Recording Dillema

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Ok, here's our situation. We're getting ready to do our second (or third, if you count the ghetto first one) album. It's been two years and we have tons of new material so we really need to get something out.

A band member is a decent amateur engineer and has cubase, a tape four-track, some excellent mics but not a lot of other fancy gizmos (compressors and amps and all that stuff that I don't really know about). He has a BRILLIANT natural ear but lacks some advanced technical knowhow that a pro might have, not to mention the fancy equipment.

Original plan was to just do this thing ourselves but we're having some feet-dragging problems. Also we were going to do it -- the drums at least, in our practice space, which could have logistical issues and might not be the ideal sounding room.

So I have a couple of ideas, tell me what you think

1) We could just do it all ourselves and then get it mastered and grin and bear the problems, and put up with the fact that it might take longer.

2) We could do the whole thing in a studio and use some of our savings.

3) We could just get the tracks recorded in a studio and then mix them ourselves so as to have more control and not dip QUITE as much into our savings. (has anyone ever tried this?)

4) We could do the reverse -- record ourselves and then send them to get mixed.

What do you guys think?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 03:36 (nineteen years ago)

4) We could do the reverse -- record ourselves and then send them to get mixed.

i like the look of this one. it seems to make the best use of your current strengths

jim p. irrelevant (electricsound), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 03:42 (nineteen years ago)

Recording yourself costs $0, so do that and see what you think. Stay away from the (presumably cassette based) 4-track. Good mics and a good ear are worth their weight in gold, and if you don't like what you hear, mess with it until you do.

If this fails, go with a professional recording, and you won't be out of anything other than time.

John Justen (johnjusten), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 04:23 (nineteen years ago)

Out of curiosity, what are the main disadvantages of the cassette 4-track? We had an idea that we could do individual tracks on the tape to get a tape sound and then run them all through cubase (the guy has a way of synching them)

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 04:28 (nineteen years ago)

Your fidelity on a cassette is AWFUL. The only way to get a "tape sound" is via reel-to-reel, unless you are looking for lo-fi.

All analog bias aside, individually recording tracks to cubase is your best bet.

John Justen (johnjusten), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 04:35 (nineteen years ago)

Hmm. We want to go lower-fi than our last recording, which we thought sounded too polished, but I wouldn't really call our aesthetic "lo-fi" so maybe you're right.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 04:39 (nineteen years ago)

Try recording some stuff on the 4-track and see if it's the aesthetic you're after... Again, you've already got the equipment so you'll only be out time if you try it. I suspect John's right, and you'll find that "cassette sound" is not the "tape sound" you're after, but everyone's ear is what it is, and you may like it. Hell, there are many four track cassette records that sound a lot better than you'd think.

Another option, if your man has good ears and isn't afraid to research and mess around, is renting equipment. A good friend of mine rented a top notch Manley compressor when he mixed his home-recorded album, and he managed to make a great-sounding record just by taking his time, reading a lot about compression and using his ears. I'd definitely say he's got a natural talent in the ear department, but it sounds like you've got that covered too, so it's always an option to rent. Just be aware that if none of you know much about it, it will take you a little longer to dial in what you're looking for with a compressor. They are a little odd conceptually to get used to, and good ears help a ton. But no matter how you slice it, it's not like a compressor is a rocketship. You don't have to go to school for years to grasp the concept and turn the dials until you hear what you want.

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 05:20 (nineteen years ago)

Hmmm, definitely 3 or 4, but I don't know which would work best for you guys. One friend's band recorded at home for months and then went for pro mixing and mastering, which was cool because they got to take the time to get parts right in a comfortable environment. They did rent out a nice room at the university to do the drums, though.

Another friend's Cuban jazz band went in and cut basic tracks in a nice studio in a couple days, then took it home to take time mixing it and doing overdubs.

I prefer the former method 'cause I don't like high-pressure recording situations, but they both have their good points. I guess it depends how your band works best and whether or not you have someone that can mix.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 05:24 (nineteen years ago)

Jordan OTM IMO

i've done both. drums are the only instrument that absolutely MUST be tracked somewhere decent or you'll regret it later.

by somewhere decent i mean

1. a room with nice reflections - reflections that suit the track - this can be a shed if the sound's right

2. separate mics + desk + multitracker - ask around, beg borrow steal, couple of sm58's off matey, so and so got a tube condenser etc. hire a 16 channel desk in - you'll need 6 tracks min for drum parts plus you're gonna want to track bass/guide guitar with it even DI'd as a refernce.

gotta go - back later....

john clarkson, Tuesday, 24 January 2006 09:16 (nineteen years ago)

on the recording my band did a few months ago that we did all ourselves, we used a large hall to track the drums/bass and guide parts. we used a digi 002 plus a couple of rented multi-channel preamps through a behringer adat interface. came out sounding pretty nice all told.

jim p. irrelevant (electricsound), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 09:26 (nineteen years ago)

my old band recorded drums and bass at a decent studio, then had a friend record guitar and vocal overdubs as well as mix the whole thing.

i'd think the only time you could ever record drums decently was with a superb drummer who didnt play loudly or dynamically.

so i would advise recording the drums at a studio, as well as some bass to go along with it (but dont waste time on the bass), go back and record everything else yourself, you should be able to get decent sounds if you have good mics and that bandmate with the ears, then try mixing it yourself, see how it works.

AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 14:24 (nineteen years ago)

dilemma

there, I said it.

sorry

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 15:35 (nineteen years ago)

Argh, I was staring at that spelling knowing it must have been wrong -- why did I not just google it?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

That's really embarrasing.

(joek)

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)

3) We could just get the tracks recorded in a studio and then mix them ourselves so as to have more control and not dip QUITE as much into our savings. (has anyone ever tried this?)

I have and recommend it. Having all the time you want to edit and mix tracks really counts. You can take advantage of your in-band engineer's compressors and stuff without having to worry about the learning curve. It's easier to do vocal overdubs outside of a "pro" studio than it is to do drums.

senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

The more I'm considering it, I'd like to record the drums in a studio, or at least in a different room. Does anyone have any NYC/Jersey studio recommendations?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Saturday, 4 February 2006 18:34 (nineteen years ago)

sure do! i mean, ultimately it would depend on how much you want to lay out, but here are some options where you don't feel like you're in a dentist office, and all offer analog recording:

(these first two are both in the $5-1000 a day category)

if you've got some cash to work with, Bryce Goggin has his NICE Trout Recording in brooklyn: http://www.troutrecording.com/ - he wrote me back about mixing my record one time, and he's a nice guy, but budget wise, a little out of my league. he _has_ done huge records for like, Pavement and Phish. Vintage Neve desk.

another room that looks cool as hell is Cowboy Technical Services, also in brooklyn - http://www.ericambel.com/CTS-Home.htm - it's kinda like an open-loft studio layout, so theres a much more relaxed feel as you sit on a couch and do yr guitar overdubs. he's got a really good guitar collection, a really good amp collection, and nice vintage drums including a 26" 'bonham special' kick. nice selection of old recording stuff too, including a Fairchild limiter.

ok, the next three are in the 3-400 a day category.

a studio that i think i'm going to hit up for my next record is the Seaside Lounge, yet again in brooklyn- Park Slope. http://www.seasidelounge.com/ - a VERY homey feel but still with a big space vibe to it. some really solid gear as well, they have a 2" 16-track machine that used to belong to Eddie Van Halen, API/Tele preamps, a Vistalite drumkit, etc. i haven't emailed or whatever with these guys but i'm psyched to work there in the future.

probably one of the best deals in Manhattan is Tone Float - http://www.tonefloatrecording.com - a pretty small space i would think, but it seems to have some nice stuff- a 2" machine, vintage Neumann mic, RCA Ribbon, some 70s API pres, Tele tube pres, etc. nice assortment of offbeat vintage guitars and amps- 63 SG Jr, Univox 4001 bass copy with built in fuzz, Supro/Magnatone/Traynor/Sunn amps, etc.
they used to be around $250-300 a day, but that might be old news.

i've been working on my current 'record' at Chumbuckets Studio- http://www.chumbucketstudios.com/ - Brian, owner/engineer, knows his shit when it comes to Punk/Rock stuff. he's got a nice Otari 2" deck, nice Trident pres, a Fatso, Distressor, and I think he's completely mastered dynamic mics. he recently moved to New Brunswick, when I started recording there a good portion of my logic was that he can drum on my stuff, which he did excellently, and that it was like 15 mins from my house, which made all the different in the world. he's around $300-350 a day.

hope that helps!

b. mulvey, Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:01 (nineteen years ago)

Fantastic. Thanks!

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 5 February 2006 07:11 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...
New Site for Cowboy Technical Services...

http://www.cowboytechnical.com/

$750 per day incl engineer and use of house analog reel.

Eric Ambel, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 19:46 (nineteen years ago)

Man, if your name didn't look so familiar, I'd call the spam police.

Redd Harvest (Ken L), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

ugh, i just spent an hour recording drums and percussion for a track, but i haven't recorded live into cubase for awhile (mostly use samples and record keyboards & bass direct) and my buss setup was fucked up. so now i'm building up the motivation to redo it all. ;_;

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Sunday, 14 December 2008 01:04 (sixteen years ago)

(eh it didn't actually take very long to re-record, and it's always easier to do it the second time anyway)

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Monday, 15 December 2008 00:01 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.