I Hate SUVs

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
You have every right to drive whatever vehicle you wish, but I have every right to call you a selfish moron. Unless you live on a ranch or something there is no good reason to own one. If you crash into me you will most likely kill me. You think that cuz you have 4wheel drive you can drive 60mph in the snow, but that 4wheel drive ain't gonna do you any good when you're braking. No one can see around your huge hunk of metal when pulling out of a parking space or trying to turn. Even when the fad is over the problem won't go away since you'll have teenagers driving them around cuz they'll be cheap used cars, polluting the environment even more and endangering the lot of us. Go to hell.
Thank you.
That is all.

p.s. learn how to park your monstrosity asshole, Thursday, 3 April 2003 19:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

yes this is an easy target but recent events bugged the fuck out of me.

meagain, Thursday, 3 April 2003 19:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

there is a reason why they are reffered to as "offroad vehicles". its because they are OFFROAD VEHICLES. i hate them too. tho someone with an SUV was kind enough to tow my broken down car up the hill. still they are fucking dangerous and the people who drive them are invariably idiots.

di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 3 April 2003 19:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

I used to drive an SUV. Now I have a small Acura. The SUV was incredibly helpful. I would have been stuck in snow millions of times without it. I would have been unable to make it to work because of the bad conditions of the roads that run through the hills and woods of New Hampshire. I've also moved around a lot, and it helps having all that space to lug furniture in. A simple solution would be for everyone to go live in log cabins and stop doing anything that's harmful to anybody else or the planet, but something tells me that's not going to happen. Life is dangerous. Deal with it. People who abuse what they have will learn in the long run, I hope and pray. In the meantime let's not place eternal damnation on those who oppose you... and I won't judge you for being narrow-minded... ;)

And yeah Honda Civics do rock

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Friday, 4 April 2003 01:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

'sports utility vehicle' fucks sake what the hell's wrong with sports car~? or do you need to hide your dumbness behind a curtain of extra words to mmake it more technical for you/everyone?

jonathan gittins (nevermind^), Friday, 4 April 2003 10:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

Having everyone live in log cabins wouldn't do much to save forests.
There are cars that have 4wheel drive and they are better in the snow so that's not a good excuse. I'm sure that for many people SUVs are necessary and the most practical car for them. However, this group makes up a small percentage of SUV owners. If you need to move, spend the 20 bucks and rent a truck...people got along fine moving furniture w/o SUVs before. Does the few times you actually put it to good use justify the hazards it poses to fellow drivers, not to mention the environment?
It's impossible to live life and have no impact on the environment. That is not the goal. The goal is to have the least amount of negative impact.

oops (Oops), Friday, 4 April 2003 13:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Man, the McDonald's corporation, not to mention other fast corporations, slash-and-burn's parts of the rain forest so they can farm cows, yet people still eat fast food. Goods are made out of non-recyclable material that fills every available space in landfills, yet we still buy the shit. I could go on and on and on about all the things people could be doing to leave the least amount of negative impact on this planet. Everyone is guilty of fucking up this planet, and I'm not going to condemn people who drive SUV's because there sin seems more obvious. Thousands of accidents happen everyday with or without SUV's. Yes, the design makes them especially lethal if involved in accident. I guess what pisses me off is the mentality I see constantly of instead of teaching people not to shoot others, we say get rid of all the guns. In this case, instead of teaching people to carpool or drive safely we'd rather condemn everyone who has an SUV. Maybe we should just get rid of cars altogether. Everybody can be given a bicycle, and we can use our cars to store old stuffed animals in.

And I'm sure if everyone got a log cabin and lived in the woods and started living in one with nature like Thoreau did in Walden, eventually buildings would crumble and golf courses would start to be overtaken by the forest and you'd see more healthy vegetation on this planet than you've seen in a century or two.

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Friday, 4 April 2003 17:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Still not buying the old "b-b-but lots of other things ruin the Earth too" argument. When I talk about how McDonald's is ruining the environment, are you gonna say "leave McDonald's alone, everybody else pollutes too, including those who drive SUVs"? I don't think so. Let's stick to the subject. Just because I attack SUV drivers doesn't mean I don't simultaneously have contempt for other irresponsible inhabitants of the planet.
If everyone lived in a log cabin there'd be no more woods. There's too high a population to live off the land w/o out destroying it...we have exceed the earth's carrying capacity.

guess what pisses me off is the mentality I see constantly of instead of teaching people not to shoot others, we say get rid of all the guns.

I'm not for banning all guns, just high-powered automatic ones that are, pardon the phrase, overkill.
Similarly, I'm not against all automobiles, just SUVs.

oops (Oops), Friday, 4 April 2003 17:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

The funniest thing I ever saw was this little asian lady climb into the driver's seat of a Ford Excursion and attmept to manuvre it out of a parking stall at one of the malls out here. I don't hate SUVs, but think they are a little impractical... kinda like an unnecessary status symbol like Mercedes and BMW. They both suck ass. As for me, I only buy American (suprise suprise) and I drive a Ford Focus. It's the coolest car ever. I race people and beat them.

Lola Falana, Friday, 4 April 2003 20:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

Big diesel trucks fuck up the environment. lots of vehicles fuck up the environment. It's just because SUV's have gained popularity that we choose to attack them. Bullshit. A car is a car is a car, no matter what you drive you are helping to feed the demand for oil, and you are going to not only help to ruin the environment but helping to keep the battle for oil that is forever going on in this planet continuing. So let's stick to the subject. You are trying to saying that a greater degree of evil is more excusable than a lesser one. And I say that it's hypocritical. I don't say to leave McDonald's alone or any other enviro-terrorists alone, but if you are going to start attacking things that are hurting the earth, and the people who buy products that hurt the earth, you should take a very close look at everything in your life, from the clothes you wear to the books you buy. Injustice and environmental harm does not exist only where you recognize it. The SUV has been invented. It exists. People will continue to drive it unless you present them with facts and reasons why they shouldn't... and you better make it damn good reasons, because most people don't give a fuck if they're doing something that's not environmentally friendly when everyone around them is doing the same. I don't condemn most people who drive an SUV. Just the ones who driving endangers my life, but that goes for anyone regardless of vehicle.

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Saturday, 5 April 2003 02:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

That is very true Dan, but I think I'd rather be hit by a Kharmann Ghia than a Navigator. ;)

Lola Falana, Saturday, 5 April 2003 04:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

possibly... I don't trust fate tho... who knows which path will lead you where

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Saturday, 5 April 2003 05:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

True dat. I'd actually prefer to not be hit by anything really.

Lola Falana, Saturday, 5 April 2003 15:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

Big diesel trucks fuck up the environment. lots of vehicles fuck up the environment. It's just because SUV's have gained popularity that we choose to attack them. Bullshit

Not bullshit. Obviously there are many many problems in the world. There are not enough hours in the day to attack all of them. Therefore, we should start with the ones that are easiest to change and those that are caused by the most amount of people. It is precisely because they are so popular that they are a problem. If only ranch hands and some construction workers drove SUVs they wouldn't be as much of a concern. Looking at the problem at a micro level doesn't give you an accurate perception of it.

oops (Oops), Saturday, 5 April 2003 18:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

i think mcdonalds sux so i don't eat there. if that makes me a self righteous prat then i fully embrace that.

di smith (lucylurex), Sunday, 6 April 2003 06:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

Right! So why not try and create a better SUV, instead of going off on everyone who drives them, or making SUV's harder to purchase... "There are not enough hours in the day to attack all of them. Therefore, we should start with the ones that are easiest to change and those that are caused by the most amount of people" HAHAHA.... SUV's are the largest ecological problem being caused by the most amount of people? I can't buy that. Sorry. I still think you're saying we should attack the most obvious, which doesn't neccesarily make it the most hazardous. I don't buy into thE extremism of the anti-SUV movement. I'm not going to pray swift death on people who drive them when the world is filled with many other things that cause environmental damage and loss of life. You say that I'm not looking at the big picture, but I'm not the one hung up on SUV's alone. Rather then try and rip away SUV's from the consumer, wouldn't it be better to promote safer roads and try and decrease the amount of reckless drivers, while trying to modify the SUV?

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Sunday, 6 April 2003 15:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

Being against SUVs doesn't mean I'm not against other things and for other ways to help the environment and make driving safer. If I bitch about something here, why do you assume that is all I bitch about. Weren't you the one who said we should stick to the subject at hand? Yet you keep on bringing all these other things into it.
All the other things you speak of (better roads, etc.) are much more difficult and costlier to implement than simply buying car instead of an SUV. Sure, there are bigger, more hazardous problems, but SUVs are easy to deal with and completely unnecessary overall.
People are at work 24-7 to try to make safer roads and get people to car pool. These problems have already been identified and everyone has agreed that they are in fact problems. This is not the case w/SUVs, where people are so enamored with them that they fail to see how impractical they actually are.
Create a better SUV? They already have, it's called a Subaru Outback, but these aren't cool enough and don't have enough prestige in order for Suzy Soccermom to want to buy them.

oops (Oops), Sunday, 6 April 2003 19:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

If people don't want to buy a better made SUV, I'd say that's the fault of the marketer's, not the consumer's. Subaru shouldn't be the only maufacturer on the market pushing a better SUV, because not everyone likes Subarus! I don't think any of my conversation has gone off track, and if you look back you'll see that you were the first one to mention me getting off the subject. I try to make my ideas have relationships... a common ground... I don't bring up something if I don't think there's a relevant connection. My whole point has been that the SUV is not the problem. It's the mentality of the buyer, and the person who produces the SUV. To rally against people who spend their money how they want to, claiming they are a threat to the rest of the world, isolating these people out as if they are so different from the rest of the populace... it's just too hypocritical for words. What if they are putting their vehicle to good use? Who are you to judge who is and who isn't? Do you watch them 24/7? With all the other things that humans do to polute, are SUV owners really ahead of the line on the fast track to hell?
I wouldn't buy an SUV. I'd rather not even own a car. I wish I lived in a city like the ones I've lived in before, where I could take Bus or Subway. Vehicles are dangerous. ALL OF THEM. I don't think we should stop people from buying sports cars because they have good acceleration and might tempt the driver to engage in reckless driving. But hey, people have their reasons for buying things and I'm not going to judge them for it. You can never know the whole story... and when you assume you make an ass out of you and me (hahaha sorry had to throw that in).
I don't assume you are only against SUV's oops, but it seems ridiculous to me to be so passionately against an SUV when you could view most cars on the road as monstrosities. What about places that serve you excessively large amounts of food, like the jumbo popcorn or drink at the movies? That's a waste of packaging, but not many will go and write editorials on the excess of it. I can already imagine your reply of "an SUV is not like popcorn, stick to the subject" but hey that would be assuming and we're not going to do that... the point being is that everything is getting larger, more excessive... that's the nature of the beast of the country we live in. But despite the fact that rationale should be nipped in the bud, I do not think the consumer should be deprived of the opportunity to engage in this excess. Why? I'm not going to tell someone what they can and can't buy. I'm not going to assume everyone who has an SUV has bought one to fufill some sense of vanity they have. Nor am I going to label them as destroyer of the Earth because they have bought one. I'm convinced that if you work, live, sleep, socialize, buy products, and generally keep the flow of competitive commerce going in this world, then in that light we are all guilty of fucking up this earth. SUV or no SUV.
I say give up the battle against SUV's... you say it would be easier to take care of the SUV problem than the road or carpool problems? Mmm... not really.... people are all for improving roads, and can appreciate the benefits of carpooling, but nobody likes being told what they can and cannot buy.... and people vote for the officials that make these things happen, and no politician (no smart one anyway) is going to do something that will haunt them come election time.
Please somebody give me a new stick to beat this dead horse, this one's kinda worn out

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Monday, 7 April 2003 05:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

So you're not saying that SUVs aren't bad, just that many other things are bad too. Pardon me, but duh. This has been your argument all along and is impossible to respond to more than I have already.
If I came out and said "Ice cream is bad for you" I'd expect you to respond with "Leave ice cream alone, there are many other things that are bad for you, I think people should have the right to eat whatever they want, let's try to get people to exercise more, etc." And I'd say, 'yeah, duh, but all I'm saying is ice cream if bad for you...that's it".
How can you argue w/someone who isn't even making an arguement?

oops (Oops), Monday, 7 April 2003 16:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dan... here is a shiney new stick. It's a big stick, and it's Y shaped... use one half to beat the dead horse, and the other half to beat... what you wish...

Lola Falana, Monday, 7 April 2003 17:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

*sigh* my first post was a response to the very first message on this thread. If my point is so "duuuuuh" obvious then why are all SUV owner's being lumped together in one broad category and being crucified together. If someone looks at all the vehicle options out there and wants and SUV, good for them. In your very first arguement you said that "Does the few times you actually put it to good use justify the hazards it poses to fellow drivers, not to mention the environment?" I do not think anyone except the person who purchased the Sports Utility Vehicle is fit to answer that question. As for your whole "Ice Cream" reference, in this case we would be talking about ice cream that people think the government needs to be regulating, controling the flow and availability of. And then there would be a whole group of people who say "Those people who eat ice cream are endangering me because they got so fat that when a fire alarm went off they couldn't fit out the emergancy door and I was behind them and trying to get out and I almost got engulfed in flames. THOSE ICE CREAM EATER SUCK!!!" This is the kind of reasoning I see at work and I don't buy it. The SUV and the SUV driver need to evolve, but I don't think they are enough of an immediate danger to bring about the kind of self-righteous SUV-hating attitude that is growing among people.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have a to go flog myself and a horse with this shiny new stick from Lola.

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Monday, 7 April 2003 18:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well then you're reacting to the reaction,i.e. 'self-righteous SUV-hating attitude that is growing among people, not the actual subject.

oops (Oops), Monday, 7 April 2003 21:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

I am reacting to the first posting on this thread, Oops. It's entertaining to run around in circles conversation wise but it's getting old fast.

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Monday, 7 April 2003 23:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

i hate SUV's. but i like SWV.

di smith (lucylurex), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 00:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dan...lean on me, when you're not strong, and I'll be your friend. I'll help you carry on...

Lola Falana, Tuesday, 8 April 2003 04:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

I am reacting to the first posting on this thread

That's funny, because you have said nothing to refute the points that were brought up in that post, just that there are other. bigger problems in the world. I have to remember that tactic, so anytime somebody gets mad at something I do I'll just say "Leave me alone, there's bigger problems in the world."

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 13:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yes Oops. Write that one down in your notebook, like a good little doobie. The first post took relevant problems, and then gave them an extremist spin that is not true for every SUV driver and vehicle. The implied notion that all SUV drivers are eco-terrorists is hypocritical considering the world we live in. I have tried to break this negative perspective towards SUV users by way of comparison, showing where SUV's lie withing the greater scheme of things. Not as a defense of SUV's but trying to provide a reality-check to all people who think that SUV's are working towards bringing about the downfall of civilization... as if the only cars that crash are SUV's, the only dangerous drivers are SUV drivers, and the only things that pollute the world we live in are SUV's. The first post on this thread reads like hate propaganda, and it's weak and over-assuming. SUV drivers are not satan-spawned gas-guzzling whores come to rape the earth and drive you off a cliff like something out of the movie "Duel". You can just as easily be killed by someone driving a motorcycle hitting you... motorcycles endanger lives too. I do not believe in SINGLING OUT ONE GROUP OF AUTOMOBILE USERS. You are really missing the main point I have been trying to make. choosing instead to take every possible misinterpetation of my words as a counter-defense, and I am glad it entertains you....
So let's go through this all again Oops. It get's more and more educational each time around.

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 20:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

The first post on this thread reads like hate propaganda, and it's weak and over-assuming.

Again, duh. Isn't this board called "I Hate Everything"? The whole point of that post was to be over-generalizing. I would love it if you'd point to the part where I said "ALL SUV DRIVERS ARE THE SPAWN OF SATAN. THEY ARE THE ONLY THINGS WRONG WITH THIS WORLD." You're the one who put the 'extremist spin' on what was said.

I'm sure that for many people SUVs are necessary and the most practical car for them. However, this group makes up a small percentage of SUV owners.

See, you just assume that I was attacking every single person who ever stepped foot in an SUV. But I wasn't. I am truly sorry that you're stereotype of people who stereotype SUV drivers was not correct when applied to me.

motorcycles endanger lives too

Oh gawd...you'll say anything just to prove your 'point'. A pillow can endanger lives too. Some things, however, a MORE DANGEROUS than others. If you can't see that, then I don't know why I'm arguing with you.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 21:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oops, I'm commenting an attitude I see over and over again against SUV drivers, the part about them being the spawn of satan was a colorful exageration about the anti-SUV driver attitude many people have, either on this board or other boards. I'm sorry if you took me seriously, I'll try not to make statements like that again around impressionable minds.

"Does the few times you actually put it to good use justify the hazards it poses to fellow drivers, not to mention the environment?"

And who are you to judge what qualifies putting it to good use... how can you assume that the majority of SUV drivers are NOT putting them to good use... do you know them all personally? And don't get started on stereotypes.... you're the one who brought up the average SUV buyer as being Suzy Soccermom... oh wait, that's not what you meant... you probably specifically meant this woman down the street from you named Suzy who is a soccermom, and I shouldn't ASSUME what you meant.

You think I'll say anything to prove my point, but I think you should pay more attention. People have been bitching about the dangers of automobiles for years, and the SUV is just the next new thing to point your finger at. Motorcycles are involved in a lot of accidents too, friend. People have been saying that the dangers of motorcycle out weight any usefulness it might have as a vehicle, and that it contributes to noise pollution. There are people in this world who feel just as strongly against motorcycles as anti-SUV people, and it's just because of increased popularity that SUV's are being focused on. You are taking about the SUV's POTENTIAL for destruction. Does potential translate to definitive danger? The majority of accidents are caused by human error, not the exsistence of SUV's. Go look at the statistics. If you hit a semi, There is a good chance you are going to die. Semi's are everywhere... plus they have more weight to them than your average auto vehicle, and put more wear-and-tear on the road, making for worse driving conditions. Do we ban the semi? No! It's performing a useful function! It sucks up a lot of diesel tho! We could go back to trains, but nooo it's simpler to stick with semi's. People can keep exagerating the evils of something, and I'll keep calling them out on it. I'm not losing any sleep over it. IF YOU ARE GOING TO RECOGNIZE THE DANGERS OF ONE VEHICLE, WHY NOT BE FAIR AND MENTION THE DANGERS OF ALL? The transportation system on a whole needs changing, and when I hear people going off on one type of driver it makes me just as annoyed at the naysayer as at the dangers involved with an SUV. A lot of people who buy SUV's buy them because "they feel safer"... shouldn't it be obvious they are people with good intentions? But no... people would rather bash the drivers. How cool is that?

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 22:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

A lot of people who buy SUV's buy them because "they feel safer"...

Exactly. Who cares if the person they crash into gets demolished, as long as their safe, right? I'm sure many have good intentions, but they are usu good selfish intentions. Plus, SUVs have been proven to be less safe than traditional vehicles.

how can you assume that the majority of SUV drivers are NOT putting them to good use... do you know them all personally?

I could ask you how can you assume they are being put do good use, but that won't get us anywhere. I live in suburbs of Chicago, so I know almost for a fact that no SUV driver is going off-road simply because there is nowhere within 1000 miles to do so. Sure, maybe a few go out to Utah every year, but I can safely say that there's not many who do. Plus, the majority of SUVs I see aren't even good off-road. There just for show.

I have something against semi's and I think we should find other ways to transport goods, but right now they're the best option we got. SUVs are not the best option we have.
I also have a problem with motorcycles, mainly Harleys, that are WAY too loud. I used to have a shitty car w/a slightly loud muffler and got pulled over for it (actually, he just wanted to search my car...I told him 'no, you can't' and he said 'it's my perogative, I see those SteaknShake bags there, ya had the munchies didn't ya?' BULLSHIT!...anyway). My exhaust wasn't even half as loud as a Harley's=double standard. But, if I crash into a biker, he's gonna be in more pain the me, which is not the case w/an SUV.
Oh, and good intentions are meaningless if they don't produce good results.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 13:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

their safe=they're safe

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 13:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

one month passes...
"A simple solution would be for everyone to go live in log cabins" - Um,not really. Everyone living in log cabins taking up all that extra space and driving even farther for their commutes and each of their errands is exactly what we don't need. Not to mentiion problems like water and sewer that would also occur. Its way more environmentally sound to live in cities.

David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Monday, 12 May 2003 00:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

HAHAHAHA.... no.

Nothing does a better job of destroying an ecosystem like a city. And please, for every one city that actually manages to main some semblance of a balanced environment, there's about ten cities that are nothing more than concrete and asphalt monstrosities with too many people and not enough vegetation. Don't even get me started on that one. But we've already made the cities, so I guess we'll just have to learn to deal. At least until the second ice age hits.

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Monday, 12 May 2003 01:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh, and why would people commute if they tended their own land, grew their own crops, and managed their own livestock?

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Monday, 12 May 2003 02:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

To buy records! But not too often, really

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 12 May 2003 09:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah, that would be sacrifice. But then again, maybe more people would make their own music if they couldn't listen to others so often...

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Tuesday, 13 May 2003 02:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

i would have thought they would be too busy tending their own land, growing their own crops and managing their own livestock

webber (webber), Tuesday, 13 May 2003 07:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

And going "wait I am now a hippy"

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 13 May 2003 10:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

Nah, you tend the farm between 5am and 5pm.... you got a good...3 hours to write some music in there :)

I think most hippies are too lazy, uh, I mean, relaxed to change the channel, so I don't know how they'd tend a farm LOL

The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Tuesday, 13 May 2003 20:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

one year passes...
Hey all anti SUV activists, I have just recently read a few articles which fuelled my fire against the ever so dangerous SUV's. So hence I was wondering, as an Australian is there some sort of group that I can conjoin with? is there a site you can reffer to me?

Seth Caine, Wednesday, 17 November 2004 10:26 (nineteen years ago) link

the Anti-SUV jihad
carmageddon
sorry not aus specific
interesting wikipedia list of carfree places (where humans live) I was looking at today

cuspidorian (cuspidorian), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 11:12 (nineteen years ago) link

critical mass, australia
urban ecology australia

cuspidorian (cuspidorian), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 11:16 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.