
― terminator boyfriend (rrrobyn), Saturday, 18 October 2008 14:49 (seventeen years ago)
that outfit might look rong on the average person, a standard that has no application to Lindsay Lohan.
― gabbneb, Saturday, 18 October 2008 15:01 (seventeen years ago)
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/460/slide_460_11041_large.jpg
― I DIED, Friday, 24 October 2008 18:58 (seventeen years ago)
is that chick actually BUYING meat??
― DC Purrman (sunny successor), Monday, 27 October 2008 14:31 (seventeen years ago)
ignorant Canadian alert.. that's NOT Sarah and Trig in that photo.. right??
― skeletal lexing (Finefinemusic), Monday, 27 October 2008 14:35 (seventeen years ago)
yeah it is
― I DIED, Monday, 27 October 2008 15:10 (seventeen years ago)
Whoa. Give her back those 150k clothes.
― A socialist who's happy to spread the wealth (Susan), Monday, 27 October 2008 15:13 (seventeen years ago)
eh I mean she is grocery shopping with a baby, this is a picture from a year and a half ago when she was picked the huffpo frontpaged a bunch of old photos of her starting with the beauty contest one from like 1982, which i thought was a really tacky thing to do
― claudia schefter (daria-g), Monday, 27 October 2008 15:25 (seventeen years ago)
kind of neither here nor there, but... if that's from a year and a half ago, then the baby isn't trig.
― lauren, Monday, 27 October 2008 15:45 (seventeen years ago)
oh damn, totally looked like him from that angle
― I DIED, Monday, 27 October 2008 15:50 (seventeen years ago)
haha
― lauren, Monday, 27 October 2008 15:51 (seventeen years ago)
i mean it even has a dog in there somehow
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 21 November 2008 21:12 (seventeen years ago)
what she is wearing on hear shoulders... is that what you would call a "capelet"?
― the magic length of god (elmo argonaut), Friday, 21 November 2008 21:56 (seventeen years ago)
i like her boots though. theyre over the knee but not whorish. thats not an easy combo to come by
― she should look better if she's gonna be a bitch like that (sunny successor), Friday, 21 November 2008 22:44 (seventeen years ago)
lol that smile screams "i dressed up all by myself today!!!!"
― :) Mrs Edward Cullen XD (max), Friday, 21 November 2008 22:47 (seventeen years ago)
Okay, this is a different, self-made disaster.
I was waxing my own brows (bad economy, etc.) and dropped a glob of it on my eyelashes. I kept pressing it with a hot washcloth and got some off, trimmed a 1/4 inch of the end of my lashes but still have some. I *might* be able to camouflage it with mascara but it's very irritating and I'm still worried about it pulling out the lashes.
Any ideas? Please don't laugh.
― La Push It (Susan), Sunday, 7 December 2008 23:45 (seventeen years ago)
can you put an ice cube on your eye and see if it helps freeze and break off the wax? that works with fabric :\
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 8 December 2008 00:36 (seventeen years ago)
I don't know how that would have worked out, it made have made the lashes brittle!
Well, I kept working on it, gently separating the lashes. Most of it's gone now and it looks okay. Fortunately I have very long lashes so the missing bit doesn't really show.
So clumsy.
― La Push It (Susan), Monday, 8 December 2008 13:58 (seventeen years ago)
what kind of wax were you using?
― very quotatious (tehresa), Monday, 8 December 2008 14:00 (seventeen years ago)
Just the Sally Hansen kind you microwave. Otherwise it went really well and I was satisfied with the results. I'm sure I'll do it again but try to be much more careful.
― La Push It (Susan), Monday, 8 December 2008 14:05 (seventeen years ago)
i have the bliss poetic waxing kit but have yet to use it. my bangs cover my eyebrows at all times, pretty much, and this has made me incredibly lazy.
― lauren, Monday, 8 December 2008 15:27 (seventeen years ago)
Susan, I would think if you got the lashes warm enough like in the shower or etc, it would wipe right off?? I'd prob do a hot washcloth on the eye for a few minutes and then blot with a tissue or paper towel to absorb the wax. I don't think that home-use stuff has to be all that hot to soften.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Monday, 8 December 2008 15:27 (seventeen years ago)
I used a hot washcloth at first and got quite a deal off. My lid just got so irritated from messing with it I left it alone. By this morning, most of it has gone so I think it will be alright. So stupid. . .
― La Push It (Susan), Monday, 8 December 2008 15:54 (seventeen years ago)
God sorry, I'm such a dope -- you already SAID you did that. This was the first thing I looked at on ILX this morning and it may have been pre-coffee.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Monday, 8 December 2008 15:56 (seventeen years ago)
i think you were on the right track, though, l. continued hot water (in tolerable amounts) will probably clear up the rest/help it liquify/dissolve.
― very quotatious (tehresa), Monday, 8 December 2008 16:55 (seventeen years ago)
was why i was wondering what type of wax it was. some of them are sugary and will clean up pretty easily.
― very quotatious (tehresa), Monday, 8 December 2008 16:56 (seventeen years ago)
Olive oil/any other oil! I do my own legs and rubbing gently with oil will dissolve that shit no probs.
― quincie, Monday, 8 December 2008 17:32 (seventeen years ago)
I used mineral oil where I spilled it on my hand, but srsly, with my bad luck I'd blind myself putting it on my eyes.
― La Push It (Susan), Monday, 8 December 2008 17:54 (seventeen years ago)
Speaking of eyebrow waxing, I do it professionally, but do you all get the phantom redness above the brows?
― Virginia Plain, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:11 (seventeen years ago)
yes, and it started getting REALLY bad for me over the past few years, which is why i switched to threading. it doesn't make me red, and it seems to last longer than waxing. recently, though, i found out that a small place near my office will use what they call "sensitive" wax if you ask for it. i tried it a while back, and it was so much less irritating.
― lauren, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 15:25 (seventeen years ago)
I never get any redness past the day of when I get it done at the salon.
― La Push It (Susan), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 15:39 (seventeen years ago)
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/09qsgQ421T4Lf/340x.jpg
i can't even look at this.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 15:27 (sixteen years ago)
like, it is really upsetting me that someone so top heavy/broad shouldered/small faced would put this on their body.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 15:28 (sixteen years ago)
SHE LOOKS LIKE A SHRUNKEN HEAD
the flouncy shoulders are ridiculous and make her look hueg, get rid of them and the dress is suddenly 50% better. the length is weird -- you could sew the shoulder ruffs onto the hem and it might be almost okay. but that orchidaceous collar is just too too much
not sure if it's because of the tits and hips or the fabric or what but she's makin' it look so sloppy
― obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)
yeah -- i feel like that fabric does very few people any favors, and i'm kind of against it in structured items to begin with. should be only used in bias cut 1930s sheathy things. but the ruffles are really the thing here, she looks like a giant body with a tiny tiny head!
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 15:59 (sixteen years ago)
It looks like this bridesmaid dress that my sister had to wear once for a wedding, and I spent the whole week laughing at how bad she looked in it. Purple satin is no one's friend.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 16:52 (sixteen years ago)
Except Prince, maybe. And then only maybe.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)
I support the design but oppose the color/fit/choice for her body type. Big hair would have helped. But ugh, the color! A deep plum would be nice, even a jewel-tone purple. That shade is too. . . . I dunno, lavenderish.
― quincie, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, satin is good for nobody, unless you're going to put it on AT the place where you're appearing, and then never sit down again until you take it off. Also her tits are enormous, so big, dramatic ruffles just make her look like one of those collared lizards with the aggression response (where oh where is that jpg when you need it??).
― How can there be male ladybugs? (Laurel), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)
If she were one of those little starlets with a tiny ribcage and narrow, bony shoulders and a smaller chest, maybe it would work; maybe even then the fabric would sabotage it. But definitely that is way too much body in the satin.
― How can there be male ladybugs? (Laurel), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 18:09 (sixteen years ago)
honestly i kind of think she dresses poorly in general, and i try to give her a "it's hard for actresses bigger than 110 lbs to get someone to lend them dresses for events" pass, but this was beyond the pale. i just don't even understand why the designer would've went for this on her.
and yes, i agree that the shade of purple seems like it...clashes? i don't know how better to explain it. i have similar skin coloring and i have to be careful with purples.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
i'm having a slow day and focusing on nothing but this outfit, this terrible article in my magazine about PPL WHO CANNOT CHANGE THEIR OWN LIGHTBULBS this is how useless our society has become, and the ny post racism cartoon controversy to pass the time so i've given a lot of thought to ms. hendricks's clothing.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 20:20 (sixteen years ago)
yah she dresses consistently terrible i mean there's no aspect of that dress that works - color, fit, silhouette, fabric its actually kind of geniusly unfashion
― Lamp, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)
I think she should hire the stylist from the show to pick modern outfits for awards shows and such, since she looks consistently fabulous on the show.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, their show stylist is obviously amazing.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)
I wish I could hire the show stylist, tbh.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 21:17 (sixteen years ago)
it looks like her breasts are both magnetized. with the same pole.
― Jomanda Lepore (Stevie D), Friday, 20 February 2009 04:44 (sixteen years ago)
lol i know the art director of the show irl, maybe i should tell him to have a word with the costume person so they can arrange an intervention
― velko, Friday, 20 February 2009 10:27 (sixteen years ago)
DO IT.
It's a national tragedy to have Christina dressed up in lavender ruffles.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Friday, 20 February 2009 14:37 (sixteen years ago)
yeah if you don't intervene here then i'm afraid she will be lost to us forever -- do you SEE that thing she put on herself!
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Saturday, 21 February 2009 03:59 (sixteen years ago)
http://gofugyourself.celebuzz.com/2009/03/25/85593701.jpg
SERIOUSLY, SOMEONE HELP HER.
― Event Horizon (Nicole), Friday, 27 March 2009 13:44 (sixteen years ago)
sigh
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 27 March 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)
buh
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 27 March 2009 14:12 (sixteen years ago)
That might have looked alright with a skirt
― No name is good name (Susan), Friday, 27 March 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
It would have, no one should wear jumpsuits.
― Event Horizon (Nicole), Friday, 27 March 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
Except David Bowie, because his jumpsuit in this video makes me liz:
― Event Horizon (Nicole), Friday, 27 March 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
that dude she's with looks like a cleaned-up ian svenonius
― he sounded italian enough to give me something (the schef (adam schefter ha ha)), Friday, 27 March 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)
that pic is so big that it loads slowly from the top & ur eyes just sort of widen with horror as you watch it appear on the screen
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 27 March 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)
oh
no
― guys i need to eliminate this business associate and im really nervous (Laurel), Friday, 27 March 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
she looks like an extra in chicago to me
― he sounded italian enough to give me something (the schef (adam schefter ha ha)), Friday, 27 March 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)