Bands opposed to American Apparel products

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Hey there,

I'm trying to find a few bands who refuse to print T-shirts and other clothing on American Apparel products for an article I'm writing for a national music magazine. It doesn't matter why you oppose the company, as long as you have turned down opportunities to use their products due to moral objections.

If you'd like to give me your two cents... or just throw a few pennies at me... reply to this message.

Thanks,
Sarah

Sarah Dahnke, Saturday, 5 November 2005 01:03 (nineteen years ago)

I'd do it based soley on their annoying Pitchfork banner ads.

darin (darin), Saturday, 5 November 2005 01:10 (nineteen years ago)

I've never heard of such a phenomenon. I guess I don't know enough about the company, but could it be any worse to print on their shirts than on generic sweatshop-brand shirts?

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 5 November 2005 13:40 (nineteen years ago)

The only thing I've heard were rumours of the owner of the company sexually harrassing employees, and/or the company culture including him getting to sleep with any of the amateur-porn-model-like employees who grace the back pages of VICE.

Alternatively, there could be bands who are part of a contrarian pro-sweatshop backlash, because cruelty is, like, totally hardcore and shit.

acb (acb), Saturday, 5 November 2005 14:21 (nineteen years ago)

unfortunately, ethically, they're still the best option.

sexyDancer (sexyDancer), Saturday, 5 November 2005 14:46 (nineteen years ago)

I'm guessing sweatshop bosses probably sexually harass their employees too. And probably in far worse ways.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 5 November 2005 14:58 (nineteen years ago)

What a weird question.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 5 November 2005 15:14 (nineteen years ago)

Thanks for your responses. If the question does not make sense to you, then you might benefit from some simple Google searches to learn about the ways some people oppose this company.
As someone said above, the company also caters to the socially-minded consumer who would rather not purchase goods that were made in sweatshops.
As a writer, I know all of this, and while I appreciate your input thus far, I'm simply looking for bands that fit into this one category to counter information I have from bands who do not.

Sarah Dahnke, Saturday, 5 November 2005 15:35 (nineteen years ago)

Well, we appreciate what you're simply looking for, but this is a discussion board, so we're discussing stuff.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 5 November 2005 15:42 (nineteen years ago)

All I could really find out from googling is that the CEO is sleazy.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 5 November 2005 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

can we get the mods to move this thread to i love music or another board? it seems like it would fit somewhere else, and might get the appropriate response the writer's looking for.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 5 November 2005 17:20 (nineteen years ago)

Thanks for your responses. If the question does not make sense to you, then you might benefit from some simple Google searches to learn about the ways some people oppose this company.

ew, this sounds snide and patronizing. check your tone, lady!

if you did your "google research" on the rest of the ILX site, you might find there's a few existing threads in regards to american apparel. perhaps those will be helpful to you, rather than rehashing past discussion.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 5 November 2005 17:23 (nineteen years ago)

Maria,

I'm sorry if you viewed my tone as anything but helpful, but I'm also sorry to say that you misinterpreted it completely.

I have searched the board and have not come up with any useful information from within the past year. I'm also seeking band contacts rather than people's opinions from previous posts.

Thank you for your help, though.

Sarah Dahnke, Saturday, 5 November 2005 17:29 (nineteen years ago)

american apparel-C/d?

I want to bone American Apparel.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 5 November 2005 21:00 (nineteen years ago)

They're putting an AA store in Broboken. I'll probably shop there. I already buy stuff from Gap on occasion, and I could probably get the same sort of crap but maybe even a little better and less soaked in third world blood.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 5 November 2005 23:50 (nineteen years ago)

So that's two points for Maria then. Good show!

I am personally not entirely sure how I feel about boycotting, except in the most obvious cases. It implies a certain transparency in how businesses work that I'm not sure really exists (and I'm not completely sure should exist) (since where does it end? it's hard to see the difference between me not buying a product because I know the makers behave in a way that I don't approve of, and, say, a company denying me a job because I behave in a way they don't approve of) (also, boycotts are based on allegation rather than proof generally -- it becomes a form of vengeance, surely -- and that seems no good) (also, let's say a bad company makes the best and cheapest t-shirts; if I deny myself access to the best and cheapest t-shirts, then I am spending more money to make a worse product, which I presumably won't be able to charge as much on; this means my profit margin is smaller, and THAT means that, although the bad guys might have less money to do bad, I also have less money now to do good; and my general experience is that "bad" already has gobs of money, whereas "good" needs every penny it can get) (that is, admittedly, oversimplified but my main point is that the issue of boycotting doesn't seem as obvious to me as it does to many) (though I should also point out that even though I have my doubts, I really am of two minds about it and think it's possible it could work and be a good thing -- I really don't know) (there just seem to be better tools for this sort of thing) (legislation is better than boycotts) (and if it's not a misdeed that you wouldn't want legislated, then why this off-the-books vengeance-like form of street legislation?) (etc.).

Casuistry (Chris P), Sunday, 6 November 2005 11:19 (nineteen years ago)

i worked at the philly store for a hot minute. i dont know why i tried to convince myself that i could be morally OK with it. some of the national reps who came to set up the store would scour the city looking for "attractive people" to hire and it was disgusting to hear the comments they'd make. intensely shallow and degrading shit.

now, working retail is depressing in some aspect but i could at least inject humor into whatever was being thrown at me -- having to wear a "rookie" button on the first few days of my job at IKEA, the numerous lame coffee shops i squandered my precious college years in, etc; working at AA toyed with my insecurities in the most sinister way ive never experienced before. im not the most attractive/skinny/cool/etc person in the world and i remember going home everyday feeling like complete shit. i barely lasted a full week.

i almost think the few relatives i know who have worked in actual sweatshops were kind of better off because they never had to deal with the creepy mindfuck of a workplace environment that AA provides. and thats really messed up to think such a thing! exploited regardless, but they just went in, did their job and went home.

anyway, if you're truly wrangling with the sweatshop/sweatshop-free t-shirt issue, here's a couple alternatives to AA:

http://www.alternativeapparel.com/
http://www.astees.com/

IMHO, i wish these companies would truly distinguish themselves by dropping the faux-AA aesthetic.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Sunday, 6 November 2005 15:15 (nineteen years ago)

as a "moderator" who has yet to flex any "muscle", and doesn't really intend to, I think it's fine leaving this here as is, especially since you've posted those links, Maria. Sarah is looking for bands, this is a discussion board for bands, and this is the extent perhaps of the response. For the record, Sarah, relatively few people read this section of the board and Maria is right, you'd be better off looking to those other threads/boards, because there may be people there who can help you, or know other bands who feel the same way.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Sunday, 6 November 2005 16:59 (nineteen years ago)

hurting: are they really putting an aa in hbk?

nervous (cochere), Sunday, 6 November 2005 17:31 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I definitely remember passing an AA in progress. I think it was by the Starbucks on that street behind Washington (near the PATH station)

Hurting (Hurting), Sunday, 6 November 2005 22:44 (nineteen years ago)

oh no shit
thankfully hoboken still has a few redeeming qualities... tunes, maxwell's, PATH access and decent food being some of them. but with like the construction on the river, etc, etc, hoboken is going to be another fucking borough within 5 years

nervous (cochere), Monday, 7 November 2005 03:17 (nineteen years ago)

Eh, I already kind of think of it as Manhattan for people who can't take Manhattan. Or perhaps consider it as NYC reflected, across the Hudson, in the fun-house mirror of New Jersey.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 7 November 2005 14:00 (nineteen years ago)

But yeah, it has lots of redeeming things - PATH, light rail, Maxwell's, Tunes, whatever that used book shop is called, La Isla, a few other decent food places. Really it has more stuff than Jersey City, where I live, it's just overrun with obnoxious people.

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 7 November 2005 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

It seems like it would be expensive to use AA products for band merch. The plain t's are like $15 at the store, and I understand they probably have bulk prices, but still.

n/a (Nick A.), Monday, 7 November 2005 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

Journalist inventing a "phenomenon" and then trying to do a story on it shocka!

Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 7 November 2005 15:55 (nineteen years ago)

It seems like it would be expensive to use AA products for band merch. The plain t's are like $15 at the store, and I understand they probably have bulk prices, but still.

We use American Apparel for our t-shirts -- I think the bulk rates are pretty reasonable, and they're nice, well-made shirts. From what I understand, there aren't too many other options, either.

Also we support public masturbation.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 7 November 2005 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

I'm sorry if you viewed my tone as anything but helpful, but I'm also sorry to say that you misinterpreted it completely.

well, Maria read it a certain way and so did i.

take it from someone who's been called out on this kind of thing before on ilx - self-righteousness is both easily identifiable and pretty rancid. climb down now while you still have the chance. persuade don't lecture. no one gives a rats fuck how 'noble' your cause is, guilt trips don't work period. sorry to come off so harsh, i'm talking to myself as much as you.

john clarkson, Monday, 7 November 2005 22:06 (nineteen years ago)

Hi all,

I was directed to this board by a musician friend who thought that this may be the proper forum to find some bands with a stong opinion towards this issue. As a few of you pointed out, this forum may not be the best area, and I thank you for your help.

For the record, this is an article and nothing more. I am not seeking bands opposed to American Apparel because I am personally opposed, so there is no "nobel cause." I am simply trying to fill a void in my article where the information is clearly unbalanced. Since posting on this board I have located a number of resources that make the story richer and balanced.

And John, interpretation always has an individual side, and I am sorry if I made you or any other reader feel as if he/she was being given a guilt trip. However, just because you read something a certain way doesn't mean you know the person's tone.

It's the internet, man. Lighten up.

I'm officially unsub'ed from this list, so goodbye and good luck.

Sarah Dahnke, Monday, 7 November 2005 23:22 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.wonkavisionmagazine.com/writers/sarahdahnke.jpg
Sarah Dahnke
Contributing Writer

Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 24

About the writer:
I write by day, dance by night and study cellular respiration and diatomic particles somewhere in between. I hate driving, roaches, fake lunchmeat and people who ride their bike on the sidewalk. I love crocheting, red wine, boots and dimensional analysis. I have a cat named Ike, who plays fetch with a miniature beanie Grover. I'm not as punk rock as everyone else around here.

Top 5 Favorite Records - All Time

1. BEASTIE BOYS Check Your Head
2. THE FLAMING LIPS Clouds Taste Metallic
3. THE PIXIES Surfer Rosa
4. THE CLASH (self titled UK version)
5. KILL THE VULTURES (self titled)

sexyDancer (sexyDancer), Monday, 7 November 2005 23:48 (nineteen years ago)

PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME FROM THIS LIST

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 00:04 (nineteen years ago)

Eh, I already kind of think of it as Manhattan for people who can't take Manhattan. Or perhaps consider it as NYC reflected, across the Hudson, in the fun-house mirror of New Jersey.

WELCOME TO THE SIXTH BOROUGH. oh wait, thats philadelphia, right?

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 00:45 (nineteen years ago)

How come nobody wants to know about tube amps or effects pedals which are opposed to American Apparel products? Now there's a question I can answer!

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 01:16 (nineteen years ago)

Martin which tube amp should I play while wearing a 100% cotton American Apparel tube top? Does AA make anything I can use to cover and protect my Big Muff?

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 02:02 (nineteen years ago)

Journalist: I'm writing about this story. Help me out.
Random internet person: I've never heard of this story!
Journalist: Well, why don't you just google it and find out?

This is, apparently, the new role of the journalist: To tell you what to google. The blogs have won.

Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 02:51 (nineteen years ago)

Sarah Dahnke is gone off the net because of you.

Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 03:05 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.bbonline.com/innkeeper/lightenup/pix1.jpg

Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 03:08 (nineteen years ago)

Does AA make anything I can use to cover and protect my Big Muff?

Actually I do have a vintage Big Muff which I keep rolled up in a t-shirt to keep it from getting scratched. It's an old Dead Milkmen tour shirt. I think it's Fruit of the Loom or Hanes, but AA should work fine. Don't let all the collectors and bullshit tonehounds tell you that the older shirt manufacturers are better. Cotton hasn't changed in the past 20 years. It's still analog.


martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 15:14 (nineteen years ago)

When you're onstage, people aren't going to be able to tell if your cotton is shitty. (Ok, I'm really stretching it now!)

righteousmaelstrom (righteousmaelstrom), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 15:41 (nineteen years ago)

http://tiny.abstractdynamics.org/archives/image001.jpg

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 17:25 (nineteen years ago)

im just waiting for nitsuh to swoop in on this thread and do line-by-line analysis of sarah's kiss-off to us.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 17:38 (nineteen years ago)

I don't really mind her asking questions here for a story, but it's kind of annoying to get told off for not being helpful. I wasn't trying to be helpful, lady! I was just shooting the shit. Just cause you start a thread doesn't mean you own the whole thing.

Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

You never her!

righteousmaelstrom (righteousmaelstrom), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

I am in tears.

Jdubz (ex machina), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 16:44 (nineteen years ago)

"nobel cause."

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

come on nitsuh, dissect this!

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.dreamjobstogo.com/images/heds/unsub.gif

iDonut B4 x86 (donut), Thursday, 10 November 2005 00:58 (nineteen years ago)

HEY GUESS WHAT -- I BOUGHT A T-SHIRT ONCE AT A SHOW, I GOT A MEDIUM CUZ THAT'S MY SIZE AND, WELL, IT WAS DEFINITELY A SMALL! TOO BAD CUZ IT'S A COOL LOOKIN' SHIRT.

WRITE THAT IN YOUR ARTICLE

PHOIOEI (blastocyst), Friday, 11 November 2005 20:54 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, what? I don't know what to dissect! She was reasonably polite about the whole thing, I guess. And she's at least enough of a career journalist to not use serial commas, so that's something.

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 12 November 2005 20:15 (nineteen years ago)

There are only three purely good things in this world: serial commas, serial commas, and serial commas. Career journalism isn't on that list, sadly.

Casuistry (Chris P), Sunday, 13 November 2005 00:19 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...
Hey, SkinnyDancer Jernaleesta;
Write me an article about how those AA (yes, i mistook it for Alcoholics Anonymous and was confused, but only for 5 minutes or so until i figured it out) ####### like to call their mediums LARGE. i, too, suffered the heartbreak of buying a tee with a kickass stencil in what should have been my size, only to have it *sob* NOT FIT. By the time i got around to trying it on, the stand and the event i'd bought it from were both long gone.
Funny, this discusion doesn't strike me as particularly punkrock, unless by punkrock you mean "rejecting of me".

ecstascene wihs, Tuesday, 29 November 2005 01:06 (nineteen years ago)

American Apparel sizing is one of few schemes that actually works out for me!

nabiscothingy, Tuesday, 29 November 2005 02:21 (nineteen years ago)

since no one else will help me point out the flaws in her post, i will do it, especially since i have some free time on my hands!

For the record, this is an article and nothing more. I am not seeking bands opposed to American Apparel because I am personally opposed, so there is no "nobel cause."

well, for one, an article thats laced with an agenda is more than an article, and really, writing about AA in 2005 isnt going to win you any nobel prizes.

I am simply trying to fill a void in my article where the information is clearly unbalanced. Since posting on this board I have located a number of resources that make the story richer and balanced.

actual meaning: no one on here would say anything that would pretty much write the article so waaaaahhhhh, im leaving!

And John, interpretation always has an individual side, and I am sorry if I made you or any other reader feel as if he/she was being given a guilt trip. However, just because you read something a certain way doesn't mean you know the person's tone.

hello, could we please stop writing these paragraphs where you say one thing in the first half, only to refute the argument in the latter? if you truly believed that interpretation in a matter of individual taste, you would have considered your own tone before posting.

It's the internet, man. Lighten up.

if we're supposed to lighten up, then why are you posting this? also, why does the internet always have to be 100% jokey all the time?

I'm officially unsub'ed from this list, so goodbye and good luck.

good luck unsubbing from a public messageboard!

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 02:29 (nineteen years ago)

Maria, I think she had the thread set to send email notifications, and then cancelled that -- hence the unsubbing. As far as her agenda, I'm not sure she really had one -- it honestly sounds like she was supposed to write a story about AA and bands, heard someplace that a lot of bands hated AA, and then went trolling for some source that could represent that side of things.

And then you made her cry!

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 19:08 (nineteen years ago)

And then you made her cry!

yeah, im mean. but it hurt me more than it hurt her!

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 19:18 (nineteen years ago)

wow, good thing this thread came back...I'm djing an American Apparel opening in Tribeca from 8-11 this friday.

and as far as sizing, I was told that their shirts shrink a full size. As in general depending on the fit of a particular brand, where I am on my weight yo-yo ride and mood, I'm a large or x-large and occasionally even a medium, AA X-Large shirts after washing fit me nicely, much better then most other x-large shirts which fit me like a tent.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 20:18 (nineteen years ago)

They seem to be pegged just right for me -- a post-wash medium gives me a perfect comfy everyday-shirt fit, and a post-wash small is just right for a more fitted style.

(Christmas is coming guys HINT HINT)

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 20:56 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
i hear their CEO is into union busting

clamdestiny, Thursday, 26 January 2006 01:26 (nineteen years ago)

wow kids - I was unfortunate enough to have been personaly aquainted with "SkinnyDancer Jernaleesta" for a number of years and I would like to note that, you pegged her right. Consider yourselves fortunate concerning the timely event of her unsubscription.

Daniel Gamwell, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 09:40 (nineteen years ago)

seven months pass...
You guys don't read.

She's a journalist who is doing a story about bands and AA. She already has several bands who support them and is looking for bands who don't to balance the story and provide another view. This is a message board that someone referred her to so she posted her request - which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation? No, you say? Because that's rude? Well, it's rude on the internet too.

Learn to communicate.

tianne, Tuesday, 5 September 2006 06:28 (nineteen years ago)

which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.
which all of you ignored and started your own conversation.

Shoes say, yeah, no hands clap your good bra. (goodbra), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 12:50 (nineteen years ago)

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

When you chat in person do you ignore what the person you're talking to just said and have your own conversation?

mts (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 17:10 (nineteen years ago)

HI DERE CAP'N SAVE A JOURNALIST.

John Justen, All Dude Dual Groom Swordfight Revue (johnjusten), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 18:02 (nineteen years ago)

The funny part is that yeah, if I were talking to my friends and a stranger came up and asked "Hey, do you know any bands that don't like American Apparel," we would in fact in real life probably probably say "no, sorry," and then talk about American Apparel ourselves. I wonder what Tianne would do differently.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)

we are all made of farts

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 19:04 (nineteen years ago)

nabiscbot ok correct

gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 20:47 (nineteen years ago)

My name is "Shoes" and I am an Apparelholic.

Shoes say, yeah, no hands clap your good bra. (goodbra), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 01:08 (nineteen years ago)

Since she was in the topic "Ask a question" and she started the thread you're typing in, you WEREN'T already talking to your friends. The only way she could be interrupting a conversation between you and your friends is if she crashed a topic you started. You actually did that to her. All you had to do was ignore the post if you didn't have an answer - or start your own thread on whatever you wanted to talk about. Unless, of course, you think the entire board is for you and your friends only.

tianne, Wednesday, 6 September 2006 12:58 (nineteen years ago)

I think you aren't quite getting how boards like ILX work: Thread-starters are mere sparks to the tinder of blab. If the fire doesn't quite go in the planned direction, that's just how nature works. Service requests not accompanied by full and adequate fundage are not guaranteed to be filled in a timely fashion.

And besides, what's up with the pretentious email address? Purewisdom? Faithmile? Hello, I didn't know Mother Theresa was kickin' out the jams on ILX!

Shoes say, yeah, no hands clap your good bra. (goodbra), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 14:28 (nineteen years ago)

Tianne, are you friends with Sarah? I don't get it. This is old.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 18:44 (nineteen years ago)

Nairn? Is that you?

John Justen, All Dude Dual Groom Swordfight Revue (johnjusten), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)

1. I guess I don't know how these particular boards work because the ones I post on have strict rules that everyone has to follow.

2. My email address is not meant to be pretentious. I looked up what my real names mean and that's what I came up with. Since most name meanings aren't negative (at least not the ones they put in name books), whatever came out is bound to make me sound glowing. As for faithmile, I'm a Christian, which isn't meant to be pretentious, either.

3. This is probably old, but I ran across it while googling something else. I'm not a friend of Sara's, but my undergrad degree is in Mass Comm, so I can feel her pain and I've heard of SO many people complaining about biased news stories that I couldn't understand people who were complaining about a journalist who was actually trying to get both sides. I'm not saying anyone had to give her information, I just don't understand the "non" responses. I chose not to go into news as a career because I felt that the ethics I was taught were not reflected in the newscasts I saw, but I have respect for the profession.

4. Since I'm not really a part of this community, I'll butt out and stop posting. Have fun!

tianne, Thursday, 7 September 2006 04:13 (nineteen years ago)

I think I'mma change my name to Wealthy von Rockstar.

Shoes say, yeah, no hands clap your good bra. (goodbra), Thursday, 7 September 2006 04:22 (nineteen years ago)

tianne, please don't ever post on my ILX again.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 7 September 2006 04:38 (nineteen years ago)

it wont be yours for much longer..

mr. brojangles (sanskrit), Friday, 8 September 2006 00:40 (nineteen years ago)

The jury's still out on that one. (I did, however, mean "my ILX" in the sense that any regular might consider it "my ILX".)

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 8 September 2006 00:54 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.