Today I'm wearing skinny jeans tucked into knee-high boots. Is this acceptable? I feel like I'm about to go horseback riding. . .
― Not Everyone Can Be Tupac (Susan), Thursday, 11 December 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
haha - i knew ILS needed some kind of style tip column
― baaderonixx, Thursday, 11 December 2008 15:57 (seventeen years ago)
i think this is perfectly acceptable, s!
― very quotatious (tehresa), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:00 (seventeen years ago)
I am going to a black tie event on Saturday. Can I wear Dr. Martens boots? It's either that, buy new shoes, or wear trainers.
― caek, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:00 (seventeen years ago)
i am wearing a purple dress over jeans that makes me look like violet beauregarde but i really like the color. how do you make shapeless dresses look good? is there a way? or is it just hopeless. i don't want to give it up bc it has pockets.
― very quotatious (tehresa), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:01 (seventeen years ago)
Susan: A most personal issue! Ally makes this style work, I am staunchly opposed to it. Ally also has the legs of the century, so as far as I'm concerned even something that DIDN'T work would be fine on her.
I think Lauren will be somewhere in the middle of this continuum.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)
Caek: I feel like DM's could be kookily charming at a black tie event if yr cultivating a sort of "can barely feed himself without help" ne'er-do-well outsider charm. If paying for new dress shoes isn't an option right now, then rock what you have proudly.
If you want to be mistaken for a grown-up and have some dosh, I suggest buying new shoes.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:04 (seventeen years ago)
Perhaps M White et al can speak more learnedly about exactly what shoes send what msg in men's formalwear, that is beyond me.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:05 (seventeen years ago)
can I tuck in a light v-neck sweater?
― baaderonixx, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:07 (seventeen years ago)
Only if you're sporting a bling name-plate belt buckle that says "Kanye"
― Not Everyone Can Be Tupac (Susan), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:09 (seventeen years ago)
I think this is too individual to the circumstances to rule on! Prob has more to do with how the pants look and how rest of outfit looks, proportionally, than it does with whether the top is a sweater or a V-neck.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:19 (seventeen years ago)
xpost, I was joking. I'm the last person you should take fashion advice from.
― Not Everyone Can Be Tupac (Susan), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:21 (seventeen years ago)
you can make shapeless dresses look nice by making sure that at least one attractive contour of your body is well-displayed: an ankle, a well-turned calf, boobs, etc. the rest is implied.
at least this is what i tell myself when i wear shapeless dresses.
― La Lechera, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:21 (seventeen years ago)
neck/clavicle also counts as an attractive contour
― La Lechera, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)
No (unless it is an especially raffish academic crowd or you care not at all about the impression you give). Buy shoes or rent (ew?) them - there are particular shoes that are (though certainly need not be) worn with black tie.
― and whataburger (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:23 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, I don't know, I must have short torso or something since all my v-necks (whic I wear pretty often at the office) seem much too long - hence, ugly
― baaderonixx, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:26 (seventeen years ago)
have you inverted the sweater bottom?
― and whataburger (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
i think it's possible to get away with tucking in if you are svelte and wearing wool trousers and the sweater is fairly form-fitting, but it's dicey
― and whataburger (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:32 (seventeen years ago)
If the weight of the knit is very, very light, you stand a better chance of tucking in. If it adds really any noticeable bulk to yr hips, I think "no". Tucking in a sweater will also raise the stakes about 5x on how well your pants fit, whether you use a belt, etc.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:32 (seventeen years ago)
Should have said: the crowd is very academic. It's black tie because it's the theme is old Hollywood, rather than because it's a formal event (it's essentially an office Christmas party). I feel like most people wouldn't even notice. I know I'll need a pair of dress shoes in the long term, but I think I can spin it out for one more year.
― caek, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:35 (seventeen years ago)
academic xmas party=u can totally wear docs
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:36 (seventeen years ago)
yes, you can wear docs. it's a good idea to have at least one pair of dress shoes. tho.
― and whataburger (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:38 (seventeen years ago)
(not that docs are very old hollywood)
― and whataburger (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:39 (seventeen years ago)
haha, I'm actually wearing a lounge suit, not black tie for this. I've never worn black tie in my life, despite going to Oxford.
― caek, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:43 (seventeen years ago)
Tucking in a sweater will also raise the stakes about 5x
yup. my first instinct is that there are so many ways this could end up looking horrible that it's better not to try it.
― lauren, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:51 (seventeen years ago)
imho, having a slightly long sweater is better than a tucked-in sweater that puffs out around the midsection or adds bulk to your hips under your pants or whatever.
― lauren, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)
who tucks in sweaters? the last time i remember doing this was like 1991 and i was in high school and the pictures prove that it was a bad idea even then.
― La Lechera, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:54 (seventeen years ago)
and you're right! i think it's fine, depending on the person. i usually only tuck in with my rain boots when necessary, because even though i'm not exactly short, i'm really long-waisted and anything that emphasizes the length of my legs is not a good look.
― lauren, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:56 (seventeen years ago)
Q: I work with a group of young people ages 12 to 18. They constantly give me grief for tucking my sweater into my dress pants. Is this a fashion no-no?
A: Yes and no-no. My best-dressed co-conspirator, the dapper Hooman Majd, wears his trim cashmere V-necks tucked into his trousers, which are cut with a fairly high rise (i.e., the pant waist approaches his anatomical waist) and are not tight. This is a great look often seen on such paragons of impeccability as Messrs. C. Grant, G. Cooper and F. Astaire. Given the current styles of most American men’s sweaters and trousers, however, the tucked-in look does not work; sweaters are too baggy and trousers are almost hip-huggers (hence the endemic American “plumber’s butt”). Majd adds, “To be tucked in, the sweater must be fairly thin. Forget tucking in a cable knit. And don’t tuck in your sweater if you’re wearing braces—unless, of course, you work at Microsoft.”
― it's always funny until someone gets hurt and then it's just hilariou (Rubyredd), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:57 (seventeen years ago)
I took out the pants. Just didn't feel comfortable with it, which is of course the key to style.
― Not Everyone Can Be Tupac (Susan), Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)
― very quotatious (tehresa), Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:01 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
belt? if for some reason it's unbeltable, La Lechera is right, i think. i am much more tolerant of shapeless dresses than i used to be because it's true about the body contour stuff.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 11 December 2008 17:12 (seventeen years ago)
it is not beltable, really :( that thought did occur to me. i am wearing skinny pants (not like super tight... but not baggy or boot cut) but i am afriad it just ends up looking super top heavy.
― very quotatious (tehresa), Thursday, 11 December 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)
but the pockets are just so fun.
i had to junk a really nice tunic/top thing from french connection that had no belt or empire waist or anything after seeing a photo of myself wearing it and looking 12 months pregnant.
― lauren, Thursday, 11 December 2008 17:20 (seventeen years ago)
Ally makes this style work
haha i am wearing this style today.
re: docs, i think for that event it would be fine. bf wore docs with his suit just this past friday to a (not formal) wedding of a close friend of mine, and he looked fine and was even once complimented on the shoes. he was smarter than i was, i wore more appropriate fancy red heels but didn't consider that i was going to a filipino-italian wedding and four-inch heels on me means i towered over virtually every other guest :(
i am sketchy with tunics and shapeless dresses, i feel like they hang off my boobs and just make me look pregnant. i have a cute turtleneck dress from AA (not the skin-tight one but the swingy one) and it's just slightly too big and i'm just not sure how to wear it. i keep wanting to belt it but i don't have any fashionable wide cinchy belts, just low-slung shit with big buckles and i dunno. help?
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:04 (seventeen years ago)
I almost wore a tunic-y top and a wide black belt today and then I thought "I look like a publicity/editorial assistant" and changed.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:08 (seventeen years ago)
So basically I can't help you here because that's not a look that I like.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)
i wore DUCK BOOTS today
― beyonc'e (max), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)
GENERAL Q:
tailoring of shirts
have you done it, what do you recommend, is it worth it, what to watch out for
Advice and tips, basically.
― kuntrie/hardrock-tributes (goole), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)
^^^ i want to know about this, many shirts are too big for my waist when they fit my chest and vice versa yet the ladies i know on this board all seem to manage not to have this happen to them
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
i got around that problem by not wearing anything but knit shirts. i have yet to find a button-down shirt that fits me on top yet isn't tent-like everywhere else.
― lauren, Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:27 (seventeen years ago)
xpost
I do too. No real solution except I usually sew up the front of button-ups so they don't gap, pop open.
― Not Everyone Can Be Tupac (Susan), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:27 (seventeen years ago)
I don't wear broadcloth shirts. they're always way too tight in the waist and upper arms. This working girl has to sit at a desk all day, my waist does not stay the same shape as when I'm standing. Dresses and knit tops only.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:30 (seventeen years ago)
However: MEN. HAVE YOUR SHIRTS TAILORED.
If I never again had to see a billowing tent of a Midtown Blue dress shirt being blown across the sidewalk by a stiff breeze, I would be so grateful. Nothing says "frat boy" like an oversized dress shirt.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:31 (seventeen years ago)
oh man i would love to be able to wear a pretty button down shirt - i've been searching for the right one, in navy, forever. i have this amazing tie i found at a thrift store for $1 about 4 years ago and i just can't find a shirt to go with it. small shoulders + huge hips + comparatively small waist = difficult to find shirts that don't make me look dumpy.
― it's always funny until someone gets hurt and then it's just hilariou (Rubyredd), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
― lauren, Thursday, December 11, 2008 1:27 PM (51 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yes, exactly. it's kind of a relief that other women do this, too.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:20 (seventeen years ago)
MEN. HAVE YOUR SHIRTS TAILORED.
otmfm. I remember my first tailored shirt, the second I put it on I knew I'd switched my style up one million percent.
― ledge, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:24 (seventeen years ago)
[technically it was off-the-shelf, but an off-the-shelf tailored for tall skinny guys like me]
― ledge, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:25 (seventeen years ago)
I do make it a point to never buy a shirt that has sleeve seams that fall on my arm.
Always at my shoulder.
― my name is crap jones (PappaWheelie V), Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:26 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, men don't have shirts 'tailored'; they buy them that way, whether cut in a slim fit or made-to-measure
not that the fratboys in billowing buttondowns care what you think
― Mr. ¿Qué (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:27 (seventeen years ago)
^^^ someone's feeeeelings are huuuuuuuuurt
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 11 December 2008 21:21 (seventeen years ago)
i wear slimfit shirts and am not a fratboy, btw
― very very serious (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 21:27 (seventeen years ago)
No, really, per ledge, the problem here is solved by buying the right and most flattering fitted shirts, much more than actually taking things to a tailor for that last 15% of perfection. I don't think I know anyone who actually goes to tailors with shirts (I don't know any super-rich guys, I guess); the ones with good shirts are just shopping carefully and buying fitted things, basically.
― nabisco, Friday, 12 December 2008 00:07 (seventeen years ago)
Whereas the fratboy problem is going to chain-type stores and grabbing shirts just because you like the print and then thinking "sure, this fits" just because it's loose and comfortable, even though it makes you look like a wall and/or balloon
― nabisco, Friday, 12 December 2008 00:11 (seventeen years ago)
(especially given that common chain-store shirts are usually cut to accommodate / camouflage soft physiques and beer-bellies and such)
― nabisco, Friday, 12 December 2008 00:14 (seventeen years ago)
schef, i have tons of issues w/stuff fitting properly though i am almost flat chested, just really wide shoulders. i got a super nice top & trousers from APC on sale, have to return them because.. of course, shoulders are too small and body way too big on the top, so it is completely unflattering, and the trousers fit except where they hit right @ the hipbone which is never going to get any smaller! so annoying. i am pretty sure i can't actually ever buy anything except t-shirts and sweaters from APC, it's all cut for people who are much more small boned.
at least i live in a city now where i can actually find some clothes that fit, it was impossible back in high school @ small town (and college, middle of nowhere), you had to drive an hour and a half to even buy jeans at the gap, nothing from the crappy mall ever fit right. at least the grunge era made it acceptable to wear dad's old sweaters, baggy jeans and docs most of the time.
― I DON'T MIND THE NFL (daria-g), Friday, 12 December 2008 01:30 (seventeen years ago)
private sale at APC tomorrow... aah...
― baaderonixx, Friday, 12 December 2008 03:31 (seventeen years ago)
anyway I love this board, really
a) unless you are wearing hella padded bras you are not "super flat-chested"b) do i have a b?c) i guess i'm fucked
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 12 December 2008 04:00 (seventeen years ago)
When i wear boots over jeans the jeans get really bunchy around the knees--tips for this? More tight, stretchy jeans?
I have also taken a sabbatical from button downs, because, even though they are my favorite shirt in the world, the ones that fit around the shoulders are going to be tight around the midsection.
I have a weird dress that I wore today--it's a combination sack+clingy+belted. I can't tell if it's shapeless or fitted--but I don't feel self-conscious about it, and it reminds me of Broadway Boogie Woogie.
― Virginia Plain, Friday, 12 December 2008 04:01 (seventeen years ago)
but i do feel the big boned thing-- a huge issue that i have (because i'm not astronomically endowed either) is that i have big shoulders and a big rib cage. it's just odd how they cut shirts -- i was just super hoping the secret was buying big shirts* and then tailoring the waist but now i'm just gonna keep wearing what i wear i guess :(
* this made me think of the big suit.
xpost mine get bunchy on knees too. i think the solution is "tighter jeans" but we're now talking those awful "legging-jeans" you see girls wearing that even look bad on the skinniest 20 yo nyu cokeheads...that the last time i wore them i was 11 and it was '91.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 12 December 2008 04:03 (seventeen years ago)
I've been happy with the Levi's 531 Low Skinny, I think I've said. The short length is really better for me but if I'm going to scrunch them up over my boots, I can also wear the regular length bunched around my ankles. That jean fit is tapered w/o being the stretch nightmares of which Ally speaks.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Friday, 12 December 2008 13:57 (seventeen years ago)
Ally, I think it's worth at least trying a bigger shirt and having it tailored? Women's shirts are fitted way differently from men's (obv), much less one-size-fits-all, as in most clothing. If you want to wear button downs, that seems like the way forward.
I remember reading in some mag about a designer who was doing women's shirts in like 5 different fits (same shirt, different cut) but they were $120 apiece and sold at Sak's or something like that. Still, it would be v luxurious to have a non-stretchy shirt that looked sharp and fit.
― One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Friday, 12 December 2008 14:23 (seventeen years ago)
i need to google for that. i'd really like a more basic button-down for some variety. the only one i have is a boxy, pajama-style shirt that's really nice but not very versatile. it's bronze silk and makes me look a bit like a flapper on dress-down day.
― lauren, Friday, 12 December 2008 14:46 (seventeen years ago)
That doesn't sound like a bad look.
― Not Everyone Can Be Tupac (Susan), Friday, 12 December 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago)
I don't think I know anyone who actually goes to tailors with shirts
bcuz like gabbneb sd youd just get them made-to-measure rather than buy a shirt and have it tailored. i do think that made-to-measure stuff is more than a 15% better fit btw
― Lamp, Friday, 12 December 2008 17:41 (seventeen years ago)
my q was really about cost vs getting the right fit. i have a whole bunch of great older well-made shirts i got 2nd hand (or as gifts) that range from a good-but-not-great fit to near-tentlike. is tailoring a good way to get a perfect shirt out of them, or should i not bother and just buy more new?
ftr i don't even know what my measurements are, i'm a clothes idiot.
― kuntrie/hardrock-tributes (goole), Friday, 12 December 2008 17:47 (seventeen years ago)
it really depends on where the shirts dont fit e.g. its a lot harder to say fix the placement of the armholes than it would be to create a slimmer torso
― Lamp, Friday, 12 December 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)